PISA 2025 Students' reading and mathematics performance declined across the OECD
Posted by mazokum 3 hours ago
Comments
Comment by somenameforme 16 minutes ago
Why this is, is an interesting question but it hits on too many taboo topics. Though perhaps rational discussion becoming taboo is itself a part of the reason. When you accept reality, whatever it gives you, you're obviously going to have a far more rational population and better outcomes than one that insists on bending reality to fit a desired narrative, even when it obviously does not. After all this is precisely what brought Greater Arabia from the center of education and learning in the world to rather the opposite. It wasn't religion, but letting ideology dominate reality instead of the other way around.
[1] - https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a43469569/american-...
Comment by blululu 1 hour ago
Japan: -3
S Korea: -1
Singapore: +1
Taiwan: +9
---
Germany: -45
France: -38
Sweden: -33
US: -10
This is an issue with the western industrialized world. Which ought to make the analysis simple since we can look at what those countries have done differently than their East Asian counterparts and stop pursing those actions as national policy
*edit for formatting
Comment by Haven880 11 minutes ago
Comment by polski-g 27 minutes ago
Comment by amadeoeoeo 1 hour ago
Given the big gap between the east and the west... does anybody know if these are somehow less used/abused in asian countries?
Any other reason why this gap might happen?
Thanks
Comment by JumpCrisscross 25 minutes ago
FTFA: “Digital distraction also affects the wider classroom. More than one in four students said that classmates were distracted by digital devices in most or every science lesson. Students surrounded by distracted classmates performed less well, were less engaged in learning and felt less connected to their school. Students who say they did not use AI to draft text for writing assignments outperformed those who say they did. Among frequent users, however, students who used AI to help them learn and were taught how to assess the quality of AI-generated information tended to perform better than those who received no such guidance.”
Comment by nixon_why69 54 minutes ago
If some third type of country didn't do doomscrolling but ignored their homework to play outside, that's better than scrolling but it's still not homework.
Comment by Tade0 46 minutes ago
Poland's math score dropped by just 5 points. As for other tests:
Science: -4
Reading: -7.
Much like with GDP per capita, my country is climbing the rankings, but only via walkover.
Comment by immigpolicy 14 minutes ago
Comment by meindnoch 1 hour ago
Comment by MrBuddyCasino 55 minutes ago
Comment by BeetleB 47 minutes ago
Comment by rayiner 38 minutes ago
Comment by PKop 12 minutes ago
No. Here's your breakdown.
Comment by immigpolicy 9 minutes ago
Comment by bsoqk 1 hour ago
Comment by rayiner 1 hour ago
Comment by my-next-account 58 minutes ago
Comment by jimaway123 1 hour ago
Comment by cufjufxtx 1 hour ago
Comment by RGamma 38 minutes ago
Comment by JumpCrisscross 26 minutes ago
Harsh educations don’t work. Neither does modern coddling, prevalent in the West. If any adversity prompts a mental health crisis, you’re at a global disadvantage. Economically and, I’d argue, in terms of quality of life.
Comment by Huarache1 7 minutes ago
There is also something else to be said about Mental Health, coming from one of the countries with the lowest rates of someone taking their own lives, and its not just due to underreporting.
Peru probably isn't the best place to live, but the food, weather, people, and general culture which almost normalizes suffering in an almost Buddhist way (Sufre Peruano sufre! lit. Suffer Peruvian, Suffer!) might have something to do with a more robust mental health situation?
Comment by kmitz 1 hour ago
See graphs on PISA 2025 homepage : https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2025-results-volum...
So much for all the EdTech startups that want you to use their AI teachers. Seriously, this should be a major signal to keep screens and AI solutions out of classrooms. That's not solving everything but at least students would be given a few hours window of de-brainroting everyday. I'm open to accept that AI can have a positive impact on education but people and tools are apparently not ready and for the moment using it is a net negative.
Comment by Aurornis 1 hour ago
The AI they’re talking about is not EdTech AI-based teaching tools. It’s students who use ChatGPT to handle work for them so they can ignore any teaching parts.
Apples and oranges. Using this study to draw conclusions about AI EdTech would be a mistake
Comment by zulban 1 hour ago
If everyone is hiring a "tutor" to just do their homework for them, that doesn't mean that all tutors are bad.
Comment by goalieca 1 hour ago
Simply put, there’s nothing better than old school pen to paper.
Comment by rtkwe 5 minutes ago
Comment by nialse 1 hour ago
Comment by jfim 1 hour ago
Comment by nntwozz 1 hour ago
These days it's reversed, only 20% pass.
I was told this was the case around 2005 when I studied there.
The exam has not changed in difficulty.
Comment by adrianN 1 hour ago
Comment by Forgeties79 1 hour ago
Comment by tsimionescu 1 hour ago
Comment by mcphage 1 hour ago
Has what students are expected to know changed since the 60s? For instance, have there been any, I dunno, new developments in technology over the past 60-odd years?
Comment by yobbo 8 minutes ago
No, basic algebra and calculus has not changed.
Comment by logifail 27 minutes ago
Appreciate this stuff gets political very quickly, but I'm curious what did England do that Scotland and Wales did not do (or vice versa)?
Comment by gonzalohm 33 minutes ago
And I think this wasn't a "just my class" kind of thing.
Comment by JumpCrisscross 22 minutes ago
Is there evidence for this attitude not generalizing?
Comment by lordnacho 1 hour ago
Comment by andai 1 hour ago
Comment by yorwba 1 hour ago
Comment by lo_zamoyski 12 minutes ago
Social and cultural expectations and conventions are extremely important. Even in supposedly laissez-faire Western countries where traditional cultural expectations have withered to the point of laxity, people still live their lives according to convention and expectation, even if those conventions and expectations are increasingly vulgar and dictated by powerful interest. (Indeed, the fertility crisis is determined largely by patterns of convention. It used to be that, for most people, it was expected that you would marry and have children earlier rather than later. Now, our cultural expectations actually penalize that kind of behavior. You're supposed to "find yourself", "play the field", or "build up your career" first.)
Human beings operate more by convention than by moral reasoning. Society needs an environment demands good things from them. Even when we know what the right or good course of action is through moral reasoning and discernment, it is very helpful for social convention and culture to support those choices.
The law is also traditionally a source of guardrails that help people attain better lives.
Comment by rayiner 1 hour ago
The U.S. is at 17.8% top performers, well behind Japan and Korea but around the same as Canada and Switzerland. But the U.S. is significantly ahead of the big EU countries: Germany is at 14%, France is at 9.8%, Italy is at 10.1% and Spain is at 7%.
Comment by Zadak 1 hour ago
Comment by Xirdus 47 minutes ago
Comment by watwut 31 minutes ago
Comment by rawgabbit 1 hour ago
PISA 2025 was the largest assessment to date, involving 760 000 students across 91 countries and economies.
What were the sample sizes in previous years and their related demographics?Comment by charlieyu1 9 minutes ago
Comment by marsven_422 1 hour ago
Comment by tokai 2 hours ago
Comment by squishington 1 hour ago
Comment by andai 1 hour ago
Comment by squishington 51 minutes ago
Comment by jpgvm 15 minutes ago
I averaged around 18mo to either a promotion or a move in my 20s, mostly off the back of working harder (to get the promotions/comp increases) and working smarter (to work out when they aren't coming and jumping somewhere else).
If this makes sense for someone has a lot more to do with their ambition/desire and ability to work the system than anything else. It also helps a ton if you are also legitimately very good at what you do. Then it's pretty easy because you are just demanding you are paid commensurate with impact.
Simply doing overtime and having hustle doesn't cut it though, you actually need to be able to leverage it into career progress or it's just wasted life.
Comment by myrmidon 1 hour ago
Comment by squishington 55 minutes ago
Comment by lentil_soup 33 minutes ago
Comment by HNSheldonImpost 48 minutes ago
Comment by a2ff6eeb0 1 hour ago
AI already writes most of the articles I see posted here, is doing math at the level of the best mathematicians, and is writing a ton of the code out there. Given another decade to develop, the kids will be hitting the workforce with very stiff competition. It's not a shock they're putting their energy elsewhere, and I can't say they're wrong.
They may be the first generation who grow up fully catered to by AI.
Comment by omnicognate 1 hour ago
Terence Tao a few days ago [1]:
> When we point the AIs at really difficult problems where none of the standard techniques apply, they are still very, very bad, I mean they're just randomly guessing.
Please don't reply saying they'll be proving the Collatz conjecture next week. It adds nothing.
[1] https://youtu.be/svl_1upFpQo (worth watching on the role of LLMs in maths)
Comment by adrianN 1 hour ago
Comment by Timon3 1 hour ago
Comment by a2ff6eeb0 1 hour ago
And we're only a couple of years in. Their capabilities aren't going to be getting worse over time. These kids will be hitting the workforce after AI has another decade of improvement put into it.
Comment by omnicognate 1 hour ago
Comment by a2ff6eeb0 1 hour ago
Comment by omnicognate 1 hour ago
Your broader point is based on a future extrapolation of LLM capabilities that is far from guaranteed to play out, so it sounds like poor risk management to me, even accepting your framing of it purely in terms of value in the workforce (which I don't).
Comment by dumberquestions 1 hour ago
Comment by getnormality 1 hour ago
If true, this is a disastrously foolish thing to believe. Education is only going to become more important as supervising increasingly advanced AI agents becomes more difficult. We need people who understand all different domains of human endeavor at the deepest level possible.
I mean, what's the alternative? AI does everything for me and I play Fortnite all day? Might as well plug yourself into the Matrix.
Comment by js8 1 hour ago
The situation will probably be like with airline pilots. The plane is mostly an automated system, but we simply don't let automation to work through exceptional situations, without human review. Therefore, lots of pilot training (and their presence) is still required.
But it's also hard to guess what exactly skill should the pilots have. It's clear that lots of things from manual aircraft do not translate well to automated.
Comment by themaninthedark 55 minutes ago
>In 1997, American Airlines captain Warren VanderBurgh gave a lecture warning about the dangers of autopilot. He titled it "children of the magenta line," after the magenta coloured course line the flight computer draws across a cockpit display. He noticed that pilots were so used to following that line, to managing the automation rather than actually flying the plane, that they lost their own skills to manually fly the plane. This wasn’t a problem until it was a problem.
>VanderBurgh’s concern was not about autopilot itself but rather the complete dependency on autopilot at the expense of the internal knowledge of how it works and the loss of the judgment to know when to use it. In 2009, his warning came true in the very worst way possible over the Atlantic. When Air France 447’s sensors iced over, the autopilot handed a perfectly good airliner back to its crew, the pilots, confused and out of practice, stalled it into the sea.
-https://carlhendrick.substack.com/p/children-of-the-magenta-...
Children Of The Magenta Line -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ESJH1NLMLs
Comment by jcfrei 1 hour ago
Comment by bluecheese452 1 hour ago
Comment by a2ff6eeb0 1 hour ago
Comment by loloquwowndueo 1 hour ago
Comment by lordnacho 1 hour ago
Give yourself a few hours to write out some code in the old way. Can you really tell me that you could not have done a better job with AI in the same time?
Eg, implement chess or poker games.
Or write a component like a Swiss table.
It's not obvious to me that AI produces bad work at all.
Comment by loloquwowndueo 1 hour ago
Comment by lordnacho 42 minutes ago
Comment by AdamN 1 hour ago
Comment by jahller 1 hour ago
Comment by loloquwowndueo 1 hour ago
Comment by GPerson 1 hour ago
Comment by meindnoch 1 hour ago
Comment by watwut 1 hour ago
Comment by suddenlybananas 1 hour ago