Show HN: Hacker Times, a New York Times-inspired version of Hacker News
Posted by polpenn 3 days ago
I thought it would be fun to browse HN as if it were a newspaper. The site updates once an hour. Enjoy!
Comments
Comment by emaro 3 days ago
A couple of months ago (so probably vibe-coded too):
This one even from 6 years ago:
https://www.wolfgangfaust.com/project/paper-hn/ (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23669650, 627 points, 133 comments)
Comment by mshafir 3 days ago
Might appreciate a print version of this mailed to my house :)
Comment by emaro 3 days ago
Comment by blocked_againnn 3 days ago
Comment by emaro 3 days ago
I packed the thought into "consider if your vision is really distinct enough": make it better, make it weird, or make it recreationally (i.e. by hand). Make it opinionated, in Minecraft, whatever, but give it at least some new substance.
It's also fine to do Hacker Tube or Hacker Times (it's really not about this specific instance) for the 100th time, but if nothing else distinguishes it from the others than "I wanted to have one too", maybe it's not the curiosity-inspiring thing to share on HN we should strive for.
Comment by blocked_againnn 3 days ago
Comment by simsla 3 days ago
Comment by blocked_againnn 3 days ago
Comment by emaro 3 days ago
My specific examples aren't listed, but the guidelines on what to submit support my point I think:
> If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
Comment by pessimizer 3 days ago
Comment by blocked_againnn 3 days ago
In reality it's just some false belief they have.
There is no guarantee that the first implementation of the idea will be the first to capture the attention of the public.
Also it's perfectly fine to have someone post a duplicate implementation of an idea and get no reception as well.
Comment by herrherrmann 3 days ago
Comment by nomel 3 days ago
Comment by willguest 3 days ago
As someone committed to transdisciplinary work, I think the tech also really supports this - i can do lit reviews on topics and cross-reference much more easily, which gives me more time for reading and thinking (both of which are also falling out of fashion, but that's another story)
Comment by kreddor 3 days ago
A shame that it broke a few weeks ago. These projects tends to get abandoned after a while.
Comment by nico 2 days ago
Comment by carloscheddar 3 days ago
Comment by cloverich 2 days ago
Comment by yewenjie 3 days ago
I built this to aggregate all the aggregators (like HackerTube, Hackerbooks etc.) that were popular a few days ago (they go back to 2011, at least).
Comment by T0Bi 3 days ago
Comment by j45 3 days ago
Comment by lioeters 2 days ago
And a link to download the data in JSON format! Oh I wish every site had one of those. Thanks for putting that together, I'll enjoy browsing through the curated links.
Comment by anthHR 2 days ago
Comment by liwuqiong 1 day ago
Comment by nor0x 3 days ago
Comment by iorekz 3 days ago
Comment by vtemp009 2 days ago
Comment by eddiewithzato 3 days ago
Comment by II2II 3 days ago
Comment by omoikane 3 days ago
I like the description for Manufacturing Consent font:
https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Manufacturing+Consent/abou...
https://github.com/google/fonts/blob/main/ofl/manufacturingc...
Comment by itanalot 3 days ago
Comment by user_7832 3 days ago
> Ah, Manufacturing Consent—the font that doesn’t just scream “serious journalism,” it calmly editorializes it in 144-point Fraktur while subtly nudging your worldview.
Unfortunately feels too much like an LLM output for me.
(Which is probably post-ironic in this context?)
Comment by danpalmer 3 days ago
Given that this seems to just be a re-skin, why a full site that updates hourly, instead of just a browser extension that rewrites the content in-place live?
Comment by FearNotDaniel 3 days ago
Comment by Pavilion2095 3 days ago
Comment by Pavilion2095 3 days ago
Comment by rabisg 2 days ago
Comment by prmoustache 3 days ago
I think we can leave it at that no?
Comment by codazoda 3 days ago
Comment by me_vinayakakv 3 days ago
Comment by woggy 3 days ago
Comment by donohoe 3 days ago
Comment by joveian 2 days ago
Comment by KellyCriterion 3 days ago
Lot of people come just for comments
Comment by woggy 2 days ago
Comment by duckkg5 3 days ago
Comment by Tryvrsakjo10 3 days ago
Comment by num42 3 days ago
Comment by walthamstow 3 days ago
Comment by smileybarry 3 days ago
Comment by theodpHN 3 days ago
Comment by slater 3 days ago
Comment by rectang 3 days ago
The tradeoff of the Hacker Times design is increased information for each story but lower density of stories compared to the HN homepage. The high-density design of the HN page is probably optimal for my habits, even though some of the user-submitted headlines are opaque enough that I miss some things I would otherwise click on.
Comment by havik772 3 days ago
The paper side would just be to anti-digitize my life more, feels like it would be almost like a paper RSS feed.
Comment by reaperducer 3 days ago
Back when people still understood that they don't need to know about every single "breaking" news story on the planet the instant it happens.
For a couple of months, I took a digital news break. I only read one national paper on Sundays, and the local paper twice a week. Amazingly, I didn't burst into flames or get stranger dangered. I felt both calm and informed. I plan to resume that pattern after the election.
FOMO is the drug. The tech industry is the dealer.
Comment by IAmBroom 3 days ago
By analogy, my best market moves were when I checked market activity about once a week, irregularly. Once I made a big decision, I stuck with it by not checking the market for a while. Not saying that is right for everyone, or even for me all the time, but I did very well in the 2008 crash.
Comment by vunderba 3 days ago
Comment by al_borland 3 days ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20131020160134/https://itunes.ap...
Comment by vunderba 3 days ago
Comment by Arubis 3 days ago
If you can track down some decent sources that you like (maybe something like Kagi News, https://www.positive.news/, a good local paper if you have one), you could with little effort vibe up a daily printout and have it waiting for you when you get up each day. For a fun version, there's plenty of cheap thermal printers on aliexpress and similar that'd give you a non-US Letter/A4 version so it doesn't feel like Yet Another Document.
Comment by nechmads 3 days ago
Comment by al_borland 3 days ago
I would imagine one could take something like that, and have program fetch it each morning, format it nicely, and print out a front page overview of what's going on. Just pick up the paper from the printer each morning.
This idea might be fine for a front page, but would fall apart when you start getting into long articles and think pieces. You'd be burning through a lot of paper.
Comment by y-curious 3 days ago
Comment by logicallee 3 days ago
have you read it recently? Is it still the authentic articles? (as opposed to ads for whatever you were browsing a few minutes earlier.)
Comment by duck 3 days ago
Comment by logicallee 1 day ago
Comment by albertgoeswoof 3 days ago
Then I can show it on my eink art board
Comment by polpenn 3 days ago
Comment by vektormemory 3 days ago
We built a combined books/video version as well in our app library.
https://medium.com/@vektormemory/vektor-2-0-4-hacker-news-bo...
Comment by thingfyi 3 days ago
I do wonder if this kind of republishing is compliant with the original site? As in, if one can store the content vs. not and just lazily convert live - have been curious about the copyright rules & practices in this area.
Comment by anakaine 3 days ago
Comment by x______________ 3 days ago
Dark Reader extension for Firefox, works on mobile and desktop. I constantly forget this setup and blinds myself when I access HN from elsewhere.
Comment by mpetrovich 3 days ago
https://gist.github.com/mpetrovich/b3e4ec291d21bbdbe17b1adf4...
Comment by dongecko 3 days ago
You can adjust the theme to your liking and I find it actually quite pleasant. No subscription, no login, mobile friendly and it has been stable and online for several years.
Comment by keymasta 3 days ago
Comment by jaapz 3 days ago
Comment by mnhcorp 3 days ago
Shameless plug: https://rnn.news/
Comment by muglug 3 days ago
Georgia Bold is not fit for the purpose, and there's no earthly reason to use it at 55px.
There are so many good serif fonts to choose from on Google Fonts. An embarrassment of riches.
Comment by IAmBroom 3 days ago
Fonts that don't distinguish between 0 and O/o are abominations before God and all that is good in life.
Comment by donohoe 3 days ago
Comment by huhtenberg 3 days ago
PS. Hello from the former typophile.com ranks :)
Comment by thrdbndndn 3 days ago
Comment by neom 3 days ago
Comment by thrdbndndn 3 days ago
"Sorry, you have been blocked
You are unable to access chatgpt.site"
Comment by m348e912 3 days ago
Comment by drumpkid 3 days ago
Comment by JulianPaul 3 days ago
Comment by ontouchstart 3 days ago
Comment by craaaig 3 days ago
Comment by statikor 3 days ago
Comment by CMay 3 days ago
Comment by vanjajaja1 3 days ago
Comment by reaperducer 3 days ago
Comment by exabrial 3 days ago
But honestly, the headlines there are refreshing
Comment by animal_spirits 3 days ago
Comment by markkitti 3 days ago
Comment by onel 3 days ago
Comment by simongray 3 days ago
Comment by CAISY 3 days ago
Comment by LightBug1 3 days ago
What a time to be alive ...
Still waiting for Doom running on HackerNews or Doom-inspired HN ...
Comment by DivingForGold 3 days ago
Comment by giglamesh 2 days ago
Comment by DrewADesign 3 days ago
Man, what a tragic waste of a great .com era community. The whole community self-moderation thing worked ok before the more worthwhile people left. Now they can’t even be arsed to pop by once an hour to remove the multi-page swastika ascii art comments.
Comment by smolder 3 days ago
Comment by DrewADesign 2 days ago
Comment by starkshift 3 days ago
Comment by Rapzid 3 days ago
If I cancel can I get the service for $1/week? That's my favorite NYT feature.
Comment by option_greek 3 days ago
Comment by Nition 3 days ago
Comment by turtleburger 3 days ago
Comment by ironborn123 3 days ago
Comment by dsalzman 3 days ago
Comment by swiftcoder 3 days ago
Comment by alexgoodhart 3 days ago
Comment by siva7 3 days ago
Comment by polpenn 3 days ago
I added a few of them to the site:
- Games and AI section - NYTimes style comment section
Comment by dotcoma 3 days ago
Comment by francisofascii 3 days ago
Comment by arich 3 days ago
Comment by sshussain270 3 days ago
Comment by x______________ 3 days ago
Please don't :(
/s Please do! Who knows what will stick when you throw it at the wall?
Comment by smolder 3 days ago
Comment by blobbers 3 days ago
Comment by sweaterkokuro 3 days ago
Comment by rob74 3 days ago
Comment by Perz1val 3 days ago
Comment by tenderfault 3 days ago
Comment by bell-cot 3 days ago
Comment by absqueued 3 days ago
Comment by rosseitsa 3 days ago
Comment by asmodeuslucifer 3 days ago
Comment by ForgotMyUUID 3 days ago
Comment by aurareturn 3 days ago
People complain about AI generated content, then proceeds to give a dancing cat AI reel 1 million likes.
People here complain about vibe coded apps, then proceed to upvote this to the front page.
Comment by dang 3 days ago
I think there's another factor: it takes time to find the best ways of using such new tools. The community is working this out slowly (as is society generally) and it is naturally a lagging phenomenon.
Seeing generated sites like OP and karpathy's HackerTube (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50319510) which look good and don't have the obvious-LLM sameiness that so many others do, is an interesting step along this way. It's also refreshing. There's no intrinsic reason why generated software should look bad or work poorly.
Comment by aurareturn 3 days ago
Comment by lagrange77 3 days ago
I also regularly complain about AI generated content. I do that mostly, because it's often either
- extremely uninspired design and UX wise (e.g. the classical beige/serif AI slop website),
- full of obvious and stupid mistakes (e.g. those shitty infographics on social media),
- just mimics the real thing, but misses the actual purpose (e.g. again those shitty infographics on social media)
- or is ridiculously overloaded with features and documentation (e.g. many AI generated software tools on GitHub)
That's repelling to me, because it screams that the human behind it is himself lazy and uninspired. It's bland, overloaded or full of mistakes, because raw output is a commodity.
It feels like a waste of time to even consume something, that the author or developer wasn't willing to put actual effort and thought into.
But that's an artefact of how the author is using the tool and presenting the results.
It's not an inherent property of AI use itself. HackerTimes for example doesn't feel uninspired or bland. And i like it.
Comment by wiseowise 3 days ago
Comment by washedup 3 days ago
Comment by gchamonlive 3 days ago
Comment by howtageek 3 days ago
Comment by Himanshugupta00 3 days ago
Comment by ravivarmat 3 days ago
Comment by muazfurkankl 2 days ago
Comment by gubidonius 3 days ago
Comment by eggsandbeer 3 days ago