Claude Opus 4.7

Posted by AlphaWeaver 1 day ago

Comments

Comment by ChrisArchitect 1 day ago

Some more discussion on announcement post: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793411)

Comment by tomhow 1 day ago

Comments moved thither. Thanks!

Comment by AlphaWeaver 1 day ago

Might be better to update the URL to this, actually: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7

Comment by jameson 1 day ago

How should one compare benchmark results?

For example, SWE-bench Pro improved ~11% compared with Opus 4.6. Should one interpret it as 4.7 is able to solve more difficult problems? or 11% less hallucinations?

Comment by constantius 1 day ago

Not related to this release, but is anyone aware of what's happening with Deepseek? The usual cascade of synced releases has been lacking this frontier lab whale for a while now.

Comment by rvz 1 day ago

> Not related to this release, but is anyone aware of what's happening with Deepseek?

Given that no-one is talking about DeepSeek, I assume it is coming this month.

They are still releasing research papers and that is what really matters and not the .1 increment releases of AI models to massage benchmarks or create hype around.

Comment by cmrdporcupine 1 day ago

There's been months of "DeepSeek v4 next week!" rumours and none have panned out.

They're either stuck/dead or they're sitting on something really fantastic that they only want to release once they've perfected it.

My realistic side thinks the former, my optimism on the latter.

In the meantime, GLM 5.1 is actually really good.

Comment by bsaul 1 day ago

i tried to find an API pricing for GLM 5.1 but couldn't find any on the homepage. How are you using it ?

Comment by cmrdporcupine 1 day ago

per-token via DeepInfra, who hosts it as one of their models.

https://deepinfra.com/zai-org/GLM-5.1

Comment by vomayank 1 day ago

Curious how people are evaluating real-world gains with this version.

Are you seeing meaningful improvements in reasoning reliability, or mostly incremental quality changes compared to previous releases?

Comment by grandinquistor 1 day ago

Quite a big improvement in coding benchmarks, doesn’t seem like progress is plateauing as some people predicted.

Comment by hansmayer 1 day ago

Ah, here we go again.

Comment by pukaworks 23 hours ago

[dead]