Jellyfin 12.0

Posted by 0xC0ncord 11 hours ago

Comments

Comment by doctoboggan 11 hours ago

As a long time plex user with a lifetime pass, I always enjoy seeing the good progress with Jellyfin as it will increasingly give me a soft landing for when Plex finally does something to make me move. At the very least it will hopefully keep some of plex’s most user hostile behavior in check.

As an aside, I recently started having Claude help me with configuring my *arr stack and it has helped tremendously. I used to have to babysit and manually intervene on maybe 10% of requests, now it’s near zero, plus I got audiobook requests and subtitles working great. Granted a big part of the increased success was signing up for a Usenet service but of course Claude was able to configure it all and make it work. I was a little worried Claude would demur in the face of the task, but it was more than happy to help me acquire media in this way

Comment by atombender 5 hours ago

I left Plex for Jellyfin + Infuse a couple of years ago, and I'm not looking back.

But the sore point right now is outside access, which Jellyfin really isn't made for. I set up Tailscale so I can connect Infuse to Jellyfin remotely. But that's not exactly as smooth as Plex. I can't give friends and family access, either, which was dead easy with Plex.

In terms of the UX, Infuse isn't very good, but it does the job okay. The built-in subtitle fetcher is amazing; that stuff never worked for me with Plex.

Comment by y-curious 3 hours ago

For people that don’t know, Infuse lets you use Jellyfin on Apple TV and it’s very helpful for day purpose

Comment by orsorna 1 hour ago

There is also an open source tvOS client called Swiftfin. The experience isn't as good though.

You can also transcode your files to formats that the free version of Infuse supports if you are a miser.

Comment by Gareth321 3 hours ago

Crazy expensive though. It's basically a Plex subscription, just for the player.

Comment by swat535 16 minutes ago

I just bought a lifetime pro access , I think it was around 200$ but really worth it. I get all the updates for free.

Whenever I can, I buy my software now these days instead of renting it.

Comment by skydhash 2 hours ago

Isn’t it something like $10/yr or something?

Comment by illegalbyte2 2 hours ago

Yep. Worth every cent. The Apple TV experience of Infuse is night and day with Plex. I used to constantly struggle with Plex buffering and crashing on my local network with the Apple TV app. Infuse just points to a file share on my NAS and streams beautifully, even at larger 4K files.

I used Plex for years. I’d never go back from Infuse now, and I’m happy to pay that subscription to support its excellent development.

Comment by Gareth321 2 hours ago

It's not as bad as I thought/misremembered. $23/year here in Denmark, and $140/lifetime.

Comment by tomaskafka 1 hour ago

... and is awesome even without Jellyfin - I have it installed on all devices including Apple TV, connected to family NAS through webdav.

Comment by felixmc 1 hour ago

I use port forwarding on my home router to open up jellyfin to outside access. it's not as pretty, but it works.

Comment by sfwf 1 hour ago

[dead]

Comment by fl0id 57 minutes ago

tailscale + cloudflare for lets encrypt support. can then give family tailscale access

Comment by penetrarthur 45 minutes ago

Has cloudfare become any more strict with passing large amounts of video data through them? I heard they were kind of against it, but haven't enforced anything.

Comment by LollipopYakuza 42 minutes ago

One does not need cloudflare for letsencrypt. The tooling has become really simple to use.

Comment by leokennis 6 hours ago

Both for simplicity and portability, I am a very happy user of https://firecore.com/infuse.

I guess it's less full featured as Plex or Jellyfin (it still more than covers the bases for video: format support, different video/audio/subtitle tracks, tv series recognition, skip intros, Trakt.tv etc.); but then again all it requires is any online storage, and the Infuse app (either on iDevice or AppleTV).

Comment by vulkoingim 6 hours ago

Yeaah, second that! I use it on the AppleTV and across the rest of my devices! Works like a charm, and coupled with Tailscale I can access everything on my Nas everywhere :) I have it configured to use Jellyfin as the source, runing on said nas

Comment by s_dev 2 hours ago

You should try this: https://neptuneplayer.com/

Comment by zeagle 1 hour ago

Does it do bitstream DTS and DV on Apple TV? If so maybe I’ll have to try. Also am I going old or is the whole join our discord to see what it’s about/download is the new norm on the web? My click through rate on that is about 0.

Comment by ulimn 33 minutes ago

Oh my, this immediately looks so much better UX-wise than Swiftfin!

Comment by firecall 11 hours ago

Feels like only a matter of time with Plex doesn't it!

I've got the lifetime pass, but it really does feel like a Sword of Damocles situation...

Comment by jmuguy 17 minutes ago

Its hard to tell if the folks at Plex understand the position they're in. They definitely are dancing right up to the line of pushing people too far. I could see them trying to boil the frog with stuff like putting their garbage free streaming stuff front and center more. Like so there won't be one specific thing they do that makes everyone realize its time to leave.

I think one silver lining is that whenever it does reach a tipping point there's going to be a ton of support for projects like Jellyfin, so hopefully we see more feature parity - in particular for shared access for friends and family.

Comment by heed 3 hours ago

they'll eventually come out with a completely new overhauled version of plex that's sub only but your lifetime pass will still be good for "plex classic" which they'll stop supporting

Comment by therealpygon 49 minutes ago

Or if like PlayOn, they’ll simply replace your legacy lifetime license software with their new version that no longer does the core functionality that has to be kept up to date — recording different providers — without upgrading to their new extra-special monthly cloud licensing that replaces your “lifetime” license you bought to support their fledgling business. One thing is almost certain, any software claimed to be “Lifetime” will become a lie if given time and one should assume “lifetime” in software almost never means more than 5-10 years before a new executive has a bright idea to generate more revenue.

Comment by schrectacular 2 hours ago

Or just end the lifetime tier and make people pay like fastmail did. If even the HN beloved fastmail would do it I pretty much expect it from everyone.

Comment by awakeasleep 47 minutes ago

I think this already happened. They increased Plex lifetime to 750 bucks. That’s effectively an end.

Comment by doctoboggan 11 hours ago

Yes it really does, and I intend to switch eventually but from what I heard the last time I looked into it, the end user clients are a big area where plex still beats Jellyfin. Since that’s where my non technical friends and family mostly interact with the system, it’s the area I need to be the most polished and hands off.

Comment by c0nsumer 11 hours ago

Yes, this is the big one for me. Seemingly unlike a lot of folks, Plex is my main music server. Years ago I ripped all my CDs (1800+, IIRC) and Plex + Plexamp is really, really, really good for listening. I haven't yet found anything else that works as well.

I use Plexamp on desktop/laptop computers and then the Android and iOS apps for on-the-go music. I tried Symfonium [1] because it seemed promising and would give me a Jellyfin path, but it was weird and kinda buggy and ate my phone's battery.

I'm hopeful there'll be a good replacement available eventually, but for now, I just have to stick with Plex.

[1] https://www.symfonium.app/

Comment by algyt 7 hours ago

I use (and contribute to) Finamp the Jellyfin PlexAmp alternative and it's just done a 1.0.0 release which brings it up to parity with PlexAmp for me. I've previously been a long time PlexAmp user but FinAmp now does everything I want it to.

Comment by aembleton 3 hours ago

That 1.0.0, and 1.0.1 is in Beta. Is that ready to be moved into stable? Or am I looking at the wrong project? https://github.com/finamp-app/finamp/releases#release-1.0.1-...

Comment by c0nsumer 3 hours ago

This is promising. Thanks! I'll check it out. I hope it gets the major features and works well.

Comment by jamie_ca 9 hours ago

Yeah PlexAmp is amazing. Feels like it's the only music client around these days that has a functional "shuffle by album" option, instead of treating my library as only a collection of individual songs.

Comment by Marsymars 7 hours ago

> Feels like it's the only music client around these days that has a functional "shuffle by album" option

foobar2000 has this!

After trying dozens of music clients (including PlexAmp) I eventually settled on simply using foobar2000 pointed to an smb share - nothing else seems capable of properly handling playback by folder structure. (e.g. I've got all my Led Zeppelin albums in the "Led Zeppelin" folder, and I want to just select it and play their discography in album release order.)

Comment by 4 hours ago

Comment by rpearl 8 hours ago

Lyrion (fka Logitech Media Server ) does album shuffle

Comment by firecall 8 hours ago

Another up-vote from me for Plexamp.

I find the mainstream subscription players to be excruciating to use to play what I want at the time.

Comment by tyre 9 hours ago

woahhh this exists? I have an Apple Music playlist called Sunday Albums and have always wanted exactly this.

Comment by devindotcom 10 hours ago

yeah I'm in a boat of similar shape. plex and plexamp is very simple and plug and play - it handles the IP stuff for remote play, which is the tough part for me.

I don't mind lacking features in the server or the client honestly, if I can find and play an album or playlist I'm good. But the connectivity piece can be hard if you're not familiar with self host stuff. I tried to do Jellyfin and Tailscale and some client and it... kind of worked? But it was definitely not as seamless.

I do hope every year that it's my last year paying for Plex. Maybe this year!

Comment by c0nsumer 3 hours ago

I'm fortunate that somehow I ended up with a lifetime PlexPass for... I want to say like $50 a bunch of years back?

Because yes, the remote stuff -- and PlexAmp just working the same wherever I am -- is the huge part of it. Music sits on my NAS and things... just work.

I also really like how easy the caching and offline mode is, because I frequently find myself driving in areas without mobile data service. I keep a couple favorite albums downloaded to my phone, then knowing the app will cache the next ~2 albums of queued tracks generally makes it Just Work.

Comment by BLKNSLVR 11 hours ago

Jellyfin's Android clients seem to be fine. Android TV and smartphone at least. Have been fine for at least five years.

Can't speak to other platforms though.

Comment by egeozcan 10 hours ago

This gave me an idea, what if I let an agent make a proxy for Jellyfin to act like Plex? Best of both worlds!

Maybe worth a try.

Comment by andermic 10 hours ago

I’m interested in helping with this. Let me know if you start a repo. I was considering the same approach, though I’m not sure how feasible it is.

Comment by benoau 9 hours ago

I don’t think it’ll work because Plex gates everything with a sign in to their online accounts, so auth would have to go through them and there might be server-to-Plex verification going on too.

That said, I’m very interested in this space - I’ve been building a music server that provides compatible APIs for Synology and QNAP mobile apps, with a few more on my todo list. I’d love to include Plexamp so if it is possible please let me know!

Comment by bigstrat2003 7 hours ago

> I don’t think it’ll work because Plex gates everything with a sign in to their online accounts...

That isn't true. You can configure the server with which subnets are trusted, and do not require auth.

Comment by Hard_Space 5 hours ago

I would be interested to hear from anyone who set it and can still access Plex over their LAN in a network outage. I have set this multiple times according to docs, and it worked only once ever, thereafter apparently resetting to online login. Of course, they do not make this an easy setting to change!

Comment by jaffa2 2 hours ago

You need plex pass to do this now. They changed it recently you didnt used to need it.

Comment by al_borland 9 hours ago

Performance was also a big issue for me the last time I tried running Jellyfin on the same hardware as my Plex server. I’m happy to see that has been their focus.

Comment by mzi 9 hours ago

I have a lifetime pass as well, but switched to Jellyfin years ago.

Comment by madeofpalk 5 hours ago

Maybe I'm naive, but I feel like if Plex was going to do anything to existing lifetime subscriptions, they would have done it by now. I think we're fine for now.

Comment by senectus1 9 hours ago

really is just the normies access to it via samsung and LG TV's that hold me back.

Comment by notrealyme123 8 hours ago

I am currently on vacation and used jellyfin via the browser on all the smart TV. And it just works great. I didn't expect it to work this good.

Comment by mrmlz 2 hours ago

Newer TiZEN models has a jellyfin app now in the appstore!

Comment by ThomasBb 9 hours ago

There is a nice Jellyfin app for LG now

Comment by prophesi 7 hours ago

Lifetime pass user long before the ridiculous price hikes for it and the direction for the service going down a path I didn't want to support. You can run Plex and Jellyfin on the same server concurrently pointing to the same media files. My Plex server was still running until I was able to transfer everything over and their mobile app ecosystem got up to parity.

Comment by internet101010 7 hours ago

If there is one thing that needs to be re-written and consolidated it is the arrs ecosystem. Replacing/consolidating the arrs themselves is pretty straightforward. The trap that quickly becomes a token incinerator is incorporating the downloader into the library manager itself. A lot of learned lessons in that sabnzbd codebase.

Comment by davidwritesbugs 5 hours ago

As someone with coding projects in the is area would you care to elaborate on "a lot of learned lessons"?

Comment by SSLy 4 hours ago

sabnzbd is basically packaged decades of domain specific knowledge about deobfuscating media files

Comment by Gareth321 3 hours ago

> As an aside, I recently started having Claude help me with configuring my arr stack and it has helped tremendously.

LLMs have been AMAZING for home server maintenance and improvements. I have completed SO many of my "some day" tasks. I never have to read another fucking log file ever again. It has taken all of the friction out of the hobby. It's all* fun now.

Comment by joshstrange 2 hours ago

I’ve set up literally hundreds of different self-hosted applications over the years on my homelab. I’ve configured the reverse proxy by hand, setup the docker containers, etc.

Now I can just tell Claude “Setup XYZ app on my server” and it does it all and leaves a note in my Obsidian vault documenting the service (setup instructions, backups, hostname, etc).

Trying out new things has never been easier now that the effort is near-0 to kick the tires.

Comment by darknavi 11 hours ago

> As an aside, I recently started having Claude help me with configuring my *arr stack and it has helped tremendously. I used to have to babysit and manually intervene on maybe 10% of requests, now it’s near zero

Any more details here? I hit this a lot and it's not too much work, but still pretty annoying.

Comment by doctoboggan 11 hours ago

Step one is to just let Claude have ssh access to the machine you run plex from and let him do a full sweep. I had some conflicting profile rules and was not properly blocking malware and not properly marking failures so they were never retried. This fixed a big portion of the manual work needed, but the usenet account is really what got me to nearly 100% hands off. I think I am paying $3/month for the next fifteen months, and apparently if I pay attention during Black Friday there will be some pretty cheap deals. For more months of access at even less

EDIT: Claude was also able to look at my logs and noticed that nearly all of the exe or other malware was coming from 2 trackers so we just eliminated those.

Comment by Gareth321 3 hours ago

I second your Usenet recommendation. I also have the $3 deal which just rolls over each year.

Comment by tired_star_nrg 10 hours ago

Where could someone learn more about the usenet account method?

Comment by doctoboggan 10 hours ago

Claude will be able to help you with everything you need. If you don't have Claude code then the various self hosted subreddits are a good starting point. I had Claude do a sweep of the recent reddit posts to capture the current most recommended usenet accounts, he gave me two links, told me to sign up and paste in the API keys and he took it from there.

Comment by Hikikomori 6 hours ago

How long before they block this kind of work with ai.

Comment by Gareth321 3 hours ago

They're already banning certain questions and workflows in the frontier models, but you can usually work around it with well structured queries. The ablated ("cracked") local LLMs will do whatever you want.

Comment by davidwritesbugs 5 hours ago

I already had DeepSeek tell me "I cant help you with torrents or other copyright infringing uses".

Comment by weiran 5 hours ago

You can get around the checks with careful prompting. You’re just interested and want to learn more about it.

Comment by davidwritesbugs 3 hours ago

All I did was create a wrapper script to pipe to the torrent client, then "pipe these torrent files to the script" - so easy to circumvent you wonder why they bother

Comment by SSLy 4 hours ago

weird, when I ran ds4flash it didn't complain about it at all.

Comment by gotbeans 8 hours ago

I have had claude do the same, plus reorder nfs mounts, share templates, and do some init-container magic to start vpn/gluetun with port-forwarding, all in a k8s cluster. It's become so easy to manage and debug.

Comment by devindotcom 10 hours ago

unrelated to your otherwise helpful comment, I just wanted to note that it is "demur" (i.e. hesitate or object) you want in this case; "demure" is an adjective meaning shy or modest.

Comment by doctoboggan 10 hours ago

Thanks, fixed

Comment by jwr 4 hours ago

I also have a lifetime pass, but I'm becoming increasingly annoyed with Plex. Why do I have to regularly turn off their "recommended" stuff that is just ads for movies I can buy online? Why does it appear and re-appear?

Also, the Plex app for LG TV has been buggy and broken for years: some content will not play at all, some will not play if you ff/rewind, and some will not play until you physically turn your TV off and then on. Very annoying.

I'm glad to see competition.

Comment by bombcar 10 hours ago

Claude and jellyfin and HASS is great. Now my phone has a “door lock” which turns off the kids user’s access, but lets the current playing finish. And another “door lock” unlocks playing for ten minutes.

Comment by y-curious 3 hours ago

What do you mean by door lock, where does the code show up?

Comment by dgrin91 11 hours ago

What are you using for audiobook requests? I also recently setup arr stack, but I saw readarr is depreciated and there doesn't seem to be a clear successor.

Comment by doctoboggan 10 hours ago

After reading a lot of reddit threads I settled on ReadMeABook[0] and it has been working great so far. One pretty cool feature is that it lets you connect an LLM API key and then you can have it make requests based on your library. I now have Fable 5.1 suggesting my next book.

[0]: https://github.com/kikootwo/readmeabook

Comment by y-curious 3 hours ago

Hello Mantis. Question: what do you do with the books? Is there kindle integration somehow?

Comment by SkepticMystic 8 hours ago

Chaptarr is great! Just had their public release after a long alpha testing phase

Comment by kombine 8 hours ago

Could you share a link to source code/repo? I couldn't find it

Comment by oriettaxx 7 hours ago

https://github.com/Chaptarr/chaptarr maybe?

Comment by Xerox9213 10 hours ago

It’s been a while since I used it but lazylibrarian has worked for me in the past.

I tried shelfarr as well with some success a while back, but haven’t needed any new books lately since I’m busy catching up on the books I’ve downloaded (the Bible is long lol).

Comment by davkan 9 hours ago

If you don’t want to commit to one of the vibecoded no community arr clones for books then i recommend shelfmark. Lightweight grabber, easy to start with, easy to rip out later.

Comment by BLKNSLVR 11 hours ago

I just like the confirmation that AI is happy to be a Boatswain.

Comment by post-it 9 hours ago

Claude is perfectly happy to do it and gives great suggestions. I can't imagine it will last, I did run into one situation where I wanted to archive all the media on a subscription site before my subscription expired, and it refused. But splitting it into one session to collect all URLs and a second session to plug them into yt-dlp with the right arguments worked just fine.

Comment by jshier 9 hours ago

Also a lifetime pass Plex user, I'll leave as soon as someone has a good solution for identifying raw Bluray rips automatically. Why do I have to manually name the episodes? We had CDDB last century, why isn't there an equivalent for raw video rips? The ripped data should be identical, a simple hash should uniquely identify it.

Comment by 0points 8 hours ago

Are you describing a plex feature? I was under the impression they required the media to follow certain naming conventions. [1]

Maybe mkv-renamer is of use to you? [2]

1: https://support.plex.tv/articles/naming-and-organizing-your-...

2: https://github.com/ssanj/mkv-renamer

Comment by jshier 6 hours ago

I'm describing a hypothetical feature that I want. Essentially an automatic version of mkv-renamer that can identify series, episodes, and special content based on the signature of the ripped files. For whatever reason, such a service doesn't even exist.

Comment by IAmBroom 25 minutes ago

Does Filebot not do this for you? A quick glance suggests it does, but I'm not overly concerned with its decision-making; name matches are close enough.

Comment by bigstrat2003 11 hours ago

I (also a lifetime Plex Pass user) decided to try it out ~6 months ago, and I've switched over. I haven't had any gaps in functionality yet, though YMMV of course. While it isn't better than Plex (which is still fine for now), it isn't worse either, and I trust the Jellyfin devs a lot more than the Plex devs at this point.

Comment by VladVladikoff 11 hours ago

I switched to jellyfin about 6 months ago and I can say it is definitely worse. I’m constantly fighting to fix thumbnails, fix episodes to be in the same show, force rescans to get it to even recognize a show that already exists. I never had any of these problems with plex. Plex also defaults to transcoding which fixes a lot of gaps with clients that don’t support certain codecs. I’m often running into issues where infuse can’t play DTS so I need to reencode before I can play the movies.

Also in the process of ditching plex I switched to audiobookshelf for my audiobooks and I have to say it’s also crap. It’s constantly refusing to start playing, or pausing for a really long time before playing.

All that being said I’m not switching back. It’s been a pain but it was worth it.

Comment by xbmcuser 9 hours ago

The default recommended folder naming settings are different for jellyfin from plex if I recall correctly. Personally I just let the arr app download metadata and let jellyfin scan local nfo files only for metadata so have not had a problem for a long time.

Comment by potatoicecoffee 8 hours ago

I moved from plex to jellyfin and got 10% of the way through organising the films the jellyfin style and then just moved the rest of the video files into a folder called 'ok' and it worked fine. try the lazy way first and see how it goes

Comment by bigstrat2003 7 hours ago

I don't recall the folder names being different, but by default Jellyfin uses different metadata providers than Plex. That means that things like numbering of specials (think BSG and the webisodes), or shows which have a different aired vs DVD order (i.e. Futurama) might differ between the two. For those, you have to either tweak your episode numbers or just tell Jellyfin to use the metadata provider Plex does (which is what I did for those edge cases).

Comment by Marsymars 7 hours ago

> Plex also defaults to transcoding which fixes a lot of gaps with clients that don’t support certain codecs.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but as far as I can tell, Plex defaults to direct play enabled, and will direct play unless it's not supported by client. (Or other constraints, like limited bandwidth settings, etc.)

Comment by sandcat_ 10 hours ago

That's fair. It got most of my stuff without issues, but there were a fair few I needed to fix.

However, compared to Plex, I've found the remote experience (through Tailscale) to be a lot easier and better performing than the Plex equivalent for me personally. I never have any issues connecting externally now, whereas I did all the time with Plex. Maybe I just needed to get Plex running over Tailscale but it seemed to fight that a bit.

Comment by Hikikomori 6 hours ago

Don't have any of those library issues, something wrong in your setup? My tv also doesn't support DTS, but don't have to do any manual work, jellyfin should do it on the fly for you.

Comment by bigstrat2003 10 hours ago

Fair enough, but I honestly have not had a single issue with Jellyfin. It really has been on par with Plex for me.

Comment by abenga 5 hours ago

My only beef with Jellyfind when I used it some time back was inability to resize subtitles, which were huge on a large TV. Could have been lack of knowledge on my part though.

Comment by RajT88 11 hours ago

I must be old school. I never got on board with Plex, because my "lifetime" licenses for PlayOn, TVersity and Twonky all ended up completely useless. Yes, those licenses still work, but you can't get the latest versions which provide support for the latest codecs, features, etc. There's a cutoff on the versions that "lifetime" license allows you to upgrade to, and some of those licenses were not that cheap at the time.

So of course, Plex is going to engage in the fuckery that they are. JellyFin on the other hand, for the amount it costs is surprisingly low on janky behavior.

Comment by BeetleB 11 hours ago

Yes, eventually, all of them will end up this way. But the attitude lacks nuance. I paid $120 for Plex 8 years ago, and if it becomes utter crap tomorrow, it's been totally worth it.

Don't think of any such thing as "lifetime". Just ask: "For the amount they are charging me, how long does it need to last for it to have been worth my money?" With the price I paid, one year would have been enough.

Comment by villish 11 hours ago

I like them both, but I can never give up plexamp. I’ve tried navidrome and various jellyfin clients but I keep going back.

Comment by bigstrat2003 9 hours ago

For music, I use Navidrome + Symfonium. Not quite as smooth as Plexamp was (and there's nothing on par with Symfonium on desktop), but I disliked having my music and video commingled so it's been worthwhile for me.

Comment by ggm 8 hours ago

Thank you for starting this thread. Another lifetime plex pass user, interested in my choices. For now, I am happy on plex/plexamp. Good to know what jellyfin is at.

Comment by bitexploder 10 hours ago

For what it’s worth, I am very happy with Jellyfin and the *arr suite. It took a bit of agent prodding to get them all playing nicely together and bypassing Cloudflare CAPTCHAs. However, it's pretty sweet when you get it all working.

Comment by scubbo 9 hours ago

> bypassing Cloudflare CAPTCHAs

Can you say more about this? I've never encountered this problem in nearly a decade of running the same stack.

Comment by alacritas0 9 hours ago

With the *arr stack, some of the trackers it uses to search for a torrent will present a captcha when Prowlerr queries it for a search. If you integrate FlareSolverr and set up Prowlerr to submit queries through it for the trackers that have CAPTCHAs, it won't get blocked by them.

Comment by bitexploder 7 hours ago

Yep. It really isn’t nefarious or abusive. I keep mine slowed down to not scan often to be considerate. Even private trackers can require it now.

Comment by colechristensen 5 hours ago

huh, yeah I should start an xbmc fork/reimagining. the limitations with the tools of the day are imagination. a LOT of the software I use these days are things I facilitated the creation of and a media player is definitely supposed to be on that list

Comment by bhaney 11 hours ago

Upgrade experiences, anyone?

I have a ~40TB library and was still on 10.10.7 because of all the performance issues with 10.11. Upgraded straight to 12.0 and was impressed with how quick and painless it was! As the upgrade instructions warn about, some of my titles disappeared until a rescan added them back, but that was the only weirdness. The whole initial migration only took a few minutes.

Comment by s_dev 5 hours ago

Went from 10.11 to 12.0 and had zero issues. Scaleway/Ubuntu/Docker env with 8GB RAM.

Well one small niggle, I had a custom script setup on Caddy that overrides how certain buckets are sorted because my users are too lazy to follow my instructions. They changed the BucketID string in some way but this more to do with me having a custom script dependant on something they don't guarantee.

Hopefully they allow admins to change a users preferences in the future but currently it has to be done at the user level. I'm sure that will be in a future update.

Comment by dust-jacket 3 hours ago

if you're running on scaleway, can I ask what you're doing for media storage? scaleway block storage?

Comment by s_dev 3 hours ago

Scaleway Object Storage + rclone. Airbus is switching from AWS to Scaleway and has begun their migration. So they are enterprise grade but seem to have the ease of use of Digital Ocean which I migrated from last year. I get a bit overwhelmed by AWS sometimes in work so it's nice to use a simpler product for my personal setup.

Comment by sippeangelo 6 hours ago

I wrongly assumed I was below version 10.10.7 and tried to "upgrade" to it first as the migration guide said, but this completely blew up and the db migrations failed. I then tried to skip straight to 12 and that also crashed on startup during db migrations, so I just nuked the whole Jellyfin config and started from scratch.

Bit unfortunate how this can even happen, but it's on me for not checking or taking a backup first. The config/db really contain anything important anyways, other than "watched" markers that are already out of sync for me across Emby/Jellyfin/Plex.

Comment by Mashimo 1 hour ago

So on what version where you?

Comment by suprjami 4 hours ago

Updated the rootless podman container and restarted, worked fine.

Comment by amiga386 10 hours ago

Same here, though my migration took about 10 minutes, and the rescan took about 30 minutes. It also had a few minutes of generating trickplay images, though it must have just been filling in gaps, because generating trickplay images for a large library takes days.

Comment by Hikikomori 6 hours ago

Just pulled latest container and it just worked as far as I can tell.

Comment by noisy_boy 11 hours ago

Subtitles are the Achilles heel of Jellyfin (at least the Android client sending the stream to Chromecast stick connected to the TV). I can see the subtitle present but it doesn't show on the movie. Ok, I will just add manually - can't, progress indicator loops forever. Ok, I will remove the existing subtitles and add - removal succeeds - addition fails. This is the same fiddling everytime. If it works, it is a miracle. I used to forget about the subtitles and start the movie - you could just fix it on the fly right?! Nope, now I do full prep before calling everyone that the movie is good to go.

This is not coming from a bad place - I am very appreciative of having a open source alternative to Plex. Just putting this out there in case it catches someone's interest to improve it.

Comment by drdexebtjl 10 hours ago

I had this problem, but I fixed it by setting it up so it extracts all embedded subtitles into SRT files, and enabled a setting prevents Jellyfin from serving embedded subtitles.

From what I remember, some clients don't support streaming subtitles, so they must download them completely in advance, when the movie starts, before they start appearing. If you pick embedded subtitles with these clients, Jellyfin must extract the subtitles files immediately, and this takes a while depending on container format, file sizes and server load. External subtitles are faster.

Comment by Retr0id 9 hours ago

Could you elaborate on how you set it up to extract the embedded subtitles?

Comment by embedding-shape 4 hours ago

I think you don't want to do the "extract embedded subtitles" method, it's slow as hell and downloading external subtitles is much faster than the built-in extract, at least for HDR+4K mkv video which is what we end up with the most. Can take up to a minute for a 40 minute episode to extract the subtitles, which means you'll need to pause for a minute before you can watch with subtitles, with a 5950X CPU.

Comment by drdexebtjl 1 hour ago

> which means you'll need to pause for a minute before you can watch with subtitles

The entire point is that it will extract the embedded subtitles ahead of time (when the media is added to the library) so Jellyfin doesn’t have to do it when you want to watch it.

Comment by embedding-shape 1 hour ago

Oh, I thought we were talking about Jellyfin's "extract subtitles on the fly when playing", which I think is how it works by default, which is what I described before.

If it's a async process that runs on import/update of the library, that sounds great. I'm guessing we're/you're talking about Bazarr then? Although I don't see it explicitly mentioned in this thread earlier. Or some other application?

Comment by drdexebtjl 33 minutes ago

There's an official plug-in called "Subtitle Extract" that does it in advance, no need for Bazarr :)

You can use this and then block embedded subtitles on a per-library basis, which is what I vaguely described a couple of posts up.

Comment by drdexebtjl 8 hours ago

There's an official plug-in in Jellyfin called "Subtitle Extract" that does it automatically for you.

I personally use Bazarr instead, because I also want to download subtitles for different languages. In Bazarr, Embedded Subtitles is just another subtitle provider that can fetch subtitles depending on your rules.

Comment by thaumasiotes 9 hours ago

> If you pick embedded subtitles with these clients, Jellyfin must extract the subtitles files immediately, and this takes a while depending on container format, file sizes and server load.

Really? How?

My expectation would be that extracting a subtitle file takes a few seconds at most. If you had to do it on the fly every time you watched anything in your library, it wouldn't matter.

Comment by drdexebtjl 9 hours ago

I don't undestand how movie containers work, but I ran this on a 70 GB movie file to test:

    ffmpeg -i input.mkv -map 0:s:0 /tmp/subtitles.srt

The movie is 2 hours long, and the expected time to complete is 21 minutes. It seems like it's reading the entire file. This is on an average SATA SSD that is also being read/written to by the torrent client in the background.

Comment by thunderfork 8 hours ago

IIRC, in many containers embedded subtitles will be interleaved with the video and audio atoms/boxes/packets/etc., and so pulling out the subtitles requires scanning the full file. Not quite as expensive as decoding or re-encoding, but still as slow as "stream the full file into memory and demux the streams"

Comment by tyffanypastecf 6 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by axionbraid 8 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by s1n_ 8 hours ago

Do you use bazarr? That’s been the final fix for me with subtitles

Comment by aidenn0 10 hours ago

FWIW, Moonfin and Infuse both work flawlessly on an AppleTV.

I also remember Google TV working fine, but it seemed like ads got added to another part of the UI every month so I got sick of it.

Roku only supports text subtitles, so if you have picture subtitles (like a DVD or bluray), then you'll need to burn them in if you want to play on Roku.

Comment by patrickk 6 hours ago

The default jellyfin client works great also on my NVIDIA shield.

Young children and non technical adults can use it as easily as any streaming app. I guess you can tweak and theme it endlessly to look like your favourite streaming app but I haven’t felt the need to so far.

Self-hosting always involves a bit of jankiness, if you can’t handle that then back to overpriced subscriptions and spyware you go.

Comment by drewg123 39 minutes ago

Skip forward / back is so janky and annoying. Eg, left or right on the remote wheel moves the timeline, but doesn't change the play position until you press the center button. I wish there was an option to skip immediately.

Comment by Cyph0n 10 hours ago

SenPlayer is also very good on ATV.

Comment by trog 11 hours ago

Is that an old problem, or a problem that is still in this new v12?

Comment by amiga386 11 hours ago

I had to go back from 10.11.x to 10.10.7 because the performance was bad, but I'm very confident they've fixed all the performance problems with this 12.0 release.

I'm also confident they've found most of the bugs and have produced something you can just upgrade to, given they've had 7 release candidates over the past few months:

   12.0 RC1 - Jun 22
   12.0 RC2 - Jun 28
   12.0 RC3 - Jul 22
   12.0 RC4 - Aug 02
   12.0 RC5 - Aug 11
   12.0 RC6 - Aug 26
   12.0 RC7 - Sep 01
   12.0     - Sep 08

Overall it looks like a lot of solid testing has gone into this, I shouldn't have to go back to 10.10 again.

UPDATE: Upgraded to 12.0, performance is great, better than 10.10 and 10.11, including in third party apps! No problems with the migration.

Comment by ddmf 1 hour ago

I'm using Wholphin as a client which should just work with v12 but I've not had time to update yet.

I've only really been using jellyfin for a month or two but it's much more user friendly than the xbmc/kodi setup I was using, and the pause/resume between devices is fantastic. I'm totally converted.

Comment by NoGravitas 51 minutes ago

Interesting! I have been using the Jellyfin addon for Kodi as my main client, but it would be interesting to try Android TV again on the same device, since I 90% only use it for things on Jellyfin. How is the music player on it?

Comment by hi_hi 8 hours ago

I love jellyfin, been using it for years now, alongside the *ARR stack.

My young daughter recently started getting into audio books, so I installed Listenarr alongside a vibe coded mcp server [0] which I have running with all the other arr service mcp connections.

This allows the family to easily download and manage their media (err…Linux distributions) via Onyx AI, which I also have running with everything else on local box running microK8s, all on a relatively puny Geekom minipc with 16Gb

This whole setup is pretty straightforward to manage with Claude which has no issues working with K8s.

For those interested in the listenarr audiobook mcp: [0] https://github.com/leachuk/listenarr-mcp/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

Comment by rcarmo 7 hours ago

I have a trifling complaint about this, which is that it smacks of LLM aid throughout, especially in headings. I wish people would aggressively filter for these things--I have a technical writing SKILL.md that tries to remove all the AI tropes it finds and use simplified technical English (it's a thing, look it up) to do docs, and that makes one heck of a difference...

Comment by ZeWaka 7 hours ago

link: https://github.com/rcarmo/piclaw/blob/main/skel/.pi/skills/t...

Comment by davidwritesbugs 5 hours ago

this skill may help: https://github.com/blader/humanizer

Comment by someothherguyy 10 minutes ago

a skill that looks mostly written with a llm to make a llm produce more human sounding language?

https://github.com/blader/humanizer/issues/252 -- looks useful for cheating

https://github.com/blader/humanizer/commit/9862685f575c65a82...

hmm? is the readme not written by a llm?

Comment by tym0 5 hours ago

As other have said the apps for devices is still the issue with Jellyfin.

For TV you pretty much have to use Kodi and all the decent theme require a surprising amount of other plug-ins to work...

Anyone know of a decent theme for Kodi that won't fall over next time it updates? I just need "Resume Watching", "Newly Added" and alphabetical lists.

Comment by l3000 5 hours ago

Moonfin?

Comment by tym0 1 hour ago

That looks nice but no Xbox support.

Comment by iAMkenough 48 minutes ago

Swiftfin and InFuse are great for Apple TV. Yet another reason to use a streaming box.

Comment by zhivota 11 hours ago

Jellyfin works great for me. My only gripe is logging around library scanning being pretty difficult to interpret. I'd love to add a dedicated scanner log that focuses only on logs relating to scanning, which for me tends to be the trouble spot in these systems.

That said I very rarely would even need it, the last time I thought I did was when I had my under configured to not see R rated movies because of my kids, the logs were not clear that the movie was ever scanned so it was hard to realize.

Comment by she46BiOmUerPVj 2 hours ago

They don't mention it so I don't think it was changed, but I am really looking forward to multiple libraries actually separating the contents.

This <https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/17215> is an example bug; there were others but I can't find them at the moment.

Comment by sbinnee 45 minutes ago

My raspberry pi 4 struggles every time I scan the library. I hope that this release helps.

Comment by andai 1 hour ago

So what I'm getting from the thread, this is Plex, minus the cancer, but also minus the features?

Comment by Mashimo 1 hour ago

I think the biggest downsites for most people are the clients. Plex has still better client support on most TVs and mobile devices.

And then maybe watch offline support.

Comment by dev0p 48 minutes ago

What features is it missing, exactly?

Comment by iAMkenough 52 minutes ago

Open Source Plex that anyone can write a client for. I’m not missing any features after switching.

Comment by crazybonkersai 3 hours ago

Coming from Plex, I gave Jellyfin a try, but returned back to Plex after several months. My biggest gripes were poor subtitle support and inability to differintiate TV shows from movies stored in the same folder. Does this version improve these issues?

Comment by JoeBOFH 3 hours ago

Can I ask why you have TV shows in the same folder? I have a /video folder and under that /tv /movies /kidsmovies /kidstv. Just kinda curious.

Comment by OroPla 29 minutes ago

Plenty of shows continue in a movie, like Firefly (2002) -> Serenity (2005), so I can see why you'd want to mix.

Comment by JoeBOFH 20 minutes ago

I get it’s a personal thing but yeah I’d still separate them. Tv != Movie.

Comment by NoGravitas 49 minutes ago

They probably had it set up that way for Plex, and didn't read the documentation about how Jellyfin needs its libraries organized.

Comment by praveer13 10 hours ago

I have a plex pass but moved to jellyfin, because I can't get plex to reliably stream from my server at all. While jellyfin works so smoothly. Look forward to this update!

Comment by OroPla 1 hour ago

I do run a Jellyfin server for family, but I don't use it that much. I just do everything through a terminal, like I do most other stuff. It's faster and less finicky, I feel.

Comment by danparsonson 1 hour ago

How does the terminal replace a networked media player?

Comment by OroPla 11 minutes ago

By using a bunch of CLI tools and self-written scripts.

I don't use streaming (though, mpv can likely handle it). Prefer to have all media I use locally. Don't watch video on my phone, either.

Comment by ThomasBb 9 hours ago

Dow folks migrating frem Plex ; Codex/Sol had no issue transferring played/watched status to my new Jellyfin library.

Comment by anygivnthursday 6 hours ago

Jellyfin has worked great so far for us, I never used Plex or Emby so cant compare. They recently made an official Tizen app too, so dont have to build and sideload anymore, just works.

One of the remaining issues is that the Samsung client remuxes if you select a secondary audio track[0] - apparently fixable by using the AVPlay player instead of the HTML player.

[0]: https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin-tizen/issues/337

Comment by szmarczak 32 minutes ago

Unfortunately doesn't support Vulkan decoding/encoding (ffmpeg 8 does).

Comment by MyelinatedT 4 hours ago

Literally last night I was trying to set up books in Jellyfin and dismayed to see the bookshelf plugin archived with no mention of ongoing support.

Very happy to see it’s been folded into the server!

Comment by stanac 6 hours ago

Not sure if they support multiple OPDS catalogs now.

I am on v10 (using JF for music only) and with book plugin (forgot which one) it didn't offer to split books into multiple catalogs, which was a bit annoying. Maybe I missed it in v11. Solution for me was to vibecode a simplest OPDS server with 0 css and basic auth.

Comment by smoked-egg 4 hours ago

Something I've long wanted is something far more minimal than jellyfin that just browses my library by folder but has a web player that can transcode/remux as needed for the browser. As it stands when I want to watch a film with someone elses computer I give VLC/whatever a link to a webdav URL and it streams from that. It'd just be nice to have it be in the browser.

Comment by ndom91 4 hours ago

Upgrade from 10.11.11 was also successful here - only took 2-3 minutes. Can definitely notice the performance improvement

Comment by warpspin 4 hours ago

How does it compare to current Plex? Are there proper, usable apps for Apple TV and iOS already?

Edit: Anyone is running Jellyfin on Qnap?

Comment by lode 4 hours ago

I recently switched from Plex's pretty terrible native players to Plezy (on iOS, iPadOS and tvOS).

Plezy supports both Plex and Jellyfin as a backend - I'm not sure if there is 100% feature parity.

Comment by warpspin 4 hours ago

Thanks, definitely will try that one.

Comment by ErrorNoBrain 4 hours ago

Not sure if there is for Apple TV

but they have an iOS app for ipad/iphone https://apps.apple.com/us/app/jellyfin-mobile/id1480192618

Comment by porjo 3 hours ago

Swiftfin, Moonfin are two Jellyfin clients for Apple TV.

Comment by getcrunk 8 hours ago

Did they fix that thing where like you can’t have mixed movies and tv in the same folder without it going nuts

Comment by mock-possum 8 hours ago

How would jellyfin be able to tell whether the video files in a directory are movies or tv? What does going nuts actually look like, and what causes it?

Comment by joseda-hg 13 minutes ago

I assume via metadata, classified externally, which is a large part of the selling point of Jellyfin

Comment by sfRattan 4 hours ago

Not OP, but I've run into similar instances of Jellyfin "going nuts."

Mixed media type libraries are depreciated and "broken" according to the documentation[1], which is fair enough, but sometimes this results in weirdness if a TV-show is also part of a franchise and has associated TV-movies (e.g. the Battlestar Galactica reboot, Futurama, or Breaking Bad). If you want to keep those movies on your file system in a folder with the other stuff from the franchise, Jellyfin often can't handle it. And it's not obvious to new users whether these TV-movies belong in a TV-shows library or a movies library.

I've also noticed it cannot handle additional layers of folders (i.e. for Genres) in TV show libraries, but it can handle that layer in movie libraries. Failure mode (the "going nuts") looks like those genre folders recognized as bizarre or obscure television shows, and nothing scanned the next layer down.

I haven't looked into how their scanning algorithms work, but it's definitely frustrating that there's not a button or feature to say: "No, Jellyfin, this is a folder, not a show or movie. Try scanning again on the subtree starting here."

Honestly, any software that either silently/automatically reorganizes a user's files and folders (not Jellyfin, but there are others that do this... even FOSS projects) or demands a specific meta-hierarchy on the file system is frustrating to anyone who deliberately keeps their files and folders well-organized.

[1]: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/mixed-movies-...

Comment by amiga386 1 hour ago

I bit the bullet years ago and just have separate folders for the two, using recommended naming conventions.

I realised it doesn't improve my life, to care about folder structure and naming, so much that I insist on retaining it and hobbling the media browsing frontend. The media browser brings in massively more metadata than I would have personally collected and encoded into the filepath/filename, and makes it nicely hyperlinked and searchable. Screenshots, posters, backdrops, cast, director, ...

You may think differently. In which case, enjoy your UI being a series of nested folders.

What I have for mixed media are Jellyfin's Collections, where I can mix together films, TV series, music, books on any given topic. That's not accounting for TV show "specials" which live with the TV show, if TheTVDB.com honours it thusly.

Comment by chocochunks 2 hours ago

Are you sure? At least with Kodi for specials like Futurama you make a Season 0 with them that the scrapers understand. Seems like Jellyfin understands that too: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/shows

I guess for Theatrical TV show movies like The Simpsons Movie it might be more complicated, but worse case you always create or edit your own NFO files with something like MediaElch and have Jellyfin use those.

I think it's better to have genres in the NFO files and not in the folder structure. A show or movie can easily fall into two or genres which is not going to get captured by a single folder.

Comment by gyomu 11 hours ago

The success of jellyfin in recent years has affected me in one unexpected way: I have a project whose .com domain name starts with jelly* and at some point I started getting so many signups from confused Jellyfin users who thought it was related.

(fortunately it’s a niche thing, so I just closed signups and just give my prospective users a one time invite code)

Comment by maxglute 6 hours ago

What's the situation on intro end ending detection and skipping?

Comment by NoGravitas 46 minutes ago

Intro skipping should work; requires a plugin, may only work with the web client? I have the plugin installed, but it doesn't work with the Jellyfin addon for Kodi. Ending detection works fine; don't remember if it requires a plugin.

Comment by Thev00d00 7 hours ago

Exciting times, they really messed up with 10.11.x shipped half baked DB refactoring

Comment by yunaflox 11 hours ago

Does this introduce basic UX changes, like saying that a media will be permanently lost instead of "will be removed from Jellyfin" which is inaccurate?

Edit: And making it more secure? Just because it is commonly for LAN doesn't mean it can be insecure

Comment by Mashimo 7 hours ago

> like saying that a media will be permanently lost instead of "will be removed from Jellyfin" which is inaccurate?

I don't know if that changed, but I gave jellyfin only read only access to my movies.

Comment by frez1 11 hours ago

i believe the maintainers stance is that jellyfin should not be exposed and it should always be behind a vpn

Comment by iAMkenough 45 minutes ago

Reverse proxy works fine. There’s even a setting in Jellyfin to provide the proxy IP.

Comment by Mashimo 7 hours ago

I doubt that, how would that work? You would need to give all your friends a VPN login into your local network for all of their devices, including TVs.

Comment by mrheosuper 6 hours ago

or your friend can setup VPN on his Router box.

Comment by Mashimo 6 hours ago

But then all of his traffic goes through my internet. Unless he has a special high end router that can only route specific domains.

Comment by mrheosuper 5 hours ago

You dont need high end box, a old mini pc running pfsense/opnsense is enough.

Comment by Mashimo 4 hours ago

High end, as in feature rich.

If you think most non tech people can just casually find an old pc, install and setup pfsense, then you are out of touch with reality. And they also would have to let it run all the time and have space for it. That's just not something realistic. It's not an option for my friends. Might also break chromecast.

Comment by mrheosuper 1 hour ago

Most non tech people just subcribe to netflix/hbo/disney and call it a day.

Comment by Mashimo 56 minutes ago

Correct, most do. Still leaves a significant portion that does not want to sub to multiple streaming services. Be that as it may, I have multiple friends who I share my jellyfin with. Giving them all access to my network is just not an option. It's not.

Comment by alacritas0 9 hours ago

not necessarily always a VPN, but you can also use a reverse proxy like caddy or nginx where encryption and security are primary concerns instead of something non-essential like in jellyfin.

Comment by paddim8 7 hours ago

Their stance is actually that exposing it is fine

Comment by unsnap_biceps 10 hours ago

Frankly at this point, everything that is not explicitly fully public should be...

Comment by yunaflox 10 hours ago

Unfortunately, yeah.

Comment by RajT88 11 hours ago

Including, but not limited to, sending passwords in cleartext on login.

Comment by post-it 9 hours ago

As opposed to what? The password needs to reach the server. Encryption is the job of HTTPS.

Comment by izacus 6 hours ago

... as opposed to using salted hashing like in every tutorial since 1990s.

Comment by jack-cooper 5 hours ago

I think you have some confusion between expectations upon the client and the server. This very site (and almost every other) sends your password in plaintext over form data when you sign in.

Hashing (and/or salting) a password client-side before sending it would offer next to no protection, as if the server is expecting this value and the attacker intercepts it, they could just replay the hashed value themselves. Why would they need to know the original password?

The salt for the password should also have been randomly generated when it was first created, and stored alongside the password in the database. The only way for the client to know this value would be to retrieve it based on username alone, when the request is first made. This would reduce the security of the system and allow a dedicated attacker much more leverage to try and crack that single password, if they knew only the username of the user.

The comment you're replying to is correct, encryption is the job of HTTPS.

Comment by Borealid 27 minutes ago

I don't think this is what the GP meant, but he's accidentally correct in that there is indeed no good reason for a password to reach the server.

The client could do a challenge-response PAKE with the server, proving the client held the password while not transmitting it. The session cookie could be sent from the server as part of that exchange, encrypted so only the holder of the user's password could decrypt it.

That's not how the web works, but it's strictly superior to the accepted standard of the client sending the raw password to the server, and it would be secure even over an active MITM unencrypted link.

Comment by Cider9986 11 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by villish 11 hours ago

This seems like spam in order to get people to sign up to a service with your referral link. It’s literally just a guide on how to create an account.

Comment by Cider9986 11 hours ago

That's not mine. I can remove the link if it makes it look less spammy.. It's not always easy for people to do the setup.

Comment by mvdtnz 9 hours ago

It sounds like a real pain in the ass upgrade, I'm thankful I've put off trying Jellyfin this long.

Comment by Mashimo 7 hours ago

Stop jellyfin, update containers, start container, start library scan?

Just like all the updates before that.

Comment by altano 11 hours ago

I hate people who are demanding of open source projects but... doing performance improvements and adding comic book support before making the product secure enough to expose to the internet is wild prioritization and I don't know what else to say.

Or release native clients that can use OIDC.

Doing neither sucks =[.

Comment by iAMkenough 43 minutes ago

What have you contributed to the project?

Comment by VladVladikoff 11 hours ago

Just use Tailscale. It’s always 1 day away from an 0-day anyway.

Comment by altano 11 hours ago

You can either require mesh vpn or make it easy for friends to access your library. You can't have both.

Comment by VladVladikoff 1 hour ago

Then whitelist their ASN.

Comment by sgc 10 hours ago

I stay purely home network, as I suspect most do. So although I can see your use case, I can also understand why it's not a bigger priority than those other features.

Comment by gloflo 6 hours ago

Sorry, but you are being one of those people there. Open source development lives on intrinsic motivation and community. If those things which you want, aren't things that motivate other to donate their free time to, you can implement them yourself, you can try throwing money at people to do it for you, you can take other unwanted chores from them to free their time, but you really ought not push negativity lime this.

Comment by thesh4d0w 9 hours ago

I've had my instance on the internet for years without issue. (Tailscale is great for me, but not feasible for family)

Comment by 9 hours ago

Comment by nearlyepic 10 hours ago

What about it is insecure with regards to exposing it to the internet?

Comment by amiga386 9 hours ago

There's nothing wrong with exposing it to the internet.

There have been exploits: https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/security

The project is a fork of another project (Emby) and there has always been potential for user-supplied data ending up in command-line arguments, or exploitation of the (admin) user getting to upload various files. Nonetheless, all reported security bugs have been fixed promptly, and they're proactively sweeping through the full set of APIs they inherited, looking for possible exploit paths.

Most exploits required an authenticated user.

If you're concerned about this, you should run Jellyfin's docker image, with read-only mounts of your media library, and only give accounts to people you trust, which is how you should treat your personal media library anyway.

Comment by altano 9 hours ago

https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

A lot of Jellyfin's API doesn't require any authentication at all, as an example.

Comment by gloflo 6 hours ago

> ...

> Is this a massive red-flag security risk that actively exposes your data to the Internet? No.

> At this point, this over-4-year-old issue has gotten posted to HackerNews more than enough times and gotten quite enough unhelpful peanut-gallery comments like those above..

Comment by jaimex2 9 hours ago

I think they are confusing Jellyfin with the crazy exploits in Plex recently.