We know 15k websites are infected. how do we tell them?
Posted by speckx 1 hour ago
Comments
Comment by baby_souffle 50 minutes ago
I believe the default configuration for suspected spam and phishing and other malicious sites is that the user gets a red warning page that they have to click through first. Website owner would either get notifications from users or notice the drop off in traffic?
Comment by phyzome 44 minutes ago
Primary obligation is to the users, not the owners of websites that got themselves infected.
Comment by bragr 2 minutes ago
Comment by warkdarrior 10 minutes ago
Comment by sublinear 34 minutes ago
> Supply chain - a third-party script file that a site loads is infected with malware, and is then loaded on to the site, exposing all visitors.
I already know many will disagree, but this is far too vague for your answer to make much sense. The list of 15k websites isn't given.
Most websites have at least one analytics script. Some of the biggest vendor names in that space have known XSS issues via nonce reuse that they aren't going to fix because it threatens their entire business model.
You usually get the whole clown car as soon as you allow one 3rd-party script for relatively innocent use cases like wanting a heatmap of user interaction.
You should fully expect that such a blacklist would take out most, if not all, of the websites you use every day. The security model for 3rd party scripts tends to be "trust me bro, we're $bigname"
Comment by telebub 28 minutes ago
Comment by sublinear 23 minutes ago
Comment by 306bobby 15 minutes ago
Comment by akerl_ 2 minutes ago
Comment by athrowaway3z 3 minutes ago
Responsible disclosure is to prevent harm. You think about your disclosure options and pick the one that is best overall weighing the impact and harm.
They're already infected - or so you claim.
I get that companies want to use responsible disclosure as a mechanism so it can save face and their reputation, and if both are possible at the same time then sure.
But if you think you're right, you have to pick one and live with the consequences; and its not that hard to pick the right choice.
In fact, if you don't make the right choice you need stop misusing the word “responsible disclosure”.
Publish the URLs that prove they're infected. Auto update it whenever one get's fixed.
Comment by ryan_glass 2 minutes ago
Comment by theamk 46 minutes ago
Google, Facebook, Bing, other large platforms will get those websites blocked. Their traffic falls almost to zero. Then:
either web admin notices and fixes website
or people stop visiting yhem
either way, no more infected people, win for everyone.
Comment by Guestmodinfo 58 minutes ago
Comment by henearkr 31 minutes ago
This would be an idea very similar to haveibeenpwned.com, which is immensely helpful.
Comment by ajjahs 12 minutes ago
Comment by ryandrake 53 minutes ago
Comment by testplzignore 23 minutes ago
I don't get why he brings "responsible disclosure" into this. That is appropriate when you find a door lock that is easily picked; that is not appropriate when you are watching from across the street while a house gets looted.
Comment by lacoolj 15 minutes ago
You can list them all out, with the specific pages/methods that are compromised and shouldn't get much backlash from the owners.
This is a different situation than a CVE
If you want to be paid for your efforts, I dunno :\
Comment by teekert 8 minutes ago
Comment by thaumaturgy 36 minutes ago
I host a modest pile of WordPress and other applications, and all traffic gets proxied by nginx. I've been occasionally sniffing around for something that I could use to monitor the JS of outbound traffic and give me a heads-up if it smells like one of the sites is delivering something it shouldn't be, but I haven't found a tool for this that I like yet.
Comment by wlkr 47 minutes ago
https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/section/about-this-website/report-sc...
Comment by fusslo 11 minutes ago
...why?
Some of the sites collect credit card information. Wouldn't they have a 'contact us' or some other legal identity information required for collecting and charging cc's?
Other than looking at security.txt what else have they tried? did they try programmatically checking for a 'contact us'? or the old trick of emailing 'webmaster@domain.com' or 'admin@domain.com'? did I miss those details in the article?
Maybe things have changed in the past 10 years, but it was a MASSIVE deal if a website ended up on some site claiming it has malware. Like, contract-ending, people-getting-fired, 10s of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees kinda deal.
I don't think 'it's hard' is a good excuse to ignore responsible disclosure
Comment by thesuitonym 20 minutes ago
Comment by eli 17 minutes ago
Comment by cubefox 9 minutes ago
It does cost some money, but a possibile solution could be to spin up some cheap agents to search for contact details for each website individually. (For the subset of sites which don't have any findable contact details some other solution would be required.)
Comment by pizzafeelsright 43 minutes ago
I suspect that these problems exist everywhere at this moment in all major systems.
Perhaps a bot to attempt to make contact and alert the staff.
Comment by brink 38 minutes ago
It's too bad that such a person would likely end up arrested if they don't mask their identity.
Comment by 0xbadcafebee 9 minutes ago
Comment by boothby 51 minutes ago
Comment by cpncrunch 37 minutes ago
Comment by notorandit 20 minutes ago
Comment by zzzeek 44 minutes ago
im sure for 15,579 websites there will only be about 2500 of them that send the cops after you for "hacking their site", manageable
Comment by superkuh 48 minutes ago
Comment by thesuitonym 21 minutes ago
> whois ycombinator.com
Domain Name: ycombinator.com
[snip]
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
[snip]
Admin Email: 1bd279b6ad24fb60b2e200db8f486c3f-2545852@contact.gandi.net
Gandi.net will get the message through to the person who would have been registered as the admin contact.Comment by iagiagiag 38 minutes ago
Comment by vaylian 45 minutes ago
Comment by phyzome 46 minutes ago
Comment by haukebri 33 minutes ago
Comment by ajjahs 11 minutes ago
Comment by obummer 13 minutes ago
Comment by Kenji 56 minutes ago
Comment by DivingForGold 1 hour ago
My primitive websites are FREE of all javascript, the tool by which advertisers and corporation anger us with Paywalls, Nag screens and the like.
Hope all of them explode.
Comment by zahlman 9 minutes ago
Comment by analog8374 49 minutes ago