Thief of $90M in seized U.S.-controlled crypto is gov't contractor's son
Posted by pavel_lishin 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by dada78641 1 day ago
Rapp snitches.
Comment by MisterTea 1 day ago
Comment by alistairSH 1 day ago
Comment by bluemenot 1 day ago
Comment by SilverBirch 1 day ago
Comment by mrgoldenbrown 1 day ago
Comment by direwolf20 1 day ago
Comment by wmf 1 day ago
Comment by arjie 1 day ago
Or, as Trump might say, "Bring back the autopen!"
Comment by keyle 1 day ago
Comment by stavros 1 day ago
Comment by causalscience 1 day ago
To be explicit: The person you're responding to didn't say it but they have as a premise that when it comes to political systems, lack of empathy is the defining characteristic of fascism (I'm not saying I agree with the premise, I'm saying they had this premise). If you accept this, then their argument is not logically wrong. In contrast, your example is logically wrong. In the "two feet" example you're point at one attribute of something, not a defining characteristic. The correct example would be "All bipeds have two feet (by definition). Bob has two feet, therefore Bob is a biped". The gibberish you produced is logically wrong, while that of the person you're talking to is not, but you're too stupid to understand that.
Comment by sieep 23 hours ago
Here's a section just for you: "When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names."
Comment by stavros 1 day ago
> Fascism is a lack of emotional intelligence, which is basic intelligence. Empathy and compassion are a form of basic intelligence. (_AND THEREFORE, fascism lacks empathy and compassion_)
This doesn't follow. Fascism can be a lack of emotional intelligence, emotional intelligence can be a form of basic intelligence, empathy and compassion can be a form of basic intelligence, and it can still be the case that you lack emotional intelligence but have empathy and compassion (you might simply lack in other aspects of emotional intelligence).
Comment by keeganpoppen 1 day ago
Comment by knowitnone3 1 day ago
Comment by ortusdux 1 day ago
Comment by FatalLogic 1 day ago
There's a lot more detail, and delivered in more professional way
Comment by altairprime 1 day ago
Comment by anonymousiam 1 day ago
Comment by caycep 1 day ago
Comment by cj 1 day ago
Comment by wmf 1 day ago
Comment by alfiedotwtf 10 hours ago
Comment by tamarinddreams 22 hours ago
Comment by shrubble 1 day ago
Just learned that the federal government has long term leases on office buildings that congressmen have a financial interest in. More disappointment.
Comment by N_Lens 1 day ago
Comment by drdaeman 1 day ago
It would be, but both mass media and people attention spans have changed, so it would be very different in a lot of ways.
Comment by alfiedotwtf 10 hours ago
Don’t believe me? Google how TikTok got sold off to Trump’s base and now the word “Epstein” has been banned in DMs
Comment by tim333 1 day ago
The stuff currently happening in the US is unusual for the US but mild compared to Putin's Russia which Trump seems a little inspired by. At least you don't have people falling out of windows yet.
Comment by tartuffe78 1 day ago
Comment by linksnapzz 1 day ago
Comment by chneu 1 day ago
What's more wild is how much of the US believes that the other party would be much worse.
To be clear, Republicans are absolutely the current cause of this insanity that's going on. The two party system doesn't help, but Republicans have committed insanity while claiming everyone else is doing worse. Trump is a literal pedophile who openly admitted to hating immigrants his entire life. We all saw this coming.
Comment by NicoJuicy 1 day ago
Comment by renewiltord 1 day ago
But corruption has been part and parcel of US politics. Or are we supposed to believe that things like the Chappaquiddick incident were actually innocent accidents?
When I was younger I remember thinking that George Bush pardoning Scooter Libby was outrageous. Then I found out what these people were up to routinely.
Comment by tim333 1 day ago
Comment by linksnapzz 1 day ago
Comment by tbossanova 1 day ago
Comment by ajross 1 day ago
Comment by nerdsniper 1 day ago
Comment by roysting 1 day ago
Comment by belter 1 day ago
This whole headline in incredibly comical: https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center/press-rel...
https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/dem...
Comment by aryan14 1 day ago
Crazy world
Comment by duxup 1 day ago
Comment by knowitnone3 1 day ago
Comment by inlined 1 day ago
Comment by trhway 1 day ago
And i think that similar preemptive pardon here, without charge and thus any guilt admission, wouldn't allow the fund seizure.
Comment by SV_BubbleTime 1 day ago
Comment by tbossanova 1 day ago
Comment by SV_BubbleTime 1 day ago
Comment by avaer 1 day ago
Comment by duxup 1 day ago
Comment by laughing_man 1 day ago
Comment by grugagag 1 day ago
Comment by lostlogin 1 day ago
You’re a hell of an optimist.
I’d say that it’s just as likely that the pardon sharpie is being readied, just as soon as the super PAC donation clears.
Comment by paulpauper 1 day ago
Comment by jLaForest 1 day ago
Comment by kevin_thibedeau 1 day ago
Comment by paulpauper 1 day ago
Comment by lupire 1 day ago
Comment by londons_explore 1 day ago
Plenty of people would happily flush their career down the drain to run away with their family and $90M
Comment by tartoran 1 day ago
Comment by lazide 1 day ago
Both have cherry-picked their life experiences to support this view.
Comment by knowitnone3 1 day ago
Comment by tartoran 23 hours ago
Comment by bayarearefugee 1 day ago
Pretty sure they'll both be fine as long as they still have access to that money.
Comment by jongjong 1 day ago
Comment by paulpauper 1 day ago
Comment by caminante 1 day ago
I don't have the knowledge to sanity check the claims, but I would've figured someone would be getting rolled by now. I recall that the dad was scrubbing socials along with the son, but that could be token harassment.
Comment by big_youth 1 day ago
Comment by caminante 1 day ago
Watches? You can also be right. Though, I don't think you need $90 million to spend <$1 million on a watch to splurge.
Comment by cucumber3732842 1 day ago
Comment by wmf 1 day ago
Comment by paulpauper 1 day ago
Comment by misiti3780 1 day ago
Comment by wmf 1 day ago
Comment by geor9e 1 day ago
Comment by misiti3780 1 day ago
Comment by gmuslera 1 day ago
Comment by cucumber3732842 1 day ago
This is a petty dispute. I'm not gonna go put a bullet in someone who over a petty dispute like this. Nobody is, not even thieves and other people who live outside the law. That's just absurd. Someone who I've wronged in doing so (i.e. someone who likes them) might put one back in me. Or there might be other consequences. People let those things go because it's just not worth it vs the risk of consequences.
But say I can do something that will cause the government to go after someone for me at no risk to myself... That's basically what happened here.
This is basically an attempted (we'll see if it succeeds) DDOS reflection attack but with government.
Comment by Mistletoe 1 day ago
Comment by tcfunk 1 day ago
Comment by collingreen 1 day ago
Comment by tasuki 21 hours ago
That's not how wallets work.
Comment by qingcharles 15 hours ago