Flux 3

Posted by ThouYS 20 hours ago

Counter551Comment130OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by user43928 19 hours ago

I hope the open-weight versions will be SOTA.

> Over the next few weeks and months, we will make the following capabilities available

> Open-weight access to a multimodal backbone, for content creation (video, audio and image) and action prediction. (“FLUX 3 Dev”)

> We will also release more technical details on the underlying approach.

Comment by 3form 18 hours ago

Open-weight promise seems nice, but 1) I've seen people commenting that these hopes amounted to nothing for some previous releases (no idea which promises were made though); and 2) if the backbone is released as Dev, what will be missing? I can't easily tell from the post.

Comment by musebox35 18 hours ago

dev variants are usually cfg distilled which means that directly finetuning isn’t as effective. In the past, for the flux2 klein models,they released base versions that are not distilled. So it will probably be a while before you can fully take advantage of the open weights.

Comment by passingup 16 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by 3abiton 14 hours ago

Could be handicapped version with more limited functionalities. Noentheless, open-weight is open-weight, I just hope the quality is good enough to be sota.

Comment by vunderba 9 hours ago

Most of the disappointment around the previous open‑weight BFL release (at least for Flux.2 [dev]) came down to two main issues:

• It initially required significantly more VRAM and was much slower than alternatives released around the same time (like Z‑Image Turbo).

• The license felt overly restrictive.

Comment by iLoveOncall 18 hours ago

I run some of the 2.3 models locally so I'm not sure where you saw that they didn't follow their words?

Comment by tarruda 15 hours ago

It is not that they don't release open weights, but some users report that they are significantly inferior to the closed versions.

Comment by potsandpans 9 hours ago

Flux2.dev and even klein 9b are extremely close to sota. People who are saying otherwise probably haven't used them very much.

Comment by vunderba 9 hours ago

I run a fairly high-traffic site for generative image models focusing on complex prompt adherence. Flux.2 doesn’t score anywhere near SOTA proprietary models.

Klein 9b is decent for image-to-image, but when used for pure generative purposes brings back SDXL levels of body horror (have some Gattica pianists).

If you can get past the annoying JSON structuring, Ideogram 4 is probably the best option in the open‑weights world right now for text2image purposes, and even scored higher than the original Nano-Banana.

For ref: Flux.2 scored 5, Ideogram4 scored 8, and gpt-image-2 scored 12 out of 15.

Comparison of Flux.2 [dev], Ideogram4, NB Pro, and gpt-image-2.

https://genai-showdown.specr.net/?models=nbp,f2d,g2,id4

Comment by potsandpans 5 hours ago

I suppose "close" could be interpreted subjectively.

I use flux2.dev on my 5090 with a prompt upsampler (that I host on my 3080ti, it's been so long since I looked at it, its either some qwen or Mistral model). I use the upsampler to produce json structure based on this prompting guide: https://docs.bfl.ml/guides/prompting_guide_flux2

For being able to run on my 5090, it produces incredibly consistent and stable results that work for my use case so well, I find myself reaching for it over proprietary models.

I'm always interested to see objective comparisons though. It's clear from yours that flux lags. But the fact that I can use it locally over closed source sota models is very compelling (to me).

You've convinced me to checkout ideogram4 though!

Comment by vunderba 5 hours ago

Ideogram4 is great! Just make sure that you either use some kind of preprocessor to convert your natural language prompt to the strict structured JSON format otherwise the results can suffer.

I personally use Qwen3 8b LLM for this purpose, but I think that the KJ prompt builder node handles this out of the box in ComfyUI.

https://github.com/kijai/ComfyUI-KJNodes

Comment by thisisauserid 19 hours ago

- Showed close to zero examples of people.

- Frivolous use of the term World Model.

- Claims 20 seconds of video, shows only jumpcuts.

Coming soon!

Comment by sexy_seedbox 18 hours ago

Many video examples on /r/stablediffusion

Comment by thisisauserid 12 hours ago

None within 24 hours of the announcement that show realistic human faces for than 3 seconds.

Comment by bobthebob 18 hours ago

And they are stunning

Comment by fractorial 11 hours ago

Funny how rule #3 is

> No nudity, lewdness, or sexually suggestive imagery. If it wouldn’t be appropriate for a workplace or younger audience, don’t post it here. NSFW tags are not an exception, stay classy.

Emphasis on the second sentence; where do these people work?!

Comment by lava_pidgeon 11 hours ago

Reddit is open for minors and parents browse Reddit on their leisure time.

Otherwise a Gen Ai has to check this subreddit

Comment by smokel 18 hours ago

> Frivolous use of the term World Model

The term "world model" as it was once used in model-based RL can now apparently refer to anything as silly as linear regression. Then again, the RL folks probably borrowed the term from behavioral scientists before them. It's probably best to simply accept this :/

A similar thing happened to "object oriented" which has been misused by philosophers and visual artists alike.

Comment by fidotron 14 hours ago

I'd have way more sympathy for the world-model-term-misuse complaints if the ML world hadn't studiously ignored and then reinvented so many fields over the years.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.06485 is enough to make any half decent game dev sit around wondering what was going on, as well as the general "maybe we're wasting a lot of space with all these floats?" At least now LLMs can tell them what SoTA is in other fields before they try to rediscover it.

Comment by mdp2021 17 hours ago

> probably borrowed the term from behavioral scientists

It's from epistemology. It is not there to refer to the subjective but to the objective.

> A similar thing happened to "object oriented" which has been misused by philosophers and visual artists alike

For instance?

Comment by smokel 17 hours ago

In the 1990s "Object-Oriented Ontology" was introduced by Graham Harman [1]. The name was borrowed from computing, but its meaning has little or nothing to do with Simula or Smalltalk.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Harman

Comment by mdp2021 16 hours ago

This is very interesting especially in the terms of what I think some call a "rabbit hole",

but we could be curious on how and why you saw misuse.

Comment by Der_Einzige 13 hours ago

The OOO/"Speculative Realism" crowd are loony charlatans who make the current post-modern neo marxist politburo who runs the humanities parts of academia look downright sane.

My response to unironic OOO believers is that we must wage war on objects:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistentialism

Comment by Q6T46nT668w6i3m 12 hours ago

I don’t see a problem. It appears to use a shared latent to learn inverse dynamics.

Comment by vitorgrs 18 hours ago

Yeah, very weird launch. I was like... where's the videos?

Comment by jdthedisciple 18 hours ago

It's incredible how negative and dismissive the comments in here are while here I am thinking the model actually looks impressively capable.

But then again I heard the downers have always been the first to leave their dung comments here so let's see...

Comment by ra 18 hours ago

It would be interesting to see some time-series sentiment analysis of HN. Subjectively it feels like there's much negativity on HN these days, I hope I'm wrong.

Comment by speff 12 hours ago

You may like this old comment by dang who did this type of analysis: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24215601 (2020)

Comment by roenxi 17 hours ago

Bunch of software engineers are worried about their future employment prospects.

Comment by ryanchants 13 hours ago

A lot of us spent substantial parts of our careers automating other folks out of jobs. But now that it's come for us, we're upset.

Comment by indymike 16 hours ago

It's not that as much as the usual something new, complain about rapid change.

Comment by deadbabe 10 hours ago

IMO it’s best to just stop worrying and embrace it as the end of days for the field.

These are the last good ol’ days you will have before it’s all over. Worrying about it won’t change the future. Just try to focus on all the good AI does.

Comment by rclkrtrzckr 15 hours ago

s/software engineers/filmmakers/

Comment by deadbabe 10 hours ago

filmmakers have the most to gain here, now anyone with a good idea for a story can just prompt out their own full length movie or tv show.

Comment by CamperBob2 8 hours ago

Before AI: 90% of everything was crap

After AI: 99% of everything is crap

... but there will be >10x more of it, so we'll ultimately end up with more good stuff.

Comment by taneq 2 hours ago

But since our capacity to experience stuff can't keep up with the sheer quantity of stuff, 99% of the stuff we see will be crap, even if there's technically a larger amount of good stuff in absolute terms.

Comment by CamperBob2 17 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by grosswait 15 hours ago

Add in time zone of the commenter and potentially some really interesting data emerges.

Comment by azinman2 14 hours ago

Such as?

Comment by mdp2021 17 hours ago

> time-series sentiment analysis [...] much negativity on HN these days, I hope I'm wrong

Depending on the members, there certainly is. Put aside the "dismissers", those who have a habit or a hormonal reliance to cast a "meh". Those who objectively assess according to the input that the development of facts provide may bend their "apparent mood" accordingly. This may be more evident here because in brighter times we may be more inclined to post and submit about more idle intellectual beauty ("complications in ancient clocks"), and in darker times it makes sense that we are more focused on the problems.

Comment by globular-toast 16 hours ago

Personally I'm just bored of AI releases. I kinda dread it because it'll hog the front page of HN for a couple of days and it's just the same comments every time: people showing what it generated, people signalling that they aren't luddites etc.

For me this is like announcing a slightly more efficient form of coal-powered steam engine. Great, but it's still running on coal. I'm excited about moving beyond coal to cleaner and more sustainable energy sources. Current "AI", based on machine learning, is just recycling existing human works: books, films, code, forum posts etc. But those works, like the coal, is going to run out. We've decided to stop making new things and just burn the coal that's already been deposited.

Comment by 14 hours ago

Comment by impossiblefork 15 hours ago

It's probably actually good, but after this stuff with Qwen-Image-3 and it's ability to things like render images that look like they were rendered with LaTeX or compose many things side by side or in depth, maybe it's perhaps not totally in the right direction to only focus on visual stuff.

Comment by walrus01 16 hours ago

I'm a person who is making extensive use of current-gen "smart" LLM for coding tasks and building automation tools, doing some of the drudge work of gluing disparate open source things together into new projects. I'm fairly optimistic about that. Particularly when you have a good harness setup and you know enough about the subject matter to understand when a model has gone into some dead-end of reasoning or has built something that's not quite right.

At the same time, I can see social media is being flooded with absolutely horrid AI slop images and video. I'm much more pessimistic about the practical beneficial real world use of totally artificial image and video generators. It seems the uses that these things are put to when they get into the hands of millions of people are detrimental to society and not a benefit.

Comment by icantevenhold 16 hours ago

Only the enlightened tech elite should have access to such sophisticated technology - we can’t expect the uneducated masses to not misuse them

/s

Comment by TeMPOraL 15 hours ago

Yeah, really, masses are fine. I mean gross and boring mostly, but fine. Problem is when entrepreneurs get their hands on such tech, because they invariably put it to use for scamming and cheating people (read: marketing). It's the business people who are flooding social media with AI slop, for example.

Comment by icantevenhold 13 hours ago

Yea but that’s a fad - people are already fed up with the obvious slop. I don’t think it’s something we will see a lot in ~1-2 years. Marketers will continue to hop on the next big trend just like they always did and all the current slop will become a different flavour slop.

Comment by drsalt 18 hours ago

none of this is exciting compared to holodeck in star trek

Comment by NitpickLawyer 16 hours ago

> in star trek

Heh. On the other hand, we are seeing so much negativity around "AI", while we have access to something as close as possible to the "universal communicator" from trek. There are now several CotS things you can buy that basically serve this purpose. You can walk into a mall, buy one, and travel to the most remote place on Earth, speak in your own language, and almost anyone else can speak in their own language, and through technomagic the two of you can communicate. And yet there's so much pessimism...

Comment by TeMPOraL 15 hours ago

Yup. People still don't believe when I say that we've cracked universal translation with LLMs. That's despite the proof being in their hands; anyone with any SOTA multimodal LLM app (read: Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini) with "advanced voice" / "live mode" can test it on the spot: just launch it and tell it will hear multiple languages and its task is to translate what it hears in one language to the other, and vice versa.

Comment by jarjoura 7 hours ago

Given that Martin Scorsese is now an "advisor", I suspect BFL will continue to position itself as the research lab for filmmakers. This video model, if comparable to Seedance 2.0 won't really make sense as a slop generator, as it's too expensive for that, but it would be part of a projects VFX pipeline.

Comment by muppetman 18 hours ago

Advertisers love these sorts of reactions.

I see nothing here but them TELLING us how great it is. Not showing us.

Comment by jdthedisciple 18 hours ago

> Not showing us

Have you watched the 46s video full screen on a monitor and not marvelled at the incredible 4K detail of the FPV motorcycle racing clip?

Comment by vouaobrasil 18 hours ago

It's possible it's because some people care about the consequences of what we're doing as a society beyond the mindless satiation of curiosity. Nothing wrong with curiosity in my books by the way, but I do think isolating it the way we've done in the technical fields is a dangerous and irresponsible attitude.

Comment by user43928 17 hours ago

As I understand it HN is a community for hackers to discuss interesting and curious topics.

Pessimistic opinions on the labor market, views about society and politics that border on the dystopian, as well as exaggerated concerns about datacenter environmental impacts, all seem like a poor fit for this website.

Comment by walrus01 16 hours ago

It would be a very uninformed world view and naive to say that the people who build and implement cutting-edge technology shouldn't be thinking about its societal implications and dangers. Or even considering more basic things like making sure it doesn't hurt anyone. Just because you can do a thing doesn't mean you always should do a thing.

Anyone ever taken a CS course that includes extensive discussion of the Therac-25?

Comment by user43928 15 hours ago

My issue with comments around the impact of AI is that often they are just not interesting.

What substance is there beyond "I don't like it, and I think it is a negative for society", typically delivered with what I perceive as a self-righteous attitude?

Comment by ryandrake 13 hours ago

> My issue with comments around the impact of AI is that often they are just not interesting.

To quote the movie, that’s just your opinion, man. To me, the impact of technology on society is 100X as interesting and important than the technology itself. Tech does not exist in a vacuum. And we don’t invent it for its own sake. The major point of AI (maybe the only point of it) is what humans will do to each other with it. And like it or not, not all of those things are positive.

Comment by user43928 12 hours ago

That not all of the tech's applications are positive seems obvious, and hardly makes for interesting discussion.

Is there something in particular that you think would be interesting to discuss here?

Comment by walrus01 15 hours ago

My criticism is specifically with the use of text-to-image and text-to-video generators that will create fully artificial video and image content. I've seen the uses that these tools are being put to in 2025/2026 for electoral manipulation, social issue manipulation and it leaves me with a very distasteful impression.

You will not see me leaving comments such as this, for example, on the release of a "strong in coding tasks" tool like GLM5.2.

I actively go out of my way to avoid patronizing businesses that advertise with AI slop generated images now, AI slop restaurant menus, and so forth.

Whether you want to interpret a desire for authenticity as some sort of self-righteous attitude is up to you. There's a lot of people that share my opinion, and a lot of them that don't. There is also clearly a lot of money behind pushing AI slop images everywhere. Facebook and the various 'pages' and 'groups' that are near 90% AI slop content are a fine example of that. I'm sure a great many advertising impressions and click-throughs have been served, much revenue has been earned. Great success.

Comment by TeMPOraL 15 hours ago

> electoral manipulation

That must be the poster child of the most boring and meaningless accusation thrown around new technologies (after the data center water scare, which was just plain bogus). We've heard this non stop since Cambridge Analytica nothingburger. It's all noise distracting from the one meaningful aspect of it: marketing to people is electoral manipulation, and since that's unquestionably allowed, the horses have left the barn long time ago, and futzing over the AI barn door control makes no sense at this point.

If anything, the problem that this is effective in the first place is the one to address - this translates to people still believing anything politicians say, despite decades of continued proof all the campaign promises are just plain bullshit, and stated beliefs are situational and not principled.

Comment by walrus01 15 hours ago

I'm not just talking about within the context of Cambridge Analytica / USA specific things.

For a more immediate example, look at Russian weaponization of social media in Mali for a pro-russia, anti-everyone-else narrative. Often deployed against a population that has a much greater level of credulity of anything they see on social media, and lack of inoculation against it by multiple years of seeing artificially generates nonsense.

Comment by inquirerGeneral 9 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by 14 hours ago

Comment by lostmsu 16 hours ago

I bet you even Windows built-in Pinball game hurt somebody and had social implications.

Comment by walrus01 15 hours ago

I reserve my opinions on microsoft fuckery for more practical and immediate concerns like the recent LG monitors and device drivers auto-installing adware.

Comment by lostmsu 12 hours ago

The point is inclusion criteria are too broad

Comment by mdp2021 16 hours ago

You must expand the view to: members here form a community of people with aggregage special skills (which the "intellectual curiosity" part itself suggests) and are operators in a real world, which we assess and discuss.

There are urgent matters, important matters, and nice matters - all relevant to us.

Comment by popalchemist 8 hours ago

It is precisely those people who have abdicated such concerns who most need the discussion. You can not compartmentalize reality, even if you can compartmentalize your own mind. These discussions lead one closer to a relationship with reality as-it-is than as your mind would like it to be.

Comment by Fricken 15 hours ago

There are less things to talk about on HN today than ever before!

Comment by user43928 14 hours ago

I disagree.

We live in a time where artificial intelligence begins to rival humans in some areas.

We can now really automate things.

How interesting is that? There is so much to talk about.

Comment by 14 hours ago

Comment by nuclearsugar 30 minutes ago

Hope the open-weights reduces the VRAM requirement compared to Flux 2.

Comment by forgotusername6 13 hours ago

Is anyone feeding models touch data? It seems the main thing we want the robots to do is touch things, but we are just feeding them audio/video/images. The model has to learn how to touch things despite never having touched anything before. Perhaps that's why they all look so hesitant when they touch things?

Comment by downrightmike 9 hours ago

Its faster to just have them simulate touching things, they figure it out way faster that way

Comment by Tenoke 17 hours ago

Flux 2 Dev Klein has practically been the best you could use on most commercial hardware so I really hope Flux 3 has a comparable updated open-weights model to it. if not it'd be a great loss to most hobbyists.

Comment by make_it_sure 18 hours ago

first AI thing coming from Europe that gives high hopes

Comment by tormeh 17 hours ago

These people are hiring in... Freiburg im Breisgau? Wonder how hiring is working out for them there.

Comment by mindhunter 16 hours ago

A very beautiful place on earth: one friend who lives there enjoys road biking in the surrounding mountains. Another friend does cross-country skiing in his lunch break (in winter times).

Comment by tormeh 16 hours ago

I can totally see that. I imagine it's great for hiking and food. But if/when this company has an issue you'll have to move again or start working at the local Sparkasse or something.

Comment by beydogan 14 hours ago

I live nearby, its an amazing area, one of the sunniest in Germany with perfect landscape. Not sure about the talent pool though but there is a university.

Comment by nl 15 hours ago

Freiburg University is pretty well known isn't it?

Hiring in university towns is a pretty standard practice for startups outside SF.

Comment by toilet 16 hours ago

there's a reason people call it Flyburg im Nicegau.

Comment by cachius 13 hours ago

Why Fly?

Comment by marvinborner 12 hours ago

Being "fly" is slang for being cool. It has been officially chosen as German youth word of the year in 2016 [0].

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youth_word_of_the_year_(German...

Comment by cachius 12 hours ago

Ok boomer. SCNR 2016 is a while ago. Flew by me

Comment by vrganj 16 hours ago

I think these days not being in the US is a plus for many potential hires.

Comment by kensai 16 hours ago

You are completely ignorant. This is one of the best places to live and work on earth. Nonetheless, they also have positions in San Francisco for what is worth.

Comment by dang 4 hours ago

I'm sure it's a great place to live and work, but can you please edit out swipes from your comments here, as the site guidelines ask (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html)?

Your post would have been just fine without that first bit.

Comment by rambojohnson 10 hours ago

the bay is not the world.

Comment by 16 hours ago

Comment by Gecko4072 18 hours ago

I thought the clips were real footage until they were dancing in a flooded room.

Comment by OldMatey 17 hours ago

I am very excited for this. 2.3 was excellent and I've seen clips from people who got early access along with reading their reflections on it and I think this will be the new SOTA for home use.

Comment by NSUserDefaults 17 hours ago

> a model must learn a representation of the world: […] and how events sound

I honestly hope they put an unrealistic amount of wilhelm scream into the learning process, just for fun.

Comment by bensyverson 13 hours ago

"Actually, let me be careful placing the rubber sealing. If I do it too roughly, it screams."

Comment by zmmmmm 19 hours ago

> It jointly learns from images, videos, and audio within a unified architecture, because what it needs to learn is not any one of these elements in isolation.

I'm confused, videos contain images and audio ...?

Comment by ibotty 19 hours ago

That's most likely a disagreement on terms. In the media world, video is only the moving images, not audio. This is separate from images, that are meant to be still images.

Comment by EricBurnett 16 hours ago

Video contains images (frames), but not every image would reasonably be found in the frames of a video, or interpreted spatially. In the space of world model synthesis, consider blueprints, relationship diagrams, pages of instructions, sheet music, or a boarding pass.

Comment by PxldLtd 19 hours ago

It's more a comment about the feature detection I think; all image, video and audio input contribute to the same weights/activations that can produce image, video and audio output.

Comment by pwillia7 15 hours ago

Awesome -- glad they're going to release the open weight version! I've been waiting for an excuse to re jump into AI OS image gen!

Comment by 16 hours ago

Comment by abdusco 18 hours ago

I wonder if this also creates people with huge heads and short necks like Flux Klein does.

Comment by AmbroseBierce 12 hours ago

Amazing. This will be fundamental for the future for robots to distinguish the sound of the poors getting close to Besos/Musk's/Zuckerberg bunkers and quickly adapt to any new kind of attack by the masses, robots will quickly learn to adapt to the behavior of the attackers, quickly infer where they are grouped, their numbers and so for.

Of course there will be feuds from robots of different family groups but they will be minimal as it quickly becomes symmetrical robot conflict with high casualties as they learn too fast from each other, it's likely those will be avoided, it will be after all much easier to confront humans for any given resources.

Truly a pinnacle for technology, albeit perhaps not for mankind.

Comment by vrganj 12 hours ago

When they hide in their bunkers, who's to stop people from pouring concrete down the ventilation shafts?

Comment by isoprophlex 8 hours ago

Or aerosolized LSD...

Comment by saejox 18 hours ago

i don't get why they are investing money on image/video gen. All generations i have see looked blurry, lacking in fine details and missing the artistic touch (lacks meaning? lifeless?)

Comment by mdp2021 18 hours ago

> why they are investing money

Maybe they presume that after a series of "good enough to some" they may be getting near the Real Thing?

Comment by vitalyan8184 15 hours ago

now look at AI images/videos from 5 years ago.

Comment by yangcheng 15 hours ago

I hope flux will include a 3D generation model. right now the open-weights version of 3D is failing behind closed source by a big margin. Hopefully the improved spatial ability helps with robotics too

Comment by mattmanser 19 hours ago

Open-weight plans are near the bottom (Launch section):

    - Video and audio generation and editing through APIs and private weight access. (“FLUX 3 Video”)
    - Action prediction through selected research and commercial partners, beginning with mimic robotics (“FLUX-mimic and FLUX 3 Action”)
    - Image synthesis and editing through APIs and private weight access. (“FLUX 3 Image”)
    - Open-weight access to a multimodal backbone, for content creation (video, audio and image) and action prediction. (“FLUX 3 Dev”)

Comment by spidercob 17 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by rekpero 18 hours ago

I have a feeling open-weight models ought to be outperforming proprietary ones by now, but that still hasn’t happened. So far, Nano Banana and GPT-2 Image seem to be the best in class, and Flux still isn’t crossing that quality bar.

Comment by ex-aws-dude 14 hours ago

If you think about it why is language/image even separate from video?

Isn’t video + audio all you need?

Comment by doubleorseven 13 hours ago

video is just a group of images (GOP) if the gist is what you're after

Comment by teiferer 19 hours ago

Lots of words about multi-modal but then this:

> our mission to develop real-world visual intelligence

Visual is mono-modal, isn't it?

Comment by cpldcpu 18 hours ago

its doing video, audio, images and motion. I think that counts as multimodal.

Comment by nerdsniper 19 hours ago

Is this really the value-add comment you’re going with?

Comment by camillomiller 19 hours ago

Says the one who posts this comment?

Comment by rambojohnson 10 hours ago

the grift that keeps on grifting. no examples longer than a second, non recent anyway... just more hype, and no substance.

Comment by 16 hours ago

Comment by SubiculumCode 19 hours ago

Well, unified multimodal intelligence is the only way we will get to The Terminator, which seems to be the goal now of Silicon Valley and every Nation State with a military budget, so have at.

Comment by UberFly 19 hours ago

I wish you were being hyperbolic but I know better.

Comment by SubiculumCode 18 hours ago

I don't even know anymore, to be honest. I talk to AIs more than I do with humans, these days...So who knows

Comment by dgellow 18 hours ago

That doesn’t sound healthy

Comment by SubiculumCode 17 hours ago

Well, probably not, but I am not engaging in socialization. I am using it to help me decide among competing statistical modeling approaches, or other aspects of my research, including coding, neuroimaging pipelines, and an assortment of other thorny issues that come with longitudinal/developmental neuroscience.

Comment by frotaur 19 hours ago

Sorry because pointing this is a bit tired by now, but reading already the first two paragraph thete is this unmistakable stench of LLM slop writing. Immediately disengaged.

Comment by TeMPOraL 14 hours ago

Nobody is forcing you to read it. If you lose some interesting information because you don't like how it sounds, that's your loss.

Comment by cobolexpert 19 hours ago

Thanks for the heads-up

Comment by user43928 16 hours ago

It comes back as AI written when checked in Pangram, but I am skeptical.

It does not seem as grating as the slop I typically see in README.md files or generated docs.

Comment by camillomiller 19 hours ago

Correct reaction

Comment by Good4boothee 17 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by tancoai_dev 10 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by tancoai_dev 10 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by bkingfilm 14 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by vladsiu 18 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by doitright99 18 hours ago

AI slop trained on copyrighted content.

Comment by csvm 17 hours ago

"Horseless slop trained on centuries of coachmakers' and blacksmiths' work. It'll never replace a real horse." - Hacker News commenter in 1889 criticizing the automobile

Comment by human305893 15 hours ago

This is close to the stupidest thing I've ever read. Congrats

Comment by TeMPOraL 14 hours ago

How about CNC mill being slop trained on millions of hours of blacksmith and machinist experience?

Comment by vouaobrasil 19 hours ago

The fact that people keep developing this technology shows that the true problem is not that machines are likely to become intelligent, but that people have already become machines - unthinking and without any care to the future whatsoever.

Comment by mdp2021 17 hours ago

Show it, don't just say it. The argument would be?

Comment by luciana1u 18 hours ago

imagine spending nine figures training a model to learn that the sound has to match the impact. my 8-month-old figured that out by dropping a spoon on the floor twice.

Comment by gillesjacobs 15 hours ago

Same person that was mocking the hands in image generation in 2023, is the same person that was saying 'hands are fixed but it can't generate "the red dog jumps over the jump rope held by the blue pelican while juggling 5 balls"' in 2024, is the same person that posted this.

Comment by mdp2021 18 hours ago

"One-shot learning" is still part of the discipline, actively studied (definitely in the past and surely in the present).