I thought I knew how electrolysis worked [video]

Posted by tambourine_man 5 days ago

Counter99Comment12OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by teekert 7 hours ago

What a time to be alive, to find such ultra high quality and inspiring materials for free. When I was young I spend so much time with an illegal copy of Encarta (which sparked my career as a scientist) and already considered myself to be fortunate... What a time to be alive.

Comment by rithdmc 5 hours ago

Today I learned Encarta was not free.

Comment by bux93 27 minutes ago

I have fond memories of the, I think 1995, Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia. I think it was given away with new computers, like Encarta and Grolier's. I think I did buy the Compton's CD, but at a huge discount, since I bought it grey market (not bundled with a PC, but from a PC retailer).

Comment by tantalor 3 hours ago

It cost $100 in 1993, after they dropped the initial price. That is about $235 now.

Comment by teekert 4 hours ago

In a sense it was (set?) free. And that led to a lot of good things, imho.

Comment by jasonmp85 1 hour ago

[dead]

Comment by mandeepj 1 hour ago

> inspiring materials for free

Minus ad watch time! The cost is directly proportional to how you value your time.

Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago

There exist adblockers and extensions like SponsorBlock to block in-video sponsor segments, tangents, intros, outros and other time wasters.

Comment by robinduckett 7 hours ago

I didn’t know how electrolysis really worked, and probably still don’t but I know a little more, and these cheap ion filtering membranes are absolutely wild, and turning the graphite fire blanket into a super high surface area electrode is super interesting. I remember when he re-made the “lost” aerogel-like substance a while back and wonder if we can make graphite aerogel-likes using similar processes somehow for super high surface area electrodes. Sometimes I think I’m more interested in practical materials science than software engineering, but at 39 years old I am probably past the point of going to university to actually study. Of course, unless we all get UBI quickly because of Claude 8.5 taking everyone’s jobs.

Comment by fc417fc802 3 hours ago

> at 39 years old I am probably past the point of going to university to actually study.

That largely depends on your financial situation. If you have a strong technical background and you've already secured your retirement you could certainly do a masters or phd. But if you aren't financially secure then yeah, accepting (somewhat worse than) minimum wage for the next 5 years followed by a high degree of uncertainty sounds like a really bad idea.

That said materials science is something of a bastard child of inorganic chemistry, applied physics, and engineering. The theory side of it can be absolutely brutal. Before embarking on an adventure I'd suggest looking over the coursework for physical chemistry to see if you can handle the quantum mechanics stuff.

Comment by 2 hours ago

Comment by selimthegrim 3 hours ago

Current 39 year old finishing their PhD in solid state theory who left a software engineering job to do so, feel free to ask any questions.

Comment by MisterTea 2 hours ago

What got you interested in the field?

What kind of job are you after?

Comment by mudil 44 minutes ago

You know what splits water molecules? Photosynthesis. The oxygen released by plants comes from water molecules.

Comment by pcvetkovski 2 hours ago

[flagged]