Extremophile molds are invading art museums
Posted by sohkamyung 6 days ago
Comments
Comment by joshuamcginnis 2 days ago
I'll have to think on this but I don't think there are any easy solutions other than just routinely cleaning and decontaminating the articles (at least the ones that can tolerate it).
Comment by RataNova 1 day ago
Comment by 0xDEAFBEAD 1 day ago
How about keeping each item in its own airtight plastic case?
How about both of the above?
Comment by arnorhs 1 day ago
Comment by kevindamm 2 days ago
Comment by joshuamcginnis 1 day ago
Comment by Cthulhu_ 1 day ago
Comment by modeless 1 day ago
Comment by sanjayjc 1 day ago
"When a mold’s takeover of an artifact must be stopped, there’s gamma radiation—pelting it with electromagnetic energy from radioactive decay to kill fungi and spores. But this technique penetrates deeply and can extensively damage materials."
Comment by TomatoCo 1 day ago
Comment by Grimblewald 1 hour ago
Comment by HPsquared 1 day ago
Comment by somekindaguy 1 day ago
Comment by adastra22 1 day ago
Comment by flir 1 day ago
Comment by metalman 1 day ago
Also there is the "museum beetle".Anthrenus museorum
Comment by culi 2 days ago
> Through the 1970s conservators deployed biocides, chemicals—including antibiotics and formaldehyde—that wipe out microbes indiscriminately. [...] But just as broad-spectrum antibiotics can wreak havoc on the human gut by eliminating good bacteria along with the bad, biocides can open the door to even more harmful microbes by clearing out the competition.
> Scientists think decades of treatment with biocides in Lascaux led to the proliferation of a fungus called Fusarium solani that covered the cave like snow in a matter of days. The biocides are also thought to have allowed antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria and fungi to grow unchecked in the cave, as well as pigmented fungi that left permanent dark stains on the Ice Age images. In Europe, the use of biocides is now tightly restricted.
This seems to have ramnifications far beyond the museum:
> Xerophilic molds can colonize human tissue in immunocompromised people—doctors found colonies of Aspergillus fumigatus, another mold involved in museum infestations, in one Danish woman’s brain, chest and lungs after she had been treated for leukemia in the contaminated wards.
Comment by nxobject 1 day ago
Comment by anigbrowl 1 day ago
Comment by bell-cot 1 day ago
Comment by peterfirefly 1 day ago
Comment by kilvar 1 day ago
Comment by 1970-01-01 2 days ago
Comment by ted_dunning 2 days ago
The hazard is if the inert gas displaces oxygen in the storage facility. That can make them a death trap.
Comment by analog31 1 day ago
Comment by verisimi 1 day ago
Comment by msuniverse2026 2 days ago
Comment by arjie 1 day ago
Comment by swordsith 18 hours ago
Comment by bell-cot 6 days ago
Comment by giraffe_lady 2 days ago
There is kind of a cost/preservation/accessibility triangle with curatorial preservation, and museums already normally choose storage that is somewhere other than the most expensive/best preservation corner of that triangle. Oxygen-depleted facilities significantly extend that corner, but if we're already not using what we have there then it may not be a useful addition.
Low-oxygen environments also have their own preservation issues. I'm not actually a museum curator so I don't know the specifics. But it is a very complex and old discipline and they've tried just about everything. The problem is usually funding, which unfortunately boils this whole thing down to another boring "you can't solve social problems with technical solutions."
Comment by baggy_trough 2 days ago
Comment by saintfire 2 days ago
Comment by autoexec 2 days ago
Society wants to see these things, and learn from them, even though every moment they spend out in the open exposes them to more harms.
We're fortunate that digitizing has come such a long way. We can preserve and even recreate a lot of things long after the physical objects themselves are gone. It's not the same as having the originals, but at a certain point the reproductions are all we'll have left.
Comment by baggy_trough 2 days ago
Comment by chasil 1 day ago
When you add up all the books that were required for our careers, would they be a megabyte?
The little that we understand is uncomfortably summarized this way.
Comment by vintermann 1 day ago
But even so, there's so much archive material which hasn't even been digitized. I run into it in genealogy all the time. It's in some box in a museum, if you're lucky they made microfiche images of it fifty years ago.
Comment by culi 2 days ago
EDIT: Aspergillus penicillioides is mentioned in the article and it can survive in both anaerobic and aerobic conditions
Comment by 0xDEAFBEAD 1 day ago
Comment by moi2388 1 day ago
Comment by riwsky 1 day ago
Comment by Dave_Rosenthal 2 days ago
Comment by arjie 1 day ago
Comment by jjmarr 1 day ago
Turning museums into a Resident Evil house is a cool idea.
Comment by zdc1 1 day ago
Comment by thaumasiotes 2 days ago
Comment by WalterBright 2 days ago
I.e. practice panspermia.
Comment by ianburrell 1 day ago
It is also unlikely to do anything. The conditions are well beyond anything on Earth. Mars is near vacuum; life has survived in vacuum but didn't grow. Titan has liquid organics, but is really cold and microorganisms don't really handle hydrocarbons.
Comment by WalterBright 1 day ago
Those two statements contradict each other.
It's a given that Terran life would be poorly adapted to the conditions. So native live would overwhelm it.
Comment by account42 1 day ago
Comment by triceratops 1 day ago
You aren't going to see anything "take hold" on a human timescale. Evolution takes place over geological time. By the time there's something to observe, there might be no one to observe it. Or all knowledge of the experiment might be lost.
Comment by WalterBright 1 day ago
If it's humans vs alien slime mold, I stand for humans.
> ou aren't going to see anything "take hold" on a human timescale
Right. Seeding life onto lifeless planets takes a long time, but it is a moral imperative. We are the only life in the solar system, and maybe even in our galaxy.
BTW, the Earth is going to fry in 100m years. We'd better learn how to colonize the other planets.
Comment by triceratops 1 day ago
Comment by squibonpig 1 day ago
Comment by WalterBright 1 day ago
Comment by squibonpig 1 day ago
Comment by WalterBright 22 hours ago
Comment by mrguyorama 1 day ago
There is no intrinsic "purpose".
The universe itself is perfectly content with dynamics over timescales we cannot even approach comprehension of, and never will. The only driving force in the universe is an evolution from a state with heterogeneous energy densities to one with homogeneous energy density. "Life" isn't even in the equation.
Interstellar travel is not possible for humans. Even if we could somehow induce perfect hibernation, scifi style, how do you maintain an engineered vehicle in the abyss for centuries?
Meanwhile, we can't even take care of the abundance of resources here on earth.
Comment by WalterBright 22 hours ago
Consider that the only reason you exist (and have wonderful things like air conditioning) is because your predecessors did have a purpose.
> Interstellar travel is not possible for humans.
Yes, it is. Transcribe DNA, put it in probe, probe goes for centuries, orbits a promising planet, then employs nanobots to build humans from the DNA. I.e. a seedship.
> abundance of resources here on earth
Our solar system is brimming with resources. All we've exploited so far is just pond scum on the Earth's surface.
Comment by WalterBright 2 days ago
Comment by mikelabatt 1 day ago
Comment by RataNova 1 day ago
Comment by htek 1 day ago
Comment by thaumasiotes 1 day ago
Up to this point, the tool that was used to detect every infestation described in the article was an unaided human eye.
Comment by PrettiGoodDead 2 days ago
Comment by eigencoder 2 days ago
Comment by proee 2 days ago
The key is to keep humidity down (relative to temperature). There is a concept of "Days till Mold" growth. Once you're past this number all bets are off.
Here is a chart that shows Days to growth. If museums can stay in the "no risk" zone then artifacts should be good. If they fall outside that zone, then artifacts are at risk.
https://energyhandyman.com/knowledge-library/mold-chart-for-...
Example: At 85'F and 84% Humidity, it will take 7 days for mold to grow into your nostrils and reach your brain.
Comment by Raidion 2 days ago
Comment by hex4def6 2 days ago
Comment by padjo 1 day ago
Comment by padjo 1 day ago