Ask HN: How to escalate a rejected Google extension?
Posted by modzu 1 day ago
I submit an extension (an adblocker) to Google Chrome's web store.
Google keeps rejecting it for dubious reasons. The first rejection was claim it was "spam". When I appealed, the review came back that it contained "additional functionality" because it uses "modifies network traffic". Well of course it does! When I asked the reviewer how I could achieve the stated functionality of blocking ads without the use of "declarativeNetRequest" I simply received the same canned response.
I submit a totally new update that simplified the code and included comments, and references to other open source projecs that use the exact same mechanisms. Again it was rejected. On this appeal I asked if it could be escalated to a senior reviewer who could possibly reply with more context. Same canned response and rejection.
I can't help but think Google has some internal policy to give adblockers a runaround. It is obvious to me the stated rejections are not valid (Note that I'm also not new to this - I have several extensions that have been published for years with thousands of users) but have never encountered such gate-keeping before.
It's a sad state of affairs even if not totally unpredictable. To be honest I'm surprised Google hasn't made it an official policy to prohibit adblockers. But they haven't - obviously there are other adblockers published to the store, and that's what makes this so frustrating.
Anyway, fellow developers. Anyone run into a similar situation? And how did you resolve it? Thanks!
Comments
Comment by Rygian 1 day ago
Publish it as a Firefox add-on instead.
Comment by xingped 1 day ago
Comment by stronglikedan 1 day ago
Comment by ahriad 1 day ago
Comment by xingped 1 day ago
Comment by noncoml 1 day ago
apparently, as demonstrated by this post, they care about ad-blockers too..
Comment by Boxxed 1 day ago
Ding ding ding. Stop using chrome!
Comment by gwbas1c 1 day ago
When you submit, assume every time that you're going up against someone who's going to miss context from the prior submissions.
Comment by cantalopes 1 day ago
Of course they are going to do this
Comment by jsxyzb9 16 hours ago
Comment by sitzkrieg 1 day ago
Comment by BestQ 1 day ago
One path I haven't seen mentioned: the official chromium-extensions Google Group. Googlers from the Chrome Extensions team actually reply there, and a clear public post with your item ID gets a human eye the appeal form never does.
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-extensio...
Good luck, genuinely.