What's Under Your Feet in New York City?
Posted by sohkamyung 5 days ago
Comments
Comment by evrydayhustling 20 hours ago
It was extraordinary, like something out of a sci-fi where an alien ship has been torn open and the mess of pipes and wires looks organic. It was also a funny case of lost tech / organizational memory -- I heard they had to ask the union to help find retired folks who had worked on the lower levels and could explain why pipes were laid out the way they were.
Comment by mike_hock 1 day ago
Comment by hinkley 20 hours ago
And if your name is Winston, it's just best if you stay above ground, or stick to the subway system.
Comment by throw1234567891 22 hours ago
Comment by hinkley 20 hours ago
Comment by argelio4321 22 hours ago
Comment by dbuxton 22 hours ago
Luckily ChatGPt does a pretty good impression https://chatgpt.com/s/m_6a6662e9af6c81918523fb06d1384e74
Comment by jayrot 15 hours ago
Comment by dbuxton 7 hours ago
tldr the initial effort didn't seem to read the linked article so I copied and pasted the full text in
Comment by hotstickyballs 1 day ago
Comment by dataviz1000 1 day ago
Comment by woodruffw 1 day ago
(Also pedantic, but it’s not the entire city: there’s a Manhattan eruv that covers a large part of Manhattan, while Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx have separate smaller eruvim.)
Comment by skissane 11 hours ago
There have been some big fights about the topic: https://traditiononline.org/unpacking-the-iggerot/
Although from what I understand, Moshe Feinstein wasn’t opposed to eruvim in principle, he just viewed them as an inappropriate for a city like NYC
Comment by randallsquared 23 hours ago
> following the law of the highest of high courts to the letter.
but I don't think that "there is no 'high court' at all" is one, for believers.
Comment by woodruffw 23 hours ago
(Each movement has its own beis din, but there is not “high court” that unifies religious rulings across them. Which is why an eruv created by one group is often considered invalid by others.)
Comment by bombcar 13 hours ago
Comment by woodruffw 13 hours ago
Comment by bombcar 12 hours ago
Comment by woodruffw 7 hours ago
https://voices.sefaria.org/sheets/144163?lang=bi
(Talmudic interpretation doesn’t stress this story because it shows how much Jews love to argue, or because they can win arguments against God. It stresses the story because it demonstrates that the law has been received (“It is not in heaven”) and thus does not need to appeal to God. This, inter alia, is why nobody asks God for their opinion on eruvim.)
Comment by ButlerianJihad 13 hours ago
Comment by radicality 22 hours ago
It also has a status page! https://eruv.nyc/
Comment by frantathefranta 21 hours ago
Comment by radicality 19 hours ago
Comment by lesuorac 20 hours ago
Like a lot of the rules are very fuzzy in their origin. The whole kosher business comes from a passage about "Not boiling a kid in it's mothers milk". I think most people would interpret that much more literally and you couldn't kill a child goat (kid) and boil it in it's mothers milk; and probably also extend it to other animals like cows. But I'd still think that killing a kid and putting a slice on cheese on the meat would be fine.
So if somebody is going to be obtuse with what you can do it seems like it'd be good fun to figure out all the ways around it.
Comment by to11mtm 18 hours ago
Stuff like disease (i.e. most of the other rules about kosher animal prep including 'inspection',) allergies (shellfish ban), heck even pasteurization (going back to the 'boiling in milk', what are the odds that the milk hit the right temperature all throughout versus only some of it boiling, which in fact could encourage certain bad bacteria to grow, let alone whatever's in the likely uncooked meat being able to feed off the whole thing...)
Comment by quickthrowman 38 minutes ago
Comment by markovs_gun 4 hours ago
Jews think of the law differently. The law came directly from God- therefore, it is free from errors. If there are loopholes you can find in the law, God put them there for a reason and won't be mad if you use them. Some people even think that God put the loopholes in there as a reward for careful study of the law. Jews also don't think that there is eternal damnation in Hell facing anyone who defies the law, so I suppose the stakes are lower than for Christians so they can afford to be stricter.
Comment by cogman10 1 day ago
Religious infighting with 2 fundamentalist sects that somehow boiled down to some people digging a tunnel connecting 2 buildings because of... reasons? Like it seems like they thought that if they built the tunnel that'd magically lead to everyone deciding "You know what, this expansion project is a good thing!"
Very bizarre.
Regardless, I'm glad it got shut down before a collapse killed someone.
Comment by woodruffw 1 day ago
The very short version is that both groups claim ownership of that building, and one of them wants to expand it significantly. Neither group is allowed to modify the building because of a court order, so the one that wants to modify it did it surreptitiously in an attempt to create facts on the ground that would modify the status quo.
(Obviously none of this is sensible, but the actual reasons are pretty quotidian.)
Comment by masfuerte 1 day ago
> four defendants refused to accept a plea deal and were set to be tried in April 2025
I can find loads of stories reporting those facts, but I can't find an account of what happened next. Did they change their pleas? Were they tried?
Comment by Brybry 9 hours ago
You can find the defendant names in this article (from the wikipedia link) [1] and then look up some basic case info by name: google "new york WebCriminal Defendant Search" and then search by defendant name + Kings Supreme Criminal Court. You'll see information like case number and next court date. You can also find similar info with "nyscef case search".
When I was clicking around, the website sometimes had language about not linking to it directly without permission so that's why no link... even though it seems a bit silly.
[1] https://www.nbcnewyork.com/brooklyn/men-charged-brooklyn-syn...
Comment by throw47733 4 hours ago
Comment by rdtsc 1 day ago
This was unexpected though:
> stills taken from videos of the synagogue's interior as well as the room leading to the tunnel, which showed a stained mattress and high chair, respectively, fueled antisemitic conspiracy theories
> A USA Today fact-check stated that the stained mattress seen in viral videos had been removed from behind wood paneling of the synagogue rather than from the tunnel itself, undermining online speculation that the mattresses were in the tunnel
Comment by noworriesnate 23 hours ago
https://xcancel.com/Truthtellerftm/status/197901264211193488...
Comment by burkaman 22 hours ago
Comment by mschuster91 20 hours ago
I'd say it was an utterly braindead move and pretty much everyone involved is lucky to be alive.
There's just so, so much dangerous stuff you can hit below ground - high voltage cables that really, really do not like it if you even nick them, high current cables giving off nasty electromagnetic fields, ordinary low voltage cables whose isolation is already degraded, old water, gas, steam and sewer mains that may or may not burst simply because the only thing holding together the rust is the pressure from the soil, other, maybe long forgotten tunnels...
And that's before even getting into the issue of potentially getting caved in, creating a sinkhole or an ingress avenue for stormwater.
Comment by ButlerianJihad 8 hours ago
> The 13 people, all young men, pleaded not guilty in State Supreme Court in Brooklyn ... Another four defendants were absent because they were in Israel, according to their lawyer, Levi Huebner.
> Justice Adam Perlmutter ordered the defendants ... to turn over their passports.
Comment by programmertote 23 hours ago
Comment by radicality 22 hours ago
Comment by jayrot 18 hours ago
Comment by euroderf 20 hours ago
Comment by hinkley 20 hours ago
Comment by willworktill4pm 10 hours ago
Comment by xg15 20 hours ago
Comment by markdown 9 hours ago
Comment by theletterf 22 hours ago
Comment by ozyschmozy 21 hours ago
Comment by zkmon 1 day ago
Comment by barrenko 22 hours ago
Comment by woodruffw 22 hours ago
[1]: https://sohobroadway.org/soho-broadway-block-by-belgian-bloc...
Comment by pimlottc 3 hours ago
This report [0] from the Historic Districts Council in NYC says:
> Despite the name Belgian block, it remains unclear to what extent, and during what era, paving stones imported from Belgium may have provided the raw materials for New York City’s streets.¹ It is known that the city’s early paving stones included a type of six- inch-square traprock commonly called “Belgian” block, and said to have first been used in Belgium.
>1. While it has often been reported that Belgian blocks were imported to New York as ship ballast, we have not found primary evidence to confirm this practice.
https://hdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HDC_Historic-Stre...
Comment by woodruffw 3 hours ago
But your point about importing heavy material is mislaid: the blocks are intentionally heavy, because they (apocryphally) served as ballast.
Comment by VoodooJuJu 1 day ago
Comment by dfaoidsoi 1 day ago