TiVo to charge money for skipping commercials in your own recordings

Posted by dmitrygr 1 day ago

Counter179Comment107OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by hliyan 1 day ago

I argued this in 2015:

> "...why I believe you will not escape ads by paying for your content: people who can afford to pay for content are people with money, or people with buying power, in other words, the exact same people advertisers look to target. The more buying power you demonstrate, the more advertisers will target you. So the more you pay to keep ads away, the more advertisers will pay to put them back in..."

Comment by like_any_other 1 day ago

The lesson is you can't pay the danegeld to make a problem go away - the only lasting solution is to get the power and sovereignty to do it yourself. Or as Kipling put it - "But Iron – Cold Iron – is master of them all."

Comment by Obscurity4340 21 hours ago

Had to do this recently and buy a wireless HDMI adapter to stream to my own tv. The alternatives all need internet and its just not necessary or reliable and there has to be a reason they all want internet when its technically unnecessary

Comment by HPsquared 1 day ago

Then you have lobbyists, who perform the same function as advertisers. Those with power are the most ad-targeted of all.

Comment by like_any_other 1 day ago

'Power' in this case is hardware and software under your control.

Comment by whateverboat 1 day ago

Power in this case is the political power. There's no other power.

Comment by ang_cire 23 hours ago

Political power grows from the barrel of a torrent client, in this case.

Comment by readthenotes1 18 hours ago

ICYMI, ang_cire is making a reference to

"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun"

--Mao Zedong.

Comment by like_any_other 6 hours ago

Yes there is. It's much easier to enforce laws if everyone's electronics tattle on them, or if they are otherwise sabotaged, as with DRM, than if citizens have tools that answer to and obey only them.

If there were no other power than political, we wouldn't need weapons to fight wars or rebellions.

Comment by tedggh 1 day ago

I wound pay not to have TiVo at all.

Comment by surcap526 22 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by flowrange 1 day ago

Here in France, some Internet+television providers have started implementing a new rule : you can't skip commercials on recorded shows.

It was entirely dictated by TV channels, in order to close the obvious "recording loophole" : instead of watching the show in their VOD app, you could record it, and obviously skip all commercials.

Now you can't anymore. There's even a small dialog when you try that tells you that "Due to a specific demand by <TV Channel>, skipping is a disabled feature."

Comment by 7734128 1 day ago

The correct response should be to actively disregard all IP owned by corporations participating in that behavior.

Comment by rpdillon 21 hours ago

I don't listen to podcasts with ads, but my wife does, and I was in a car ride with her a couple of weeks ago, and she demonstrated something that I hadn't known about even though it's trivial. Her fast forward button skipped forward 30 seconds, and her rewind button skipped back 10 seconds. So it allowed her to skip forward by 30 second increments until she got to content, and then skip back by 10 seconds until she got to the break. I'm sure this is well known by everyone, but it seems to be a generic enough algorithm that France would have trouble banning it. Is it that France is banning the skip commercial functionality or they're literally preventing video players from skipping forward by 30 seconds? Seems draconian if it's the latter, but then again, I was blown away by how La Liga has been the tail wagging the internet dog lately.

Comment by tencentshill 11 hours ago

That is the exact reason spotify only allows 15 second skips both ways.

Comment by thunderfork 19 hours ago

I'm inferring that "banning skipping commercials" is a restriction on the part of the service provider, not on the part of France's legislature

Comment by snapplebobapple 12 hours ago

Call up cable tv provuder and say" due to a specific demand by me, i am cancelling my tv service." Then use the time you would have watched tv to lobby to red&ce copyright back to the original 14 years where it probably belonged.

Comment by xtiansimon 1 day ago

Solution—don’t watch TV

Comment by shellwizard 15 hours ago

Or use tvheadend + comskip

Comment by consp 1 day ago

> Here in France, some Internet+television providers have started implementing a new rule : you can't skip commercials on recorded shows.

Wait until you hear of the extended version of this: Some longer whole day live sports on Dutch RTL (and others, it's catching on) have the option for playback but you have to watch from the start and cannot fast forwards in any way. Want to watch the last match? You need to pay more or play several hours of ad ridden TV first!

They are just m3u8 files so extract that, drop it in VLC and you are fine. But 99.9% of the populance will never be able to do that.

Comment by ThatMedicIsASpy 21 hours ago

HD+ is 17 years old already (German hd broadcast for private channels). One of its features were no skipping commercials in your own recordings.

Comment by thot_experiment 21 hours ago

I don't understand, how is this possibly implemented?

Comment by soco 1 day ago

In Switzerland there's another solution: the streaming providers (Sunrise, Teleboy) insert their own ads if you choose to skip the channel ads. To be fair, Teleboy offers also a more expensive tier without ads at all, but like other commenters said, I reckon that public is gonna be milked more and more.

Comment by tiagod 21 hours ago

In Portugal, the providers were fined for showing ads in recordings and ordered to stop.

Comment by lovich 11 hours ago

I suppose you could walk away to grab a snack or bathroom break during a commercial like in the old days but then I assume we will accelerate our path to drinking the verification can.

Reference for those who don’t know the meme

https://imgur.com/please-drink-verification-can-dgGvgKF

Comment by stasomatic 1 day ago

Sweden

Comment by surcap526 22 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by OroPla 1 day ago

I couldn't imagine engaging with any form of media where the possibility of being exposed to an ad exists. I haven't seen an ad in over 20 years now and I can't go back.

Only watch Blu-rays and when I do Youtube, I do it through yt-dlp. If there are ads, I'm out. I just can't physically handle this assault on my mind. It's too much.

Comment by geye1234 20 hours ago

It's astonishing that people accept advertising as normal and acceptable. It's psychological abuse.

Obviously this doesn't apply to classified ads or their electronic equivalents. But what we normally mean by advertising, where people are paid vast sums of money to think very, very hard about how to manipulate you to hand over money for shit you don't need, is vomit-inducing. Billboards are even worse because they deface and degrade the public landscape, and ugly landscapes can contribute to depression, anxiety, irrational anger, and other problems. They are as bad as littering.

What has made people think this is ok?

Comment by 1 hour ago

Comment by parlortricks 9 hours ago

I think it is the boiling frog experience. It has just slowly happened over time, and sometimes they push too hard and get blow back. So you step it down a notch but keep pushing forward until one day you look back and can't remember a day where there were no ads.

I have ad free household. We treat ads like a poison, like there's a fire. Over the top reaction to shut them down if they creep in. It has taught my own child to avoid ads like the plague (unlike their peers).

I have no idea how people use the Internet with all the ads, no blockers. It is just bonkers, and even at work it is an uphill battle to convince people ad-blockers should be enforced just to protect the business from malicious ads, let alone their own brains.

I want to lobby to have all adverts removed from public transport, but I am unsure how to do that in Australia, but I will work it out.

Comment by driverdan 1 day ago

The SponsorBlock extension does a good job of skipping inline YT ads when watching on the site.

Comment by account42 2 hours ago

I prefer to take it as the video creator confessing that their voice is for sale and not to be trusted and then act accordingly by closing the video and making a mental not never to watch anything from that person again.

Comment by mopsi 23 hours ago

And not only that, but also has settings (configurable per channel) to skip intros/outros, tangents, etc.

It's the superior Youtube experience that, funnily enough, is not available on paid platforms like Apple TV.

Comment by Systemmanic 21 hours ago

This is how I use SponserBlock with YouTube on my Apple TV:

https://github.com/dmunozv04/iSponsorBlockTV

>iSponsorBlockTV is a self-hosted application that connects to your YouTube TV app and automatically skips segments in YouTube videos using the SponsorBlock API.

Comment by david-gpu 1 day ago

I am on the same boat. Product placements on movies and TV series are bad enough.

Comment by BLKNSLVR 1 day ago

So, like, you just have to imagine all the things that could make you unhappy and jealous that you don't have?!?

Comment by someguynamedq 1 day ago

So you don't use any form of social media whatsoever? Ad blocks don't block sponsored content

Comment by Mateon1 1 day ago

Sponsorblock does exactly that (and a bit more). I can't watch youtube without it nowadays. Subscription feed -> yt-dlp -> mpv with sponorblock. If this ever stops working I'm not suffering through ads, I'm ignoring youtube as a platform.

Comment by shellwizard 15 hours ago

You can use yt-dlp with sponsorblock timings directly [0] to get rid of all the sponsorship segments from the final video, no need to use it later via mpv.

[0] https://yt-dlp.net/guides/sponsorblock

Comment by parlortricks 9 hours ago

that is awesome

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by mikeweiss 1 day ago

What about product placements in movies?

Comment by OroPla 21 hours ago

I don't mind as long as it doesn't take me out of the story. It probably helps that I don't recognize most products being placed, as I do not know ads.

Thinking about it... product placements do introduce an interesting dynamic.

TV shows I watched in the past often went out of their way to change brand names, for example Somy instead of Sony, WacDonalds instead of MacDonalds etc.

This is done to avoid copyright infringement, I think.

But on the other side brands pay to be inserted.

Comment by nickthegreek 23 hours ago

my blu-ray’s have ads before the movie starts.

Comment by OroPla 21 hours ago

My Blu-ray rips do not.

Yes, I also couldn't watch a Blu-ray in a normal player. Too many ads.

Comment by account42 2 hours ago

Not to mention user-hostile features like region restrictions or DRM requirements for your TV and display connection that are incompatible with free computing.

Comment by ProllyInfamous 18 hours ago

The most surprising thing here is that Tivo is still a company.

I knew the Tivo employee that coded the GUI button for "play a random recorded episode" (circa 2010). He/Nate left there ~2012, when it seemed to be on its last gasps of relevency.

An unrelated-shoutout to all us "Papered Trees," from waybackwhen... boy did we watch some recorded television, stoned.

Comment by V99 1 day ago

My parents still have a couple, but I think most people's reaction to this is "TiVo still exists?" CableCARDs are going extinct and there are lots of other options to record OTA these days.

Comment by jjav 1 day ago

> "TiVo still exists?"

Certainly that's my reaction that made me click on this. Hard to believe.

Never used TiVo but I ran a MythTV box for a long time, it was really awesome. But it's been ~15+ years or so haven't used it. Can't believe TiVo still exists.

Comment by dspillett 1 day ago

> TiVo still exists?

Not for long. They stopped making hardware a while ago, this feels like the last ditch attempt to find a new business model that works, before it doesn't and what is left of the company is bought and asset stripped (the key remaining asset likely being what data they hold about their customers).

Comment by nottorp 1 day ago

TiVo has already been bought by some patent trolls years ago.

Comment by dspillett 4 hours ago

In that case I'm surprised they still hold on to the rest. I would expect them to hold it for long enough that a quick resale doesn't tank what value they can get, keep the patent portfolio and flog the rest for someone else to strip. Presumably then this is an attempt to push up the monthly income figures temporarily ready for a sale, I doubt a patent troll cares about the long term business now they have the part they are experts on exploiting.

Comment by pjc50 1 day ago

I wonder how long technical protection measures will last in the era when everyone has an AI with a spectacular reverse-engineering capability. See the current MIDI piano thread.

At the very basic level you can have the AI spot when ads are playing and mute them for you. Used to be easily done with loudness and various other in-band signals.

Comment by avaer 1 day ago

They were saying the same thing about DVR's ability to skip those pesky ads, and look where we are.

When the enshittification hits AI, your AI will magically develop the ability to politely refuse such a request.

You could hack together your own solution (like you can today), but most people won't and that's the point.

Comment by HPsquared 1 day ago

This general kind of thing is why diverse (currently Chinese) AI is so important ... and one reason it'll be banned.

Comment by pell 1 day ago

I don’t see why China would have an incentive to keep investing in open models long-term. They aren’t doing that for the betterment of society.

Comment by skinfaxi 14 hours ago

What's the incentive now and why would that change, in your view?

Comment by latexr 1 day ago

Exactly. This (the argument you’re replying to) is basically the same as when some new tech is introduced to the public (e.g. LLMs) and on day one you get hundreds of hot takes on how some company (e.g. Google) is DOOMED. As if they’ll just roll over and die at the first sign of trouble.

It’s like smacking a tennis ball to the other side of the court and immediately thinking you won, completely ignoring there’s a person on the other who’ll just smack it back.

It boggles the mind how people still fall for the promises of these giants about what a wonderful world they’ll create and all the amazing things you’ll be able to do. Whoever was caught off guard by (for example) LLM providers introducing ads hasn’t been paying any attention.

Comment by darkwater 1 day ago

This. I think the generation that grew up and became adults alongside the Internet (so, early techie millennials) already lived through this illusion. And yes, some of the initial dreams/promises actually became true but most turned sideways given enough time, and the same will happen again.

Comment by pell 1 day ago

Astra flagged my request to look into a security vulnerability into my own(!) code. So I’m not sure.

Comment by walrus01 1 day ago

Once again PLEASE DRINK A VERIFICATION CAN (note this is from 2013, and while its origin is as a shitpost, it's prophetic)

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/632877-halo-4/66477630

Comment by tokai 1 day ago

It was based on a patent for a system where you had to get up from your couch and yell McDonalds to continue you game or movie. Its prophetic because it is satirizing those corporations explicit fantasies.

Comment by walrus01 21 hours ago

As I recall from the original post when it was going around, it was related to the xbox one (before it was released at the end of 2013) being online only and blocking the resale/trade of physical disc based games, google "xbox one 2013 controversy"

https://www.google.com/search?&q=xbox+one+2013+controversy

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jun/19/xbox-one-...

Comment by skinfaxi 14 hours ago

Comment by reedf1 1 day ago

Reads like an onion article. I've gone to great lengths to avoid ads - but it's a war I am losing. Content is now interleaved with ads at the creative stage in subtle (and not so subtle) ways, this inexorable convolution occurs even on formerly alternative spaces. Let me pay, I want to pay, I'll pay a lot, just stay out of my fucking head.

Comment by Leonard_of_Q 1 day ago

> I've gone to great lengths to avoid ads - but it's a war I am losing. Content is now interleaved with ads at the creative stage...

In the end you'll win this war, maybe not in the way you envisioned but win it you will by avoiding 'content' altogether. There is more than enough to read, listen to, see and do that you don't need 'content' to keep you satisfied. Drop it like the lukewarm turd it is and you'll be better off while they can hide their ads where the sun don't shine.

Source: living ad- and 'content'-free for decades

Comment by dudisubekti 1 day ago

I agree. Most of the life-changing content I've consumed has been either freely available (in the public domain or online) or a one-time-purchase, ad-free book.

Comment by Leonard_of_Q 1 day ago

You didn't "consume" that "content", that's newspeak which we'd all be better off without. You read books, listened to music, saw movies, plays, etc. You didn't "consume" them either, they're still there after all? You're not a "content consumer" but a person, an individual who reads, listens, sees, experiences.

Comment by retsibsi 1 day ago

I don't like that phrase either, but do you have a direct replacement? Language usage tends toward efficiency, and sometimes I want to speak generally rather than specifically, and so if my options for conveying the idea 'read books and/or listened to music and/or saw plays and/or watched tv and/or ......' are to write that out or to say 'consumed content', I'm probably going to hold my nose and go with the latter, at least once I've heard it enough times for it to feel relatively normal.

edit: actually, and this is just a tangential point, I don't think 'content' covers plays or other live experiences. It's usually screen-based, and the main possible exceptions are things that are almost interchangeable with their screen-mediated forms, like books or magazines.

Comment by itake 1 day ago

must be nice...

On iOS, I see ads for paying for iCloud.

Entering my own apartment, the elevator has ads blasting on the tv.

Wont even start on Windows or web browsers.

Comment by Leonard_of_Q 1 day ago

> On iOS..

There's your problem, you rented a terminal managed by the fruit factory so they get to decide who the thing serves. Either "jailbreak" the thing or get a Google-free Android device with an AOSP-derived distribution on it. I have the latter and I don't see any ads.

Windows... same thing. Avoid it if you can and yes, you can unless your employer forces it upon you. In that case see if you can use the LTSP version since that isn't as laden with spy- and adware as the regular versions.

Browsers? Firefox or one of its derivatives help to get rid of ads and other nuisances. I don't see any ads on either mobile or X-top, they don't seem to make it through the combination of network, host and application-level filtering. Those filters just work without needing maintenance, you just need to put them in place.

As to that elevator blasting ads you're more or less on the same situation. The only way to avoid that would be to make sure you manage your own environment. Doing so is much more involving than changing from a fruit phone to something under your own control. I live on a farm in the Swedish countryside where ads just don't seem to thrive, I understand this isn't for everyone but if you're serious in wanting to escape there'll be something similar available in whatever country you call your own.

Comment by itake 21 hours ago

Firefox has ads on by default.

I can’t develop apps to the AppStore without an iOS device, which is a source of income for me.

Degoogled androids have issues with push notifications and banking apps

There isn’t an AirPod pro experience on Google free android.

If my iphone breaks, it’s super easy for me to buy a new one and recover from a backup while I travel.

Comment by account42 2 hours ago

Sounds like you don't dislike the ads all that much if those are your excuses.

Comment by metalman 1 day ago

I'll add that much of the 'content' is very carefully designed to be the canvas for the advertisements. ie: the content reaferms your demographic/cultural afinity and opens you up to suggestions that are attached even oblicquely, rather than persuing an interest of your own that actualy benifits you. By watching media alone instead of it bieng a group outing you give up even the real cultural reafermation of dragging or bieng drug along by friends where doing the thing together is of more interest than the media, unless on the rare occasion when you get to see something world class that you all take with you. These glowing slabs, aint that. Beware, Beware the glare.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by sublinear 1 day ago

I think back on when I consumed the most "content". It was way back before I worked from home. The peer pressure was a significant part of why.

I agree with you otherwise, though.

Comment by saturn8601 1 day ago

Just in case you don't know the SponsorBlock extension can skip past Youtube interleaved ads, promotional items other time wasters. You can pick and choose what you want to skip and in the Youtube Interface you can also press a button to automatically go past a skipped item you wanted to see. [1]:https://sponsor.ajay.app/

Also hate clickbait title cards? Theres now an extension to remove those as well: https://dearrow.ajay.app/

This SponsorBlock extension also integrates with yt-dlp so downloaded videos can have ads stripped in the final video. That way you don't even have to ever go to youtube itself. The war isn't over yet and people must keep fighting back.

Comment by fercircularbuf 1 day ago

Yeah, I pay for youtube so I don't have to watch ads, but then youtube creators at some point all decided to jump on the bandwagon of interleaving ads into their content. Many are kind enough to make it easy to jump ahead to when the ad is over, but man, I would much prefer they set up a patreon or just let me pay them through youtube's own UI. Incredibly annoying.

Comment by ZaoLahma 1 day ago

I'm surprised YouTube allows it. I'd expect them to want "their" share of the ad money, since creators in a way are side stepping the "normal" ad flow.

Comment by PlunderBunny 1 day ago

The only winning move is not to play.

Comment by TitaRusell 1 day ago

Only old school media is holding themselves to a standard. No AI, no sponsored content. And thank god we still have a public broadcaster.

The future is unfortunately propaganda and brain rot.

Comment by Freak_NL 1 day ago

What is keeping you hooked to that type of content?

Comment by nkrisc 1 day ago

There’s an easy solution that I’ve taken: just stop watching stuff. Choose not to participate in the bullshit.

Comment by grishka 1 day ago

I'm surprised there's an online component to that. I've never seen such a device in real life but I've always assumed that these have some sort of automatic commercial break recognition and that such features were first introduced way back in the 90s when requiring an internet connection was impractical to say the least.

Comment by theage 1 day ago

If you can get your recording to play in the browser my TivySkip Web Extension[0][1] will skip broadcast commercials for free. I use Jellyfin's web portal to playback my recordings adfree but the ext will actually work on any site playing live TV with various jump around and visual block/mute schemes to choose from.

[0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tivyskip/ [1] https://github.com/relaxo-player/TivySkip-extension

Comment by Steve44 1 day ago

Virgin Media cable user in the UK here.

I had their Tivo box until a couple of years ago when the forced an "upgrade". The new box has uch better hardware but the software was a leap backwards.

Regarding ads, on recorded programmes I can fast forward through them. It's not a direct skip but can jump +30 seconds at a time.

When viewing through any of the channel apps most of them used to allow skipping, but over the past few months it's now blocked on all of them I think. They do tell you how many adverts there are in each block and how long the one is, such as "2/10 29 seconds to go". Unfortunately they don't tell you the total length of the break, some sections are just a few seconds.

Comment by jonhohle 22 hours ago

I’ve been a TiVo holdout because it is a great for OTA and can stream recordings to mobile devices, even over the internet. It really just works.

That said, I paid for a lifetime subscription for a specific feature set. I’m sure there terms allow them to turn it into a brick without having to compensate me. They seem to want to get rid of their non-corporate customers anyway, so maybe this is how they do it.

Comment by KevinMS 1 day ago

I've been a heavy user of Tivo from 1999 to a couple years ago when I dropped cable TV. I have never heard of SkipMode. Is it something they just added? because "longest-standing and most popular DVR features" doesn't sound like it was just added.

Comment by wodenokoto 1 day ago

Never owned a TiVo, but I just looked up what skipmode is, and I thought that was the whole point of a TiVo.

Like, it has always been advertised as record shows and skip commercials. When they said skip commercials in the early 2000s, did they just mean fast forward?

Comment by KevinMS 1 day ago

there's a 30 second skip button, and also the fast forward button is really well tuned so you watch for the end of the commercial break, hit play, it jumps back a few seconds to where you couldn't react fact enough. It all worked very well somehow.

Comment by lakkal 19 hours ago

I loved TiVo for years also until around 2011 or so, when I 'upgraded' my ancient box to whatever their new hardware was. The interface was so laggy I could no longer consistently FF through crap and have it autorewind that couple of seconds to the beginning of the show anymore. That was the impetus for me to cancel TV and sell mine completely, which I don't regret at all.

Comment by Mashimo 1 day ago

Some commend on Reddit said it was introduced in 2015. I can't verify that.

Comment by toilet 1 day ago

Stremio + Torrentio + Gluetun

Comment by someguynamedq 1 day ago

Gabe Newell had the clearest thoughts on this topic

Comment by rpdillon 21 hours ago

Yeah, it's interesting to watch humanity graduate from "how can we delight the customer the best?" to "how can we trap the customer and extract the most from them?"

Comment by amelius 1 day ago

Ads are really a cancer of modern society.

Can we please just ban them to yellow pages only? (Where we can watch them on __our__ terms, not __their__ terms)

Comment by bell-cot 1 day ago

Far more a vice. Cancer victims don't like cancer, and try to be rid of it.

Vs. modern ads are far more like cheap-at-first drugs. Similar to dirt cheap printers with ever-more-expensive consumables, E-Z financing plans that nobody reads the fine print for, and politicians who conveniently forget all their wonderful-sounding promises the moment they're elected.

Comment by _superposition_ 2 hours ago

The pinnacle of enshittification

Comment by xiaodai 1 day ago

can't believe tivo is still around.

Comment by tech234a 1 day ago

They stopped selling new units and lifetime subscriptions about a year ago.

Comment by andrewstuart 1 day ago

Shocking! That TiVo still exists.

Comment by rootsudo 1 day ago

Honestly I thought they disappeared 20 years ago.

The old dvrs were great for old pata hdd that you could individually RMA.

God I’m old.

Comment by fithisux 1 day ago

It depends on their analysis. Companies are interested in profit and not loyalty or morality. If they have done their analysis and predicted that this decision will bring more profit, good for them.

Intuitively, without any analyses I predict the opposite will happen. But they may have real data supporting their decisions which I do not have.

Comment by xeyownt 1 day ago

Enshitiffication again.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by tyffanypastecf 1 day ago

[dead]

Comment by surcap526 22 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by kotaKat 1 day ago

[dead]

Comment by chrisjj 1 day ago

> TiVo to charge money for skipping commercials in your own recordings

Deceptive and false title.

True title is: TiVo Plans to End Free Automatic Commercial Skipping in November, Tests Paid Premium Replacement Service

Comment by Ariarule 21 hours ago

That is also the title I see clicking through into the page, although it seems to be 24 characters over the limit, so that _some_ change to OP would have have been required to submit it.

Comment by theginger 1 day ago

This is a really good example of how capitalism doesn't work so well in a digital economy. Normally there is are various arguments about how the subscription pays for the development / invitation. But here we have a feature that's been there for more than a decade, the only innovation is figuring how to monetize it.

Comment by gblargg 1 day ago

Isn't this because it's not a free market, e.g. the DMCA and other laws that prevent publishing how to work around digital locks?

Comment by agileAlligator 1 day ago

Yep. IP is not true "property" either, since it is not "scarce"

Comment by tancop 1 day ago

Free markets are impossible under capitalism. If wealth is allowed to concentrate there will be some companies that get so powerful they can influence public policy.

At that point you get regulations designed to make competing with them expensive or risky, like DMCA or submarine patents. They also legalize union busting and get courts to declare that you can get fired for any reason and getting pressured to sign an unfair contract is your fault.

The only thing you can really do against it as a government is making sure nobody ever captures a majority of any market and workers have ultimate control over their company. But that system is a form of market socialism so you can't really call it capitalist anymore.

Comment by imtringued 1 day ago

Correct, in a free market the returns reflect the underlying reality and if that reality means that in the capital abundance stage further capital is unnecessary and capital carries maintenance costs, then the return to capital becomes negative.

If capitalism is the pathological obsession that capital should always net a positive return, then it is incompatible with free markets by definition.

Comment by 1 day ago