Space Force looks at moving "significant number" of launches from ULA to SpaceX
Posted by Bender 2 days ago
Comments
Comment by unixhero 2 days ago
And the IPO valuation rises
Comment by Dig1t 2 days ago
ULA uses expendable rockets. From an environmental perspective and also just a basic efficiency perspective this is a no-brainer.
If the Air Force were flying cargo across the country why would we want them to be using cargo planes that get destroyed after a single use?
Comment by bell-cot 2 days ago
Might anyone have a view under the hood here, and not be under NDA, to comment on why ULA hasn't replaced Northrop Grumman with a less failure-prone SRB supplier?
Comment by LarsAlereon 2 days ago
I can't think of any other remaining large solid rocket manufacturer in the USA, NG bought them all.
Comment by eugenekay 2 days ago
They would have to admit that they were wrong to switch away from using the proven Aerojet-Rocketdyne AJ-60A boosters (developed for and still flying with the Atlas V family).