Babylonian Lamb Stew with Beets (1750–1730 BCE)

Posted by yubblegum 5 days ago

Counter168Comment139OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by dvh 2 days ago

Apparently their beets looked the same as ours:

> The kind of beets used in such an ancient recipe should not be different from the beets we use today, even in name. We read in Dictionary of Assyrian Botany (by Campbell Thompson, 1948) that in the ancient Mesopotamian region it was called ‘shumundar,’ it was as red as blood, and has a spinning-top shape (pp. 49, 51).

Comment by alephnerd 2 days ago

The recipe is also similar to Hamedh [0], a delicacy in Iraqi and Baghdadi Jewish households. The only major difference is the addition of tomatoes thanks to the Columbian Exchange, and rice - which would have not been cultivated or traded in West Asia yet.

On that note, in Arabic, Farsi, and Hindustani the word for Tomato is essentially shared (tumatar/tamatimu) with the English word "tomato".

But anyhow, a lot of home cooking and traditional meals actually have a pretty long history.

[0] - https://www.splendidtable.org/story/2000/12/12/hamad-iraqi-b...

Comment by culi 1 day ago

> rice - which would have not been cultivated or traded in West Asia yet

Surprisingly it was still imported in surprising quantities nearly 1000 years before it started to be cultivated. Not significant enough quantities for it to be a common staple, but still an interesting tidbit

Comment by ErroneousBosh 1 day ago

One day, someone - someone like you, maybe, someone with the Hacker Nature - was looking at the rice they'd bought and thought "You know what, it just *cannot* be all that difficult to just grow this stuff here, it costs a fortune to import. How hard can it possibly be?"

So they set to digging irrigation trenches, and had a go at it, and maybe a couple of shitty harvests later they'd got the trick nailed.

And here we are.

Comment by culi 1 day ago

Possibly! It seems more likely that migrants brought rice cultivation. Or maybe a mixture of both. Maybe some "I wonder how we could grow that here. Lemme visit that new community of immigrants"

In Sicily and Spain, rice cultivation began because Islamic expansion brought advanced irrigation and cultivation techniques. It's called the "Arab Agricultural Revolution"

Comment by amir_karbasi 2 days ago

Actually, in Persian, tomato is literally translated as “western plum”. This is common in our language as we usually say “western” or “foreign” as a prefix to many things that were introduced to Iran (strawberries, sit-style toilets, etc)

Comment by thrdbndndn 2 days ago

Chinese does the same thing, using prefixes like 西 (western), 番 (foreign), and 洋 (foreign) for introduced items.

For tomatoes, interestingly, it has two common names that follow this pattern: 西紅柿, literally translated as "Western Red Persimmon", and 番茄, literally translated as "Foreign Eggplant".

Other produce examples include 番薯 (Foreign Yam) for sweet potato, 西瓜 (Western Melon) for watermelon, 洋蔥 (Foreign Onion) for bulb onion etc.

Comment by dotancohen 2 days ago

The recorded English-language etymology for "ketchup" suggests that the word comes from one of the Chinese dialect's word for tomato. Do you have any idea which Chinese word sounds like ketchup?

Comment by thelibrarian 1 day ago

My personal theory based on nothing more than the vibe of the thing is that it comes from the Malay/Indonesian word ‘kecap’ (which is pronounced almost identically to “ketchup”), the word for sweet soy sauce. This is soy sauce that is thickened and sweetened with palm sugar, and I could see European cooks attempting to replicate it based on the vague descriptions given by sailors, and ending up with ketchup.

Comment by suddenlybananas 1 day ago

It came from the Malay word, but the Malay word comes from Hokkien.

Comment by thelibrarian 21 hours ago

Oh, interesting, I didn’t know that, but it makes sense given the influence of Hokkien cuisine on Malaysia.

Comment by dotancohen 1 day ago

Interesting, thank you.

Comment by bwv848 1 day ago

茄ke2 汁zap1, but if I remember it correctly, Dan Jurafsky believes it is from 喼git1 汁zap1, worcestershire sauce

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iYwUh1Hdho

Comment by taneliv 1 day ago

Not exactly a Chinese dialect, but Vietnamese calls tomatoes "cà chua": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/c%C3%A0_chua .

Comment by dotancohen 1 day ago

Are the Vietnamese and Chinese languages related? Or perhaps one of the two cultures was introduced to that fruit by the other, and thus preserved the name?

Comment by shawn_w 17 hours ago

China ruled Vietnam for a thousand years (111 BC–939 AD) so I'm sure there was some linguistic cross pollination.

Though tomatoes come around long after that period...

Comment by avadodin 1 day ago

Not related at all in recent history and I have no insight on the etymology links but Vietnamese used to be written in a mix of original Vietnamese Chinese-style characters before they changed to a Latin alphabet with Colonialism and Communism so there was definitely contact.

Comment by 17 hours ago

Comment by dotancohen 1 day ago

Thank you

Comment by fsckboy 1 day ago

possibly Hokkien 膎汁 (kê-chiap, “fish sauce”) via Malay kecap ~ kicap “any dark clear sauce from soy, fish etc”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketchup#Etymology

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by mytailorisrich 1 day ago

In Chinese the use of 西 (western) often really means from the West compared to China so India/Central Asia/Middle East, which can be a little confusing at first if you are used to the word meaning "Western World".

For instance, watermelons come from Sudan/Egypt and thus arrived in China from the West long before Europeans visited.

Another example is The Journey to the West (Monkey King) novel which is also about travelling to India.

Comment by xattt 2 days ago

As an aside, tomatoes are golden apples (pomodoro), and oranges are Chinese apples (Apfelsin) in some languages.

A lot of cultures appear to name botanicals using apples or, in GP’s context, stone fruit as “reference” points.

Comment by Agentlien 1 day ago

Everything is an apple, it seems. You also have earth apples (pomme de terre in French, aardappel in Dutch) for potatoes, grenade apples (pomegranate in English, granatäpple in Swedish, ...), pineapple, ...

Comment by xattt 1 day ago

It helps that Latin has the word pomus for fruit.

Comment by YeGoblynQueenne 1 day ago

Wait 'till you hear about melon - "μήλον" i.e. "apple" in Greek.

Melon, watermelon, pomelo, etc. The ancient Greeks themselves started that with the "golden apples of the Hesperides" a.k.a. oranges.

I guess any fruit people didn't know how to call was ... some kind of apple.

Comment by vladgur 1 day ago

Wow, апельсин - apelsin(Russian) makes total sense now

Comment by mlni 1 day ago

Potatoes are called "earth apples" in french (pomme de terre) and a bunch of other european languages

Comment by snthpy 1 day ago

Thank you for this. Knowing both those words, i could never work out the original/history of the terms.

Comment by fsckboy 1 day ago

>A lot of cultures appear to name botanicals using apples

don't know if it makes the point or upends it, but the fruit in the Garden of Eden wasn't specifically an apple.

Comment by riffraff 2 days ago

Interesting, in various European languages those tend to be "Turkish": turkey hens (the bird called turkey now), Turkish corn (maize), Turkish beans (long beans).

Again, trade routes.

Comment by idontwantthis 2 days ago

In Panama they say Chino for foreign versions and in Cambodia they say barang which literally means Frankish (via farang from Thailand).

Comment by selcuka 1 day ago

> Turkish corn (maize)

And in Turkish maize is called "Mısır", which comes from the country name Egypt (which is also Mısır in Turkish).

When Arabs conquered Egypt, they called it "Mishr" (مصر) which literally translates to "country" or "borderland". Maize was originally imported from the Americas, but because the trade route was through Egypt, Turkish people initially called it Egypt Wheat or Egypt Millet. In time, it is started to be called only Mısır/Egypt.

Comment by sehansen 1 day ago

I wonder what they call maize in Egypt then?

According to Kagi Translate, a term for maize that's specific to Egypt is "الذرة الشامية" (al-dhura ash-shāmiyyah) which could be directly translated to "Levantine sorghum". Can anyone with actual knowledge of Egytian Arabic confirm?

Also I had the idea that "Maize" might have come from "Mısır", but etymonline claims it comes from the native (Arawakan) name for the plant: mahiz.

Comment by oldandboring 2 days ago

> maize

Which, in turn, originated in Mexico and didn't make its way to Europe until the 1500s.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by eru 1 day ago

Austrians call tomatoes Paradeiser, from an older word for Paradise.

Comment by bitwize 1 day ago

There is a bird native to the Americas which in English is called the turkey, from its original name "Turkey fowl", because it was thought to come from "the east" of which Türkiye is the country with which most Europeans were familiar (due to being the closest). In Turkish, the bird's name references India ("hindi"); the same is true of other languages such as French ("dinde", from "poule d'inde", chicken of India).

Comment by alephnerd 2 days ago

Appreciate the clarification!

Comment by amir_karbasi 2 days ago

My pleasure! I also find languages very interesting and have had the opportunity to grow up in a bilingual home and learn French and German.

One more fun fact is that potato is a direct translation of the French “Pomme de terre” (“sib zamani” or “ground apple”).

Back to the actual topic, this is a recipe that’s definitely worth trying. Persian shallots are actually more garlicky than oniony. A great addition to lamb dishes and yogurt.

Comment by dotancohen 2 days ago

Thank you! In Hebrew we literally call the potato תפוח אדמה which is "ground apple". Now I know where the idea comes from.

Comment by bitwize 1 day ago

I find it fascinating that the Persian word for "foreign"/"Western", farangi, actually means "Frankish", which gives some idea of the "compressed geography" people experience regarding faraway places. It was also used to name a race on Star Trek.

Comment by abtinf 1 day ago

It is not a “clarification”. You are wrong and are spreading misinformation. In Farsi, the word for tomato is gojeh farangi.

Comment by dotancohen 2 days ago

  > On that note, in Arabic, Farsi, and Hindustani the word for Tomato is essentially shared (tumatar/tamatimu) with the English word "tomato".
In the Levant we use the word بندورا "bindora" in Arabic for tomato.

Comment by alephnerd 2 days ago

Huh. Like Pomodoro. That makes sense.

Comment by dotancohen 1 day ago

Very likely from Pomodoro. In Arabic P is pronounced B or F.

Comment by IgorPartola 2 days ago

In Russian we use tomat and pomidor interchangeably.

Comment by jamal-kumar 1 day ago

Meanwhile English speakers joke about disagreements over the pronunciation of tomato

Comment by simonh 1 day ago

Comment by thaumasiotes 2 days ago

If it's any consolation, their lambs were nothing like ours.

This period is early enough that sheep weren't yet sheared.

Comment by fsloth 1 day ago

Oh! So were sheep just for meat back then?

Comment by eru 1 day ago

Maybe also for leather?

And in nature sheep drop their coats without shearing.

Comment by wolfi1 1 day ago

do they? there are reports of lost sheep which when found had a very thick fur or whatever the shepherds call it

Comment by eru 1 day ago

Sorry, when I said in nature, I meant undomesticated sheep.

Domesticated sheep that get lost for a while don't magically learn how to shed their coat, yes.

Comment by ErroneousBosh 1 day ago

Pretty much all domesticated sheep will cast their fleeces.

There are some breeds that don't, and obviously due to random genetics you'll get individuals that don't.

Sheep that don't cast their fleeces are damn near impossible to shear and are mostly kept for meat. Likewise, sheep that don't have much of a "rise" (see my other comment) and are difficult to shear quite often, uh, don't have a particularly long career, as it were.

Comment by AdamN 1 day ago

Man shearing this one is a pain in the a$$. Hand me the sticking knife ...

Comment by ErroneousBosh 1 day ago

Well, not quite, but it's one you're going to cull out at the end of the year when it's time for them to go to market.

And of course, the only truly stockproof sheep enclosure is a deep freeze.

Comment by thaumasiotes 1 day ago

No, the sheep were harvested for wool, but not by shearing. When they shed, we picked the shed wool from them.

Modern sheep grow their wool continuously, but that took a while to breed in.

Comment by ErroneousBosh 1 day ago

> Modern sheep grow their wool continuously, but that took a while to breed in.

No they don't.

In the summer their wool starts to grow out much thinner, like maybe a quarter as thick - it's really noticeable. This gives what's called a "rise", a gap between the sheep's skin and the thicker coarser wool. Once that's high enough to get shears (or these days, machine clippers which are like a big beard trimmer) into you can shear the fleece off.

If there's no rise you haven't a hope in hell of cutting it.

If there's a good rise it practically falls off.

If you leave them long enough or if the rise starts growing in too soon, they'll start "casting" where their wool just falls off in big chunks. This is actually quite dangerous for them because it's itchy and they roll on their backs to scratch, and get stuck upside down with their legs in the air and suffocate.

And you thought sheep farming was easy and fun ;-)

Comment by YeGoblynQueenne 1 day ago

I thought animal farming in general is an arcane science.

My friends have goats but they aren't farmers and they haven't got a clue how to care for them. The females sometimes are left with milk in their breasts after their young are weaned and one of my friends will get anxious about that and ask us to help her milk them. It's impossible. You can't milk a goat that doesn't want to be milked. If you push them too hard they lie down so you can't reach their teats and that's that unless you want to have three people lifting the goat up and another one trying to milk her while she squirms and kicks. I don't trust the milk either. Once in a while they succeed in milking a goat and when I tried the milk (after boiling it) it was sort of gritty, like it was mixed with sand. It was not impurities from the environment because I filtered it through a muslin so I think the animal may have had some infection like a mastitis or something that affected the milk's texture.

I bet farmers know exactly what to do about all that or probably they know how to get the animals used to milking when they're still young so that the won't resist it that much. I've watched videos of goats being milked and it looks almost effortless when a pump is used. The goats just line up in their feeding trays and then someone walks up to them from behind, pumps out their tits and moves to the next one, bish bash bosh. My friends don't even have a dedicated structure to feed the goats, we just throw hay for them on the ground so they end up fighting.

My friends really have no idea how to care for the goats, it's rather sad. The owner of the farm has even said he wants to get "wild" goats that don't need to be cared for. By that he means a herd of goats that have gone feral and roam the hills in a village nearby. He thinks because nobody actively cares for them and the herd persists that must mean the goats are somehow self-sufficient. I think that's a big misunderstanding. Domesticated animals need a lot of care one way or another.

I think I'd prefer to have sheep though, if I had animals. Sheep look much nicer than goats.

Comment by ErroneousBosh 1 day ago

I absolutely love goat's milk and I would love to keep goats, but they are every possible kind of a pain in the tits to deal with.

A neighbour of mine had a goat that we thought had some terrible thing happen because she was choking and gagging and frothing at the mouth like some cartoon rabid animal. Nope, far simpler. She'd eaten a grey lycra-and-elastic sports bra off the washing line, got a bra strap hooked over her tongue, and the rest of the bra down her throat. Hooked the strap with my finger, pulled it out in one quick deft rather unpleasantly squelchy motion, and ten seconds later you'd never have thought there had been anything wrong with her.

The bra went in the bin.

Bloody goats.

Your friends either need to learn how to care for goats - if only there was some world-wide repository of knowledge with books and videos and stuff! - or give them a good home somewhere else. They're probably hard to milk because as you say they're not used to being handled, and it may be too late to do that by now. If that's the case, you may never be able to milk them no matter how you handle them, and maybe you can breed from them, or maybe you can give them a nice new home, cosy and fragrant, along with some onion, garlic, ginger, cumin, coriander, and chilli, with a kilo or so of spinach too.

As an aside, you probably want to get yourself a copy of "Self-Sufficiency" by John Seymour, and have a read of that.

Comment by YeGoblynQueenne 1 day ago

>> The bra went in the bin.

XD My friend got her skirt munched. While wearing it.

I totally think it's like you say: the goats have never learned to be milked and now they'll never learned. The new generation might, but who's going to teach them? Not me because I'm only there half the year (when it's hot and I don't want to move).

>> As an aside, you probably want to get yourself a copy of "Self-Sufficiency" by John Seymour, and have a read of that.

Thanks. I'll have a look.

Comment by chakintosh 1 day ago

In arabic they are called "Shamandar"

Comment by gyanchawdhary 1 day ago

Intresting. In Hindi/urdu it’s called “chukandar”

Comment by rahulmax 1 day ago

username checks out

Comment by eikenberry 2 days ago

Close to a recipe on Tasting History... https://www.tastinghistory.com/recipes/babylonianlambstew Our current favorite dinner watching along with Alton Brown.

Comment by Rendello 2 days ago

I've made this Roman recipe probably a dozen times and everyone who's tried it really likes it [1].

The strange ingredients are garum [2] and asafoetida [3]. The former is just a fish sauce, so that's not hard to substitute, but you have to find asafoetida on the Internet or at an Indian food store.

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LynenQ5h2Y

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garum

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asafoetida

Comment by dormento 13 hours ago

Knew it was Parthian Chicken before i opened the link.

This guy is a treasure.

Comment by jamal-kumar 1 day ago

I can usually find hing (asafoetida) in grocery stores in certain more populous parts of Canada in the spice section, it's quite a good garlic substitute for those who can't do garlic

Comment by Rendello 1 day ago

It's used by Janes as eating root vegetables like onions or garlic is discouraged or forbidden in that religion [1].

(Un)related: onions and garlic are pretty close to each other. Chicago is named after šikaakwa, [2] the native word for the local Allium that's alternately called "wild onion" or "wild garlic" in English [3]. You can hear a similar word for onion in a different Algonquin language, Ojibwe [4].

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism#Ahimsa_in_practice:_Ja...

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago#Etymology_and_nickname...

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allium_tricoccum

4. https://ojibwe.lib.umn.edu/main-entry/zhigaagawanzh-na

Comment by tptacek 1 day ago

Yep, Chicago is named for ramps. They're delicious and you can only get them for like 3-4 weeks in the spring.

Comment by ilc_genesis_01 2 days ago

Yep, this is a great shoutout and I'm also a big TH fan. If you haven't yet, check it out!

Comment by maxglute 2 days ago

https://blog.crystalking.com/ancient-roman-food-parthian-chi...

the parthian chicken was stupid easy and tasty

Comment by AdamN 1 day ago

I like this tidbit, "Emperor Nero is rumored to have had the last sprig."

Comment by 3RTB297 1 day ago

Came here to mention Max Miller as well. Amazing work putting together historical context and recipes. Always fun, fascinating, and the recipes are generally very approachable.

I've also made the Babylonian stew from this recipe, and it's rich and hearty. It's easy to see how this would knock the...sandals off of ancient people.

Other ancient recipes...let's just say that humans have very much not held the same tastes over the eons. Some recipes were incongruent or sweet and savory in a strange way, or simply a flex about how many spices you had access to and cold throw in a dish, not about what it really tasted like. YMMV.

Comment by greatquux 2 days ago

Yes! Came here to recommend Max. His cookbook is also educational and interesting and some of the recipes are even good! :-)

Comment by harel 2 days ago

Coincidentally this book which has been a labour of love of his creator is going into print this week: https://www.tableofgods.com

It's quite expensive though, but it does look amazing.

Comment by ragazzina 1 day ago

The fact that they promote the preorder of a 200$ book without showing even a single page is crazy.

Comment by harel 1 day ago

They were sending pages to the people on the kickstarter list, effectively crowd sourcing recipe testing. That was quite clever I thought. And their socials keep showing videos of the actual recipies etc. This is a legit book. It's just a shame that it carries that price tag. I could do with a less "beautiful" version if it was reasonably priced. Maybe a future edition.

Comment by ragazzina 14 hours ago

I know I could do without Euphrates clay in my cookbook cover, that's for sure.

Comment by lettergram 2 days ago

If you like this, you may like the "Tasting History" YouTube channel - https://www.youtube.com/@TastingHistory

He basically covers a different historic dish every week ranging from the oldest recorded dishes to cafeteria food from 1990; or what they served on the Titanic, etc.

It's a great channel, and covers history well.

Comment by alex-moon 1 day ago

"Rocket, coriander, cumin? Somehow I doubt the Babylonians had Mexican herbs and spices." Turns out I was wrong about where these come from! All three are native to the Mediterranean/Middle East and would certainly have been used in this recipe at the time.

Comment by peri-cl 2 days ago

The source texts are available here, if anyone wants to read the literal translations:

https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/ancient-mesopota...

Comment by comrade1234 2 days ago

How's the presentation? Just imagining it, it would seem that the meet would have a weird color.

Comment by debo_ 2 days ago

It looks great. When I first saw it, I thought "this color can't be beet"

Comment by LastTrain 2 days ago

OMG perfect :-)

Comment by _continuation 2 days ago

good one

Comment by bornfreddy 2 days ago

I think the taste of their beer would have been much different from what we drink today?

Comment by 0xbadcafebee 2 days ago

Nutty, aromatic, yeasty, slightly sour. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK4DMt8ARyU

Comment by applicative 2 days ago

They certainly didn't use hops!

Comment by cantalopes 2 days ago

Gonna be quite challenging to get "1/2 cup of rendered sheep fat"

Comment by strken 2 days ago

In Australia where lamb is more common than in the US, it'd be pretty easy to keep the fat after roasting a lamb shoulder, or to freeze the fatty offcuts from forequarter chops and render them after I had enough.

Comment by jp0d 2 days ago

Lamb is quite popular down here in Australia. I usually keep some rendered fat from my roasts etc. Sometimes I cook other meats with it and it adds heaps of flavour. I do that with pork fat as well.

Comment by bgnn 1 day ago

You need sheep with tail fat like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tail_fat

Comment by yesbabyyes 1 day ago

I usually put away a nice amount of fat at the lamb slaughter and then render it, it keeps very well. We also put away a good amount for the birds.

Comment by dyauspitr 2 days ago

Lamb is usually the red meat of choice, other than pork, almost everywhere besides the US.

Comment by hulitu 1 day ago

You should visit Europe.

Comment by badc0ffee 1 day ago

Or Japan, or Canada, or Argentina, or Brazil, or Chile, or...

Comment by dyauspitr 1 day ago

Yeah seems like a north and South America thing for the most part.

Comment by pjmlp 1 day ago

We do eat a lot of lamb in Southern Europe.

Comment by dyauspitr 1 day ago

I was there for two months a month ago. Is it a lot of beef? I couldn’t really tell I remember a lot of pork and fish and chicken.

Comment by rsynnott 1 day ago

I’m not sure that it’s dominant anywhere other than Greece and the Balkans, but lamb would be quite popular in a lot of European countries. Pretty much anywhere on the Mediterranean, plus Ireland and Britain, at least.

I’m not sure there’s anywhere in Europe where it would be as unusual as it is in the US (where it definitely does seem to be seen as kinda vaguely exotic.)

Comment by YeGoblynQueenne 1 day ago

I'd say that in Greece the dominant meats are pork and chicken. That's the main meat in all the grill houses and the meat in gyros and souvlaki. Lamb is beloved but eaten more rarely, particularly in religious feasts, especially Easter Sunday where the tradition is to put a lamb on a spit and eat everything off it down to the bones (except the entrails that are made in a special soup to end Lent, or various sweet meat skewers like kokoretsi, gardoumba, splinandero, etc). It's also more expensive than pork and chicken so it tends to be left for special dinners at home.

But, honestly, nothing beats a nice pilafi with lamb, with garlic wedges and slowly cooked until the meat falls off the bone.

Comment by mermadicsolutio 2 days ago

I was able to get some tail fat from a halal butcher. But never seen lamb fat anywhere else

Comment by s0rce 2 days ago

if you have a good butcher they might be able to get you some that you can render, but its a hassle. I've done this for beef fat to make some british pie things.

Comment by ardit33 1 day ago

Easy... Just go to a Trader's Joe, and get a lamb leg and roast it....

Comment by protocolture 1 day ago

I cant see why.

Comment by johnohara 1 day ago

The Babylonian Collection was left to Yale by J.P. Morgan in 1913. His estate at the time was estimated to be worth about $68.3M ($1.59B in 2024 dollars).

When I read that on his wikipedia page I thought "is that all?" I know I'm probably missing a bunch of other considerations, but geez, the 500th spot on the 2024 Forbes World's Billionaires list was shared by multiple individuals worth approximately $5.8B.

Comment by yubblegum 2 days ago

I'm reading Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones' Babylon - The Biography of a Metropolis which just recently came out, and that's how I ended up hearing about Yale's culinary adventures.

The book, btw, is kind of breezy in style and 'he of many LLs in his name' (Lālu-mullālu in Akkadian as suggested by my friendly AI) uses a lot of contemporary pop (nerdy) references to carry the narrative, yet very engaging and am learning a lot about this fabled city (and civilization).

It sets certain records straight ...

Comment by lgcmo 14 hours ago

You may be interested in tableofgods.com (also cool yt shorts)

Comment by PeterHolzwarth 2 days ago

What's enlightening is how astonishingly little salt is used, by our standards.

Comment by peri-cl 2 days ago

The ingredient ratios are the Yale researchers' interpretation—they're not from the source text,

https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/ancient-mesopota...

> "Like most premodern cooking manuals, the Babylonian recipes rarely list the quantities of each ingredient, and so basic experimentation is needed to determine viable proportions for the assembly of a dough or the salting of a stew. The “experimental” approach likewise offers answers to questions that can only be addressed through trial and error. For example, many of the identifications of herbs proposed by modern scholars are based mainly on medical compendia, and some of the plants thus identified can produce an extremely bitter or perhaps pungent taste when used in food."

Here's the recipes as literally translated (I used tesseract to OCR):

> "Unwinding. Meat is not used. You prepare water. You add fat. (You add) kurrat, cilantro, salt as desired, leek, garlic. You pound up dried sourdough, you sift (it) and you scatter (it) over the pot before removing it."

> "Stew of lamb. Meat is used. You prepare water. You add fat. You add fine-grained salt, dried barley cakes, onion, Persian shallot, and milk. [You crush] (and add) leek and garlic."

> "Elamite broth. Meat is not used. You prepare water. You add fat. Dill, kurrat, cilantro, leek, and garlic bound with blood, a corresponding amount of sour milk, and (more) garlic. The (original) name (of this dish) is Zukanda."

> "Tuh’u. Leg meat is used. You prepare water. You add fat. You sear. You fold in salt, beer, onion, arugula, cilantro, Persian shallot, cumin, and red’ beet, and [you crush] leek and garlic. You sprinkle coriander on top. [You add] kurrat and fresh cilantro."

Comment by adrian_b 1 day ago

The original text linked by another poster says "salt as desired".

So the quantity of salt is not specified in the original recipe, therefore it could be the same as any present cook would choose.

Comment by analog8374 2 days ago

I dislike lamb but the rest sounds great. Maybe I could sub beef.

Comment by mermadicsolutio 2 days ago

Honestly the recipe sounds like adding beets to a regular lamb stew recipe. If I havent watch this video and saw the dish, I would think some fancy restaurant is trying to be "innovative"

Comment by lorenzohess 1 day ago

Bears,Beets

Comment by culi 1 day ago

Babylon Galactica

Comment by dyauspitr 2 days ago

I mean, this had to be a dish for royalty or something right? How on earth that they have all of those fresh and dried ingredients on hand 4000 years ago.

Comment by tensor 2 days ago

No, it's common. People today have no idea how truly poor they eat. Modern fast food is essentially fake food paste.

Comment by globular-toast 1 day ago

Which is a shame because you can eat so well today you can easily skip the dead animal carcass. They couldn't really do that back then in many places with short growing seasons.

Comment by dyauspitr 1 day ago

Why would you skip the dead animal? That is by far the best part of every meal.

PS don’t jump into the whole animal cruelty spiel. I’m aware and I agree, it’s just that I don’t care. Vegetarian food, aside from maybe the narrow slice with how the Indians prepare it, is completely unsatisfying and I’m OK with animals suffering as long as I can continue to have meat because it’s just so delicious. That being said, I would eagerly switch to lab grown meat if they can do it correctly.

Vegan food on the other hand is brain dead food. I mean that literally and metaphorically. Anecdotally every vegan I’ve met seems nutritionally deficient and slow. They also go out of their way to eat food aping meat and that stuff turns out to be the most chemically processed and unhealthy stuff you could possibly imagine.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by globular-toast 1 day ago

India is the most populous country in the world so it's hardly a "narrow slice". Anyway, Italians and Mexicans are just as good with vegetables.

Even people who like steak grind some plant on it to make it taste good (pepper). Basically all interesting flavours come from plants. Meat just tastes of meat.

Comment by dyauspitr 10 hours ago

Yeah but India heavily uses dairy products to make up for the taste and protein deficiency. Vegetables are goddamn delicious but in a different way. I’ll eat vegetables all day but they are not nutritious enough and “satisfying” enough to complete the meal.

By the way, I’m sorry if this is all coming off pretty sharp, but I have what I think is a legitimate hate of veganism. I think it’s on par with the “health at every size” nonsense that people are trying to do where they are trying to normalize obesity. At least with them with GLP-1 they have found they don’t need to carry on with their delusion anymore, but vegans are still going strong.

Comment by tensor 7 hours ago

India absolutely does not "heavily" use dairy. In fact, they use very very little. Ghee is the most common dairy based item but it's only used as an oil for frying.

> I’ll eat vegetables all day but they are not nutritious enough and “satisfying” enough to complete the meal.

You have some weird obsession with meat. I'm not vegan nor vegetarian but eat at least half my meals without meat. There are plenty of other sources of proteins and flavour comes from all over. Vegetables absolutely are the bigger source of flavour. Onions, hot peppers, various dried spices, garlics. Food would be bland as shit without vegetables.

Comment by dyauspitr 2 hours ago

Every South Indian I know has tons of yogurt with each meal.

Comment by stackghost 1 day ago

Oh good, the vegans are here to leave smug comments

Comment by sophacles 2 days ago

Most of them seem like a pretty common kitchen garden to me.

And all of the plants are native to that area, or close enough that people who had been farming for a few thousand years at that point would have brought them from neighboring lands to use.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by ardit33 1 day ago

2/3rds of those herbs grow in the garden of my home as just weed (this in Albania), including mint, cilantro, origano and more.

While some have to be cultivated, a lot these herbs just grow as weeds in the Mediterranean area.

Comment by thataccount 5 days ago

[flagged]

Comment by tom_ 2 days ago

Curious indeed that the Yale Babylonian Collection should, out of all the possible options, choose the cooking of Ancient Babylon. I wonder what we should read into this. I have some theories, but it might be dangerous for me even to mention that I have them.

Comment by yubblegum 5 days ago

Cradle of civilization is not an odd culture. Babylon, meaning Gate of God, is one of the more profoundly influential urban civilizational clusters in human history.

Comment by thataccount 5 days ago

[flagged]

Comment by ahazred8ta 5 days ago

To an archeologist, 'civilization' refers to builders of walled cities inhabited by non-farmers with complex social sructure, division of labor, and usually some form of taxation. Highly moral hunter gatherers living in mud huts are not a 'civilization' in this context. Now you know.

Comment by thataccount 5 days ago

[flagged]

Comment by krapp 5 days ago

The vast majority of Africans aren't hunter-gatherers living in mud huts. They have actual cities with highways and skyscrapers and everything.

Comment by thataccount 5 days ago

I'm not arguing for what is a majority. I'm talking about the large portions of Africa that still live in a hunter-gatherer situations in mud huts.

Comment by ahazred8ta 4 days ago

Villages in New Guinea, the Amazon, etc, the word you're looking for is 'cultures'.

Cultures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Pottery_culture & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamnaya_culture & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corded_Ware_culture & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people

Civilizations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Great_Zimbabwe & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mali_Empire & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilisation & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztecs

The reason we're talking about the recipe is because it's one of the oldest recorded recipes, which is because they had writing.

Comment by thataccount 4 days ago

>'cultures'.

That's interesting, because I don't really think of a "culture" as smaller than a "civilization". I think of a culture being a necessary thread that runs through a civilization and without which there are no civilizations.

Comment by TFNA 2 days ago

Traveling overland across Africa will swiftly disabuse you of the notion that hunter/gatherer lifestyles make up any "large portion" of the continent's population. It would hardly even be feasible in the face of massive deforestation and population boom.

Comment by krapp 5 days ago

Africa comprises an entire continent. There are not large portions of it (or "large swaths") where people still live as hunter-gatherers living in mud huts, for any reasonable definition of "large portion."

Comment by jfjdkdkdkd 2 days ago

its sad that your ideology allows you to tell lies without an oz of shame.

Comment by rsynnott 1 day ago

… Eh? Even by the most generous possible definitions (including people who are primarily hunter gatherer but interact with the local economy to some extent), there are only on the order of tens of thousands of hunter gatherers today, worldwide.

As for mud huts, still commonly used in some places; there’s nothing particularly wrong with mud/earth construction if it works in your local climate.

Comment by thataccount 4 days ago

> for any reasonable definition of "large portion."

I'm sure those relatively voiceless cultures will appreciate your minimization of their contribution to the peoples of Africa.

Comment by krapp 4 days ago

You're the one who was claiming most Africans were hut-dwelling hunter-gatherers earlier. I'm not the one minimizing anything or anyone, just stop it.

Comment by thataccount 4 days ago

Uh, what? I'm not sure where you are pulling that accusation from. I said very succinctly that I was not talking about what was the majority in Africa. I think you are confused.

Comment by BugsJustFindMe 2 days ago

[dead]