Albania Is Not for Sale: Kushner's $4B Resort Triggers'Flamingo Revolution'
Posted by ortr 10 hours ago
Comments
Comment by bkovacev 10 hours ago
[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/12/17/serbia-trump...
Comment by rapind 9 hours ago
Comment by airstrike 8 hours ago
Comment by dieselgate 1 hour ago
Comment by port11 5 hours ago
Comment by LearnYouALisp 8 hours ago
Comment by joquarky 4 hours ago
Comment by FireBeyond 8 hours ago
Comment by annagio_ 9 hours ago
Comment by whatever1 9 hours ago
So what does the local economy get out of it? A few maids salary to clean up the tourist's shit?
Comment by hammock 8 hours ago
Same goes for any natural resource. Oil, precious metals, water, etc. Globalization feeds this behavior, but that’s a conversation people don’t usually want to have
Comment by Avicebron 7 hours ago
Comment by dominotw 8 hours ago
Comment by whatever1 8 hours ago
So no tax the locals. During the construction phase there is some legitimate economy uplift (similar to datacenters). But after that nothing.
Comment by dominotw 8 hours ago
is this just pure old corruption. govt not working for ppl stuff.
Comment by Tangurena2 8 hours ago
Comment by hedora 8 hours ago
Comment by BobaFloutist 7 hours ago
Comment by woodpanel 8 hours ago
With all that being said, I still think that overreliance on tourism is bad for a place in principle. Those places fossilize, the wealth of tourists overwhelmes local culture, it will create wrong incentives, draw in junk vendors, pick-pocketers, and AirBnB vultures making life more miserable for the locals. One can also be certain that the local hospitality operators will try to pass the least possible amount to locals by finding even cheaper employees from god knows where.
Comment by PearlRiver 6 hours ago
The secret ingredient is always money. Spain looks the way it does because that country was desperate for foreign currency and jobs in the 60s and 70s. Economic development is hard and Albania does not have much going for it unfortunately.
Comment by woodpanel 3 hours ago
Comment by 1234letshaveatw 8 hours ago
Comment by filleduchaos 6 hours ago
Comment by 1234letshaveatw 6 hours ago
Comment by esquire_900 8 hours ago
Quite laid-back in May / start of June, but I do not want to be there in the high season.
Comment by icar 4 hours ago
Comment by skinfaxi 8 hours ago
Comment by tweetle_beetle 8 hours ago
Comment by Dkuku 9 hours ago
Comment by adjejmxbdjdn 8 hours ago
Many countries have far more corrupt administrations than the current U.S. one, but even in the most degenerate ones none of them are as open about it.
And it’s not just a political thing.
Consider how the Chinese owned Smithfield’s is polluting lakes and land all over the Midwest with their highly intensive (and incredibly cruel) pig farming that is causing high cancer and mortality rates for the people living there, and yet the locals tend to support whatever Smithfield wants.
Comment by insane_dreamer 19 minutes ago
not sure that "many" applies anymore; we're almost up there with DRC and Zimbabwe at this point
Comment by skybrian 7 hours ago
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/trump-approval-stays...
Comment by cosmicgadget 5 hours ago
Comment by rurp 3 hours ago
In the particular case of trump, the less one knows about politics and governing the more likely they are to support him. The US is full of people who don't care much about how government actually works, which is not an unreasonable position for the most part, but can get hijacked by an effective conman.
Comment by datsci_est_2015 5 hours ago
I think voting trends are a pretty poor signal of voter values, but a much stronger signal of voter “alignment”, especially in first-past-the-post systems.
Comment by cosmicgadget 4 hours ago
That said, if people voted based on values or alignment for a candidate that said he would overturn civil service reform and conduct the bigliest deportation campaign in history, it'd be silly to think they'd reject the outcomes they voted for.
Comment by datsci_est_2015 3 hours ago
I mean, up until the election he was denying that he even knew what Project 2025 was, and now he’s bragging about how much from the document he’s accomplished.
Trump’s win was not a policy win, it was a culture war win.
Comment by cosmicgadget 3 hours ago
And you point out the single-issue voters that the GOP has farmed for decades. The culture war was there but since he protrays himself as elite, he couldn't do the blue collar charade. Instead it was a really half-assed demonization of trans athletes and, of course, immigrants.
The thing I think has to be mentioned is that he seems to have manipulated people's need to feel like they are on a team that is winning. I think that's why you see the cult of personality stuff like flags and tattoos - he's more of a college football team than an administrator.
Comment by skybrian 3 hours ago
Comment by cosmicgadget 1 hour ago
His relationship with Netanyahu didn't start Jan 2025, nor did the eventual showdown over nuclear weapons precipitated by our withdrawal from the arms treaty.
I know that is a lot of thinking to ask of his voters so here's an easy one - it's very obvious when the dude is lying. Anyone hearing him talk about being the president of peace should have instantly known it was no different from claiming we'd all soon be rich beyond our imagination. Or that covid would be over in a week. Or that any election he lost was 'stolen'. Anytime he describes himself as being the "most/greatest anything in history". Whenever someone asks a critical question and he freaks out (sadly for Trump voters, Joe Rogan isn't capable of this).
Comment by skybrian 3 minutes ago
Comment by 2OEH8eoCRo0 7 hours ago
https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker
Comment by philistine 5 hours ago
America is Trump.
Comment by hedora 7 hours ago
Look at the California primaries. In every race I can name, the right wing (like funded by the same people as Trump levels of right wing) and the republican token candidate are advancing to the general election.
We have open primaries, so, in theory, there could be a corporate democrat vs. a populist/progressive democrat in the general elections.
I say “token” republicans because they are clearly sending the B team. One ran on “too many dogs get to vote” and another (who advanced) on a transphobic platform.
Typical breakdowns of California primaries in Silicon Valley, translated to European norms: 5% left, 15-25% center left, 30-35 moderate to hard right, 35-40 right wing nationalist.
In the general, the first three categories will collapse, and the moderate to hard right democrat that gets elected will claim they have a mandate from the voters.
Edit: The narrative dominating the news cycle is Trump’s claim the elections are rigged because the results were so far to the left. I guess he wants two republicans facing off in every general election race, despite the state being overwhelmingly blue.
Also, on ballot initiatives, the state overwhelmingly votes left, not moderate right, so, when presented with an actual policy decision, they vote completely differently than they do when given a choice of candidates.
Comment by stevenwoo 5 hours ago
Comment by superloika 8 hours ago
Comment by swed420 7 hours ago
https://thoughtmaybe.com/the-century-of-the-self
Then corporate social media took things to the next level.
Comment by unharmed474 7 hours ago
Comment by yacin 7 hours ago
Comment by hedora 7 hours ago
They see the checks and balances that we used to have, and assumed those structures would constrain the administration to mostly tow the line.
On the one hand, it’s true they came from places with weaker institutions. On the other hand, they’re used to leaders that face real threats of coup, asset seizure, assassination, etc. The current US administration has publicly stated it is permanently above the law, and it has also dismantled most checks and balances.
Comment by yacin 6 hours ago
Comment by cosmicgadget 5 hours ago
Comment by totetsu 9 hours ago
Comment by billfor 8 hours ago
Comment by cosmicgadget 5 hours ago
Comment by FireBeyond 6 hours ago
> Rama, a long-time friend of the Trump and Kushner families
> The protests, which civil society and international media have called the Flamingo Revolution, have grown well past their environmental starting point into a challenge to Rama himself
(because of accusations he's bending regulations for Kushner that exist for other companies).
> On 30 December 2024, a Strategic Investment Committee chaired by Rama granted strategic investor status to Atlantic Incubation Partners, a firm affiliated with Kushner's Affinity Partners ... Reuters, which saw the written decision, reported .... the terms include no tax during the construction phase while the Albanian state underwrites the water, electricity and sewage infrastructure.
Yeah, forgive me if I don't exactly see his opinion as unbiased.
Comment by ToucanLoucan 9 hours ago
There are exceptions of course but the vast, vast, vast majority are tourist trapping and wealth extraction.
Comment by verminator468 9 hours ago
Comment by guywithahat 9 hours ago
Comment by b3lvedere 9 hours ago
"Conservationists describe the wider zone, the Pishe Poro-Narta protected landscape, as one of the Mediterranean's last largely intact coastal wetlands, home to flamingos, more than 200 migratory bird species, Mediterranean monk seals and nesting loggerhead sea turtles."
Comment by mcmcmc 9 hours ago
Comment by locknitpicker 9 hours ago
I'm not sure if you are trolling.
From the article:
> Albanian anti-corruption prosecutors froze the bank accounts of Albania Land Development, the company that bought beachfront plots for a luxury resort backed by Jared Kushner, as national protests against the project entered their seventh consecutive day. The preventive seizure was ordered by SPAK, the Special Prosecution Against Corruption and Organised Crime, as part of a property-fraud investigation into how land titles in a protected coastal wetland were acquired and how the area was stripped of its protected status.
Furthermore.
> In 2024, the Albanian Parliament passed special legislation reclassifying Sazan and the Pishe Poro-Narta area to permit large-scale development, the move that made the strategic investor designation possible; opposition parties and environmental groups argued the changes were written to accommodate Kushner-linked investors. One administrator of Albania Land Development, Redi Struga, has reportedly been subject to searches.
And of course the old beaten down excuse.
> Rama, a long-time friend of the Trump and Kushner families, claimed the anti-corruption and land defence campaign was being pushed by opponents of Donald Trump.
Comment by actionfromafar 9 hours ago
Comment by amitport 8 hours ago
Comment by 1over137 9 hours ago
Comment by frereubu 9 hours ago
Comment by pavel_lishin 9 hours ago
Comment by KPGv2 8 hours ago
Comment by RetroTechie 2 hours ago
That's a short-sighted view. Nature destruction is relevant to people everywhere. The locals might not even care much (unlike in this case, fortunately).
What if this construction project would wipe out animal species x, y or z? That's a permanent, irreversible loss for the world as a whole.
What if some species loses its breeding ground, decimating a population elsewhere? Or takes out a stop halfway a migration route?
Destruction of nature always has 2nd order effects. Don't ignore just because you don't live there.
Comment by rnxrx 7 hours ago
Comment by toasty228 9 hours ago
Comment by renegade-otter 8 hours ago
Now her grandson is wrecking Europe.
https://www.npr.org/2018/05/04/560224531/trump-stories-kushn...
Comment by agnosticmantis 8 hours ago
She was certainly a victim and a refugee, of which we have many today, most being denied admission to the US. Are those all legends too?
Comment by renegade-otter 4 hours ago
Comment by justin66 8 hours ago
Comment by woodpanel 7 hours ago
Comment by lifestyleguru 8 hours ago
Comment by Ccecil 8 hours ago
In my area which is over 1/3 retired people this is where the majority of their investments seem to lie. Those who are simply relying on 401k or other investments are also at risk due to the lack of diversification. Since their investments are tied to those 3 things.
If any of the legs of the stool go out...the whole thing goes down.
Comment by RetroTechie 2 hours ago
Comment by drstewart 8 hours ago
Comment by lifestyleguru 8 hours ago
Comment by nullorempty 8 hours ago
Then again, may be they already figured out how to make their lives meaningfully longer. I often think what drives 80 year old Bidens and Trumps to live the stressful POTUS life.
And I can think of only one incentive. Weird thoughts, but otherwise the dots just don't connect.
Comment by avgDev 8 hours ago
Others may be serving their own interests as it gives them access to all information.
Others may just want the power.
Comment by sys_64738 8 hours ago
Comment by Brendinooo 8 hours ago
Comment by unharmed474 8 hours ago
https://www.nbcnews.com/world/europe/kushner-luxury-resort-p...
Just google Albania Flamingo revolution.
Comment by pjc50 9 hours ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-she...
Comment by partial225 9 hours ago
As far as trolling goes, it's one of the greatest achievements in the history of mankind.
Comment by cosmicgadget 4 hours ago
That blowback though.
Comment by fooblaster 9 hours ago
Comment by amiga386 9 hours ago
1. Donald Trump's Ego Trip - lessons for the new Scotland (2011) https://andywightman.scot/docs/trumpreport_v1a.pdf
2. You've Been Trumped (2011) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr6efmndvps
Comment by thih9 8 hours ago
> Scottish people formed a Tripping Up Trump Campaign to make it more difficult to transfer the title to the land, and hundreds of people bought small interests in Forbes' property and became co-owners.
Continued in another article[1]:
> When it emerged at the end of January 2011 that Queen guitarist Brian May had agreed to the use of the band's song "Bohemian Rhapsody" in a film highlighting the plight of the families, Trump appeared to deny in a media statement that there had ever been an eviction threat, declaring "we have no interest in compulsory purchase and have never applied for it."
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_International_Golf_Links...
Comment by adf-aslk 10 hours ago
Kushner apparently wants to build a billionaire resort with the protections required to insulate billionaires from their actions. Maybe UAE is too dangerous now.
Here is another article. Try not to be put off by the Rothchild connections, they are mostly irrelevant and based on Kushner's own statements:
https://tomselliott.substack.com/p/what-is-jared-kushner-act...
Comment by water-data-dude 9 hours ago
Comment by graphime 9 hours ago
Governments around the world already keep many locations/facilities secret and hidden from the public.
They will simply arrest you, or worse, just kill you.
What’s your solution to that?
Comment by flohofwoe 8 hours ago
Those cold war bunkers only had one purpose: to keep high ranking government and military peeps alive just long enough (up to 2 weeks or so) to make sure that mutual destruction is actually 'assured'. They were not meant as some sort of cradle of a new civilization or as a safe haven to survive a nuclear war (because there would be no place to return to anyway).
Comment by water-data-dude 5 hours ago
Comment by everyone 8 hours ago
Look at what happened to Ceaușescu for example. He went from being confident in his rule to dead 24 hours later.
Comment by hedora 7 hours ago
The main point they made during the interviews: If things ever get bad enough for the owner to want to move into the bunker, the #1 priority of the guards will be to neutralize the owner. They worked out detailed contingency plans while twiddling there thumbs and rotating cans of caviar.
It turns out you cannot eat electronic money that’s sitting in the middle of a bank’s bombed out business continuity vault.
Comment by senordevnyc 5 hours ago
But hey, I enjoy fake AI content on social media sometimes too!
Comment by stevenpetryk 9 hours ago
Comment by esseph 8 hours ago
Comment by CamperBob2 8 hours ago
For that matter, what did you think gun control was for, exactly?
Comment by organsnyder 9 hours ago
Comment by olmo23 8 hours ago
Comment by LearnYouALisp 8 hours ago
Comment by abirch 9 hours ago
Comment by java-man 9 hours ago
Comment by aiisascam 9 hours ago
Comment by shevy-java 9 hours ago
Comment by pjc50 9 hours ago
Comment by treis 8 hours ago
Comment by layer8 7 hours ago
Comment by hedora 7 hours ago
Epstein 2.0 would at least double occupancy on their own.
Comment by 42jag16 6 hours ago
Comment by Havoc 8 hours ago
Comment by the_doctah 8 hours ago
Comment by avgDev 8 hours ago
Both sides SHOULD BE calling out those using the office to enrich themselves. Also, looking at their own party.
We cannot go forward as a nation when people rally up behind their party and only see the issues with the other party.
You have to be blind not to see the crypto grift from the current admin. No republican or democrat has ever done that before.
Comment by thepryz 8 hours ago
Most left leaning people I know aren’t exactly happy with Nancy Pelosi’s insider trading activities and are in full support of outlawing Congress from actively trading and are willing to hold Dems accountable for other unscrupulous actions.
Comment by buellerbueller 8 hours ago
Comment by the_doctah 7 hours ago
Comment by layer8 7 hours ago
Comment by buellerbueller 6 hours ago
Comment by the_doctah 5 hours ago
Comment by cosmicgadget 4 hours ago
Comment by the_doctah 1 hour ago
Comment by buellerbueller 4 hours ago
Whereas I recognize many of the names, the only one whose transgressions I am familiar with is Robert Menendez. He is in jail.
The burden of proof rests upon the person who makes the allegation. "Do your own research" lol.
Comment by the_doctah 1 hour ago
That was always going to be the outcome.
>The burden of proof rests upon the person who makes the allegation. "Do your own research" lol.
This isn't a court of law, I'll provide you with as much or as little evidence as I please.
Comment by Kapura 8 hours ago
Comment by 0x59 8 hours ago
Comment by nikolay 2 hours ago
Comment by mrKola 8 hours ago
Comment by lifestyleguru 8 hours ago
Comment by nikolay 2 hours ago
Comment by jeffbee 10 hours ago
Comment by ddorian43 9 hours ago
Source: I live there. It's very easy to tell if you do.
Comment by tmaly 9 hours ago
Comment by ddorian43 9 hours ago
But what has happened before is that:
The government gives free/cheap/exclusive public land to someone to build apartments/villas. They sell these to whoever wants to buy before starting construction. At the end of construction, with the profits, they build nice hotels at the frontline and keep for themselves without investing any of their own money in anything.
So they will most likely build apartments in Narta, sell them to the populace, and keep Sazan for themselves as luxury resort.
Something worse than this has started happening for high rises too, where they start selling before getting the permit even. So they don't invest their own money even to get the initial permit to start building.
Comment by foobarian 8 hours ago
Comment by hedora 7 hours ago
Same grift, different marks.
Comment by jeffbee 9 hours ago
Comment by pjc50 9 hours ago
Comment by mothballed 9 hours ago
Comment by ludicrousdispla 9 hours ago
Comment by notrealyme123 9 hours ago
Comment by ddorian43 9 hours ago
It's too luxury, most likely will pay no taxes for years, you can import workers from elsewhere, etc etc.
It's not the first time this kind of thing happens in Albania and we've already seen results.
Normal people will just never be able to go there again. People in power will either get millions or 1+ free apartment/villa, or heavily discounted price (depends on how much power you have).
I was literally kitesurfing when they came and added fences to the road to block access to the beach.
Comment by kelipso 9 hours ago
Comment by philipwhiuk 8 hours ago
(Or if you prefer because you are unable to compute that, the price is upfront $70,000 trillion (2025 prices) - cash only)
Comment by qwlart 9 hours ago
Comment by throw343 8 hours ago
Comment by hedora 7 hours ago
I predict… just a sec… footwear and insulated wire shortages and a rebar glut [1]
Comment by hereme888 8 hours ago
Comment by cmrdporcupine 8 hours ago
Comment by HumblyTossed 9 hours ago
Comment by kilroy123 8 hours ago
What if we just made a strong middle class? Made sure they had a LOT more money? Then they could just buy more stuff and services.
Comment by Sharlin 9 hours ago
Comment by gigatexal 9 hours ago
And on top of that it's Trump kids, yeet them into the sea.
Comment by shevy-java 9 hours ago
Comment by nullorempty 8 hours ago
In the past the wealthy families would fund building churches, hospitals, housing for poor.
Nowadays' oligarchs aren't that kind.
Comment by cindyllm 8 hours ago
Comment by andix 9 hours ago
edit: the governments appear to be supportive, but obviously aren't as supportive as they could be. Probably taking the bribe and not doing as much as they could.
Comment by ddorian43 9 hours ago
Which backfired after Trump won twice in US. But it's just business.
Comment by orwin 9 hours ago
Comment by titzer 9 hours ago
Comment by jdross 8 hours ago
And the wealthy die or stop participating within around 30 yrs of becoming wealthy normally. And compete themselves across idiology. Soros, Koch, Musk and Moskowitz all have very different packages of political beliefs they advocate vs each other
Comment by everyone 8 hours ago
They have never had an actual revolution akin to French revolution and the July revolution.
Comment by gnerd00 8 hours ago
Comment by roysting 9 hours ago
Comment by dang 8 hours ago
Comment by roysting 6 hours ago
If I were tasked to do it, the Albanian coast would be a top choice for me too; it has near perfect conditions for such an enterprise.
Don’t we discuss viruses, exploits, dark patterns, scammers and fraud when it comes to other things? Why would it be objectionable to call out the top civilization hackers and scammers and exploits? Everyone can talk about meaningless scams and exploits. Is there any bigger, worse exploit and hack than hacking a whole country and civilization and extracting trillions in sum?
Comment by dang 4 hours ago
In this case it's the use of denunciatory rhetoric that fries any element of curious conversation that the comment might have contained. The combination of snark and fulminatey pejoratives is the kind of internet discourse which, however popular, is destructive of what we're trying for on HN.
(Secondarily, there's also something about the combination of "His kind [...] alien [...] paraistic [...] depraved" which has overtones that I can understand why other commenters were objecting to. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, but such language does have history and the imprints of that history are still active.)
There's a phrase in your reply here which I think touches on the core and that's "calling out". Denunciatory rage and the shaming process are natural social responses to bad behavior. But it's really not what HN is for, and this isn't just a matter of taste because we can't have both forms of discourse at the same time.
Past explanations about this in case anyone is interested:
calling out - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
shaming: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
This is in no way to deny or defend bad behavior of course. It's just trying to preserve HN for its intended purpose, which is fragile and forever in danger of getting trampled by the much stronger default forces on the internet. We're simply trying to stave that off for as long as we can (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...), and since it's more or less a battle with entropy, it takes a lot of energy.
Comment by toasty228 8 hours ago
Comment by hedora 8 hours ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_(KMFDM_album)
(Judging from the lyrics, there’s a reason they went with orange.)
Comment by homeonthemtn 8 hours ago
Comment by panzagl 8 hours ago
Comment by sorokod 8 hours ago
Comment by hammock 8 hours ago
Comment by toasty228 8 hours ago
Comment by cmrdporcupine 8 hours ago
Concerns can be raised.
Comment by toasty228 8 hours ago
Comment by kevin_thibedeau 8 hours ago
Comment by hereweare26 8 hours ago
Comment by hedora 8 hours ago
I emphatically disagree.
However, there was widespread vilification of cephalopods on all sides of multiple wars during that time period:
https://neverwasmag.com/2017/08/the-octopus-in-political-car...
(To be clear, I don’t hate any sea creatures.)
Comment by roysting 6 hours ago
Comment by RobotToaster 8 hours ago
Gee, I wonder what could be happening that's similar to that.
Comment by superloika 8 hours ago
Comment by cmrdporcupine 8 hours ago
Which I don't think is the intent of anybody in this thread. We're just talking about them being privileged and rich.
I do think it's important to avoid accidental or deliberate anti-Semitism when talking here though. Epstein and Kushner being Jewish has zero to do with their vileness, but for a segment of the population it's all too easy to unconsciously (or worse, consciously) make a linkage between old vile anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about Rothschilds or whatever.
Comment by roysting 6 hours ago
Comment by toasty228 8 hours ago
Criticise a jewish person for something completely unrelated: infinite amount of green accounts created on the spot come in and start vaguely referencing "ThE DaRkEsT TiMe In HiStOrY".
Comment by jazzyjackson 8 hours ago
Comment by cmrdporcupine 8 hours ago
I raised concerns about your framing, and I think you'll find I'm not a green account. By far.
Please don't drag this forum down. With my own opinions... I wouldn't complain about "Class War" language, but your posts concern me.
Comment by toasty228 7 hours ago
If my 15k karma account wasn't banned I'd happily use it. I rotate new accounts every few months now, it's much more convenient
Comment by dopple 8 hours ago
Comment by ifjfkfkfkfj 8 hours ago
Comment by armchairhacker 8 hours ago
Comment by the_doctah 8 hours ago
Comment by dang 8 hours ago
Comment by iwontberude 8 hours ago
Comment by appplication 9 hours ago
Comment by antiframe 9 hours ago
Comment by mythrwy 8 hours ago
HN: "The scrollbar is two pixels too narrow on the article!"