Israel escalates attacks on medics in Lebanon with deadly 'quadruple tap'

Posted by tcp_handshaker 12 hours ago

Counter163Comment86OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by hakrgrl 34 minutes ago

Why on earth is this on Hacker News? There is nothing intellectually gratifying about this highly divisive topic.

> On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Comment by 22122 29 minutes ago

Hacker News is an American website. Hacker News allows political discussion. Israel is very relevant to American politics, many would argue too much so, but in any case, why shouldn't it be discussed here?

Comment by phantompeace 7 minutes ago

Read their submission history. They talk about "radical extremist Islamist regime in Iran" all the time. Seems rather odd to be this cagey when people are getting sick and tired of Israel's constant war crimes.

Comment by hakrgrl 25 minutes ago

Because it's not intellectually interesting and because it falls in the off-topic category based on the guidelines of this site.

> If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic

People don't come to Hacker News to talk about wars. They come to get away from wars.

Comment by phantompeace 10 minutes ago

Less than 28 days ago you were commenting multiple times on Iran, Islamists and geopolitics involving war. Why are you suddenly so jumpy? I don't get it. Why is it suddenly unacceptable to talk about quadruple tappings on medical workers by Israel?

Comment by hakrgrl 6 minutes ago

I flagged those stories too, stalker. They result in uninteresting flamebait like your comment. Hacker News used to be better than this. It's turning into reddit.

Ironically, many of my comments were flagged and removed where I suggested the post was inappropriate. No tolerance for any dissenting views or discussion, unfortunately.

Comment by karim79 2 hours ago

For those unfamiliar with the "Dahiya Doctrine"[0] this is exactly that:

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahiya_doctrine

Comment by taylodl 4 hours ago

How long will the world continue to tolerate Israel's egregious war crimes?

Comment by 22122 4 hours ago

as long as people keep voting for politicians that are complicit with pro zionist policies

Comment by nielsbot 2 hours ago

Until recently, in the US at least, there wasn’t any non-zionist choice. Same for the UK and for Germany.

Thank God this is changing, but it’s going much too slowly.

Comment by aeonfox 1 hour ago

Who's the 'non-zionist' choice in the US?

Comment by karim79 1 hour ago

The only one I can think of offhand is Bernie Sanders.

Comment by bdangubic 1 hour ago

Joseph Biden

Comment by karim79 1 hour ago

Joseph Biden is a self-proclaimed Zionist:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/i-am-zionist-how-joe-bidens...

Comment by bdangubic 1 hour ago

I was being facetious but in all fairness he was anything but when he was in the Oval

Comment by casey2 1 hour ago

Who remembers when they shut down the country so they wouldn't lose votes?

Comment by voxl 4 hours ago

Part of the problem is the conflation of Zionism with genocidal government. There is no room for nuiance. A Zionist can want Israelites to live in peace where they currently are and not harm others, and certainly not commit horrible atrocities against other people.

Yet, even this kind of Zionist is under their own genocidal threat, "from the river to the sea", and instead of their being a sensible perspective of "maybe let's not kill a bunch of any people's" we are left with the never ending debate or whose worse.

Comment by aeonfox 43 minutes ago

Are there any polls (or any educated guesses) gauging what proportion of people who identify as Zionists want equal status with all Palestinians (particularly democratic rights) within the bounds of what was once Mandatory Palestine?

Comment by nielsbot 2 hours ago

The only way Zionism can be moral is if it abandons the idea of a Jewish supremacist nation.

Comment by DaveFr 2 hours ago

Nobody says this about any Islamic country

Comment by 4MOAisgoodenuf 36 minutes ago

When an “Islamic country” starts getting several billions of dollars in aid from the US and begins “quadruple tapping” civilians, then I suppose there will be some outrage.

In the meantime, this outrage appears to be more based in the criminal conduct of a genocidal state than any religious amenity

Comment by aibrahem 4 hours ago

From the beginning, the founders of the Zionist movement were completely on board with the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinians from their lands to establish the Israeli state.

Comment by khaledh 4 hours ago

Did you know that Jews lived among Muslims for over a thousand years in peace? In fact, Muslims were the ones who took them in when the Europeans massacred, persecuted, and expelled them out during the middle ages.

The violence started happening when the Zionists wanted the land for themselves, exclusive of the indigenous population (1948 nakba).

Comment by voxl 4 hours ago

Revionist history at work.

Comment by Supermancho 3 hours ago

Comment by DaveFr 2 hours ago

This part https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhimmi

Edit: Sorry, I can't reply to your comment below, for some reason.

This part,

> Did you know that Jews lived among Muslims for over a thousand years in peace?

is revisionist because it paints second-class status for Jews as "peace". This is ridiculous, a fiction akin to "separate but equal" without even the pretense of equality.

Additionally,

> The violence started happening when the Zionists wanted the land for themselves, exclusive of the indigenous population (1948 nakba).

Is ahistorical. There have been small but continuous Jewish settlements in the region since antiquity, Jews are indigenous. Further, Zionist immigration started earlier than 1948, as early as the late 1800s, and finally, Arabs fled Israel to avoid the incoming invasion from Arab Muslim nations who, for bigoted reasons, could not tolerate a Jewish state.

Comment by Supermancho 8 minutes ago

> is revisionist because it paints second-class status for Jews as "peace". This is ridiculous, a fiction akin to "separate but equal" without even the pretense of equality.

Let's agree for a moment that there was intense bigotry and prejudice, as I'm very sure there was some amount. As we can also agree, there is human tribalism alive and well to this day between people of minimal or great differences.

Separate but equal is not enslavement or extermination. Dhimmi was the basis for peace, not equality, and I haven't found a compelling alternative narrative.

> > The violence started happening when the Zionists wanted the land for themselves, exclusive of the indigenous population (1948 nakba).

> Is ahistorical.

While I can appreciate what you're trying to say here, the post you are responding to was describing a situation within the context of the Zionist state movement of the mid 1900s. The fact that there have always been Jewish settlements throughout the historical Levant (and beyond) is incidental. Neither of these points are without merit. I'm not sure arguing past each other about who deserves what is constructive.

Comment by 22122 31 minutes ago

in historical jewish states, how did they treat the people they conquered? not to mention, most jews in the muslim world lived well outside of their homeland in palestine, and that's not because the muslims pushed them out, they were there before the muslims conquered, and many times they helped the muslims conquer because they would rather have lived under muslim rule than christian rule.

Comment by 22122 34 minutes ago

who gave the jews a state? people think it was britain but britain agreed to the balfour declaration, an agreement made between zionist bankers and the british state which involved upholding the rights of the indigenous arab population and which did not involve the creation of a jewish state. how do you think jews got their state regardless? did britain change their mind and decide to give jews more than they agreed to give them?

Comment by Supermancho 1 hour ago

It’s not clear what "revisionist" means in this context, especially when pointing to Dhimmi.

I’ve never heard of it before today. I’m aware that Jews and Muslims live in Iran today. There is historical evidence, including written accounts, that some arrangement (Dhimmi?) existed over 1,200 years ago—whether social, legal, cultural, or, most likely, a combination. Under this system, the religions coexisted without the overtones of genocide within their communities.

Comment by thomassmith65 8 minutes ago

  today. I’m aware that Jews and Muslims live in Iran today
That is true, in the sense that there are more than two jews left in Iran.

5x as many Iranian jews live in the USA now. 20x in Israel.

Iran has a population of almost 100 million, and the Hollywood Bowl could seat its jewish population twice over.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Jews

Comment by Supermancho 2 minutes ago

I found this: https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/11/22/iran-drops-the-facad...

Which has been enlightening. Thank you for highlighting the tenuous situation in Iran, which is not favorable toward Jews. This does shed light on the affair and seems credible to me.

Comment by nielsbot 2 hours ago

ha! you need to study history more

Comment by 2 hours ago

Comment by metalman 4 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by 22122 4 hours ago

zionism has been genocidal from the start. the early zionists were white supremacists who wanted to colonise palestine and beyond. when the culture changed against white supremacy, they rebranded to "jews just want to be safe in their ancestral lands". unfortunately, you can't pull off something like the 1948 nakba and the 1967 land grab and continued occupation and then say that you just want to chill in peace.

Comment by throwawayqqq11 8 hours ago

https://theweek.com/world-news/israel-legitimisation-cell-ju...

> How Israel's 'Legitimisation Cell' is justifying journalist killings in Gaza

Comment by LorenPechtel 5 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by khaledh 5 hours ago

You're using the term "terrorist" to describe people indigenous to the land that Israel stole. If you use logic, that makes Israel that terrorist group since they used violence to kick Palestinians out of their land and homes, not the other way around.

Lookup the Jewish terrorist groups Irgu, Lehi, and Haganah. Lookup the assassination of Lord Moyne by Lehi and the 1946 Irgun bombing of the King David Hotel. The leaders of these terrorist groups eventually became Prime Ministers of Israel.

While you're at it, lookup the attack by the Israeli military on the USS Liberty that killed 34 Americans.

Comment by LorenPechtel 4 hours ago

Hezbollah isn't in Israel, so any argument about what happened in Israel is irrelevant. And by far the primary cause of Palestinians leaving was Arab countries telling them to get out of the way of the coming invasion. And, well, when you refuse to agree to lay down arms is it really surprising you're not allowed back in?

King David Hotel? You mean British military HQ? Who received and ignored the warning about the bomb?

USS Liberty--ever consider how hard it is to identify ships from the air in a combat situation? Israel knew the ship claimed to be American, but they thought that was a ruse.

Comment by Supermancho 3 hours ago

> Hezbollah isn't in Israel, so any argument about what happened in Israel is irrelevant

Respectfully, it is relevant, as explained. Historical context matters.

> And by far the primary cause of Palestinians leaving was Arab countries telling them to get out of the way of the coming invasion.

Excepting, as in this case, where someone makes up a historical narrative with a handwave.

Comment by 4 hours ago

Comment by well_ackshually 4 hours ago

I need you to know that you're defending and justifying war crimes while blindly swallowing the propaganda of a genocidal regime.

Needless to say, it's not exactly making you look too good.

Comment by LorenPechtel 4 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by se4u 5 hours ago

> ... the person next to him is probably also a combatant

Absolutely, they could even be future combatants even if they are not now. That's why killing schoolgirls in Iran, reporters in Lebanon, etc. is justified, they are all potential terrorists. It definitely can not be proven otherwise that they are not. Why take a chance? /s

Comment by subscribed 1 hour ago

Seriously, when ate the war criminals finally dragged before courts and sentenced like their forebears in Nuremberg?

Comment by notepad0x90 1 hour ago

Nuremberg was only possible because Germany was invaded succesfully by allied forces.

All this war crime talk is nonsense. Either talk about sending your own children to war against Israel, or criticize them in other real terms. There are no war crimes against countries who don't recognize the ICJ, and even then, unless the judiciary of the country is consenting, a war crime charge isn't pursued.

It isn't a competition, but I hope you're neither an American nor a Russian, because if you are, clean your own house first before talking about how dirty someone else's is.

Comment by 22122 25 minutes ago

if you are american, cleaning your house involves going head to head with the zionist lobby which works for israel's interests. so i'm afraid the matter of israel can't be avoided here.

Comment by notepad0x90 4 minutes ago

that sounds like propaganda to me. what is "zionist" anyone who looks after the interests of israel and its right to exist (that's not the same as supporting this war for the record)? and what does zionism have to do with these wars or war crimes? Isn't it precisely the anti-zionist sentiment you eschew that resulted in the Oct 7 attacks by Hammas, which lead to this war? Or are you suggesting genocide/ethnic-cleansing but it's fine so long as it's jews? Israel has been around for ~80 years now as a country, the US has been around 250, what's your metric on how long a country has to be around before you can call your sentiment ethnic-cleansing?

perhaps you're saying the people who support the war lobbying in the US are to blame? Yeah, they suck, but what do you suggest? Iran, Hezbolla (in lebannon) and Hammas (freely elected by Palestinians) all not just don't recognize israel's right to exist, but they continually threaten to kill all Israelis and reclaim the land (and this is after countries like Iran expelled all their jewish population). So you want Israel to be self-sufficent, all with it's own nukes. What's your expectation, that they'll give up and leave (where to?), or they'll be unable to defend themselves without the help of the US, and they'll avoid using their nukes? What happens when Iran gets nukes, will they watch and wait until they get nuked, because they're afraid the US will not like them anymore (look at what they're doing now when virtually everyone but the US isn't on their side).

I just don't get it, I know you're just repeating propaganda, but it saddens me to see the lack of critical thinking, or any thought or attempt to actually seek peace or advocate positions and politics that will have some realistic positive impact.

I mean come on, the US is still in NATO and only because of trump's remarks and hostility, Europe is rearming itself against an undetermined potential aggressor, that's while they still have US support. You want the US to pull all of it's military support, for a country that has been facing existential threats since its founding, and you expect peace out of that? or is your aim to see tens of millions die on both sides, and you're just rooting for Israel to be wiped off the map, and that somehow is victory?

Do you know why there is a cease-fire today, in Lebanon? Because the US demanded it as part of the cooperation with Israel, that's it. That's what supporting them purchases, influence. Not supporting them doesn't result in peace. Do you know why Israel hasn't been bombing Iran already? because their ally the US didn't want them to, they've been trying to for ages. If these are the war crimes being committed, even with a displeased US as an ally, what do you think will happen when they have no one left to displease that they care about?

Do you perhaps think it's like the US over there, where wars end because their economy declines and too many soldiers are dying? The alternative is genocide against their people in their minds!

it's really annoying seeing performative support for those being harmed by these ridiculous wars. But I get that you and others actually care about this, I don't mean to dismiss that, but these sentiments have impact. I'm pretty sure a large part of why trump is in office now (and thus, why this war is happening) is due to people staying home or voting for trump because they disapproved of the democrats of kamala over not supporting that silly propaganda nonsense you're repeating.

Now, I've made claims that in multiple ways, your sentiment and views are contributing factors causing this conflict, and might cause even greater tragedies to happen. I hope you re-evaluate, or critically analyze my claims and find reasonable faults that allow you to articulate your own original views instead of repeated propaganda talking-points.

Comment by 4MOAisgoodenuf 38 minutes ago

The house is full of furniture from America and Russia, but it is still bloody filthy

Comment by abracadaniel 1 hour ago

That requires them to either travel to a country that recognizes war crimes and be arrested, or a country deciding to go in and get them. I can’t imagine anyone would have the political will and means to invade. It seems extremely unlikely there would ever be an arrest.

Comment by triage8004 3 hours ago

More war crimes as usual

Comment by notepad0x90 1 hour ago

Something is a crime only if it is violating a legitimate law. Laws that can't be enforced aren't legitimate.

Point being: Either war crimes get enforced (against everyone violating them), or they're not war crimes. They're just war oopsies.

If you're an American, contact your congressperson about passing a law that recognizes the ICJ, and requires turning over of US presidents and military leaders that violate warc rimes to that court. If at least you don't support this sentiment, don't talk about war crimes. For those who don't know, the ICJ works with not against the judiciary of a country (Israel's supreme court in this case).

Comment by sph 9 hours ago

If you are as ignorant as me:

"A double tap, or double-tap, is the practice of following a strike [...] with a deliberately timed second strike in the same place several minutes later, usually in an attempt to maximize the casualties of an attack."

"Double-tap strikes have been used by Saudi Arabia during its military intervention in Yemen, by the United States in Pakistan, Yemen, and the Gulf of Mexico, by Israel in the 2014 Gaza War, the Gaza war (2023-present), and the 2026 Lebanon war. by Russia and the Ba'athist Syria in the Syrian civil war, and by Russia in the Russo-Ukrainian War, especially since the full-scale invasion in 2022."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_tap_strike

Comment by foruhar 4 hours ago

The recent bombing of the bridge in Iran was apparently a double-tap strike by the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Karaj_B1_bridge_attack

Comment by 0cf8612b2e1e 9 hours ago

I thought the US was caught doing a similar thing to those boats it was destroying because they might be carrying drugs.

Comment by wswope 8 hours ago

> They were shirtless, unarmed and carried no visible communications equipment. They also appeared to have no idea what had just hit them, or that the U.S. military was weighing whether to finish them off.

> "The video follows them for about an hour as they tried to flip the boat back over. They couldn't do it," one source said.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/video-shows-final-con...

Comment by crooked-v 4 hours ago

Yes, and the entire chain of command that did so should be prosecuted for murder.

Comment by milutinovici 8 hours ago

Truly horrific

Comment by ButlerianJihad 8 hours ago

The importance of the “double tap” was expounded by Columbus in Zombieland as Rule #2 to survive the apocalypse.

https://zombieland.fandom.com/wiki/Zombieland_Rules

Comment by khaledh 2 hours ago

If you want to understand the mentality of the zionists, watch this: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CzL5_JhA_QT

Comment by aussieguy1234 4 hours ago

A double tap attack is a deliberate tactic designed to kill first responders who rush to a scene after a bombing.

Assad in Syria used this tactic to target the White Helmet rescuers who would attend the scene after air attacks.

Now Israel is using the same tactic against innocent Lebanese medics.

Comment by khaledh 7 hours ago

Every time I post something like this I get downvoted, but I don't care: Israel is just pure evil. Shame on US politicians for giving them cover for the countless war crimes they've committed.

Comment by notepad0x90 1 hour ago

compared to whom? how does one measure that purity? certainly Hammas is more pure in those terms, not that it is a competition (but you're alluding that it is).

Comment by somewhatgoated 2 hours ago

I would rather say they are eager to demonstrate that they are ruthless enough and able to kill anyone without conscience or hesitation to prove that they are a good candidate to replace the US hegemony in the greater region.

Comment by 22122 4 hours ago

not just the politicians, also the media outlets that cover for them, and the zionist political donors who fund them.

Comment by dzhiurgis 6 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by whatisthiseven 2 hours ago

Germany: 7.7 to 7.9 beds per 1,000 Japan: 12.6 to 13.0 beds per 1,000 Israel: 2.9 to 3.1 beds per 1,000 people USA: 2.3 to 2.4 beds per 1,000 people Egypt: 1.1 to 1.4 beds per 1,000 people

OECD avg per capita: 4.2 per 1,000 people

Lebanon: 1.0–1.2 beds per 1,000 people Palestine: 1.3 beds per 1,000 people

Palestine did have way more before, in 2022, at 13 per 1000. That would indeed be high.

Turns out that was purposefully done because of the extremely high prevalence of chronic disease and crises as caused by a blockade.

Now that I have wondered, I am curious as to why you would leave out such important details like this. Or not just plainly state your opinion.

I think we can guess why, and I think you also know it's because you are wrong.

Comment by perching_aix 6 hours ago

Why are you insinuating if your argument is supposedly so damning? Just state it plainly.

Comment by thrance 4 hours ago

They can't, else their bigotry and support for genocide would be too evident. Such pathetic cowards...

Comment by LorenPechtel 5 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by perching_aix 4 hours ago

To clarify,

- I'm under no confusion about what they're insinuating, that's not the point (see that below)

- I'm looking for their reply specifically

It's relatively easy to accuse, and to make up some story. It's a lot harder to provide substance and formulate a compelling argument.

Is the number of medical facilities really outstanding? Why does that suggest they're combatant hideouts? Which of them are, all? Why does them hiding combatants render double, triple, quadruple tapping, or even just targeting these facilities morally justified or reasonable? What sense does it even make to double, triple, quadruple tap in this context?

All pretty important questions I'd say, none of which are addressed by cowardly insinuations, I believe by design.

Last time I checked, my internal moral compass rated actually killing healthcare workers and the sick/injured/etc a lot worse than combatants using them as potential collateral (not that that'd be the pinnacle of morality). One would assume most other people's compass does too, hence why the above is news. How the paramedics that arrive afterwards become deserving of getting shelled, further remains an unelaborated-on mystery.

Comment by LorenPechtel 4 hours ago

Gaza, crazy number of hospitals. Lebanon, I have no idea.

Off the top of my head:

1) Remember how Israel kept talking about Hamas HQ being in bunkers under the main hospital and Hamas kept denying their existence? Very little news coverage of when Israel said of course we know there are bunkers, we built them!

2) I recall a video of Israel hitting a hospital--that we could see people were shooting from it.

3) I recall another video, Hamas had been denying tunnels under another hospital--then we have Israel nailing a senior commander with a bomb that clearly exploded in a tunnel quite near the hospital. (A bomb that explodes underground will have a very different blast pattern--watch some, it becomes apparent.)

As for moral compass: why are you supporting the people that hide behind the sick/injured?? Geneva is clear on this--military use, valid target. Human shield deaths are on the side using the human shields.

Comment by whatisthiseven 2 hours ago

Yea, you mean Israel's use of human shields, right?....wait, who are we talking about using human shields, again?

"Dressed in army fatigues with a camera fixed to his forehead, Ayman Abu Hamadan was forced into houses in the Gaza Strip to make sure they were clear of bombs and gunmen, he said. When one unit finished with him, he was passed to the next.

“They beat me and told me: ‘You have no other option; do this or we’ll kill you,’” the 36-year-old told The Associated Press, describing the 2 1/2 weeks he was held last summer by the Israeli military in northern Gaza."

https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-arm...

Comment by smusamashah 4 hours ago

Oh wow! So they make dummy hospitals and put dummy meat bags of all sizes for camera time and social media post just to make Israel look bad when they hit those meat bags. That is some strategy.

Comment by jst1fthsdys 6 hours ago

They do? Compared to who? And no, I haven't, please enlighten me.

Comment by moogly 4 hours ago

Maybe they have a disproportionate amount of wounded and sick to take care of? For some reason.

Comment by khaledh 5 hours ago

Ever wondered why Israel has disproportionate amount of settlers in the West Bank, a land that doesn't belong to them? I bet that makes them a legitimate target.

Comment by LorenPechtel 5 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by smusamashah 4 hours ago

They are evil now and they will be nice when some goal is achieved, this does not make any sense.

Comment by khaledh 4 hours ago

> they aren't the actual cause of the terror

Are you sure? Here are some stats of settler attacks from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs:

    Year    Total Incidents   Daily Average
    2021    540               1 incident / day
    2022    852               2 incidents / day
    2023    1,189–1,291       3 incidents / day
    2024    1,420–1,449       4 incidents / day
    2025    1,828             5 incidents / day

Comment by LorenPechtel 4 hours ago

And you think the UN is a credible source?

And it's amazing how many of those "settler" attacks make more sense if they are self defense.

Comment by aagha 2 hours ago

Comment by khaledh 4 hours ago

If the UN is not a credible source then I think establishing the state of Israel in 1948 should be thrown in the garbage.

Comment by LorenPechtel 4 hours ago

The UN didn't establish Israel so the two events are unconnected.

Comment by Swenrekcah 4 hours ago

> But every good deed gets harshly punished

Can you name some of the instances you’re thinking of?

Comment by cindyllm 1 hour ago

[dead]

Comment by proshno 3 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by aaron695 5 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by 4 hours ago

Comment by LorenPechtel 5 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by zimza 5 hours ago

Hezbollah is the main political party in Lebanon. Anything can be related to the main political party of a country. It's like saying you can legally kill Israeli medics because they are "related to Likud".

In any case, killing medics is a violation of the Hague and Geneva conventions and the internal law.

If this story is hard for you to take seriously, there's thousands more stories, videos and witnessings of war crimes by Israel in very recent history..

Comment by 2 hours ago

Comment by rock_artist 5 hours ago

Just worth clearing the point about Hezbollah in that context.

Hezbollah is not the “main” political party [1]

It is a major part of the government but not the main.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_L...

If they were the main party then it was Lebanon who attacked Israel following the war with Iran and not Hezbollah.

Lebanon is very pragmatic already and they actually have an army which isn’t Hezbollah.

Comment by LorenPechtel 5 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by RichEO 5 hours ago

What does it mean for a medic to “be Hezbollah” in this context?

Are you saying they are employed medics of the organisation? Party members? Combatants?

Comment by LorenPechtel 5 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by aibrahem 5 hours ago

In all your comments, you keep referring to the resistance groups fighting the Israeli occupation as terrorists, which I’m guessing makes you either an Israeli or pro-Israel.

The IOF has been notoriously lying about killing and torturing civilians. Not only that, but even soldiers caught red-handed on video raping prisoners have not only gotten away scot-free but also been allowed to rejoin the army. Is there a reason why we should trust anything such a genocidal, morally corrupt organization has to say?

Comment by fzeroracer 4 hours ago

Just a few months the OP was defending the IDF destroying hospitals and killing aid workers [1], making up stories [2] and basically saying Israel can do no wrong [3]. It's more than abundantly clear that no amount of evidence is enough, nor is any war crime far enough for them to admit when Israel is going too far.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47144548

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145254

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46469455

Comment by LorenPechtel 4 hours ago

How about actually rebutting things rather than attacking me?

Comment by chabes 2 hours ago

How is posting your comments attacking you?

Comment by LorenPechtel 4 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by aibrahem 4 hours ago

I’m not sure if linking the video would violate HN rules, and I find it hard to believe that you haven’t at least heard about it. There is currently global outrage because the soldier in this video was acquitted and allowed to rejoin the army. The video was aired on Israeli TV and the IOF arrested the military official who authorized the leak.

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/statement-ohchr-08aug24/

https://mondoweiss.net/2025/11/outrage-over-video-leak-of-is...

I belive if you search for ‘Israeli soldiers gang rape prison’ you’ll find multiple links to it.