Meta to start capturing employee mouse movements, keystrokes for AI training
Posted by dlx 5 hours ago
Comments
Comment by Avicebron 39 minutes ago
EDIT: While we are here, let's do this for politicians as well :), publicly available, auditable 24-hour surveillance.
Comment by vrc 14 minutes ago
Comment by sho_hn 10 minutes ago
The legal environment is the only way to baseline behavior. In countries with strong worker's rights, you generally don't have to fight much to make use of them; it's the norm for management, too. Likewise, the US-style norm of having no expectations toward your employer and the "stay in your lane" type takes rampant in the thread are also symptoms of the environment and its norms.
Comment by lazide 22 minutes ago
Comment by dagmx 4 hours ago
Yes they could have accessed logs before but there’s a difference between directed checking after incidents and active surveillance at scale.
Comment by JuniperMesos 2 minutes ago
When I worked at a startup that had some internal conflict between the software engineers and management, someone made a Signal group to chat about the issues among the software engineers privately and everyone joined that group with their own Signal accounts, without any kind of issue.
Comment by Blackthorn 55 minutes ago
Comment by 2ndorderthought 8 minutes ago
Companies have shown us that IP going to AI providers is acceptable. Once you cross that line your thought workers are assets not people.
Comment by gdhkgdhkvff 29 minutes ago
Comment by Blackthorn 28 minutes ago
You can't have solidarity about a bad thing with the people who are doing the bad thing! They have to stop doing the bad thing first! That's how solidarity works!
Comment by JoshTriplett 21 minutes ago
Yes. Which includes quitting, en masse, from any company that does this.
Meta ought to find it impossible to employ anyone with a policy like this.
Comment by leptons 4 minutes ago
And employers know this, so they are enacting all kinds of draconian policies because they know employees know that they can't just leave the job and also keep their families fed.
Comment by bsilvereagle 38 minutes ago
Comment by dlev_pika 31 minutes ago
Comment by Teever 27 minutes ago
This is just another factor they’ll have to grapple with in their analysis.
I’m sure some of them will find it a bridge too far but not enough to really matter. The work will continue as will the expansion of Meta and the negative externalities that it produces.
Comment by PradeetPatel 3 hours ago
I work at a tech firm in India, and we are encouraged to create skills.md based on the traits of our colleagues, with the intention of reducing key personnel risk. A handful of engineers were let go as the result of a re-alignment, and their AI counterparts are actively maintaining their code.
I wonder if this is where they are going.
Comment by Reisen 9 minutes ago
Comment by piker 3 hours ago
Feel like I'm reading a Gibson novel here.
Comment by lazide 11 minutes ago
Comment by jaapz 3 hours ago
Comment by satvikpendem 2 hours ago
Comment by whateverboat 2 hours ago
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by cyclopeanutopia 1 hour ago
proof?
> Turns out people actually don't really care about privacy at work
lol, won't ask for proof, because it's trivially falsifiable
Comment by francoisdevlin 54 minutes ago
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by Liskni_si 1 hour ago
(yes that's a real story from my career, and the company was 100+ employees at the time)
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by cyclopeanutopia 2 hours ago
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by cyclopeanutopia 1 hour ago
TBH at this point I don't believe you are a real person.
Comment by BoneShard 39 minutes ago
Comment by kaashif 12 minutes ago
I mean I have my own laptop and phone, why would I use a work device for that stuff?
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
The fact that you don't believe people who don't share your same opinion on mixing work and personal stuff are somehow not "real" is part of the problem.
Comment by seanp2k2 58 minutes ago
Maximizing shareholder value by observing you doing job in the pursuit of replacing you with a very small shell script is a great reason that they've just discovered.
Get your own laptop, pay for your own cellphone, use your own internet service, etc. If you create anything of value on their property or with their property or during times they're paying you in any capacity, expect them to use it for profit.
Comment by satvikpendem 50 minutes ago
Comment by Ifkaluva 58 minutes ago
Comment by rebolek 1 hour ago
Comment by AgentOrange1234 2 hours ago
Per TFA, this thing is literally taking screenshots of what is on the employee's screen. At work my screen sometimes had things such as: performance data on other employees, my own PII from HR systems, PII from customers, password managers, etc. It's also logging keystrokes. How many times do you type passwords a day.
Collecting that kind of information on purpose is truly wild. Imagine the security safeguards you would need just to prevent it from leaking. Wait what, they're explicitly collecting it to train LLMs with it? God help us all.
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by lazide 7 minutes ago
The ones on the ‘inside’ are doing to 500% of the time I’m sure
Comment by sho_hn 32 minutes ago
Comment by rexpop 1 hour ago
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by seanp2k2 55 minutes ago
Comment by xpe 55 minutes ago
Comment by euroderf 2 hours ago
A bogus argument, methinks. Consider that the company also owns the phones, but can or do they listen to every phone call ?
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by mulmen 2 hours ago
Comment by seanp2k2 47 minutes ago
https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/think-before-you-post-p...
https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/fbi-can-neither-confir...
https://www.democracynow.org/2025/10/2/headlines/trump_direc...
https://www.levernews.com/are-you-on-the-fbis-new-watch-list...
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-12-11/justice-de...
Comment by cyclopeanutopia 2 hours ago
Comment by futuraperdita 1 hour ago
I know you’re in India, but in the US, could this not be considered intellectual property theft on “right of publicity”? Your persona and working style is one of your core values you bring to market; building a simulacrum of that is not something I expect to be part of the “your output is the company’s IP” in an existing contract.
I will give a company the right to try to reproduce my output. But my very likeness and modus operandi? No.
Comment by vinni2 1 hour ago
Comment by seanp2k2 1 hour ago
You don't need to "give" them anything -- they already have everything they need due to basically anything you do, especially at work, especially while using company equipment, being legally considered "works made for hire" https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html + https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ30.pdf
Here's how a refusal to them doing whatever they think would maximize shareholder value with any of your output or data they collect from your company computer would actually go down: the company would do something you didn't like, you'd try to complain about it, HR would listen and document everything. In the best-possible case, they'd let you personally opt out. More likely, since you're likely very easy to replace in their minds, they'd refer you to their data privacy clauses in their acceptable usage policy section of the employee handbook, maybe reference the notice sent out to everyone about how they're doing this, then fire you for performance reasons a few months later. You'd be given an NDA and a very average severance, then you could choose to try to hire a lawyer (who would take at least a third of any pre-tax settlement amount) and fight them, in which case they'd settle for more or less the same as the severance package (and keep in mind both that and any court settlement are both taxable income, so you're not getting a windfall in any case), or you'd just sign the NDA and take the severance with no admission of wrongdoing on their part and no legal recourse.
Large companies employ entire orgs of lawyers who specialize in these matters, and it is literally their job to protect the company, not the employees, from lawsuits like this. Is it fully legal and in the clear? Probably not. Will they still 100% get away with it and leave employees with no realistic options or upside attempting to fight it? Of course. Welcome to America, land of the free for corporations which are legally people, just ones with infinite lives who cannot be arrested / imprisoned but can make legal decisions but cannot be subpoenaed. See eg https://www.theverge.com/policy/886348/meta-glasses-ice-doxx... for how the C-suite thinks about this type of thing.
Follow eg https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-and-75-organization... to see what actually happens.
More on how "work for hire" applies in a legal sense:
https://www.brookskushman.com/insights/innovations-at-work-w...
https://outsidegc.com/blog/common-misconceptions-about-the-w...
Comment by futuraperdita 27 minutes ago
I am aware of "how the C-Suite thinks about this type of thing", but this is also a good example to surface here of what to redline in future employment contracts. Yes, that will likely shut you out of a lot of places, but the opposite is beyond learned helplessness: it is capitulation to a future that will not end well for the tech worker.
Comment by Lihh27 26 minutes ago
Comment by Hamuko 3 hours ago
Like that "Scott is an asswipe who never agrees to any idea that isn't his" or what?
Comment by downrightmike 2 hours ago
Comment by nickvec 1 hour ago
Comment by lazide 3 minutes ago
Comment by reaperducer 1 hour ago
There remains a thing called human dignity.
If a company can't trust the people it hires, that's a fault in the hiring process, not the employees.
Comment by trinsic2 22 minutes ago
I can see an argument for companies not trusting there employee's because most employees harbor borderline corrupt thinking in their work place and have terrible work ethics, of course all of this is brought on by corporate culture so its there fault in the first place, but im not exactly sure what started where.
Comment by IAmGraydon 2 hours ago
This is exactly what they're doing, and they aren't the only ones.
Comment by JoshTriplett 19 minutes ago
Comment by everdrive 4 hours ago
Comment by stringfood 4 hours ago
Comment by bagels 23 minutes ago
Comment by layman51 3 hours ago
If keystrokes are captured, isn't this a double-edged sword where maybe the company might be inadvertently collecting evidence against itself if there's an investigation and the investigators want to collect keystrokes?
Comment by plagiarist 1 hour ago
Comment by simmerup 4 hours ago
Comment by kridsdale1 4 hours ago
It had no impact of recruiters trying to win me back since then.
Comment by simmerup 3 hours ago
His eyes glaze over and he just reads that instead in his corner vision instead of listening to you, and you get snubbed forever more
Comment by BeetleB 2 hours ago
How can they legally mandate an exit interview when you resigned? Is it part of the employment contract? What would have happened if you showed them the finger and not participated?
Comment by zeroonetwothree 38 minutes ago
Comment by seanp2k2 41 minutes ago
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-block-lists-affect-your-...
https://medium.com/@ossiana.tepfenhart/the-no-hire-list-is-r...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/16/silicon-v...
Comment by OkayPhysicist 2 hours ago
Comment by gambiting 3 hours ago
Comment by mancerayder 3 hours ago
I'd be more concerned about industry-wide blacklisting.
Comment by gambiting 2 hours ago
But I also had a different situation where we also decided to hire someone, only to find out that we can't because he's been let go from another company owned by our parent company, and his severance agreement said he can't work for the same group of companies for 12 months. I think he was genuinely unaware that we're part of the same group(if was a huge corporation) and it just never came up in any conversation until HR tried to put together paperwork for him.
Comment by balamatom 3 hours ago
Comment by computably 3 hours ago
Comment by jjmarr 54 minutes ago
In the USA this is mostly theoretical since HR could immediately fire the employee due to at-will employment.
But in Canada, it's a much bigger issue due to labour protections.
e.g. Many managers at American multinationals gave assurances over email to employees about work-from-home arrangements. Then the company does a huge RTO push.
When the employee refuses, HR discovers they can't fire the employee without a hefty buyout.
Best not to give assurances if you're managing a multinational team.
Comment by gambiting 50 minutes ago
Is that an American thing? I've been a manager for years and never heard of that happening. I didn't even know how much the people I managed were paid.
Comment by jjmarr 40 minutes ago
https://mathewsdinsdale.com/employers-advisor-march-2025/#:~...
Comment by storus 2 hours ago
Comment by LightBug1 3 hours ago
Comment by BeetleB 2 hours ago
When I joined the workforce a long time ago, I went in with the mindset that: Their property, their equipment, their right to monitor (or even keylog).
I was pleasantly surprised to find that not to be the case, but I've always believed in their right to do so.
Why do people expect to have a right to do non-work related stuff on the job? Every company I've worked for states in the employment contract/policies what you can and cannot do on the job. They never enforce it to the extent that they outline in the policies, but it's usually clear cut.
If you want to rant about the company, do it outside the company! Or at a physical water cooler. When coworkers want to rant to me about the company, they don't use Slack/Teams. They message my personal, non-work number.
Comment by simplyluke 43 minutes ago
In the late 2010s/pre-covid it was very common for employees to port their personal cell phone number to their work phone and just not have a personal cell phone. The internal culture at the company was remarkably open for their size.
That all went away by the time I left in 2022, and from what I've heard it has only accelerated into an employee-hostile environment. I'm not shocked at this move.
Comment by reverius42 28 minutes ago
Comment by simplyluke 17 minutes ago
From my perspective a lot of it was downstream of over-hiring in the post-pandemic frenzy. It's hard to maintain that culture while doing large layoffs, and there's no incentive for them to do so beyond the longer term reality that many of their best employees have left and they're increasingly seen as a place to earn a top paycheck in between layoffs.
Comment by sho_hn 22 minutes ago
Comment by Miraste 2 hours ago
Comment by Miraste 2 hours ago
Comment by ashley95 54 minutes ago
Either way when it comes to ranting about the company: many workplaces don't have a watercooler where all your team mates congregate (e.g. remote/different offices). Also what, you'll rant about confidential work projects over non-work texts?
Comment by whateverboat 2 hours ago
Comment by sho_hn 38 minutes ago
If humans are the point, this also goes for keeping work environments humane.
Comment by cyclopeanutopia 2 hours ago
Governments, corporations and any other organizations should all exist FOR the people, not the other way around.
American-style capitalism truly is a disease.
Comment by BeetleB 28 minutes ago
Comment by pydry 22 minutes ago
If that's something he cant handle he might have a problem with personal accountability.
Comment by overfeed 1 hour ago
More substantively: I would like the employer/employee transaction to be one of buing/selling labor. To me, training AI on keystrokes nudges the deal towards selling one's "soul" next to other dystopian tropes like brain implants and work toilets that analyze excretions.
You are correct that employers own the laptops and can install anything they want, which is why I never do anything other than work there - the farthest I will go is participate in employer-hosted shitpost groups/channels, which are not anonymous, and they are free to train their models on that.
Comment by wavefunction 1 hour ago
Like use the restroom? Personally, I'm not a slave. I am getting more and more used to the idea of having to push back on those who do exhibit such a mentality. Y'all are beginning to become a threat to the rest of us.
Comment by gtowey 13 minutes ago
Comment by zepppotemkin 23 minutes ago
Comment by anonymousDan 48 minutes ago
Comment by raw_anon_1111 44 minutes ago
On the other hand I would be looking for another job if they had keyloggers or were taking screenshots even if they said anything about me shopping on Amazon or randomly browsing Hacker News or any website that wasn’t gaming or Netflix during work hours.
Heck I use to travel a lot more for business and I used my work laptop for Netflix and other streaming services in the hotel.
As long as I’m meeting performance standards it shouldn’t matter.
Comment by miltonlost 2 hours ago
Comment by satvikpendem 1 hour ago
Comment by sassymuffinz 1 hour ago
Comment by engineer_22 28 minutes ago
"this computer is property of WORK CORP, you have no expectation of private on this computer"
If you want privacy use a personal device....
Comment by gwerbin 4 hours ago
Comment by b65e8bee43c2ed0 2 hours ago
Comment by reaperducer 1 hour ago
Comment by mulmen 2 hours ago
Comment by reaperducer 1 hour ago
Maybe because they're aware that complaining about the boss is protected by law (in the United States and many other countries).
Comment by anonymousDan 44 minutes ago
Comment by wrs 5 hours ago
And you expect Meta employees, of all people, to believe this?
Comment by lp4v4n 3 minutes ago
Comment by dylan604 4 hours ago
Comment by HoldOnAMinute 4 hours ago
Comment by kridsdale1 4 hours ago
Comment by kingleopold 31 minutes ago
Comment by wonnage 3 hours ago
Comment by bradlys 3 hours ago
You’d be surprised how few people actually buy into the corporate culture at these companies. It’s just to get paid because everyone needs a job to pay their expenses.
You want to solve this then lower the cost of housing.
Comment by seanp2k2 39 minutes ago
Comment by anonym00se1 4 hours ago
Comment by orangecoffee 5 hours ago
Comment by jmull 5 hours ago
Then they’ll deploy models trained on this, and begin capturing employees using AIs that are good at using AIs to do work.
Repeat a few times and they’ll start capturing the keystrokes from people mashing their heads into keyboards with dispair and exclaiming, “Why can’t these models do anything anymore!!”
Comment by sho_hn 21 minutes ago
This will also give them data on which employees aren't using AI enough, and then they'll be PIP'd or let go.
Comment by darth_avocado 4 hours ago
Comment by mgiampapa 2 hours ago
Comment by lotsofpulp 3 hours ago
It’s only once the business is having a cash crunch or will no longer need to hire competitive candidates that they start letting people go without severance.
Comment by darth_avocado 37 minutes ago
Tell that to Elon Musk and Twitter employees.
Comment by arjvik 4 hours ago
These models already have the skills that humans were using them for, so either by training the models to use subagents or simply inlining the work done by the AI, you have a much easier time training the model to perform tasks from a human-distribution. The humans have done the work of making the human-distribution look more like an AI distribution.
Comment by bwestergard 4 hours ago
Comment by dylan604 4 hours ago
If it is as you say, then eventually the house of cards will crumble. Then we can finally go back to work and quit being inundated with needing to use AI for everything.
Comment by Melatonic 3 hours ago
Comment by lifeisstillgood 9 minutes ago
Now imagine a society where your individual daily actions are recorded, reviewed and helpfully advised upon.
Millions of people making millions of actions each day and all recorded compared and sifted for positive feedback and improvement overall.
Just how far ahead would such a society pull compared to one that stays at today’s level. Compared to one that used totalitarian methods enabled by such surveillance?
The difference between Soviet and Western Europe was not the tech, it was the trust.
If we can build a society with f trust then this tech will turbo charge us.
If …
Comment by tristanj 5 hours ago
Comment by shepherdjerred 5 minutes ago
Really though it seems reasonable to me. They want data to train AI, and their employees are obviously a large source.
They could already track your every click. They have root on your work MacBook. Most employers do.
Comment by gip 26 minutes ago
Comment by p_stuart82 9 minutes ago
the signal is every time a human has to grab the wheel. that's a label for what the agent still misses.
Comment by rubyfan 6 minutes ago
Comment by toomanyrichies 5 hours ago
Comment by storus 2 hours ago
Comment by sharts 5 hours ago
Meanwhile, nobody seems focused on capturing CEO’s data for AI training.
Comment by ndegruchy 5 hours ago
Comment by asdff 4 hours ago
Imagine in 300 years we are still ruled by zuck, ellison, bezos, musk, thiel, et al, just in ai model form empowered by estates worth more than entire nations and legal protections designed to outlast heat death of the universe. Assuming there is still a "we" living on earth. Charitable assumption I guess.
Comment by pigeons 4 hours ago
Comment by loeg 4 hours ago
Comment by tmp10423288442 4 hours ago
Comment by __loam 3 hours ago
Comment by kleinsch 3 hours ago
Comment by charcircuit 3 hours ago
Comment by bradlys 2 hours ago
Meta does require you to have a Facebook account. The expectation is that it is your personal fb that you use regularly. However, it doesn’t need to be. You can create a new fb account with a new gmail account and that’s fine. That’s what I did and some others do as well.
That said, 90%+ of employees end up using their real personal account because the language they use makes it seem like you couldn’t do what I described.
Comment by Rekindle8090 3 hours ago
Comment by casualscience 3 hours ago
Also people use their work accounts and laptops to read their w2 and other sensitive info.
Comment by Archonical 3 hours ago
Comment by cma 3 hours ago
Comment by casualscience 42 minutes ago
Comment by lokar 3 hours ago
Comment by loeg 30 minutes ago
That said -- social media websites were later removed from the "work-related" list. So there was at least some recognition it was overreach and did not match the stated justification.
Comment by dist-epoch 4 hours ago
You can browser personal accounts from your phone.
Comment by darth_avocado 4 hours ago
I’m surprised this needs to be said out loud.
Comment by Barrin92 37 minutes ago
unless you're in a jurisdiction that has anti-surveillance workplace laws, which if you don't should probably think about before Mark Zuckerberg gets the idea to monitor to your body temperature from below the waistline
Comment by dylan604 4 hours ago
Comment by astrange 4 hours ago
Comment by 0cf8612b2e1e 1 hour ago
You don’t even need any to do something fancy in software. Could just be correlating mobile device presence with work laptop activity. Can triangulate physical location with a handful of Bluetooth or WiFi beacons.
Comment by esseph 3 hours ago
Comment by mint5 4 hours ago
Comment by fidotron 4 hours ago
Someone had to do it, distasteful though it may be. Could be quite hilarious what it learns in the process.
Comment by dist-epoch 4 hours ago
Comment by dylan604 4 hours ago
Comment by beloch 2 hours ago
This is like going to work in a drug-lab where everyone is required to strip naked to ensure no "product" can be smuggled out. It's a zero trust environment at first blush, with the added terror of it being used to replace you with AI.
People working naked in a drug lab have more job security than meta employees and an equivalent level of respect and trust from their employer. However, they can't unionize because they have no legal protections. Their employer could literally point a gun at them if they complained. That isn't the case for Meta employees. Just sayin'.
Comment by colordrops 10 minutes ago
Comment by hintymad 57 minutes ago
Comment by bossyTeacher 59 minutes ago
Comment by smalltorch 25 minutes ago
Comment by nemo44x 17 minutes ago
Comment by Maufrais 1 hour ago
Comment by camjw 4 hours ago
Comment by Desafinado 1 hour ago
Does the executive know better at this point but have toasted the culture and no one can fight against it anymore?
Comment by snek_case 1 hour ago
Comment by alexpotato 1 hour ago
There is also this effect:
- CEO says "the lights are a bit dim in here"
- that turns into "We need to change all of the lightbulbs in here immediately!"
(this is especially true in firms where the CEO cares a lot about being proactive).
Two great posts/stories about this:
1. This post about smart employees "reading their managers minds": https://yosefk.com/blog/people-can-read-their-managers-mind....
2. In Michael Crichton's book Disclosure there is a great line: "Why did you dress casually instead of wearing a suit? Is it b/c you wanted to do that or b/c the CEO did it and you wanted to show you were part of the team??"
Comment by zaptheimpaler 1 hour ago
Comment by DanielHall 1 hour ago
Comment by mandeepj 1 hour ago
What does this link tell you? https://www.thedailybeast.com/facebooks-sheryl-sandberg-told...
Comment by yodsanklai 1 hour ago
Comment by travelalberta 4 hours ago
Comment by eddyg 3 hours ago
Comment by nitwit005 4 hours ago
Seems like a strange approach in general. I'd have assumed you'd just have it use accessibility features to get at things, if there is no other interface.
Comment by lelandfe 3 hours ago
Comment by nitwit005 2 hours ago
Comment by jtemplestein 4 hours ago
Sure, you can do everything a human can, but it also seems VERY inefficient
As an alternative, maybe you could just do network in/out?
Comment by evanjrowley 4 hours ago
Comment by vorticalbox 3 hours ago
The computer UI is the way it is because that is optimal for humans, if your plan is to replace humans why not just replace the whole stack os and all to something these models already know how to use?
Comment by turtleyacht 6 hours ago
kk1Gi// file.js<Esc>M/func<Enter>o let<Esc>``
Taking screenshots too.Comment by dbgrman 6 hours ago
Comment by hightrix 6 hours ago
They don’t add anything beneficial to society. They exist to sell ads.
Comment by kingstnap 3 hours ago
Comment by kkarakk 5 hours ago
Comment by deadbabe 1 hour ago
Comment by xvxvx 6 hours ago
Horseshit.
1. Employees are being asked to train AI to replace them.
2. Performance assessments will 100% be impacted. No question.
Thinking back on the OTT interview experience that Facebook helped pioneer, imagine making it through that, getting paid a massive sum of money BUT barely getting by on it because of the location, then they drop this crap on you?
Big Brother is always watching.
Comment by instig007 6 hours ago
Comment by moritzwarhier 5 hours ago
I couldn't imagine life without my unique keystrokes and mouse movements.
Comment by hackable_sand 4 hours ago
Comment by moritzwarhier 3 hours ago
Some call it museumverse.
Comment by general1465 6 hours ago
Comment by rvz 4 hours ago
More proof that they do not care about you at all. This is Meta's way of moving fast and destroying everything at all costs.
Comment by bradlys 5 hours ago
Comment by shimman 4 hours ago
Comment by bradlys 4 hours ago
Comment by peacebeard 1 hour ago
I was curious about this claim and I dug up this article from 2024. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/software/internet-su...
It's an employee survey so it's not resistant to claims that the number is higher than people know. But I think saying "on all the computers you're given" is an exaggeration at best.
I did think it was interesting that "One in three [employees] have had activity from their employer’s online surveillance used in their performance reviews."
Sounds like if you're being surveilled by your employer there is a good chance you know about it.
I've never experienced anything like that, so it's sort of a window into another world from my perspective.
Comment by kpw94 43 minutes ago
Comment by aanet 6 hours ago
> The tool will run on a list of work-related apps and websites and will also take occasional snapshots of the content on employees’ screens for context, according to one memo, posted by a staff AI research scientist on Tuesday in a dedicated internal channel for the company's model-building Meta SuperIntelligence Labs team.
ALL YOUR DATA IS BELONG TO US
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Comment by Grappelli 5 hours ago
Comment by onlypassingthru 5 hours ago
Comment by moritzwarhier 3 hours ago
Since this is a serious website: I'd be genuinely curious how mouse velocity and trajectories differ between cultural and environmental settings (apart from hardware, that's boring and should be normalized).
There was a time when studies made headlines that were exactly about the relationship between mouse movement, typing etc, and psychiatric disorders as well as physical health.
Obviously, both are related.
If you ask me, Ad tech would probably be able to tell your denominated faith using this data, when there's enough of it...
Comment by busymom0 4 hours ago
Comment by oytis 1 hour ago
Comment by Qem 59 minutes ago
Comment by arghandugh 5 hours ago
Comment by zingababba 4 hours ago
Comment by instig007 6 hours ago
Comment by wolttam 5 hours ago
If they captured display output as well, it could be a very useful dataset for generalized computer use.
Comment by instig007 59 minutes ago