Y Combinator Early Access Network

Posted by tosh 5 hours ago

Counter69Comment53OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by avaer 4 hours ago

It's been obvious for years that AI will bifurcate society even more between the haves and have nots, contrary to "democratizing AI" niceties espoused by big AI CEOs.

It was less obvious that access will be further gated by an Old Boy Network. I guess the frontier model whitelists of yestermonth were a portent.

Comment by aleqs 15 minutes ago

Seems just like another case of collusion - continuing the story of VCs pushing all of their companies to use each other and 'stay within the network'. The good news (kinda) for the rest of us, is that many of these VC marketing/product/'strategy' people aren't actually all that competent - this is literally the best they can come up with.

Comment by pj_mukh 3 hours ago

YCombinator has its biases, but I don't know of many other investment firms that have a university style, "application" process. It's almost always, warm-intros you need.

This Early access network is just an intro system once you get through the Application process (like Universities having a job fair).

Comment by avaer 3 hours ago

TBF YC has always said the value is in the network.

What's interesting (alarming?) is them formalizing exclusion of access to technology via the network. It's explicitly ossifying an access control system over what used to be handshakes.

Comment by pj_mukh 3 hours ago

I don’t understand, Ycombinator company list is public information list, go buy from any one of them anytime?

AFAICT, this is mostly a way for YC companies to get warm intros into potential customers. Almost exactly like a job fair at a university but for software contracts instead of jobs.

Comment by avaer 2 hours ago

> Ycombinator company list is public information list, go buy from any one of them anytime

Unless this prototype model works out financially for the companies, and every AI company starts telling you to go through an (inevitably AI vetted) application process to get access.

Decades ago, getting a Google account to use GMail wasn't seen as a problem because you could run your own mail server. Try getting your own mail server to deliver mail today.

Comment by gxs 2 hours ago

It’s funny how we always celebrate (or at the very least don’t comment negatively) when someone/a startup sets out to build an ecosystem and then love punishing them after they succeed. How very American of us

Just curious, how exactly do you propose they do this instead?

Rent out a convention center, open invitation, and then still complain when all xxK slots are taken up?

Or do it virtually and inundate these startups with thousands of requests and get mad when half don’t get responded to?

Outlaw private capital altogether and force people to IPO to raise money? And then what, complain when only a fraction of those companies work out and the average guy with an E*trade account not in on the joke gets screwed over and over?

At least YC takes applicants and the process is somewhat transparent

Of course there’s a (prob big) element of who you know going on, but it seems to me like the least shitty approach if your goal is to make this at least somewhat accessible

This aspect of yc is good - I know plenty of come from nowhere, unprivileged backgrounds who got into yc and were able to start a company

Now, they fact a lot of them get super douchey once they are in is a different story

Comment by popalchemist 2 hours ago

Do not mistake any VC's eagerness to find fresh meat for the grinder for a philanthropic or otherwise virtuous motive. VC exists for one purpose only. Extract value from others.

Comment by alansaber 1 hour ago

There are far worse gigs than VC backed founder.

Comment by popalchemist 1 hour ago

What I said was not a critique of founders, just the devil they make (sometimes necessary) deals with.

Comment by ModernMech 3 hours ago

Pretty much every incubator I've seen has an open application process.

Comment by pj_mukh 3 hours ago

I mean now..yes. Not in 2008.

Comment by dgellow 2 hours ago

Why would we be talking about 2008?

Comment by pj_mukh 1 hour ago

Because that's about when YC started this open application system? When no one else was.

Comment by tptacek 40 minutes ago

What's the "old boy network" thing here? This looks like a sales outreach event. It's connecting enterprise startups that want to do pilots with enterprises that will consider pilots.

Comment by random3 3 hours ago

Nature has shown variety wins over inbreeding, I don't see how AI will change this

Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago

Inbreeding won all human societies until about 1900 and will win all human societies from now on.

Comment by 3 hours ago

Comment by ViktorRay 4 hours ago

Wonder if people going to this will have the same infamous sense of arrogance and entitlement that is common to Y combinator folks?

Source:

https://x.com/mcuban/status/692595120969875456

Comment by Den_VR 4 hours ago

How could that possibly happen to a hand-picked group of YC's enterprise-AI founders?!

Comment by nostrebored 4 hours ago

Having been through YC, there's certainly some of this, but the overwhelming majority of founders were pretty down to earth. People generally just want to solve hard problems.

Comment by dgellow 2 hours ago

This type of group is exactly what develop that feeling of entitlement and arrogance. It would be very surprising if that’s not the case.

That being said, all the ex YC people I interacted with in person have been awesome. But there is definitely a YC entitled group

Comment by walrus01 4 hours ago

Mark Cuban posting about a sense of arrogance and entitlement is certainly something. There's a reason behind the character of HBO Silicon Valley's Russ Hanneman...

[spiderman pointing at spiderman.gif]

Comment by Grosvenor 4 hours ago

I thought Chris Sacca was the inspiration for Russ Hanneman.

The beard, the shirts, the sexual assault allegations. The three nannies suing him - one for no good reason!

Comment by walrus01 3 hours ago

Sacca was not doing anything like 'radio on the internet' in the 1994-2000 dotcom 1.0 boom era...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast.com

Comment by Grosvenor 1 hour ago

^^^ this guy fucks.

You’re right. So Russ was an amalgamation of sacca, cuban, and probably a few more.

Comment by NewJazz 46 minutes ago

What was he replying to?

Comment by 3 hours ago

Comment by alansaber 1 hour ago

Hot take but I don't mind startup founders being plucky and a bit arrogant/naieve. They need it.

Comment by NewJazz 45 minutes ago

They need to be naïve?

Comment by sellmesoap 28 minutes ago

If you're too grounded you say no to everything like a reasonable person with experience :D

Comment by 3 hours ago

Comment by ElProlactin 1 hour ago

> The Early Access Network is an invite-only group of senior technology leaders who want to see what's coming before it's on anyone's shortlist.

> Four times a year, we put a hand-picked group of YC's enterprise-AI founders in a room with buyers who can actually run a pilot. Fall 2026 kicks off on October 22 in San Francisco.

Hi Claude!

Comment by alansaber 1 hour ago

AI copy from the AI company incubator is hardly the worse sin

Comment by ElProlactin 1 hour ago

I actually don't have a problem with people using AI to write but this is such a small amount of text that outsourcing it to AI screams "laziness".

Comment by jzelinskie 2 hours ago

This is interesting, but I think most enterprise AI buyers probably aren't looking to buy from the current batch; they're just too volatile at that stage. This does seem like an opportunity for cross-pollination where early start-ups get to test their product signals and enterprises get to see what's on the cutting edge.

This seems more beneficial to the founders because the the enterprises could instead just choose to do some research on the start-ups. It's not like the start-ups are keeping their knowledge quiet because for them to survive they need to convince everybody what their doing is meaningful.

Comment by wxw 4 hours ago

> The Early Access Network is an invite-only group of senior technology leaders who want to see what's coming before it's on anyone's shortlist.

> Four times a year, we put a hand-picked group of YC's enterprise-AI founders in a room with buyers who can actually run a pilot.

Seems like a win-win.

Comment by avaer 4 hours ago

For everyone except you, for most definitions of "you".

Comment by tptacek 38 minutes ago

If you're an enterprise buyer I'm confident most pre-launch YC startups would be more than happy to talk to you about a pilot.

Comment by listic 3 hours ago

Being about 'AI' is mandatory now, I guess?

Comment by HolyLampshade 1 hour ago

This isn’t just AI…it’s ‘enterprise-AI’.

It’s AI, but with more bureaucracy and politics.

Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago

Did you know you can become a member of the WEF for free and get their nonsense emails in advance of anyone else talking about what stupid stuff the WEF is doing?

Comment by zatkin 4 hours ago

I wonder what the dress code is.

Comment by samus 4 hours ago

I'm all for making swimsuit formal wear, at least in summer.

Comment by rglover 3 hours ago

The future isn't found in consensus or groups.

Comment by behole 4 hours ago

My guess - next round of this will be for pay. This is the soft-launch before they monetize this "exclusive access" .

Comment by alansaber 1 hour ago

No but it reinforces the value of the YC brand. VC is always looking for an edge

Comment by 4lx87 2 hours ago

Help me understand. The purpose is to help founders get sales contracts? What's the value for the buyers? Acquire people before they become competitors?

Comment by alansaber 1 hour ago

Usually the rule of a CTO/CIO is to foster innovation. Getting a custom solution from a big name VC helps then fulfil their JD within the company.

Comment by arionhardison 3 hours ago

So basically now YC is looking to emulate Trump and his "pay for early access to truth social posts" ?

re: https://time.com/article/2026/08/13/trump-sued-truth-social-...

Comment by avaer 3 hours ago

YC isn't taxing you, or elected to serve your interest, or beholden to public recordkeeping law or sworn to a national constitution with explicit rules against self-enrichment.

YC can do whatever they want, you can not play their game if you choose. It's not really comparable.

Comment by arionhardison 3 hours ago

This is a very good point, I did not mean literally in that sense; only in that they are offering "the privileged" exclusive access to information that will further entrench their positions.

I apologize for not being clearer in my comment. I actually agree with your response and fully understand that there is a fundamental difference but also believe that the outcomes of both the aforementioned are aligned.

Comment by 3 hours ago

Comment by ModernMech 3 hours ago

> YC isn't taxing you

It's a different kind of tax. The VC model is to get you addicted to a service and then jack up prices as soon as they've squeezed out other competition. You can't opt out of that game when AirBnBs take over your town.

Comment by mcmcmc 2 hours ago

The problem is predatory pricing is hard to prove, and the FTC is impotent or complicit, depending on the administration

Comment by avaer 3 hours ago

That's fair and accurate, there's a lot broken with the system. But I wouldn't place the blame at the feet of YC, it would be just as bad without them.

Comment by arionhardison 3 hours ago

> blame at the feet of YC, it would be just as bad without them.

I disagree, I think YC is fully to blame here as are the other grifters of the current administration.