Hex Raises $100M
Posted by tomwphillips 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by thousand_nights 1 day ago
that is one of the most unhinged landing pages i've ever seen, it looks like a vibe coded claude mess that somehow raised 100M
is no one looking at what they're releasing anymore? do people just not care? i guess they don't have to if some intern can just prompt "make cool website for our useless company" and then 100M appears at your door from eager VCs
Comment by whatthejesus 1 day ago
I’m like, what the f*k. We’re busy doing this shit for a little-hundred-mil?
Do we REALLY need these little guide notebooks? Everyone has AI just, I dunno, stuff the shit in SQLite and generate a graph.
One more thing: how many f*king insights do companies need? This shit is like analysis paralysis.
Keep it simple people, don’t pay for this crap. If you need to gather all your little magical documents, maybe it’s time to consider cleaning out the attic instead.
Comment by RugnirViking 18 hours ago
armed with the free version of chatgpt, pretty much anyone capable of understanding or composing the question can summon such a graph nowadays, given the data.
Comment by readdit 1 day ago
Comment by viraptor 1 day ago
Also it takes a few screens to figure out what is it even that they do.
Comment by arcticbull 1 day ago
The Show NexaCorp Q3 sales box, Slack box and Hex CLI box is half cut off on the right so you can't click the Codex tab, then scrolling down the "vability" which I assume is observability is cut off to the left, and the "adiness" box overlaps "Flexible by design” which I guess fair enough lol.
Worst of all they committed the cardinal sin of hijacking scrolling. Please for the love of god do not hijack scrolling.
Comment by IsTom 1 day ago
Comment by BobbyTables2 1 day ago
Comment by slantedview 15 hours ago
Comment by rightbyte 19 hours ago
Comment by woah 1 day ago
Comment by nvme0n1p1 1 day ago
> See, we were founded in 2019, making us a pre-AI company (ew!).
I'd wager the website is just the most obvious symptom of the deeper problem.
Comment by shimman 8 hours ago
What's the issue?
Comment by vanuatu 1 day ago
Comment by oefrha 1 day ago
Comment by rib3ye 1 day ago
Comment by paxy 1 day ago
Comment by goosejuice 1 day ago
Comment by gonzalohm 1 day ago
However, since they started pushing the whole AI thing I no longer like them.
It may speed up doing analytics, but makes everything hard to maintain, creates a ton of duplication and adds yet another layer to take care of.
I also think AI may come back to bite them in the ass. What's the point of an analytics platform is you can create dashboards from scratch directly using AI. What are they adding to the table?
They should have stuck to just making developers lives easier instead of that weird objective that is trying to make analytics accessible for everyone
Comment by vanuatu 1 day ago
likely they focus on something orthogonal, like trust and security, permissions, etc
fwiw i work at one of their 'top customers' and found their ai to be really useful for spinning up basically ephemeral dashboards for anyone to use (aka, i dont need to file a request to the data team and wait for someone to get back to me or go back and forth). i just ask it to do the thing.
Comment by sheepscreek 1 day ago
Once AI can orchestrate and maintain a project with dozens of clients without slipping, they will be relegated to non-technical SMBs - many enterprises would just build their own shit. No contracts to sign. Full control. AI hosts and maintains. Great.
Then they might pivot to security (heck I would if I were in any SaaS business today).
Comment by xmcqdpt2 19 hours ago
The problem with this is that, as of today, no AI company will give you support if the AI generated product doesn't work, at least no company I know of. When we pay for a software product, we mostly pay for the support and accountability transfer to the provider.
I mean at least that's what we used to do. Nowadays support and software quality are so bad that maybe one should just vibe code everything. So I think I've come around to your opinion while writing this comment lol.
Comment by numlocked 1 day ago
We can make completely reproducible reporting when we need it (for e.g. our weekly business reviews), while the agent can answer all of the ad-hoc stuff that would normally be done by a small army of analysts scurrying around.
Comment by stuxnet79 1 day ago
1 or 2 exceptional ICs, a clean semantic layer and agents is "all you need".
RIP to the sexiest job of the 21st century ...
Comment by paxy 1 day ago
Comment by darklinear 1 day ago
1-2% headcount on data is below average for a tech company but not unbelievable either.
It is true you can get a lot further than before with "just" a clean semantic layer though!
Comment by disgruntledphd2 1 day ago
Comment by BobbyTables2 1 day ago
Comment by MisterMunchkin 21 hours ago
But they don’t, because they want to look busy. And it’s not like they actually understand the data anyway, because they’ve never worked in the area the data comes from.
Comment by alberth 1 day ago
any other tools that are also key to your stack that you wouldn't mind sharing, so others can learn from and try out?
Comment by BOOSTERHIDROGEN 1 day ago
Comment by andai 1 day ago
I'm having déjà vu... I read almost the same thing word for word ~6 months ago. I think it was from an open source project.
Edit: February, but it was published in November:
What I learned building an opinionated and minimal coding agent
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46844822
Actually I think I've seen the same thing three or four times this year. But yeah, actually solving the actual problems you actually have is a good idea :)
Comment by trojans1290 1 hour ago
Comment by tomwphillips 16 minutes ago
As a data generalist in an business, it makes zero sense for me to spend my time building a it tool like Hex when I can buy one and spend my time actually moving the needle on business outcomes.
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
Comment by tibbar 1 day ago
Comment by nylonstrung 1 day ago
It similarly offers the combo of SQL and dataframes, built in dataviz and UI widgets, great LLM integration and essentially everything else one would want from either a notebook or a BI tool
Comment by gonzalohm 1 day ago
Comment by nylonstrung 10 hours ago
It has WASM support via Pyodide so people can use the notebooks without a python server or toolchain
Comment by akshayka 1 day ago
Comment by itskishankumar 10 hours ago
Comment by legerdemain 22 hours ago
Comment by fathermarz 22 hours ago
My first question, what does a BI company need $100M for?
Why does it seem that Figma’s logo is on every company’s trust badge list. Do they spend millions on SaaS subscriptions? Or are they getting bamboozled into getting their name hijacked for trust?
Is this just me or do other people feel this is getting out of hand?
Comment by tschellenbach 1 day ago
Comment by abirch 1 day ago
Comment by giovannibonetti 1 day ago
Comment by tomwphillips 21 hours ago
We signed up for Hex a few weeks ago. The PoC was smooth. My colleagues love it.
Comment by arthurcolle 1 day ago
Comment by miguel_martin 1 day ago
Comment by paxy 1 day ago
Comment by miguel_martin 4 hours ago
Comment by bemtevi 17 hours ago
God, what sort of a world do we live in where curiosity has to be "unlocked". No. Curiosity is the thing that happen when you naturally want to know something. If it has to be unlocked, it's not curiosity. And even if there were some meaning one could ascribe to unlocking curiosity, it wouldn't be with some sort of vibe-coded behemoth AI analytics system....
Glad I got out of the corporate world as soon as I could. It's all rather inhuman.
Comment by zzzeek 1 day ago
Comment by jgalt212 1 day ago
Hex saved Mercor $100MM. That's impressive!
Comment by yieldcrv 1 day ago
Comment by pianoben 1 day ago
For a SaaS, it's more or less just compliance-flavored magic words.
I used to make hardware products and it was very hard to sell in to bigger UK and Australian businesses until we could certify here.
Comment by jgalt212 18 hours ago
Comment by mpalmer 1 day ago
If I may posthumously discipline the horse - when did the suffixes "-native" and "-first" merge in unholy matrimony?
Was it when B2B marketing realized that engineers equated "native" with "best/fastest/simplest solution available"? Or is it even more stupid than that?
Comment by xp84 1 day ago
Comment by mpalmer 16 hours ago
Comment by BobbyTables2 1 day ago
I like your origin idea, but “cloud-native” is practically an oxymoron. Somehow taking a simple native application and perverting it to the cloud with added layers of abstraction in both the client and the server is somehow “cloud native”?
Makes downtown New York seem like “natural living”.
Comment by upmostly 1 day ago
If you're interested in using it, you can 1-click deploy.
Comment by doublerebel 1 day ago