New 14‑inch MacBook Pro with M6
Posted by meetpateltech 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by makmanalp 1 day ago
Comment by FinnKuhn 1 day ago
Comment by seabrookmx 1 day ago
I don't _need_ the battery life and still prefer to run Linux so the tradeoff is worth it to me, but for most users it's pretty hard to not recommend a Macbook.
Comment by FinnKuhn 1 day ago
The thing is I never had a Mac(Book) before, but the hardware at the time was just so much ahead of anything else that I didn't mind that limitation. At least for what I bought it any OS (Windows/MacOS/Linux) would have been totally fine.
Comment by riffraff 1 day ago
Comment by pinktonio 1 day ago
Comment by FinnKuhn 1 day ago
Comment by KetoManx64 1 day ago
Comment by anakaine 1 day ago
Comment by unsloppable 1 day ago
Comment by ant6n 1 day ago
Every app window / browser tab is like 1GB these days.
Comment by rickdeckard 1 day ago
"You didn't even finish your M2 yet and already want to refill your plate?"
Comment by yunnpp 1 day ago
Edit: guys, come up, muster some sense of humor. This screen is only 14" after all.
Comment by neilsimp1 1 day ago
Comment by pbasista 1 day ago
On top of that, the drives might be somehow paired to the motherboard. And I would imagine that pairing a new one with the existing motherboard may require some proprietary software that only Apple has.
These are only my assumptions though. People e.g. at Louis Rossmann's repair shop might know more.
Comment by philistine 1 day ago
Comment by 233mhz 1 day ago
Comment by AppleBananaPie 1 day ago
Comment by lynndotpy 1 day ago
It is funny because the video is 50 minutes long which requires a difficult soldering job and chip reprogramming. This does not include the process of opening the Macbook Pro, disassembling it, removing the logic board, nor the reverse process.
Comment by mycall 10 hours ago
Comment by bel_marinaio 1 day ago
Comment by arghwhat 1 day ago
If you throw enough money at a sufficiently skilled technician it can be done, but no M.2 slots in sight here.
Comment by hias 1 day ago
Comment by neilsimp1 17 hours ago
I'm disappointed a mainstream laptop is soldered, though. Why would anyone buy it?
Comment by alt227 1 day ago
Comment by DaSHacka 1 day ago
Comment by telesilla 1 day ago
Comment by peezd 1 day ago
Comment by rTX5CMRXIfFG 1 day ago
Comment by SOLAR_FIELDS 1 day ago
Comment by makmanalp 1 day ago
Comment by makmanalp 1 day ago
Comment by dreamcompiler 1 day ago
Plus it runs Asahi linux on the metal.
Comment by jonpurdy 1 day ago
The only reason I’m bitter is because they put in WiFi 6E in the M3 generation. Now I just use a 2.5Gbe USB-C adaptor when transferring large files to and from my NAS.
Comment by seemaze 1 day ago
Comment by karim79 1 day ago
Comment by qubex 1 day ago
The machine is basically flawless and entirely suitable for everything I throw at it (and throw stuff at it I do: when I’m not web-browsing or playing YouTube videos I’m using Wolfram Mathematica, which is one heck of a resource hog) and it’s absolutely utterly fine and blasé about the whole thing.
As things are, I can see myself keeping it for a decade. There was a time when I used to change Apple laptops on a yearly basis (starting with PowerBook G4s in the early/mid 2000s and up until the mid 2010s, when I migrated most of my mobile computing to iPads… which lasted for about a decade until I got this thing).
Comment by exe34 1 day ago
Comment by julietalfredes 1 day ago
Comment by paxy 1 day ago
Comment by anoojb 1 day ago
Comment by weystrom 1 day ago
I think I'll keep my Framework 13 Pro preorder.
Comment by cosmic_cheese 1 day ago
It’s not bad, but I find it still to be very much an acquired taste. It’s fine for my usage, where the DE has barely any impact but having been using macOS as my main OS for the better part of 30 years, it would probably drive me insane if I had to shift my main body of computer use to it. It’s not any one thing, but dozens of papercuts that can’t be configured away (I’d need to maintain my own fork to fix them) as well as the more Windows-like desktop paradigm.
Comment by Matl 1 day ago
Exactly how I feel about having to use macOS at work, except some of the 'configurations away' are overpriced plugins/third party tools.
Comment by cosmic_cheese 1 day ago
This is why I think it's important that there's a wealth of different desktops available to use that represent a variety of different paradigms, particularly in the context of Linux on the desktop. Desktop Linux represents the ultimate in potential to mold the computer to the user instead of the reverse, and it really bums me out to see suggestions or implications that would-be Linux users should just accept a Windows-ish shape or tiling keyboard-driven shape and stop hoping for something more Mac-like (which as an aside, GNOME is not despite superficial appearances).
Comment by alt227 1 day ago
At least this is an option with Linux
Comment by cosmic_cheese 1 day ago
Comment by alt227 1 day ago
Comment by nozzlegear 1 day ago
Comment by kev009 1 day ago
Comment by 100percentjake 1 day ago
Comment by cdelsolar 1 day ago
Still I’m very tempted by the new MacBooks. I don’t know of any laptop that is a tenth as good and I don’t want to sit at my desk all day to use a computer.
Comment by gosub100 1 day ago
I love and respect what Asahi has done but I want apple to support a turn key, open drivers, everything works, system.
Comment by psadauskas 1 day ago
Comment by tpmoney 1 day ago
It seems to me like they are indeed just “not supporting” it, to the fullest extent possible.
Comment by KerrAvon 1 day ago
Comment by elicash 1 day ago
Edit: the thing I'm confused about is it seems there are at least two but maybe three different things that they are calling "nano-texture". On buying screens, the Studio Display and iPad Mini say "Nano-texture glass" and the new MacBook Pro says "Nano-texture display." But the Duo marketing says "Nano-texture finish."
I get that the internal Duo screen has the film over it and so it says "finish," but is there a difference between "glass" and "display"?
Comment by rickdeckard 1 day ago
"Nano-texture finish" on iPhone Duo refers to an additional layer they put on top of the display panel. It's basically a sticker with a similar (same?) surface structure (they can't put it on the display glass itself because it's too thin)
Comment by floydnoel 1 day ago
Comment by elicash 1 day ago
Comment by layer8 1 day ago
Comment by codeduck 1 day ago
Comment by Hates_ 1 day ago
> Made with soft, non-abrasive material, the Polishing Cloth cleans any Apple display, including nano-texture, safely and effectively.
Comment by resters 1 day ago
Comment by Havoc 1 day ago
Comment by unregistereddev 1 day ago
My guess is this photo was taken in a local garden co-op or small farmstead, but it looked too barren to use for advertising so they added a bunch of plants later.
Comment by lp92 1 day ago
Comment by eli 1 day ago
Comment by ZeroCool2u 1 day ago
It was November/December in Iowa, so it was freezing and the local R/C club airfield was nestled between an ocean of corn fields and the city dump, so it smelled terrible.
But that 16" MBP was red hot from Android Studio and kept my fingers from freezing, so credit where credit is due. Really fun project too!
Comment by nozzlegear 1 day ago
That's just how Iowa smells. If anything, the city dump was probably improving things!
/s
lived here my whole life, it's an olfactory adventure :P
Comment by phainopepla2 1 day ago
Comment by rubyfan 1 day ago
Comment by kotaKat 1 day ago
Comment by financetechbro 1 day ago
Comment by FinnKuhn 1 day ago
Comment by bombcar 1 day ago
They missed a chance to have the lady holding an iPad though.
Comment by unregistereddev 1 day ago
Yeah this was a big miss. Farmers typically don't bring laptops out into the field, but tablets are extremely common. Tablets aren't nearly as susceptible to damage from dirt and dust and are easier to use on the go.
Comment by nozzlegear 1 day ago
Comment by bcvvvy 1 day ago
Comment by paxy 1 day ago
It is especially annoying during resale or benchmarking, because “M5 Pro” by itself doesn't mean much, and you have to count the number of CPU & GPU cores to figure out the actual SKU.
Comment by 100percentjake 1 day ago
Comment by tacon 1 day ago
Comment by drum55 1 day ago
Comment by paxy 1 day ago
Comment by drum55 1 day ago
Chip: Apple M5
Total Number of Cores: 10 (4 Super and 6 Efficiency)
Same amount of information, just formatted differently ultimately.Comment by smugma 1 day ago
Comment by timpera 1 day ago
Comment by SomeonesAccount 1 day ago
Comment by timpera 1 day ago
I used to be able to completely boot into Windows on my Intel mac a few years ago, but Apple no longer supports it for some reason. It's a shame, especially since the ARM64 version of Windows 11 has gotten very good now.
It would also be nice to be able to install Linux too. It's my own hardware, after all!
Comment by freeone3000 1 day ago
As for linux, https://asahilinux.org/ currently supports M1/M2 quite well, and is approaching ready on M3+
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
You can install both Windows and Linux on MacBooks. For Windows you may need to buy Parallels[1] or something but you can do it.
Comment by timpera 1 day ago
Looks like you're right about Linux though, I didn't know about Asahi Linux. Thank you for sharing.
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
Sadly I also can't natively install my Nintendo Switch software on my Xbox.
Comment by well_ackshually 1 day ago
Comment by mrkstu 1 day ago
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
Comment by well_ackshually 1 day ago
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
I don't know you nor do I have any say in what phone you buy, for example.
Comment by TheDong 1 day ago
Apple should be forced to release the necessary hardware specs to develop drivers so that I can use my hardware I purchased as I want. They should be required to let me own my own signing keys to boot my own software.
Anyway, I'd personally want bootcamp because it's a step closer to being able to install Linux, an operating system that lets me have a good tiling window manager that works.
Why the heck would anyone want to use macOS willingly, where the window manager and file browser are both complete unconfigurable trash.
Comment by rTX5CMRXIfFG 1 day ago
Comment by jimbokun 1 day ago
Comment by rTX5CMRXIfFG 1 day ago
Comment by bigyabai 1 day ago
Comment by philistine 1 day ago
On top of that, Windows 11 requires a TPM and Apple's implementation of the Secure Enclave is probably completely incompatible. The short moment in time when both computer families were in complete technological harmony is over.
Comment by bigyabai 1 day ago
To repeat myself, there is no valid technical reason that Apple cannot commit to documenting their platform for third-parties. People will complain, because it's an arbitrary choice on Apple's behalf to provide less transparent support than AMD, Intel or even the famously capricious Nvidia.
This has the knock-on effect of limiting macOS' exposure to third-party OS competition, enabling Apple to subsidize macOS support with SaaS offerings and advertisements. Apple customers have been increasingly asking for official Linux support on Apple Silicon, because macOS and iPadOS are not legitimate competitors to Windows or Linux. Apple Silicon is undoubtedly the second-class citizen of the PC world, and it's entirely Apple's choice to limit their hardware like that.
Comment by philistine 1 day ago
Thing you got wrong 2: iPadOS is half the usage of tablet operating systems. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_syste...
Comment by bigyabai 1 day ago
iPadOS is not a legitimate competitor to Windows or Linux. It might be a competitor against Android tablets, but goddamn what a low bar that is.
Comment by philistine 21 hours ago
In OSes everything seems to be a zero-sum game to you. What the 2010s have demonstrated is that OSes can still carve markets for themselves. SteamOS, Android, Oculus, iPadOS, and the king of it all, iOS, have proven that to be relevant, you only need to create your own category. iPadOS is the only relevant tablet OS. Users expect iPadOS if you give them a tablet. Windows is irrelevant in that space.
Comment by SJMG 1 day ago
How about suffer a lightly deoptimized workflow on one platform for the interoperability of the ecosystem…?
Comment by layer8 1 day ago
Comment by SJMG 1 day ago
Comment by alt227 1 day ago
Comment by ta8903 1 day ago
If you could install linux, however, then I would buy one yesterday.
Comment by SuperShibe 1 day ago
Comment by TheDong 1 day ago
Comment by tonyedgecombe 1 day ago
Comment by dwaltrip 1 day ago
Comment by freeone3000 1 day ago
You might be better off waiting for an Asahi linux update.
Comment by edude03 1 day ago
I'm pretty sure bootcamp was only a thing specifically because the intel macs were essentially white box windows laptops with a nicer than average trackpad for the time. Trackpad drivers is a much smaller lift when everything else practically works out of the box
Comment by mococa 1 day ago
Comment by timpera 1 day ago
Comment by Synaesthesia 1 day ago
Comment by gniv 1 day ago
Comment by hurfdurf 1 day ago
And it's still $1999.
Because the price hike happened in June, in this case from 1699 to 1999.https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672732 https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/apple-raises-pric...
Comment by culopatin 1 day ago
Comment by gniv 1 day ago
Comment by Hamuko 1 day ago
Comment by gniv 1 day ago
Comment by haseebws94 1 day ago
https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/apple-m6-12-core-vs-ap...
Comment by gniv 1 day ago
Comment by tefkah 1 day ago
Comment by fckgw 1 day ago
If the Base M6 is good enough processor for you but want a more "premium" product, then the base Pro makes sense.
Comment by philistine 1 day ago
Comment by rjrjrjrj 1 day ago
Also, there is no M6 Air yet.
Comment by foldr 1 day ago
Comment by magicmicah85 1 day ago
Comment by mono442 1 day ago
Comment by edude03 1 day ago
The major thing I notice about modern apple is they definitely rush to meet a deadline instead of just waiting for the product to be ready
Comment by alberth 1 day ago
Makes me now wonder what's in store for tomorrow's pro launch.
Comment by mastry 1 day ago
Comment by carruler 1 day ago
Comment by cmenge 1 day ago
Comment by dofm 1 day ago
The base M6 is faster (much much faster) than the M1 Max at prefill (compute bound).
The M1 Max outperforms the base M6 at token generation; this is memory-bandwidth-bound, and while the M1 Max can't actually saturate its memory bandwidth, it gets a lot closer with the GPU.
So I suspect the M6 is better if your AI tasks are decision-based or video/image based, and the M1 Max is better if you're running a coding LLM. Though prefill is a bit of an issue.
Comment by throwaway270925 1 day ago
Comment by artimaeis 1 day ago
Comment by fckgw 1 day ago
Comment by NoPicklez 1 day ago
Even if that were the case, it doesn't point to there being a power supply shortage which is the point the original commenter was making.
Comment by throwaway270925 15 hours ago
The power supply shortage was obviously tongue in cheek dude!
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
Am I missing something?
(since I'm rate limited)....
With the OP's comment "guess its a use-once device now..." I was thinking they meant power supply in the desktop sense, not the power adapter. I have no idea why a power adapter would be the thing that makes a laptop a "use-once" device.
But yes in the configuration options you can choose between two power adapters.
Comment by entrope 1 day ago
I appreciate the frustration, but as a separate item then a user can choose any power supply on the market, rather than being stuck with one that Apple chose.
Comment by artimaeis 1 day ago
Comment by tonyedgecombe 1 day ago
Comment by artimaeis 1 day ago
Edit: Even today if you go to the Macbook Pro config tool you get to choose between the standard 70 W or upgraded 96 W.
Comment by petetnt 1 day ago
Comment by cmdrmac 1 day ago
Comment by lettergram 1 day ago
Comment by Danox 1 day ago
Comment by tonyedgecombe 1 day ago
Comment by bigyabai 1 day ago
Apple has no experience running large fabs, manufacturing modern DDR4 or DDR5, negotiating for precursors, packaging memory, integrating packages, optimizing DRAM efficiency, yield tuning or process sampling & qualification testing. It's equally as absentminded as suggesting that Apple simply replace TSMC with ASMC, their in-house EUV fab that can make 3nm wafers with 100% yield. Samsung has been making memory for 40 years, and they can't compete with SK Hynix' output despite their experience in design and fabrication. And Samsung is a success story, relatively speaking.
Apple cannot supply themselves at the iPhones scale, and would bankrupt themselves binning DDR5 for 512GB Macs. The US could give Apple the entirety of Intel Foundry Services as an act of corrupt eminent domain, and Apple would still be 15 years away from supplying their own RAM. DDR5 fabs are a small club, and Apple ain't in it.
Comment by skrtks 1 day ago
Which one should I pick?
Comment by k310 1 day ago
Maybe this idea may be foreign to many, but personal computers were something I built from bags of parts socketed and/or soldered onto S-100 cards, and that experience was the foundation of most of my career.
I was a Henry Higgins, and proud of my Eliza(s). While I get along cooperatively with Eliza (the happy ending to "My Fair Computer") I don't want Eliza to be my caretaker. This morphing of computers and internet into nannies and caretakers is IMO reverting to the "good old days" of servants. While some inventions are truly liberating (ask the guy who missed his Mom at an airport and freaked out for hours until she showed up at my home, courtesy of a cab or bus) how many are just replacing people with machines?
I could seriously use some friendship of the human variety, rather than a humanoid in a box (or an especially nice robot as in "I Sing the Body Electric" by Ray Bradbury, memorable on The Twilight Zone) Try being older and living alone, typing away.
I don't even use GPS any more, since I trashed Apple Maps when they kissed the Emperor's big fanny.
Comment by sgarrity 1 day ago
I probably complained when Apple offered too FEW options too - but hey, this is the Internet.
Comment by onraglanroad 1 day ago
It seems like such an easy win and could rapidly become the most popular Linux distro, even running on non Apple hardware.
They have the money so why not just do it?
Comment by jimbokun 1 day ago
Comment by coreyh14444 1 day ago
Comment by miller_joe 1 day ago
Comment by elicash 1 day ago
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/10/25/macbook-pro-with-touchs...
Comment by WillAdams 1 day ago
Comment by the_sleaze_ 1 day ago
Comment by ramses0 1 day ago
Comment by weird-eye-issue 1 day ago
Comment by carlgreene 1 day ago
Comment by SecretDreams 1 day ago
I'm in the 14-15 camp w/ lighter form factors being worth the premium.
I tried below 13 after the trend of smaller laptops from a couple years back - I now don't believe anyone who tells me they're regularly productive on these smaller form factors lol.
Comment by nick_ 1 day ago
Comment by commandersaki 1 day ago
Love both.
Comment by icedchai 1 day ago
Comment by kphorn 1 day ago
Comment by DetroitThrow 1 day ago
It's much, much easier to transport even though I do miss the screen real estate.
Comment by technothrasher 1 day ago
Comment by eknkc 1 day ago
Comment by dofm 1 day ago
Comment by outlore 1 day ago
Comment by dofm 1 day ago
I'm just saying, the base M6 is not very competitive in terms of memory bandwidth (the M5 Pro has about 80% faster memory bandwidth).
Compared with my old M1 Max, the M5 Pro is radically better at prefill, only about 15% slower at most at generation (and probably performs better at DFlash and MLX than the M1, so it might close the gap or even outperform the M1 Max)
So the models I am using/testing should all be quite fun, assuming the 48GB RAM machine. The Gemma 4 12B and LFM should run well on the 24GB machine. Neither of those are great coding models but they should be pretty good assistants. There are harsher quantisations of those other models that may fit.
Whether playing with these things locally is worth the extra spend, I don't know. It's probably more cost-effective to buy a cheaper Mac, experiment with the smaller models, and use Openrouter for the bigger ones.
Comment by sealthedeal 1 day ago
Comment by ghoshbishakh 1 day ago
Comment by cromka 1 day ago
So tired of their PR grandiose.
Comment by arkwin 1 day ago
Also, what happened to the I/O?? I was happy to see on the M4 they had HDMI, an SD card slot, and more. Why are they back to 2 USB-C ports? I only see pictures of one side, but the left side has traditionally had more I/O.
C'mon, Apple, do better. It's a PRO model, not a MacBook Air
Comment by tefkah 1 day ago
also, i don't blame you for this given that Apple's naming scheme is so fucked here but the 32gb limitation is for the MacBook Pro with the M6, _not_ the MacBook Pro with the M6 Pro or M6 Max. yes, that is confusing, but imo the standard MacBook "Pro" with the base M chip is basically a glorified MacBook Air with a better chassis. I feel like they only sell these things to make the Air seem like a better deal and to justify a higher price for the M Pro / Max versions
edit: those M Pro versions may be announced tomorrow alongside a version with, or those being the version with a touchscreen
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/10/25/macbook-pro-with-touchs...
Comment by fckgw 1 day ago
Comment by kingleopold 1 day ago
Comment by cbeach 1 day ago
The fastest M6 MacBook Pro (24/32GB config) has a memory bandwidth of 170 GB/s. And the M5 Max is 614 GB/s.
Am I missing some nuance of the M6 MBP here, or am I right to assume it won't set the local LLM world on fire?
Comment by tpmoney 1 day ago
Comment by moosedev 1 day ago
There's rumored to be no M6 Pro or M6 Max coming, i.e. the higher bandwidth chips will skip a gen. M7 is also rumored to have better memory bandwidth across the range.
Comment by lettergram 1 day ago
> With 16GB of unified memory standard, configurable up to 32GB, and higher memory bandwidth up to 170GB/s, MacBook Pro makes multitasking and working with demanding apps and large projects even faster.
So they're basically removing the ability to run local models effectively. I wonder if they'll bifurcate their market to enable those.
Comment by fckgw 1 day ago
Comment by ericmay 1 day ago
No they won't, the market for "running local models" is approximately 0. There's nothing to bifurcate anyway because once they release the more capable chips they'll be able to be configured with hiring amounts of RAM.
Apple in recent years has been updating their laptop range or specific models (Air or something) with their latest base M series chip (M4, M5, M6, &c.) and then later comes the higher end CPUs. But the base series chips don't have the hardware to it seems support higher RAM loads, or maybe they are artificially restricted in some way.
Comment by eastbound 1 day ago
Do they get the same marketing impact?
Comment by hurfdurf 1 day ago
https://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#mac https://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#ipad
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Comment by maromocooo 1 day ago