Hackers hijack Egypt highway billboard and Malaysian screens to show porn
Posted by entryleveljobsc 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by regretsresin 1 day ago
And you might say, "Not everyone wants to see ads!" And totally agree! But like, the people who have to look at this eyesore now have to deal with a different eyesore.
Why not, "This garbage ad remived from your view by hacking group X, you're welcome" and show some pet photos or something? Or like, get clever with it? Run onion or infowars style satire.
Comment by psdndown 1 day ago
Egypt is one of them. There is value in most of the value being in the shock value. Egypt has already done the sorts of things you suggest. It doesn't work. Putting up porn actually makes a lot of sense from a decision matrix perspective here. First of all despite the pretense otherwise Egyptians watch a lot of porn (like most countries). It's sort of a great "in your face" mirror to a country rife with hypocrisy.
It's not like the authorities give much breathing room for more nuanced protest anyway. They're already in for a very unwelcome visit to the slammer if they are caught. Might as well go as transgressive as possible while you still can.
Comment by Freak_NL 1 day ago
Show a cute picture of Big Bird telling people to eat more pizza, and the company will just reset some passwords. Show a couple of choice scenes from Brazzers and the CEO just got a call from a government minister and suddenly the leaky hardware is getting replaced at breakneck speeds.
Works well too if the goal is just to get people to object to digital billboards.
Comment by ryandrake 1 day ago
Comment by whoanoway 1 day ago
Comment by nbajka 1 day ago
Comment by ryandrake 1 day ago
Comment by nbajka 1 day ago
Comment by NietzscheanNull 1 day ago
Comment by camcil 1 day ago
Comment by Freak_NL 1 day ago
Seeing some girl getting ploughed by a slab of a guy might raise questions (which is excellent, questions are always good, because then you as a parent can guide their understanding), but it won't harm them in the slightest.
Repeated exposure to porn is a problem, but that comes from teenagers having an intrinsic interest in sex and private exploration of unsavoury websites on the internet, not accidental viewing of a naughty billboard.
Comment by camcil 20 hours ago
Yikes.
Comment by yubblegum 1 day ago
Comment by rconti 1 day ago
There's a huge difference between regular exposure via neglectful or abusive parents and "oops I saw a thing". More than a few kids have "walked in" on their parents too, I assure you.
Comment by fatata123 22 hours ago
Comment by kotaKat 1 day ago
Comment by ponector 1 day ago
Just curious, do you think it will harm kids to go to nude beach or naked sauna?
Comment by yubblegum 1 day ago
> Might as well go as transgressive as possible while you still can.
This only computes in the mind of an national adversary that wants to see a society in chaos. No one in their right mind would want to "trangress" against their own society because of some political goal. Those that do are iirc are technically in the terrorist quadrant of 'protest'.
Comment by za3faran 1 day ago
Comment by excannuk 1 day ago
Imagine if Time Square was hacked with images of the consequences of monkey pox on HIV+ gay men because an Egyptian thought our society needed a shocking turning upside down.
Comment by thinkingtoilet 1 day ago
Comment by ponector 1 day ago
Comment by thinkingtoilet 21 hours ago
Comment by ponector 17 hours ago
>>Under no circumstances is it ok to show porn in a public setting.
Comment by gazpachotron 1 day ago
Comment by IncreasePosts 1 day ago
Comment by Freak_NL 1 day ago
Comment by IncreasePosts 1 day ago
Comment by bongoman42 1 day ago
Comment by IncreasePosts 1 day ago
My point is that many Arab men wont have a single meaningful interaction with a woman outside their family this year. Presenting women as sex objects to those men isn't going to have great effects. Similar to incels and porn.
Comment by za3faran 1 day ago
And you got this information from where, western media? Even if, how is it a negative thing?
> Presenting women as sex objects to those men isn't going to have great effects
Incidentally, western liberal capitalistic systems are the ones presenting women as sex objects in ads and the like. Where as they are preserved in the conservative culture in Islamic countries.
Comment by TFNA 1 day ago
Fast forward to now, and the big porn video sites have content expressly tailored to the Arab world. Everyone has smartphones, and everybody finds some alone time to wank.
Comment by giantg2 1 day ago
Comment by pitched 1 day ago
Comment by rconti 1 day ago
I find it far more offensive that you wouldn't even be able to post this headline without self-censoring in the major social media apps for fear of The Algorithm. How far the internet has fallen.
Comment by skissane 1 day ago
Our daughter is 8. As her father, I’d rather she not be exposed to pornography, and I know my wife would agree with me on that. Of course, she’s sure to somehow be introduced to it eventually, but I hope not until she’s significantly older.
Comment by aussiethebob 1 day ago
Comment by skissane 1 day ago
Comment by rconti 1 day ago
Comment by skissane 1 day ago
Many jurisdictions worldwide criminalise exposing people to pornography without their consent – see for example, Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 section 6 [0] – and especially doing it to minors. Criminalising doing something to someone without their consent constitutes an official judgement that such an act is harmful.
Comment by fuzzythinker 1 day ago
Comment by rafram 1 day ago
Comment by pretzellogician 1 day ago
Comment by za3faran 1 day ago
Comment by excannuk 1 day ago
Comment by zahrevsky 1 day ago
– for observers on the road, make them more likely to film this and share on social media;
– for news agencies, make them allocate as much coverage as possible for this incident;
– for regular readers, simply to more likely grab theirs attention.
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
That’s why across the world we should ban blanket advertisements like these. They’re a dumb eyesore.
Porn just exposes what is obviously annoying. But advertisements themselves are a sort of mind-virus you can’t opt out of. I can choose to not buy cable TV. I can’t (reasonably) choose to not walk outside in the public space.
Comment by sellmesoap 1 day ago
Comment by ericmay 22 hours ago
Comment by kelseyfrog 1 day ago
Showing a nice animal or a 'you're welcome' message achieves the goal of removing the ad, but falls short of fixing the root of the problem: the billboard existing. As long as it exists, the temptation and incentive to put ads on it also exists.
Comment by exe34 1 day ago
Comment by happosai 1 day ago
Comment by cyberpunk 1 day ago
Comment by tclancy 1 day ago
Comment by zahrevsky 1 day ago
> – It was clear what had been done. The media player's cord had been ripped out and its own content had been played.
To me, it's more an act of vandalism than hacking.
Comment by pitched 1 day ago
Comment by reaperducer 1 day ago
In addition to computers, other common obsessions were lockpicking (mechanical computing), model railroads (electricity + switches + relays), and Chinese food menus (language skills).
Comment by quickthrowman 1 day ago
Comment by cowlevel 1 day ago
Comment by vdfs 1 day ago
Comment by hard_times 1 day ago
Comment by MisterTea 1 day ago
Comment by cowlevel 1 day ago
Comment by pixl97 1 day ago
If you're the kind of person that's good at making relationships you might even talk them out of old or dead hardware.
Comment by cowlevel 1 day ago
Comment by tclancy 1 day ago
Comment by Havoc 1 day ago
Nothing against porn, but given a platform that's what you pick to blast into the world?
Comment by TFNA 1 day ago
Comment by reaperducer 1 day ago
We did the same thing back in the 80's.
The scenario was usually "Oh, wow! We got access! What do we do before someone notices in the next ten minutes?!"
Political people want to make statements. Hackers just want their hacks to be noticed.
Comment by Havoc 1 day ago
Comment by pixl97 1 day ago
The thing is with ads is after seeing so many you just kind ad block them automatically.
Now when there is porn, you 100% know it's not supposed to be there.
Comment by Markoff 1 day ago
disclaimer - I enjoy porn almost on daily occasion and I have no problem with nudity, but porn certainly doesn't show natural human behavior which should be shown to little kids who don't know any better
Comment by dinkblam 1 day ago
Comment by worik 1 day ago
Comment by ziiinq 1 day ago
Comment by excannuk 1 day ago
Comment by moniosi 1 day ago
Comment by maximilianburke 1 day ago
Comment by moniosi 1 day ago
Comment by throwup238 1 day ago
I wonder how this goes over in conservative countries like Egypt. Is it a scandal of some sort with ample pearl clutching or is it mostly a non-event?
Comment by zkmon 1 day ago
None of these would happen in places that are not invaded by speed of technology and connectedness. Slow is good, not sometimes, but always. Human life is not compatible with things moving at speed of electricity.
But you gave the controlling power to children. The children with science toys want more and more speed, just for fun and profit. They, unfortunately, control the future of human race.
Comment by odo1242 1 day ago
Currently the yearly global death toll for cars is at 1.16 million and climbing
Comment by reaperducer 1 day ago
Well, that's OK, then.
What is the exact number when it's no longer acceptable? Is is 1,001? 10,001?
Exactly how many deaths are perfectly fine in the name of progress? How many people are we allowed to kill for the sake of convenience?
Currently the yearly global death toll for cars is at 1.16 million and climbing
No need to compare. Both can be bad at the same time.
Comment by odo1242 1 day ago
Traveling the same distance without rail or air (i.e. on foot, horse, car) is also relatively deadly and the alternative (of living in small communities and not traveling long distances) is also not great for multiple reasons
Comment by derektank 1 day ago
You’d have to calculate how many lives speed saves. How many people had an organ delivered just within the safe transplant time? How many people were able to eat because a grain shipment could be diverted after a bad harvest? How many people didn’t contract cholera, because it takes minutes to manufacture pipes?
Comment by reaperducer 1 day ago
Ask any cowboy. The fastest way to move a cow is slow.
Comment by UltraSane 1 day ago
Comment by reaperducer 1 day ago
Translation: Money is more important than human lives.
Got it.
Comment by derektank 1 day ago
Comment by cowlevel 1 day ago
Comment by UltraSane 1 day ago
Comment by cowlevel 1 day ago
Comment by UltraSane 21 hours ago
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
The trade-offs are worth it and humankind continues to accept those trade-offs. Yea 60+ people died in a train crash. So what? Tens of millions ride high-speed trains on a weekly/monthly basis without any issues. So why would we overreact to anomalies when by and large the technologies we’ve invented are pretty awesome?
I’m no opponent to the “slow life” and I have a lot of critical comments regarding modernity (cars, social media, modernist art) and overpopulation but we don’t need to throw the baby out with the bath water here.