Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro?
Posted by y1n0 4 hours ago
Almost two years ago there was a thread on this (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40872102). I'm curious now that more time has passed what people think?
Comments
Comment by dsernst 2 hours ago
Getting it comfortable was the most important step. The 6-months-old DualKnit band is really great for making it a lot more comfortable. An open face mod (eg $10 Macally on amazon) helps a lot with eye breathability, and restoring peripheral vision.
Also really great for being able to work well from anywhere.
Sad that so many people are sleeping on it, but what can you do? Check out r/VisionPro for tons of people that love theirs and use them constantly.
Comment by jkubicek 2 hours ago
For context, I have no problem using external monitors without my glasses. The only downside is very tired eyes at the end of a workday, but I can read text just fine.
Comment by saagarjha 40 minutes ago
Comment by pfannkuchen 1 hour ago
Comment by dsernst 2 hours ago
Have you tried w/ contact lenses? I've seen that work well for friends when they try them out.
Comment by importRyan 1 hour ago
Comment by nwatson 1 hour ago
Comment by importRyan 1 hour ago
Xcode 27’s Device Hub now allows interacting with nearby dev devices (a bit better than Android Studio’s implementation). Super convenient change that makes it practical to do more things while in the recliner / VP.
Comment by MoonWalk 24 minutes ago
This could have been a great device for gamers, 3-D modelers, drone pilots, cinematographers... but Apple's fear of I/O ruined it.
Comment by chocochunks 2 hours ago
Comment by dsernst 2 hours ago
Similarly I tried the original HoloLens, many many years ago (2016?), with the similar waveguide technology. It was outside, at night, so relatively easy to see, albeit with jarringly tight field of view.
Without a doubt I'm excited about lightweight AR glasses that I can wear in public. My non-expert opinion is we're still a few years away.
In the meantime, I love my Apple goggles. For home usage only, and not when guests come over. Going open face (no lightshield) makes them feel a lot more like magic AR glasses, with the ~95% accurate passthrough.
Comment by sofixa 1 hour ago
Not the same type of AR, but the Even G2 look very promising. Can't use them as an external screen, they're more of an assistant with notes, live translate, app ecosystem, etc. I imagine they might be useful as a moving teleprompter.
Comment by BoorishBears 1 hour ago
But also not really a surprise given the difference in optics.
Comment by Me1000 1 hour ago
Comment by dmarcos 37 minutes ago
Comment by racl101 25 minutes ago
Comment by CraigJPerry 2 hours ago
That said, the battery cable was super annoying, id accidentally catch it multiple times per day. The battery is good for less than 2 hours so i used it plugged into the wall.
For zoom calls, the persona thing is hilariously bad, unusable in a business context. Interesting for a few minutes as a tech demo though.
The virtual layout is good - a big citrix app screen (its the ipad app) for remote desktop, zoom, safari etc off to the sides and then things like calendar widget pinned to physical wall. But text clarity / quality is just slightly not good enough for software development. Almost, its close. If you dont mind large fonts its good enough.
Ultimately returned it but it was a close run thing, i almost kept it.
I do still hanker for something like this, tempted to try xreal or other glasses but seems like the PPD is even lower.
Comment by goldenarm 2 hours ago
Comment by asadotzler 1 hour ago
Comment by sgt 1 hour ago
Comment by curiouscavalier 3 hours ago
using as a spatial monitor was cool. for about 10min until my neck got tired of the added weight. but I’ll give credit that those 10min were pretty cool.
Comment by nkrisc 3 hours ago
Wearing something heavy on the front of your face is simply not a pleasant experience.
Comment by Geee 2 hours ago
Comment by layer8 1 hour ago
Comment by numpad0 1 hour ago
Comment by sleepybrett 35 minutes ago
Comment by asadotzler 1 hour ago
Just the displays and lenses will outweigh glasses considerably and there's nothing to strip back when you're down to display and lenses. Throw in a chassis and head strap and you're pretty far from glasses in weight and ergonomics.
Comment by cineticdaffodil 2 hours ago
Comment by thih9 2 hours ago
https://old.reddit.com/r/VisionPro/comments/1cki7jc/brillian...
Comment by masfuerte 1 hour ago
Comment by t-writescode 34 minutes ago
So yes, this is done and it can help.
Comment by esikich 54 minutes ago
Comment by MisterTea 1 hour ago
Comment by wvenable 3 hours ago
Imagine if the vision pro could just be plugged into a small compute module with a battery or just plugged directly into a Macbook. It would be lighter, cheaper, and more flexible. I think a lot more people would have been interested in it.
Comment by Cassell 3 hours ago
It would be so cool to be able to plug in arbitrary input devices too, like a dvd player, but its understandable that others don’t feel this way, and it would totally not be an apple product if it did this.
One of their main imposed constraints was clearly to make the battery pocketable, which sadly precludes a lot of things which would have made it a better product, in favour of wider acceptability.
Comment by grokx 2 hours ago
You can't move the compute away in a headset. I have worked for an XR OEM, and when you are designing a headset, you want the compute to be as close as possible from the cameras and displays, to achieve the lowest possible latency and avoid motion sickness for the users.
Even moving the compute to the back of the headset was not considered viable by our HW team. And we haven't spoken about the bandwidth required for all those cameras and UHD displays.
A better way to reduce the weight of the AVP would have been to remove the (useless IMO) front holographic screen, and to replace most of the glass and metal by plastic. And maybe move the battery pack to the back, to get a more balanced headset.
Comment by wvenable 2 hours ago
Meta has shown pretty convincingly that you can literally stream VR apps/games over Wifi from a PC to a headset and have a great experience. You will need some compute on the device, as close as possible, but the bulk of the computing could be moved off.
Comment by Jabrov 31 minutes ago
Comment by wvenable 16 minutes ago
The technology has actually gotten better since I last spent a significant amount of time with it.
Comment by t-writescode 33 minutes ago
Comment by dsernst 2 hours ago
Just wanted to let you know the new Dual Knit bands are weighted in the back, and improve the balance a bunch.
Comment by asadotzler 2 hours ago
Also, it doesn't make the best virtual monitor anyway, as the display fidelity is about half-Retina, so all the pixels really stick out compared to every other display Apple's shipped in recent memory. A 1998 Powerbook has crisper text.
Comment by orimirs 3 hours ago
Comment by t-writescode 31 minutes ago
I have a battery pack I put in my pocket for the Quest 3 and I’m generally very happy with it.
Comment by ChoGGi 3 hours ago
Comment by tracyhenry 3 hours ago
WWDC also just rolled out some quite exciting features to RealityKit: https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2026/279/ as well as visionOS itself (https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2026/287/)
It makes me wonder if Apple is really giving it up as news have claimed.
Comment by jeromegv 3 hours ago
I don't think anyone serious has claimed that.
Comment by alt227 2 hours ago
Comment by asadotzler 1 hour ago
Apple shelved the follow up v2 over a year ago and signaled very clearly it was refocusing its XR efforts toward AR glasses.
There hasn't been a new Vision Pro component order since the late 2023, early 2024 original orders that were capped (by SSS's display capacity) at 500k units worth, so Apple hasn't sold even that tiny amount yet.
It was Tim Cook's baby, his last shot at a product legacy, and the guy that just inherited Cooks role put even the lesser Vision Air on ice, the last goggles product that was still on Apple's roadmap.
So, it's not dead, but it's clearly on life support with no goggles of any kind remaining on the roadmap and Apple's attention fully moved to glasses and AI.
Comment by fumar 20 minutes ago
Comment by pfannkuchen 1 hour ago
My guess is it is basically a real world survey of how people would use such a device, and what developers would do with it. Then they could later focus on a cheaper product that is only a display, or a product that is only a media viewer, or a product that focuses on VR/AR applications while deemphasizing other use cases.
This is the version of reality that doesn’t require anyone to be stupid. In my experience if a reality candidate requires that someone is just really really stupid to arrive at the outcome (in this case Apple execs), probably you are missing something about someone’s perspective.
Comment by simonjgreen 4 hours ago
Comment by cglee 2 hours ago
The two things that consistently delight me are AI and my AVP. I'm trying to combine the two.
Comment by dmitshur 3 hours ago
For other work or entertainment that doesn't take advantage of its spatial features, I tend to revert to using a computer with an external display. The display in the Vision Pro cannot quite match the resolution and HDR headroom of the external display I ended up having (a Pro Display XDR). Maybe if it didn't get outclassed by my external display when displaying 2D content, I'd have additional motivation to use it more often.
Comment by nathanyz 4 hours ago
Comment by iFred 1 hour ago
The ability to focus on something while the world around me melts away. When it is just myself, the virtual display of my Mac, and the drifting grains of gypsum at White Sands, I seem to be at peace with whatever I am working on.
Comment by mzagaja 3 hours ago
Comment by hbn 1 hour ago
I just can't justify the $5000CAD starting price to watch movies. I've considered getting a used M2 model, but I believe you still need to get fitted for the eye piece to ensure a proper seal, and the closest Apple Store to me is about a 6 hour drive. Also I'm not even sure all the cool new Siri stuff yesterday would be supported on the M2 model, so it'd kinda suck to spend all that money and be locked out of new features right away.
Comment by rpowers 1 hour ago
Comment by aspenmartin 2 hours ago
Comment by dsernst 2 hours ago
Just yesterday they announced a new OS with a number of interesting new features, like custom environments, improved click-with-your-eyes-controls (Dwell Control), a bunch more: https://www.apple.com/os/visionos/
Comment by aspenmartin 2 hours ago
Comment by djsavvy 3 hours ago
Comment by thepryz 1 hour ago
Comment by y1n0 24 minutes ago
Comment by mkw5053 2 hours ago
Comment by frizlab 36 minutes ago
Comment by nilkn 1 hour ago
My main use cases are Mac Virtual Display, movies/entertainment, PS5 gaming [0], casual browsing, and -- most surprisingly -- reading. The first few are pretty self-explanatory, but reading is one of my favorite unexpected niche use cases. It's really nice having a floating book (via Apple Books) perfectly positioned at eye height in front of you in your favorite virtual environment, listening to music of your choice. This use case didn't really take off for me until the recent dual knit band fixed the comfort issue. I dabbled with reading in the Vision Pro before but the comfort level just wasn't quite there yet. The new band is good enough to make this one of my favorite ways to read today.
[0] I use the Portal app for this. It lets you stream PS5 games into a gigantic screen inside the Vision Pro. I combine it with a Dolby Atmos surround sound speaker setup in our upstairs game room. It's truly a stunning experience. The only reason I wouldn't declare this the gold standard way to play games is because it currently relies on WiFi streaming, which introduces some input lag. The lag tends not to be an issue with the games that I play, but it's enough that you wouldn't play competitive twitch shooters with it. If Apple had just allowed you to plug in an external device via HDMI, this would hands down be the most impressive gaming experience out there. I'm personally very sensitive to input lag thanks to years of low-latency PC gaming, but I know not everybody is. If you're not, you may be even more impressed by it than me.
Comment by nickandbro 4 hours ago
Comment by simjnd 3 hours ago
Comment by bananamogul 2 hours ago
The Quest 3S has color passthrough and it's hardly an Apple-level device, and it's $349 in comparison.
I guess as a gamer, I don't care that much. I put on my headset to game, and if I need to step away for a moment, I'm more likely to take it off than to wander around my house with a headset on. Still, I thought color passthrough was now table stakes for a headset.
[1] https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/vr-hardware/the-steam-frame...
Comment by 3092-8121-9924 42 minutes ago
Comment by simjnd 1 hour ago
Comment by daviding 3 hours ago
Comment by some_random 3 hours ago
Comment by daviding 3 hours ago
Comment by NetOpWibby 4 hours ago
Comment by elicash 2 hours ago
I use it occasionally, either to watch movies or the content that Apple releases specifically for it.
Comment by bijowo1676 4 hours ago
There are only two first-adopters for any new technology: military and adult industry.
Without these you wont get any traction
Comment by wolvoleo 1 hour ago
The prudishness is really holding back the industry.
Comment by kenferry 3 hours ago
Comment by throwaway28373 1 hour ago
Comment by nkrisc 3 hours ago
Comment by kaikai 3 hours ago
Comment by NetOpWibby 4 hours ago
Comment by Rohansi 3 hours ago
Comment by bijowo1676 4 hours ago
Comment by throwaway28373 1 hour ago
Comment by wat10000 4 hours ago
Comment by bijowo1676 4 hours ago
Comment by jzellis 4 hours ago
Comment by wat10000 3 hours ago
Comment by DonHopkins 2 hours ago
Comment by some_random 3 hours ago
Comment by ako 3 hours ago
Comment by some_random 3 hours ago
Comment by t-3 1 hour ago
Comment by wholinator2 3 hours ago
Comment by antimatter15 4 hours ago
Comment by racl101 1 hour ago
Comment by breakds 1 hour ago
Comment by zorobo 3 hours ago
Mostly multiple safari windows opening on servers via webterm, cli and emacs.
It’s especially great when traveling.
Only problem, I cannot share a window when presenting…
Comment by BryantD 2 hours ago
Comment by some_random 3 hours ago
Comment by fsiefken 3 hours ago
KRVR - https://krvr.app/
Comment by t1234s 1 hour ago
Comment by asadotzler 1 hour ago
Comment by brian_herman 2 hours ago
Comment by nightsd01 2 hours ago
Comment by outside1234 4 hours ago
Did anyone ever use that and did it live up to the hype? Or did you just get sick from having a headset on?
Comment by everforward 3 hours ago
Haven’t tried on the AVP, I think it has way better displays than the OG Vive did.
Comment by stephc_int13 4 hours ago
Comment by wahnfrieden 4 hours ago
Comment by sublinear 4 hours ago
I don't specify which brand or model because I have gone through several pairs since then. They're all about the same and somewhat flimsy, but worth it for the reduced bulk.
Comment by j-wags 2 hours ago
Comment by cadamsdotcom 2 hours ago
Comment by j-wags 1 hour ago
Pros:
- Price (~$200 one year ago)
- Display quality/resolution is fine
- Brightness is excellent, can use it in direct sunlight without issue
- Build quality is fine.
- It really is just a plug-and-play USB-C monitor that overlays on whatever you're looking at.
- The focal distance (~4 meters) is really nice since my eyes often get strained when working on my laptop screen
Cons:
- (BIG con) it turns out that the field of view is TOO large - I often can't see the system clock in the corner of my screen or the quickbar in games.
- It just has normal pads like for glasses, and they can get a little sore/leave a red mark since they're heavier than normal glasses
- It's powered by the same USB that delivers the display data, so while it works fine for my macbook, it won't display from my phone. I've seen that there are battery/power converter dongles to add power to the cable but haven't tried one.
So if I did it again I'd just check reviews and get whatever is cheap and well reviewed currently. I was thinking about finding some sort of airplane-friendly keyboard+mouse setup as well but it turns out that just using my laptop keyboard and touchpad works fine.
Comment by jotux 4 hours ago
How did you use these? Did you like them?
Comment by wolvoleo 1 hour ago
Comment by sublinear 2 hours ago
With this form factor, the main limitation is physical user input, not compatibility or fatigue. There's no battery or adapters or walled garden to mess around with. I would not be opposed to a touch pad or gesture system if it actually worked reliably and didn't require accessories or excessive motion from me.
For now, they're literally just a screen in a pair of glasses, and that's all I ever wanted. I'm sure there will be improvements to this category, but any product that strays from this core functionality will be a hard pass from me.
Comment by wahnfrieden 4 hours ago
Curious if anyone is using it successfully for ergonomics (not just for the convenience of having a big monitor which is secondary for me - Macbook + iPad sidecar display is very travel-friendly but very difficult to use ergonomically away from home).
Comment by volkl48 3 hours ago
It's still 1.5lbs hanging off the front of your face and over hours that's still straining.
Lying down or in a recliner or something where you're not really having to support the device yourself is about the only way that I feel you might achieve any kind of better result in an ergonomics sense for a significant length of use time.
(Disclaimer: I had one to demo for a few months and used it/experimented with it sporadically, I don't own one.)
Comment by AAYALAG 3 hours ago
Comment by oxferd 1 hour ago
Comment by oxferd 1 hour ago
Comment by hmokiguess 2 hours ago
Comment by jordemort 3 hours ago