Field of clones: How horse replicas came to dominate polo
Posted by gscott 3 days ago
Comments
Comment by walrus01 3 days ago
Comment by beau_g 3 days ago
Comment by idle_zealot 3 days ago
Comment by mptest 3 days ago
Comment by bell-cot 2 days ago
Comment by walrus01 3 days ago
Comment by vitalyan1234 2 days ago
Comment by trumpdong 2 days ago
Comment by fzil 3 days ago
Comment by valiant-comma 3 days ago
Comment by m463 3 days ago
I think replicant would be a fun term though. :)
Comment by aussieguy1234 3 days ago
Humans riding racing robots id watch, but not horse racing.
Comment by didibus 3 days ago
Comment by brookst 2 days ago
I’m not a polo player but in most games if you’ve already hit the 99.99th percentile, it’s not wise to roll the dice hoping to do better.
Comment by Centigonal 2 days ago
Perhaps the same is true for horses.
Comment by chrisandchris 1 day ago
Edit: Can't find the study anymore. This one [1] at least partially attributes to material.
[1] https://www.balticsportscience.com/journal/vol17/iss2/2/
Comment by tstrimple 1 day ago
Comment by gobdovan 2 days ago
Comment by brookst 2 days ago
Comment by notahacker 2 days ago
Comment by mptest 1 day ago
Comment by vikingerik 2 days ago
Comment by ethanj8011 3 days ago
Comment by jmyeet 2 days ago
Could this happen if every polo horse basically ends up genetically identical? Probably not in the same way but new diseases do appear. Parvo is only 50 years old.
Comment by SauntSolaire 2 days ago
Comment by defrost 3 days ago
Doesn't matter, such things threaten the horse investor lock in economics.
Many years past, an early bit of software from my student days was a side project making an easy to use database system for a horse stud farm, high status stallions being put to mares with the feed, vet visits, results, etc. all logged.
Horse racing is pretty much all about pedigree - without the lineage horses are considered valueless by the industry - super fast back country waler crosses might be acceptable for a four mile charge across open ground onto machine gun nests .. but w/out that pedigree <shrug> no Lord or up and coming billionaire is going to syndicate that horse for racing.
I imagine Polo to be much the same, in the rich set. Probably more open and accepting out on the steppes knocking about the heads of the vanquished.
Comment by futune 2 days ago
I feel like I am missing a lot.
Comment by LearnYouALisp 2 days ago
Comment by madaxe_again 3 days ago
I know a peer of the realm who made pretty much his entire fortune on forged horses - he was breeding to make fast horses, but the pedigree was a load of, well, horseshit. All started because he’d bought a stallion who shot blanks.
Now it’s all about eight generations deep so he’s safe at this point, as they’re their own pedigree now.
Oh, and don’t even get me started on cows. There's a whole black market genomics industry going on in the uk right now, and probably elsewhere, too.
Comment by defrost 3 days ago
It's less about the horse, the speed, the actual genetics - it's all about the process, the appearance, the gate-keeping.
Country Clubs for horses (and cows, etc)
Comment by bonesss 2 days ago
I can sell a ripped t-shirt, but that same product coming from an upscale exclusive boutique owned by so-and-so’s wife is participation in a whole ecosystem with lots of signalling to other buyers in the same financial strata.
Comment by joxdosba 1 day ago
This is only true for the lower financial strata though. It’s only the poorer people for whom shopping in so-and-so’s wife’s boutique is a meaningful experience.
Comment by trumpdong 2 days ago
Comment by kotaKat 2 days ago
Turns out they made a little more than just a few piddly guns...
Comment by dnautics 3 days ago
sounds like an opportunity. as horse racing has a monetary reward associated with success one imagines a moneyball sort of play that you can compound by betting on your horse which the oddsmakers are going to handicap because it "doesn't have the pedigree" (at least the first few go arounds)
Comment by defrost 3 days ago
Here's a question though (can vary by country and racing industry), how do the winnings from racing (as a distribution) compare to the earnings from pedigree breeding, stud fees, sperm straw sales, etc.?
I agree there's room for disruption, just as there is from (say) the iron grip of the US Home Owners Associations and other cartels, but expect a lot of regulatory push back from the insiders.
The, ah, American Quarter Horse Association won't let any old nag run if they can help it.
Comment by basch 2 days ago
Comment by defrost 2 days ago
Money would count, but I dare say it'd need a bit of crafty social engineering running in parallel to crack in.
Caveat: I'm not a horse racing / polo insider - I did some contract work years back and rubbed shoulders with a bunch of millionaire horsey types.
Comment by lovich 3 days ago
This isn’t even the only instance of this technique. You can look at the Argentinian president Milei who hired a company to provide him with consistent advisors in the form of cloned dogs he talks with through a mystic[1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conan_(Javier_Milei%27s_dog)
Comment by Xorakios 2 days ago
That is a slam campaign by Milei's political opposition; the company the article mentions (perPETuate) only collects DNA for when cloning becomes feasible. That Time magazine and NY Times repeated the silliness is more a reflection upon modern editorial standards than anything else.
Comment by lovich 2 days ago
The Wikipedia page has linked references. You’ll have to provide more evidence for me than your statement for me to disbelieve them after I read through to confirm that the Wikipedia article wasn’t misinterpreting or misquoting.
Comment by usrusr 2 days ago
Comment by SauntSolaire 2 days ago
At some point breeding programs will mostly be useful for identifying new mutations to splice into the main branch.
Comment by piltdownman 1 day ago
Comment by motohagiography 2 days ago
The simple version of the problem is you ride about 1/e of the total population and then the first one that is better than all previous ones is your best option. For a pro polo player who would also breed and train others in the off season, over a multi-decade career, it's not perfect, but in aggregate, they are positioned to be pretty good.
Will there be black swan horses? Absolutely. They aren't even black swans, they're inevitable, but if your goal in the sport is to compound your average performance over time without significant setbacks (loss of a prize horse), then cloning a top player's best horse is a good bet.
I find the ethical discussions around horse cloning and sports lack a lot of domain competence in both what riding is, and the stewardship and biology it entails. From a sensory and ontological perspective, a horse is basically an alien being with a peanut sized brain that it falls to our species to be responsible for its existence. Cloning a few to adapt them for survival in our world is profoundly more humane than selling the surplus from breeding programs for meat or leaving them for predators and disease. Even though the philosophers comments about objectification were paraphrased for publication, their perspective is dumb.
Comment by LearnYouALisp 2 days ago
Comment by cckolon 2 days ago
Comment by andai 3 days ago
My grandpa said the same thing, first time he saw me.
Comment by alexpotato 2 days ago
Comment by foobar1962 3 days ago
Comment by acestus5 3 days ago
Comment by the_real_cher 2 days ago
Comment by K0balt 2 days ago
Comment by doodlebugging 2 days ago
Comment by vitally3643 2 days ago
It seems so much less interesting for the competition to devolve to "who can afford the best horse genome" instead of the actual skill and ability of the player. Since we're already cloning the horses, just force everyone to use the same horse and compete on skill instead of money.
This is one of the many reasons I find modern "pro" sports so dreadfully uninteresting. The competition has next to nothing to do with how good the player is, and everything to do with how far their fabulously wealthy sponsor can push the rules without "technically" cheating.
Comment by gordian-mind 2 days ago
Comment by SauntSolaire 2 days ago
Comment by LearnYouALisp 2 days ago
Comment by apt-apt-apt-apt 3 days ago
Imagine 10,000 Albert Einsteins and John von Neumanns working together with modern AI on medical, scientific, and societal issues.
Though there could be an Evil Einstein due to upbringing or something.
Comment by probably_wrong 2 days ago
(quote by Stephen Jay Gould)
Comment by jatora 2 days ago
Comment by probably_wrong 2 days ago
If we assume roughly 1.2k people were as smart as Einstein when he was born then, thanks to birth rates, we could have our "10000 Albert Einsteins" today. Statistically speaking ~3k of them alone were born in either India or China and are probably working a regular, badly-to-okay paid job [1]. We could be recruiting them today.
But no one cares about that because the premise is flawed and it's not about solving "medical, scientific, and societal issues". It's about making money and chasing "interesting scenarios" instead of actual solutions. As the meme format goes, men will literally clone Albert Einstein's brain instead of giving proper funding to schools.
And sure, chasing SF scenarios is fun, but let's not pretend that any of it is about making society better. As the sibling comment points out, we are more likely to get a clone of Rupert Murdoch than one of Stephen Hawking.
[1] For extra irony we can imagine a non-zero number of them work for patent offices.
Comment by SauntSolaire 2 days ago
Comment by Ma8ee 2 days ago
Comment by the__alchemist 2 days ago
Comment by thefounder 3 days ago
Comment by jfyi 2 days ago
Comment by didibus 3 days ago
Comment by SauntSolaire 2 days ago
Comment by whateveracct 3 days ago
Comment by b112 2 days ago
Comment by m463 3 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror,_Mirror_(Star_Trek:_The...
Comment by readthenotes1 3 days ago
I doubt people like Jonas Salk would accept being cloned if they could help it
Comment by dtj1123 2 days ago
The resemblance between young Donald Trump and his son Barron is uncanny, for example.
Comment by throwaway132448 2 days ago
Comment by el_io 3 days ago
Comment by ThrustVectoring 3 days ago
Comment by downrightmike 3 days ago
Comment by jofzar 3 days ago
Comment by connorboyle 3 days ago
The stories make me wonder if Argentina is a cloning hotspot, though I may be reading too much into two stories.
Comment by allthetime 3 days ago
Comment by zzzoom 3 days ago
Comment by mmustapic 2 days ago
Comment by wahern 3 days ago
Comment by pfdietz 2 days ago
Science fiction becomes science fact every day.
Comment by thot_experiment 2 days ago
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00945-7
You can't clone forever.
Comment by SauntSolaire 2 days ago
Comment by imtringued 1 day ago
If you can make clones from early embyro cells, you've sidestepped the problem.
Comment by Garlef 2 days ago
Ah... Some good, old, pre-AI journalism slop.
Oh the countless times a universities press release has been turned into four pages describing the smell of coffee some scientist inhales on their way through campus...
Comment by dindunuf 2 days ago
Comment by deadbabe 2 days ago
Comment by nxy 2 days ago
Comment by aaron695 3 days ago