Meta targets May 20 for first wave of layoffs; additional cuts later in 2026
Posted by fvrghl 15 hours ago
Comments
Comment by bekxh 2 hours ago
Meta behaves like a power grid. It can bring online or take offline a whole bunch of power plants and no one will notice anything.
Comment by MisterPea 15 hours ago
Big side effect of these layoffs is that new talent is reluctant to join, even for more pay.
Stability is going to come at a large non-monetary premium these days
Comment by rubicon33 8 hours ago
I doubt it. There’s a very hungry work force ready to take any job available.
Comment by b3ing 14 hours ago
H1b don’t care, they will take the jobs
Comment by rvz 14 hours ago
The cold truth is, there no such thing as "stability" in any job, as long as change exists in the market.
We need to stop treating jobs like a day-care because they are not. (Unless you are at Nvidia or Apple)
Comment by burnt-resistor 6 hours ago
The fixes are unionization (solidarity) and forming worker-owned co-ops that emphasize stability, workplace decency, and fairness in TC. There can never be stability working for a corporation, only parasocial delusions of such. Worker-owned co-ops can be very lucrative and extremely competitive to join with very low turnover too... about the only downside is they don't scale to very large organizations* that should instead find and promote similar organizations to partner with on things.
* Which may not be ”bad" if one thinks like Richard Branson did on keeping organizations small, efficient, and nimble.
Comment by bradlys 14 hours ago
Layoffs have been the norm for the past four years. I don’t know if anyone who is looking at the job market really takes in stability seriously at this point.
Comment by burnt-resistor 6 hours ago
The playbook for minimal morale: round-after-round of haphazard layoffs, reorgs, and rebrands demonstrating leadership is clueless and doesn't care about workers whereas the traditional, sensible layoff strategy was "cut once deep."
Top talent will never want to work for Meta regardless of TC.