Trump homeland security chief says ICE agents could be sent to polling places

Posted by throw0101a 1 day ago

Counter28Comment6OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by throw0101a 1 day ago

See perhaps 18 U.S. Code § 592:

> Whoever, being an officer of the Army or Navy, or other person in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, orders, brings, keeps, or has under his authority or control any troops or armed men at any place where a general or special election is held, unless such force be necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; and be disqualified from holding any office of honor, profit, or trust under the United States.

* https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/592

Per DoJ guidance this also means that FBI agents cannot conduct investigations inside polling places on Election Day and deputy U.S. marshals cannot be stationed at open polls because they are armed while on duty:

* https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-J-PURL-gpo145659/...

Comment by someguynamedq 1 day ago

And who defines "unless such force be necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States"?

Comment by latexr 1 day ago

There seems to always be an encoded loophole, eh? Though while marking anyone an “enemy” is subjective to interpretation, “armed” not so much. Unless, of course, you bring a sandwich with you to the polls.

https://www.mediaite.com/crime/footlong-and-fancy-free-d-c-j...

Comment by foolin 1 day ago

Voters had better show up naked which may counteract the attempts to limit the vote to the christian right.

Comment by general1465 21 hours ago

More less irrelevant. How many polling places is there, how many ICE agents do they have?

Comment by Timon3 1 hour ago

According to the NCSL, ~96k polling places vs. 22k+ ICE agents (number steadily increasing).

How could anyone even hope to affect the results by only interfering in >20% of voting locations? Obviously irrelevant.