LG TVs aren't the only ones spying on you [video]
Posted by someonebaggy 3 days ago
Comments
Comment by GreenVulpine 3 days ago
Comment by K0balt 3 days ago
Edit: it was Samsung, where Wi-Fi Direct was always-on, and concurrent with STA mode wifi, enabling other WiFi direct devices potentially to connect to the internet, including other Samsung televisions. Their televisions were also hacked to gain root over a standard DVB broadcast on fully patched firmware lol so it might be possible to pwn a whole city at a time through that vector.
Smart-TV platforms have long done cross-device identification, and there have been some surprisingly aggressive local-device discovery schemes.
In all, smart devices are pretty much surveillance devices, and a privacy nightmare. I have had enough exposure to shady goings on that I am nearly certain that most devices ship with intentional backdoors sold to three letter agencies or malware rings, either by unscrupulous engineers or by the company itself.
It’s just hard to pass on the payday that a wide deployment of a permanent relay/mic/camera/sniffer represents, especially if it’s likely to end up in corporate or industrial environments.
I’ve had speculative offers to compromise smaller projects, and I’m nobody. I have no doubt that engineers working on widely deployed projects and systems are given very attractive offers to provide tailored access.
Comment by goda90 3 days ago
Comment by LargoLasskhyfv 2 days ago
We need to deploy sophisticated military grade beam forming gizmos for selective signals canceling.
Faraday is caveman copium.
Comment by rationalist 3 days ago
So you have to go a step further and remove the Wi-Fi card, because there is no guarantee that someone else won't connect the TV to the Internet.
Comment by testing22321 3 days ago
Like HP printers. Don’t give your money to companies doing shit things.
Comment by Anonyneko 3 days ago
Comment by CharlesW 3 days ago
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/products/Flat-Panel-Displays/...
Comment by testing22321 2 days ago
Don’t buy a tv at all. I have not had one for 20 years, never missed it.
Comment by woodgala 3 days ago
Comment by Melonai 3 days ago
Comment by phil21 2 days ago
Overall it’s not a bad idea if devices need network connectivity. Have one central “box” get an Ethernet drop and it acts as a switch for your tv/xbox/playstation/media player/etc. The spec was made back when A/V receivers were more popular than they are now. It would cut down on a cable per device.
If OP means an exploit/hack then that’s a bit different.
Comment by LargoLasskhyfv 2 days ago
AFAIK it got not used, or not implented in relevant ways.
So far...
Comment by irickt 3 days ago
Comment by CommanderData 3 days ago
Vast majority won't know or care.
The way this gets fixed is laws not workarounds unfortunately.
Comment by FerretFred 3 days ago
This, unfortunately, is the biggest problem those of us care about privacy face, especially when trying to warn people about it.
Comment by sublinear 2 days ago
The authoritarians use the red herring of "nothing to hide", while the liberals only argue on the most sensational abuse cases or somewhat flimsy high-minded principles.
The correct way to get the layperson to care is with a visceral reaction using the relevant buzzwords: "sabotage", "gangstalk", "bully", "witch hunt", etc.
It makes zero sense that the same people who fight so hard over gun rights can completely ignore all the other much uglier ways the powers-that-be can threaten your livelihood.
Nobody ever spells out what "overpolicing" really looks like. Nobody makes clear enough that "the government" is what we call it when we give your literal neighbor special privileges.
Comment by Vineetyadav2 3 days ago