'Lake America' makes one thing clear: We can't trust U.S. tech companies
Posted by Teever 1 hour ago
Comments
Comment by sokoloff 16 minutes ago
Should a rendering of the land bordering the Southwest corner of the Black Sea show the city of Istanbul? Or must it remain depicted as Constantinople? Or perhaps even Byzantium?
Comment by capnjazz 19 minutes ago
Comment by k310 1 hour ago
And why not? Their CEO's are foldable as well.
"Don't be Evil"
Folded.
So here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. Here’s to you.
Folded
Comment by davesque 24 minutes ago
Comment by GMoromisato 3 minutes ago
Also, I was curious, so I looked it up: Congress passed a law (Public Law 80-242) in 1947 that allowed the executive branch to establish a single set of geographic names.
Conservatives famously protested when the Obama administration renamed Mt. McKinley to Denali. I have no doubt that when a Democratic administration returns to power, they will rename a bunch of stuff, now that the precedence is set.
My guess is we're going to go through a ping-pong of renames before the law gets changed to require some kind of independent group, or a super-majority of senators or something.
Comment by Varelion 20 minutes ago
Build and trade amongst yourselves instead of relying on this house of cards. Buy European. Buy Canadian.
Comment by throwaway894345 9 minutes ago
Comment by kashunstva 54 minutes ago
Although I haven’t much thought through the details, I wonder if these disputed names could be subject to user preference. Basically, a pre-MAGA and MAGA setting.
Comment by al_borland 34 minutes ago
At the end of the day a map provider has the responsibility to show the official names of places on a map. If it’s one name to the US and another name for the rest of the world, the pragmatic solution is to show the “right” name based on a user’s location.
This seems like a silly hill to die on, when whoever is in office next will likely revert the names of the lake and the Gulf of Mexico, unless they are deep in the Trump camp.
Messing with maps as a negotiation tactic seems rather boneheaded. It’s extremely disruptive, but blaming Google or Apple for any of this is a bad move, imo. There are much bigger fights to be had and they need to pick their battles. This isn’t it, and it will likely resolve itself in time, and should only impact those in the US, if done right.
Comment by marcosdumay 17 minutes ago
Not really. They have the responsibility to show the useful names. They are also free to show whatever the local bully forces them to.
Neither of those is necessarily the official name.
Comment by al_borland 10 minutes ago
I’m not sure what the problem is.
Comment by vkou 27 minutes ago
They have the capacity to push back, instead of pre-emptively rolling over for an autocrat.
Comment by al_borland 18 minutes ago
When it’s only one thing, you might say everyone just knows, but that doesn’t scale.
And like I mentioned, they need to pick their battles. I’d rather them save their politics and favors for things like encryption and privacy, not piss it away on map data, when they can show both names and this will likely be a small footnote in history. In 20 years I can imagine, “What was the name of Lake Ontario for a brief period in the mid 2020s?” Being a question asked at bar trivia.
Comment by tfwnopmt 51 minutes ago
Comment by ebbi 35 minutes ago
But now large tech companies in America can't even challenge the naming of a Lake and just folded, meekly.
Comment by ModernMech 32 minutes ago
Comment by jmclnx 25 minutes ago
So, companies can easily pay Trump for favors with out any consequences, but they just need to keep the money train going and kowtow to Trump's insane whims.
Comment by add-sub-mul-div 44 minutes ago
Comment by toss1 30 minutes ago
That makes them only useful as windsocks, and there are other far better ways to see which way the wind is blowing.
Comment by EA-3167 18 minutes ago
Lets not cross the streams just because it would be convenient this time... next time it may well not be.
Comment by mikepurvis 21 minutes ago