Show HN: I mapped every US golf course
Posted by rickmf 1 day ago
I got tired of Googling basic course info, so I made a free directory of every US course
Google filters for golf course results are terrible so I built a better way to browse courses using OSM as the backbone.... https://golfcoursebrowser.com/
It's a work in progress and mostly US for now, but I want to expand to the rest of North America, the EU, and the rest of the world ASAP.
It's free, no ads, no login, no bs. If you spot anything wrong (bad info, a missing course, wrong scorecard), you can flag it right on the course page. I actually read those and fix them.
Still a lot of missing info, but I'm filling out more and more each day. The goal is the most complete, and current golf course directory in the world, verified and maintained by actual golfers. I think is attainable in the next few months. The base layer is OpenStreetMap, cross-checked against course websites and enriched with scorecards, USGA rating/slope, and public/private status. User corrections from golfers who know their home course have beaten every commercial data source we check against.
Comments
Comment by crossroadsguy 1 day ago
Comment by trollbridge 1 day ago
The handful of private ones near me are also desperate for new members, and several country clubs have ended up closing. Considering some of the golf courses that have closed around me ended up being converted into Amazon distribution facilities, I am not terribly excited about the idea of more golf courses closing.
Comment by contubernio 1 day ago
Comment by trollbridge 1 day ago
One of the golf courses near me has tee times for $10. I do not consider that something that only “serves the wealthy”. They also periodically close the course and open it up for RC plane enthusiasts.
Another one you can easily go for a walk in - I often do. It is effectively a public space.
Comment by rurban 2 hours ago
Comment by scotty79 1 day ago
Comment by bookofjoe 1 day ago
https://houseofsaud.com/travel/saudi-golf-courses/
>Avoid: June–September — temperatures regularly exceed 45°C (113°F), making outdoor play dangerous
Comment by gnz11 1 day ago
Comment by trollbridge 1 day ago
Comment by gnz11 7 hours ago
Comment by paradox460 1 day ago
Comment by lmpdev 1 day ago
The vast majority of the world is nothing like this
From Scotland to Tasmania, most courses congregate around already wet and mostly sand/loamy soil (largely unusable for other purposes without major construction)
I agree with you for artificial American places like TPC Scottsdale or Wolf Creek GC etc
Comment by maccard 1 day ago
On the suitability of the soil, for some courses yeah. For the vast majority - there’s 4 courses within 20 minutes of me in an urban area and they would be developed into property in a heartbeat if they sold. My home course has an apartment block cutting through it.
I don’t think any of that matters though - it’s not like it would be a public park if it wasn’t a golf course. It’s certainly no less resource intensive than the massive concrete jungle of a sports centre with a running track across from me, or a football stadium or any of the numbers of empty buildings in the city centre. It’s an amenity, just like any other, it has a cost and we have to accept that otherwise we might as well just tear it all down.
Comment by bookofjoe 1 day ago
Comment by parpfish 1 day ago
Comment by kylecazar 1 day ago
https://maps.app.goo.gl/ccFwBoDZMrmK7Bvc6?g_st=ac
Just surrounded by dust.
Comment by paradox460 1 day ago
Comment by tclancy 1 day ago
Comment by trollbridge 1 day ago
Amazon’s new data centre, of course, is paying a tiny fraction of that since they negotiated paying less.
Comment by tclancy 1 day ago
Comment by duped 22 hours ago
Basically we found a good way to create green spaces for recreation out of flood plains and drainage ditches. During heavy rain they provide important buffers that protect the nearby homes from flooding, and reduce the urban heat sink effect.
That's not true everywhere but keep it in mind before making sweeping statements about golf courses. Some people like golf. It's fine if you don't.
Comment by rickmf 18 hours ago
Comment by crossroadsguy 1 day ago
Not perfect, far from it, but it's a start and no, that Amazon Warehouse thing I am not expecting to see here. People are divided strongly on religious and ideological lines here but everyone's tempers run high whenever Govt tries touching a public land, green patch, and now we just take matters into our hands whenever that happens.
Comment by trollbridge 1 day ago
There are a handful of government owned golf courses (sort of like parks that have tennis courts), but they are not common.
Comment by matkoniecz 1 day ago
In my city (Kraków, Poland) there was attempted to waste enormous amount of public land and turn it into private golf course, funded from public money. It seems it was stopped after protests from citizens.
Comment by navaed01 1 day ago
https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/revisionist-history/a-good-w...
In some parts of the US it is certainly the case that golf courses are private and as a citizen you notice there are v. Few parks but lots of good courses. Many of the courses pay little in taxes so they’re also feels that there is a disparity between how the rest of society functions and golf courses.
Los Angeles is a v. Good example - huge urban sprawl - poor urban planning - few green spaces - amazing golf courses - as a runner I personally noticed I would be running around golf courses and not have any parks near me
Comment by 0ldblu3 1 day ago
Comment by crossroadsguy 14 hours ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by cmiles8 1 day ago
Many new courses in the US are also built on non-developable land like former landfills.
Not trying to defend all courses, but at least in the US it’s not just uniformly bad.
Comment by mark-r 1 day ago
Comment by topato 1 day ago
Comment by nayuki 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 23 hours ago
Comment by fluorinerocket 19 hours ago
Comment by crossroadsguy 14 hours ago
Comment by philip-b 1 day ago
Comment by matkoniecz 1 day ago
Comment by scotty79 1 day ago
What? Why and how? And why wouldn't leaving a patch of forest there be way more efficient?
Comment by aaron695 1 day ago
Comment by scoofy 1 day ago
It’s cool, I want it to be public, if you want to work together, do reach out.
I would also say what you are doing is almost certainly opening you up to liability if you are just scraping other sites and republishing their data. One paper town that you published and you might have a lawsuit on your hands.
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
I'm not a lawyer but my stack is clean. My base layer is OSM, which is licensed for exactly this stuff (and attributed). On top of that I used golfcourseapi.com which i also recommend (affordable, and fairly reliable so far, but not always current). Then community notes etc.
I cross reference against other sources but I am only publishing facts, which are not copyrightable in the US.
Would love to touch base one day and compare notes. I work in the golf industry so mostly just made this for myself. But after sharing with some friends and co workers i thought the wider golf community might appreciate it
Comment by scoofy 1 day ago
Just so we're clear, I'm effectively fine with sharing my data via Creative Commons Non-Commercial licenses (say, CC BY-NC 4.0). Much of my site depends on fair use and not being for profit anyway. I'm actively losing money on the site every month (ha!).
---
One personal note...
It looks like you're not using referral advertising by linking to Golf Now. I would say -- golf nut to golf nut -- as someone who cares about small, mom-and-pop golf courses, Golf Now can be incredibly bad for those courses. I understand that might just be Pollyanna-ish given "the internet," but I've talked to folks who operate small courses who feel forced give a big portion of their margin to those middlemen (even losing money sometimes). I actively avoided linking to them. My partner works in hospitality, and it's the same for sites like booking.com (if you can book through the business's website, your probably should).
I'm entirely happy to collaborate on this, I really just care about someone mapping all the golf courses even if it's not me. I'm happy to collaborate even if we're trying to build different things. Feel free to reach to me here, on GolfCourse.Wiki, or via the blog (for some reason most people contact me through the blog): https://golfcoursewiki.substack.com/
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by thunky 18 hours ago
Golfnow offers a service that courses must value, otherwise why would they list with them? And golfers get good deals.
It's not clear to me what's so bad about this.
Comment by scoofy 17 hours ago
Yes, obviously, they have monopsony power because networks are natural monopolies. The problem is that they can extract rents because of that monopsony power... and they do.
Because it's convenient to have all buyers operating through a single network, that network has the ability to extract rents from the sellers. It should be trivially illegal to operate such a site in the US, given anti-trust laws, but we've decide in the last 40 years that we don't enforce anti-trust in the US anymore, so here we are.
The fact that sites like booking.com can charge hotels a commission of up to 25% per booking shows exactly the level of extractive power that a site this type of power, simply because they were the first to capture the monopolistic network. It doesn't matter that some of the smaller hotels and course will go out of business, even if customer as a whole are hurt, because the total market is more valuable to them by maximally extracting rents.
Comment by thunky 16 hours ago
I just don't see Golfnow as a "single network". I golf with a lot of people that have never heard of them. If a course isn't on Golfnow and I want to golf there, I still book with them however they want me to even though it's not as convenient.
Just like Booking.com has competition from Google, Google also makes it easy to find and link directly to any golf course to book.
I'm not saying you're wrong about some courses not liking them but I have a hard time understanding why it's so hard for courses to just not deal with Golfnow and take bookings another way if they think it's so harmful.
Comment by scoofy 16 hours ago
Comment by thunky 6 hours ago
There are small golf courses near me that don't use them and that's fine. Please don't shame the ones that do.
Comment by scoofy 3 hours ago
They are far and away the leading tee time advertiser. The golf courses are the “customers” I’m worried about. They are operated by the parent company of the Golf Channel. Comcast was their long term owner until they got spun off.
There isn’t really many companies in the golf space that can compete with that. I don’t want to have to explain things like the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index. My point is that ultimately, these companies are natural monopolies, and should be regulated like utilities because of that.
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by Loughla 1 day ago
Is a running gag in the area where I grew up, and made it on this list somehow. So that's weird.
Comment by shshsjsj 1 day ago
Comment by vinniev 2 hours ago
Comment by dieselgate 1 hour ago
Comment by punnerud 1 day ago
Then you could start providing a lot more details about each one automatically.
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by punnerud 22 hours ago
Comment by nirali-shekhwa 8 hours ago
Comment by wanderingmind 1 day ago
Comment by dhx 1 day ago
OSM knows of almost 40k golf courses around the world.[2] This compares to 38k golf courses known to the R&A Golf Around the World Fourth Edition (2021) report and 37.6k courses listed in the NGF course database as of July 2024. It's likely OSM knows of 99.99..% of all active golf courses and also still retains tags for closed/unused golf courses too. So if OSM were to be inaccurate, it'd likely be inaccurate for whether a golf course is open or closed, rather than OSM not knowing about a golf course existing.
I wonder whether an OSM tile server / custom style sheet for golfers would be easiest and most useful/comprehensive way to keep track of golf courses?
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole
[2] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=golf_course#o...
[3] https://assets.randa.org/c42c7bf4-dca7-00ea-4f2e-373223f80f7...
[4] https://thegolfwire.com/worldwide-golf-course-development-re...
Comment by rickmf 18 hours ago
Comment by Specled 2 hours ago
Comment by haunter 1 day ago
Comment by kubb 1 day ago
Golf is a social marker in Anglo-Saxon countries. Only the highest classes used to be able to afford it. In America they built a lot of courses because they have the space, and there was demand, obviously because lower classes wanted to feel like they’ve made it. Kind of like wearing tuxedos (or owning a Mercedes Benz in Eastern Europe).
Obviously the higher classes just got more exclusive markers (particular clubs, private jets, islands, etc.), but America is left with all that land converted into courses which apparently aren’t even used that much nowadays. Turns out it can get boring quickly.
Comment by pseingatl 1 day ago
Comment by kleinsch 1 day ago
https://www.ngf.org/short-game/golfs-growth-era-the-road-to-...
Comment by cindyllm 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 23 hours ago
Comment by mercurywells 1 day ago
https://www.pga.com/play/ny/rome/mohawk-glen-golf-course/033...
Now add mini golf courses.
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by rurban 2 hours ago
Comment by rickmf 1 hour ago
Comment by totetsu 1 day ago
Comment by navaed01 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by AshamedBadger56 1 day ago
Comment by flaburgan 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by mikeocool 1 day ago
This sometimes leads to conflict between the game’s passionate users and OSM, when they map every road around a golf course as a cart path, because that’s the only thing the game imports.
Comment by rickmf 23 hours ago
Comment by npilk 1 day ago
Comment by tysilva 1 day ago
If so, a better experience would be a landing page where users can search or specify a geographic location - only loading in what is relevant for the query.
Comment by receptopalak 5 hours ago
Comment by jaqalopes 1 day ago
Comment by postalrat 1 day ago
Comment by fsckboy 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
the tee time link is dead and google reports as permanently closed. However if its open i'd love to know!
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by comrade1234 1 day ago
I think you must only have the village name for the address and not the street address. You can see the golf course in the map image on the other side of the lake.
Comment by 0ldblu3 1 day ago
Comment by cheeaun 1 day ago
Comment by adm4 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by cwilkes 1 day ago
https://nwhickoryplayers.org/2015/08/ccs/
Believe it is only open for residents in that area
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by snisarenko 1 day ago
The search by city, state doesn't seem to work.
If you enter something like "los angeles, ca" it returns no results.
zip code search works fine.
Comment by rickmf 23 hours ago
Comment by thunfischtoast 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by broabprobe 1 day ago
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-make-the-g...
Comment by vxxzy 23 hours ago
Comment by thomasswift 1 day ago
Near my area, there is a driving range and a simulator place as pins. both nice but not courses. Do you want reports on that?
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by jasonjei 1 day ago
Comment by parker42 1 day ago
Comment by aren55555 1 day ago
Comment by eamag 1 day ago
Comment by sehugg 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by abhishek_aieng 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
It will take some time i'm just doing this in spare time.
Comment by prologic 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by prologic 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 22 hours ago
Users can contribute right on the site by submitting corrections. It goes into a review queue and then is reviewed and implemented
Comment by rickmf 22 hours ago
Comment by cantalopes 1 day ago
Comment by deepsun 1 day ago
Really, golf courses are taxed much lower usually, as they go as green open spaces (similar to protected forest areas), and also their assessed land value does not account for neighboring residential prices, so their tax is based on lower value than land can be sold at.
Comment by lukan 1 day ago
That does not seem allright. A forest has lot's of ecodiversity, but a low cut golf course?
But sure, it is still green and somewhat alive.
Comment by rickmf 22 hours ago
Comment by deepsun 1 day ago
Comment by vel0city 1 day ago
Plus the golf courses around me are often municipal, they've got some nice bike paths to cut through the urban landscape around and through the links. It's a much nicer ride than along busy streets.
That said I do tend to enjoy disc golf more than traditional golf. I have never had too good of a shot.
Comment by mark-r 22 hours ago
Comment by vel0city 21 hours ago
A city park and playground? Only for the rich, you need to be rich to have the spare time to do it.
A public swimming pool? Only for the rich, you need to be rich to have the spare time to do it.
A public baseball/softball/soccer field? Only for the rich, you need to be rich to have the spare time to do it.
An activity center with some basketball and tennis courts? Only for the rich, you need to be rich to have the spare time to do it.
Jogging trails through the woods? Only for the rich, you need to be rich to have the spare time to do it.
Picnic tables in a field? Who has the time to take their food out some place to eat it? Clearly only rich people with too much time on their hands.
Comment by mark-r 19 hours ago
Comment by vel0city 19 hours ago
How long do people normally spend at a public pool? How long will people spend playing basketball or tennis or baseball? How long is a soccer game usually? About a couple of hours?
Comment by elpakal 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by proxy_skate 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by scotty79 1 day ago
All data centers use less than 0.2 (of which only less than 0.02 is used for cooling the servers, the rest is just electricity generation, which can and should be replaced with solar).
There's no replacement for water usage for golf courses and even half a trillion number is after recent 30% reduction of usage from what it was before.
Comment by rickmf 23 hours ago
Comment by markdown 1 day ago
2101 Sneath Ln, San Bruno, CA 94066, United States
Comment by andrewstuart 1 day ago
Comment by lmpdev 1 day ago
And even then, a broad generalisation
It’s $10 USD/round in my area, cheaper than bowling by a mile
Comment by pbhjpbhj 1 day ago
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago
Comment by zenith605 1 day ago
Comment by verdverm 1 day ago
Comment by bruce511 1 day ago
And it's important to understand that "using water" isn't like "using coal". In other words, while coal can be burned once, water is in a cycle that means water can be "used" infinitly.
But back to the source. A golf course near me takes effluent water (ie treated sewerage) destined for pumping out to sea. They spread it over a large piece of land. What is not consumed by plants, or evaporation, ends up in an underground aquifer.
So it "uses" a lot of water. But it's not using tap water.
Obviously this is not true for all courses. Hence the issue of "source", not "quantity" is material.
Comment by verdverm 1 day ago
The relative comparison is a potent one as we have a national debate about how we use our resources effectively and responsibly. I've seen similar mappings for data centers and thought OP's project might be a good starting point. The golf world is also aware about this issue and looking at ways to be more balanced with nature. I've seen some articles within the golf world discussing their water usage from before the data center debate began, which was very nice to see.
Comment by ta20240528 1 day ago
Where I live, the golf courses are the largest and often only consumers of recycled water — in a water stressed city. This directly subsidises indigent water use.
It doesn't stop the easily-offended from agitating to convert them into low-cost housing.
Comment by albumen 1 day ago
Comment by bruce511 1 day ago
It's easy though to dismiss options which don't benefit me personally. If I don't cycle then money spent on cycle tracks is wasted. If I don't golf then I'll lean towards non-golf options.
Incidentally it's very seldom local users who are lobbying for more local low-cost housing. That typically reduces neighborhood property values.
Equally having green spaces is something that drives up property values etc.
And yes, creative use of effluent would be nice. We should be able to recycle grey water into toilets etc. But that is an infrastructure change, so not easy to implement.
Yes we need public green spaces. And yes we need sports fields and golf courses and so on. It's not necessarily an either/or situation.
Comment by ck2 1 day ago
people living next to golf courses have extremely high rates of cancer and Parkinsons
and if a golf course is next to an airport you probably should never ever go there due to the total toxicity
Comment by rickmf 22 hours ago
Comment by ryan_lane 1 day ago
Comment by pbhjpbhj 1 day ago
Comment by curiousObject 1 day ago
https://www.apdaparkinson.org/article/the-relationship-betwe...
That is what OP was trying to say I assume
Comment by ryan_lane 1 day ago
Comment by afdsaifdoi 1 day ago
Comment by reversemsp 1 day ago
Comment by ivanjermakov 1 day ago
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL
Comment by rickmf 1 day ago