Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

Posted by anigbrowl 1 day ago

Counter187Comment241OpenOriginal

https://archive.md/ShO4E

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/brown-univers...

https://www.masslive.com/news/2025/12/were-catching-serial-k...

Comments

Comment by noname123 1 day ago

I work on campus (very very close to the engineering building) and I previously lived near Brookline. So all of this hits home.

But what got me was the tipster who blew wide open the case is reportedly a homeless Brown graduate who lived in the basement of the engineering building (a la South Korean film Parasite). It made me so sad but also not surprised, that building does have a single occupancy bathroom with showers; and no keycard access was needed in the evening until 7pm.

So it made sense to me that he or she would've used that building for shelter and comfort. Also it didn't boggle my mind at all that a Brown grad (from the picture, the tipster looked like a artistic Brown student vs. the careerist type) would be homeless - given that I known many of my classmates who have a certain personality, brilliant but also idealistic/uncompromising that made them brittle unfortunately in a society that rewards conformity, settling and stability.

I can't get over the fact that two Brown student whom presumably have fallen on the wayside of society have chosen two different paths, (1) the homeless guy who still perseveres even in the basement of Barrus & Holley for 15 years a la Parasite after 2010 graduation but still has the situational awareness and rises to the occasion to give the biggest tip to the Providence Police, (2) the other guy who harbors so much resentment over a course of 25 years to plan a trip from Florida to gun down innocent kids who are 18 and 19 and his classmate when they were 18 and 19 year old.

Comment by alexpotato 22 hours ago

There was a homeless guy living in the gym at Rutgers prior to the late 1990s and it's why you had to show ID to get into any of the gyms/dorms.

Very similar story of:

- he was older

- dressed normally

- everyone assumed he was an assistant coach, grad student etc

They mentioned it multiple times in safety briefings and even at "how to be a club officer" meetings to ensure that everyone participating/involved was actually a student.

Comment by SoftTalker 20 hours ago

It's not uncommon. University buildings are pretty open even today. I worked with a homeless guy who was a university employee, so he had a legit staff ID card. He just didn't want to spend money on rent. He knew where the empty rooms were that nobody ever used, where the showers were.

I bet every major university has a few people living/sheltering in campus buildings.

Comment by lambda 19 hours ago

RMS famously lived out of his office at MIT for a while.

Comment by Moosdijk 14 hours ago

RMS = Richard Stallman, responsible for the GNU project and the free software foundation.

He had a page dedicated to his housing situation:

https://stallman.org/seeking-housing.html

Comment by darubedarob 7 hours ago

RMS could life couch surfing from conference to conference?

Comment by ghaff 12 hours ago

My somewhat anecdotal observation is that a lot of access has been tightened down. Some happened during COVID and was just never removed. It definitely varies. The campus I'm most familiar with, you could wander pretty freely and that's less the case today.

Comment by i80and 12 hours ago

I feel really sad about this -- I was amazed as a child to learn that I was allowed to just... GO IN to buildings and lectures as long as I was quiet and respectful. I always took pride in my university's openness.

Then I took my boyfriend for a tour a couple years ago and found all the buildings had signs warning that access was only permitted with a University ID card. Nobody challenged us or kicked us out, but it was a sour demoralizing shock.

Comment by ghaff 11 hours ago

Things were very locked down at the peak of COVID and some of us even semi-officially grumbled a bit to people we knew.

The main public buildings are generally open again during the day at least. I don't go in as much as I used to. (And have ID in any case.) But definitely not as open as it used to be.

Comment by darubedarob 48 minutes ago

So if you are a modern homeless guy, you need a skimmer and cardcloner to get in now? Have there been cases of homeless people hacking hotels/motels?

Comment by 10xDev 1 day ago

But resentment over what? I haven't seen anything on this.

Comment by musicale 19 hours ago

Graduate student violence is more common that it should be. For example, you hear about suicides every year.

I can't help but suspect that sometimes it may be related to graduate school itself, which can be stressful and unforgiving, with minimal support, and where supervisors often hold both academic power over their students' futures and financial power over their livelihoods. (And switching supervisors, even at the same institution, typically requires restarting research from scratch.) It can't be good when, after a lifetime of top-tier success, you are facing failure for the first time, with no preparation for handling it and no obvious path forward.

Comment by thaw13579 19 hours ago

Sadly so, students often associate their self-worth with research and academic achievement, so if things go south, for whatever reason, they are in crisis.

Comment by firefax 12 hours ago

>Sadly so, students often associate their self-worth with research and academic achievement, so if things go south, for whatever reason, they are in crisis.

A lot of people also are doing research they think will benefit the world, so it's not just about failing in a personal quest -- you feel you are letting down all of humanity if you do not achieve your goals.

Comment by firefax 12 hours ago

>I can't help but suspect that sometimes it may be related to graduate school itself, which can be stressful and unforgiving, with minimal support, and where supervisors often hold both academic power over their students' futures and financial power over their livelihoods.

I dropped out of a PhD -- took the master's I earned for coursework, did my quals so it would be clear I chose to leave, then took an "academic-ish" job that paid very poorly. I'd hoped to do that a bit then get hired by a big tech company, but I found out that you have less free time in a job than grad school, and my tech skills began to erode, further sending me down a path I did not want.

What caused me immense, IMMENSE distress is that I felt, for lack of a better term "involuntarily destitute" -- my adviser in grad school had told me that she'd ONLY give me a positive reference for "research" jobs, and that trying to leave for industry was evidence I had lied my way into the program, and thus she could not give me a positive reference for any roles without a research component.

I feel that she purposefully tried to "trap" me with her -- she was having trouble recruiting new students as word of her behaviors and convictions spread (she'd racked up a DUI during the liminal period between my acceptance and starting school, among other gems).

I currently work in a job that has nothing to do with my field -- I had many, many years of strife because when I was fresh out of college, I looked around my hometown and found I couldn't even get a helpdesk job because my skillset was that of an open source nerd, and they wanted people who could answer questions about the UI of Windows like "How do I enable this printer" that, having not used it for years, I couldn't answer off the top of my head -- and it's not sustainable to "just Google it" on calls over and over, people will get frustrated with the wait times.

(That was the way people generally broke into infosec back then -- get a help desk job at a bank, hospital or university, study during downtime, maybe do some certs or try to do an interesting project to present at a conference, move up to sysadmin, and eventually security analyst/engineer)

I thought I'd found a third way -- I could do this PhD, and at worst leave with a master's, and sidestep the tedium of the help desk and the uncertainty of if I'd move up. (I knew people who got worked many hours, struggled to study up, and got trapped).

Anyways, academia can be incredibly abusive and downright medieval. That's not an excuse for violence, but it is an explanation.

Comment by 11 hours ago

Comment by lazide 12 hours ago

Graduate school violence == suicide?

Comment by musicale 6 hours ago

Perhaps I should have said something like intentional harm leading to death to make it clearer. But the person isn't any more alive even if they were somehow killed by some gentle, peaceful method.

Comment by lazide 3 hours ago

That has a clear definition which I doubt is what is occurring?

Or are you asserting that these folks are getting locked up and tortured until they kill themselves?

Comment by w1ntermut3 14 hours ago

Academic success perhaps. The killer and Nuno Loureiro, the MIT professor he killed, were in the same class at Instituto Superior Técnico (Portugal's leading engineering school). Loureiro had a distinguished career at MIT while the killer was homeless.

Comment by storus 12 hours ago

Maybe he had some idea that his buddy ran away with and he attributed his success to his idea, while he was homeless? There was a whole TV show around a similar idea (Breaking Bad).

Comment by darubedarob 7 hours ago

Im pretty certain that of plagiate software would include rejected students works whole swaths of the academic successful would be let go.

Comment by wtcactus 12 hours ago

Jealousy is really the sickest of sins…

Comment by sampo 1 day ago

Comment by godelski 23 hours ago

That definitely doesn't explain things. It appears the motive is still unknown

(But I did find this article better than the WaPo one)

Comment by asveikau 22 hours ago

I don't know much about the suspect, but I do know that people have been saying for years that they go into deep debt to get degrees, even in things that are supposed to be respected or in demand, and then it turns out there is actually no job market or success path for that degree. I assume the implication is it had something to do with this kind of frustration. (Though the suspect went to school two decades ago and did not receive a degree)

Since this site has a lot of people who have successful tech careers, many of us are isolated from these stresses.

But honestly, this guy's turn to violence makes me suspect he had some serious issues driving him, possibly in the mental health realm. Most people, even economically distressed people, won't turn to murder.

Comment by Aurornis 22 hours ago

I think there’s a lot of projecting going on in these comments. The truth is we don’t know the motivation. Guessing at student debt seems unlikely given that he didn’t finish the degree, left the country, and made vague posts about deception on physics message boards around the time.

Comment by asveikau 21 hours ago

You misread me. I said "with this kind of frustration", meaning a broad category of frustration with the system of academia and education. That is not that 100% of the problem is student debt. It's that aspiring academics and scientists can have a hard time supporting themselves.

Comment by Aurornis 9 hours ago

No I understood. Your guess that it was related to finances is just a guess.

Comment by tsol 22 hours ago

I haven't heard any clear motives yet. Some people are saying it's simply a case of someone who was a genius that ended up in a mediocre place in life, leading to to killing. Still that story is so common in America I don't see how it leads to killing innocent children at your alma mater? It makes no sense to me.

But as with many of these situations the truth might not make sense-- sometimes it's simply irrational thinking by someone mentally unwell. It reminds me a bit of the Reiner killings as well, considering there too there's no clear motive except maybe a hypothetical mental break. Truthfully, we might just never have a satisfying answer as to why this tragedy happened.

Comment by GaryBluto 18 hours ago

The most obvious motive seems to be a vendetta against higher education.

Comment by willis936 15 hours ago

Not at all obvious. I'm not sure why HN comments are overlooking that the killer was the same age, from the same country, and studied at the same undergrad university as the MIT professor while starting a graduate degree in the same field. We don't know the exact nature, but it is difficult to believe that these points are not highly involved with the motive.

Comment by ndriscoll 7 hours ago

At least when I was in school 15 years ago (math/engineering), a non- or partially-funded (including living stipend) grad school "acceptance" in the US was understood by all of my peers to be a rejection. I saw a post on reddit a few years ago saying that's still true and is in fact also true in the humanities (with an assumed TA role). Is that not accurate? Why are people going into debt for grad school? Did no one tell them you're not supposed to pay for it? Are they just unwilling to accept they were rejected?

Comment by chrisweekly 20 hours ago

"this guy's turn to violence makes me suspect he had some serious issues driving him, possibly in the mental health realm"

You "suspect possible mental health issues"? Amigo, what further evidence could possibly be required?

Comment by asveikau 19 hours ago

I actually have tons of experience with people who suffer mental health issues, including psychotic illness. One thing that experience gives me is to be cautious about making armchair diagnosis from afar.

Comment by kelipso 9 hours ago

If someone else had posted exactly the same thing you just did, I would have assumed it was supposed to be funny…

Comment by 17 hours ago

Comment by rectang 17 hours ago

When we define criminality as evidence of mental illness, all we’ve done is medicalize criminality — which if anything hinders our ability to recognize abnormalities of the mind which may or may not lead to criminality.

Comment by 14 hours ago

Comment by astura 1 day ago

This whole post is filled with a ridiculous amount of unfounded assumptions.

Comment by js8 20 hours ago

I am not American but there was a good interview on American homelessness in TMR: https://youtu.be/osFQMTJz1w8

Comment by unsupp0rted 5 hours ago

> in a society that rewards conformity, settling and stability.

It also rewards value generation, often above the other things

Comment by mmooss 5 hours ago

Value defined how and for whom? Single parents without paying work provide an enormous amount of value but often can't get housing.

Comment by 12 hours ago

Comment by sometimez 1 day ago

"...the tipster who blew wide open the case is reportedly a homeless Brown graduate who lived in the basement of the engineering building..." Where did you read this?

Comment by kurthr 1 day ago

https://kfanplus.iheart.com/content/2025-12-19-homeless-man-...

It was posted on a Fox News affiliate. He won't get the reward, because he called 911 rather than the tipline.

Comment by WhyOhWhyQ 1 day ago

FWIW, The New York Post video on this said he will get the reward.

Comment by 650REDHAIR 1 day ago

That doesn't surprise me at all.

Makes me furious, but it doesn't surprise me.

Comment by rectang 1 day ago

I assume he will also no longer be able to live in the engineering hall basement. Beyond personal moral satisfaction, coming forward only means sacrifice.

But a number of people have lost their lives, which keeps the scale of the tipster's personal losses in perspective. A terrible event all around.

Comment by JumpCrisscross 19 hours ago

> number of people have lost their lives, which keeps the scale of the tipster's personal losses in perspective

I disagree. The shooter’s victims fell to a random act of violence. (As in the victims were randomly selected. The shooter didn’t randomly occur.)

It is tragic. But it was a crime committed by one man, now dead, who targeted the innocent.

The tipster is more than innocent. He is a hero. His eviction is not a random act of cruelty, but a result of his heroism. And his assailants aren’t a monster, whom we don’t expect to strive for goodness, but us.

Comment by rectang 17 hours ago

> And his assailants aren’t a monster, whom we don’t expect to strive for goodness, but us.

I expect monstrous actions from all humankind, though. What sets “us” apart from deviants is the deftness of our self-justification.

Comment by rafram 15 hours ago

To be clear, there’s no actual evidence that he’s being evicted. Talking about “his eviction” is pretty premature. It also seems like he will receive the reward.

Comment by 13 hours ago

Comment by bofadeez 19 hours ago

Last sentence went a little insane.

Comment by JumpCrisscross 19 hours ago

> Last sentence went a little insane

I'm drawing a moral analogy to mass murder, so the whole thing is going to tend towards the unhinged. But I'll stand by it. There is something sad in ordinary people bending to banal evil. Monsters being monsters is just horrific.

Comment by bofadeez 18 hours ago

Mass murder is about as far as you can get from banal. It's an extremely rare tragedy to experience. But we're talking about two things: one is a violent crime and one is a civil matter involving a squatter.

The building owners do have a right to occupy their own building, right? Or are you proposing we deny them their ownership as some kind of reward to the hero? That would amount to advocating that two wrongs make a right.

Calling the building owners 'assailants' for simply wanting to peacefully occupy their own building is quite insane.

Why not give him cash or a job or something else?

Comment by rectang 17 hours ago

> Calling the building owners 'assailants' for simply wanting to peacefully occupy their own building is quite insane.

The characterization of “us” as “assailants” is an acknowledgment of the sorrowful fate that we as a society inflict on nearly every whistleblower despite the fact that we as a society encourage people to be whistleblowers.

Comment by bofadeez 15 hours ago

This is conflating whistleblowing with the need to pay rent on your residence. This guy is not exactly a Julian Assange.

Comment by JumpCrisscross 18 hours ago

> Mass murder is about as far as you can get from banal

Not what was said.

> Why not give him cash or a job or something else?

Sure. Why not.

Comment by Dylan16807 18 hours ago

He wasn't interfering with the building owners. You're making up a justification to screw this guy over. That's really sad.

Comment by bofadeez 17 hours ago

Oh if he wasn't interferring, then they must have allowed him to keep living there? Why is that sad, you want him to be kicked out?

(You forgot to use logic or explain a point of view and instead just made a random moral judgement and expressed the emotion it made you feel, so I had to make some assumptions about your intentions and depth of thought)

Comment by Dylan16807 4 hours ago

I think my logic is fine. You pulled reasons to get rid of him out of nowhere, not based on the facts of the case. Not just supporting a possible eviction but preemptively deciding it's the only way to get peaceful use of their building even though they were already getting peaceful use of their building. That's sad, because you're justifying a big punishment as consequence of doing a big good deed, with nobody benefitting.

And your first sentence makes no sense. That's not how people usually work. They get possessive and risk-averse and ban things that are unusual. That "if-then" is a total joke, and without it your criticism of my argument falls apart.

Comment by MangoToupe 20 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by Dylan16807 18 hours ago

The fuck are you talking about?

And I'm not just saying that as a reaction, I really want to know how you could have possibly interpreted the above comment to get that reaction. Please explain.

Comment by shagie 1 day ago

https://news.sky.com/story/how-a-reddit-post-blew-brown-univ...

> How a Reddit post blew Brown University shooting investigation wide open

> Frustration had mounted that the murderer had managed to get away and that a clear image of his face hadn't emerged - until a Reddit post finally put police on his trail.

Comment by astura 1 day ago

That says he's a reddit poster, not a Brown graduate who lived in the basement of the engineering building.

Comment by blitzar 15 hours ago

A lot of reddit posters live in basements, a subset of which are in the engineering building.

Comment by astura 11 hours ago

Most Reddit posters are children. What of it? How does "he was a Brown graduate who lived in the basement of the engineering building" follow?

Comment by jkaplowitz 22 hours ago

Those two descriptions are not mutually contradictory.

Comment by tsol 22 hours ago

What I heard is he called the police tip line and left a message but didn't hear back for two days. After two days he left this tip and then was made a person of interest. This is just what I heard, not sure if there's more to this story.

Comment by astura 21 hours ago

And...?? How does "he was a Brown graduate who lived in the basement of the engineering building" follow? Wtf?

Comment by tartoran 23 hours ago

Im a bit worried for the homeless guy, he helped solve the case but he likely blew up his cover and will have to find a new shelter.

Comment by lisbbb 1 day ago

Lazlo Hollyfield.

Life imitates art.

Comment by dylan604 1 day ago

We'll have to wait to see how the Brown student's life turns out after. We'll see if he drives a way in an RV. Doubtful he'll be living in the basement after this though

Comment by noname123 1 day ago

I think Christina Paxson should hire him to be a director of patrol or more realistically a community liason for Brown campus police. The RI/FBI circus were all mum on whether the guy will receive the 50K reward - very on-brand. He wants privacy so I don't know even if there will be a GoFundMe but I think they should do the right thing and give the guy his 50 grand at the very least.

Comment by 22 hours ago

Comment by riffic 1 day ago

there is so much systemic failure and it says a lot about the people who are elevated by society and the people who are demonized.

Comment by noname123 1 day ago

I agree 100%. The biggest example here is if you read and go back to the threads of HN before the downfalls of SBF and Liz Holmes, you'll see so many people on here worshipping them and apologists for their bad behavior. Most are corporate types are conformists who buy what they are told ('till the narrative are changed). It used to bother me but nowadays I just keep it pushing and aim for the tails and let the mid-curve people be the mid-curve people.

Comment by newyankee 1 day ago

Some day while the dreaded soc* or comm* words have been abandoned, a better description might come along to account for the fact that in fact while the system is positive sum, reality can still seem zero sum to a large portion and there is only so much you can stifle the same human creativity, energy and desire to sustain themselves.

Comment by mattgreenrocks 22 hours ago

Many people are terrible judges of character. They either undervalue it, see it as weakness, or just aren’t able to discern the potential for malevolence.

Comment by 19 hours ago

Comment by djaouen 1 day ago

Now compare these two divergent "endings": would you rather be gone from this cold and cruel Earth, finally free, or denied reward money for failing to call the correct phone number, still homeless and (probably) hungry? Obviously I am not saying to off a bunch of people prior, but still.

Comment by noname123 23 hours ago

My response is there were many people (primarily engineering students and professors) who might have seen the shooter during the previous weeks - but it is only the former student who given his background of being homeless and being extra vigilante as a homeless person noticed the shooter as suspicious and even followed him to his car that led to the tip.

Many in tech will quote Steve Jobs "you can't connect the dots forward, only backwards" speech, but this guy whom I don't know, I like to believe he lived it. Flip your question on your head, would you be willing be homeless for 10 years and in the process help catch a school shooter?

Comment by claysmithr 23 hours ago

that's why there will be a day of judgement that God has set

Comment by kubb 16 hours ago

Everyone truly evil believes that they are the good one and God wouldn’t punish them.

Comment by laidoffamazon 1 day ago

My assumption is most Ivy leaguers (specifically undergrads) generally have no monetary constraints after graduating so this very much reads to me as a bohemian “by choice” decision to be more interesting than an actual tragic story.

Comment by duskdozer 11 hours ago

People have such an odd belief that the Ivy League is all trust-fund babies, even though for years and years, these schools have shown that they recruit disadvantaged people and make it affordable for them to attend.

Comment by laidoffamazon 8 hours ago

What about what I said made you think I said everyone there had a trust fund? I have a problem with homeless to Harvard as much as I have a problem with billionaires kids at Yale. Do you not understand this? How can I be more clear?

Comment by djaouen 1 day ago

I graduated from an Ivy and, after graduation, I was (and continue to be, to this day) dirt poor.

Comment by laidoffamazon 7 hours ago

I have some doubts about this, or at least what your definition of dirt poor is.

The ability required to get into an ivy is so significant I don’t see how someone could fail to make substantial sums if they wanted to.

Comment by djaouen 5 hours ago

I grew up in NYC and was lucky enough (or smart enough, I suppose) to get into one of the top public high schools in the city. Because of that (and doing well enough in that school), I was able to squeak into Cornell via its wait list.

But I don’t come from connections: my mother was a receptionist and my father was a sanitation worker. For a while after college, I managed to find work doing backend development for various local businesses, but nothing fancy. But even that has dried up due to various reasons (including a major health issue I developed after graduating).

For some reason, it seems people in authority positions are irked by me due to my humble beginnings & my insistence on continual learning, even after graduating from school. If I had a penny (or I guess now, nickel?) for every time an interviewer asked me, “How did you learn that when you majored in Industrial Engineering,” I’d be a very rich man.

Or at least able to afford all the books I want to read. :(

Comment by phlakaton 19 hours ago

This generalization is very, very wrong. I can tell you, from my personal college network, many students had monetary constraints coming in, and many certainly had monetary constraints coming out. Some of that was choice of career path; some was not.

Comment by laidoffamazon 8 hours ago

I don’t understand how someone coming out of Brown or Yale would have constraints coming out. Their degree is basically free, basically any degree can get them an analyst gig on Wall Street if they so choose, and at worst they can go down the law school path.

Comment by Philadelphia 2 hours ago

You don’t become one of the wealthy just by going to school with them. You’re still an outsider, lesser, just one of the little people, not their sort.

Comment by somenameforme 19 hours ago

This is definitely incorrect. If you graduate with a low-value degree from an Ivy League, you're still going to be just as unemployable as somebody that graduated from Party U with a low value degree. The only real difference is that at top schools there are less people that are completely directionless in life (since you're less likely to get admitted in such a case) so if somebody is graduating with e.g. a philosophy degree, then they're probably doing it explicitly with the intent of going to e.g. law school or on an academic path, whereas many people at lower ranked universities end up there largely through inertia and may pursue degrees of minimal value with no real thoughts beyond taking the easiest path to achieving a college degree, which is the direction they were pushed onto without ever really thinking about it.

And even for valuable degrees, the advantage yielded is far less than you might think. It's not like the movies where you have dozens of companies begging you to come work with 6 figure starting salaries and fat bonuses up front. You open a few more doors, and people have a better than average initial impression of you, but at the end of the day - it's not a world-shifting advantage. The overall edge in outcomes is not because of the university, but because of the sort of people that the university admits. The sort of guy who graduates class president, valedictorian, wrestled at state, and with a near perfect score on his SAT is going to do disproportionately well in life completely regardless of whether he ends up at MIT, Party U, or just skips university altogether.

Comment by SoftTalker 8 hours ago

There are still a lot of jobs that (for maybe debatable reasons) require a college degree. Major is far less important. So if you have that degree, you at least have a larger job pool to work in. Of course, having a degree can overqualify you for some jobs, so it's not a purely better situation in all cases.

And (so I'm told) at least half the value of an Ivy degree is the people you meet while you are there. I guess that assumes you do some network-building, which maybe not everyone does.

Comment by corimaith 11 hours ago

There are plenty of directionless people in Ivy League who aren't emotionally invested in the paths their parents sent them, they just go into Finance or Consulting. And in those places, pedigree does matter alot, the actual skills are not as important as the cultural compatability.

Comment by laidoffamazon 7 hours ago

BCG consultants and traders at Five Rings are very much not financially constrained after undergrad (about $100-200k difference between them but either way)

Comment by alephnerd 23 hours ago

Statistically, you're correct. That said, the thing about statistics is that outliers exist.

Also, imo the "Ivy" advantage is moreso a "family background" advantage - traditionally high social prestige and high entry barrier vocations were gatekept by Ivy and Ivy-adjacent membership.

The rise of competitive salary and low barrier of entry vocations like Software and Accounting helped dampen the value of that "Ivy" premium.

Comment by Cheer2171 20 hours ago

Your assumption is ignorant.

Most Ivy League schools have free tuition if your parents household income is below $200-$100k and full ride room and board if below $100-60k.

Rich kids can get cut off from their parents.

Comment by tartoran 10 hours ago

Rich kids do get cut off from their parents but that's usually when they get off the rails, e.g start doing drugs or drinking heavily, drop out of school. When attending university most of them get some form of support from their rich families.

Comment by laidoffamazon 7 hours ago

I want to improve my communication skills so I’d love pointers on this.

Where exactly did I imply that it was the cost of the degree that is the constraint? Everyone knows poor kids and even middle class kids don’t pay anything to go to elite schools. I simply don’t think that means they face financial constraints exiting undergrad (or during undergrad). Why would they when HRT is paying $500k for new grads?

There’s this weird belief that I should feel sorry for people that didn’t come from means but got into Yale or Brown or Stanford. Sorry, they’re just as alien and inrelatable to me as Jeff Bezos’ kids. These people are in an entirely different plane of existence and ability so I have a lot of trouble thinking they wouldn’t have unlimited opportunities exiting university that I can’t even dream of.

Comment by Glant 1 day ago

I live in the area. Crazy how many helicopters and drones showed up so quick and how many police there were. For several hours more and more police and FBI vehicles kept arriving. Probably ended up with close to 100 officers on scene. Salem NH PD, Methuen MA PD, Providence RI PD, NH state police, MA state police, FBI, and US Marshal service were the ones I saw.

I think it's the biggest response I've personally seen since the Boston Marathon Bombing.

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

all of that and they basically just got lucky. the guy walked to brown from his car parked nearby and shot up some kids, waited days, went to a guy's house in Massachusetts, killed him and never even got caught - he committed suicide and was only found days after his second killing

if anything this whole saga makes me happy smart people aren't killers more often because this guy basically got away...

Comment by nervousvarun 1 day ago

I keep seeing this sort of sentiment everywhere and I'm trying to understand it. The same thing happened after Charlie Kirk was killed and the arrest there hinged on a confession by the killer to his dad. A lot of commentary then that the police/FBI got lucky. Ditto Mangione. They got lucky he was found in a random McDonalds.

What exactly is the expectation here? Is there some sort of wide-spread belief that the world works like an episode of Law and Order and every crime is instantly solved by rolling up your sleeves and doing good old fashioned detective work?

Would assume for the majority of planned murder to be resolved as quickly as these highly publicized cases have been (the Kirk deal took about 2 days also) there's going to have to be an element of luck. Piecing together digital/forensic evidence is going to require time and effort. If it's not an obvious connection (domestic violence etc.) and there's no direct witnesses it seems logical you only have a few outcomes:

A) Going to be solved due to a lucky break

B) Going to be solved after a ton of time/interviews/piecing together forensic evidence

C) Not be solved.

Also he only "got away" because he killed himself. They likely would have caught him fairly soon after this because they had his identity from the car tags. I guess the point is though luck is all you have if it's solved this quickly because it's so random.

Comment by asdff 1 day ago

The sentiment is basically that the "all hands on deck" manpower effort is futile and if anything even a political/propaganda effort to dissuade others from having similar thoughts. What good is it to mobilize 1000 FBI agents if they aren't going to move the case forward at all? What good is having a budget capable of mobilizing that many people for a single case and not to bear any fruit with it? Is this outcome better than what might have happened if this were relegated to local PD? Surprisingly the answer is "no, not at all." That is a big indictment on federal law enforcement and their abilities to turn their budget into actionable effort that makes the population safer. And probably suggests that such resource draining manhunts might even come at the cost of whatever the FBI does in fact do well.

Comment by d0gsg0w00f 1 day ago

Half of life is collective "give a damn". If you see 1000 FBI agents, read 47 headlines, and hear a dozen gas station conversations then you start to tune in. That's when the tips start coming in, as everyone wants to be part of the big "thing".

Comment by BobbyTables2 21 hours ago

A lot of fiction will be generated too

Comment by chongli 12 hours ago

Then it’s a good thing you have a lot of people available to sort through it!

Comment by BurningFrog 22 hours ago

There is always going to be a PR element in police efforts.

In a democracy you need to show the voters you're doing work.

Comment by MangoToupe 14 hours ago

The society of the spectacle needs a spectacle!

Comment by hluska 21 hours ago

It’s easy to criticize a police investigation after the suspect has been caught. But in the moment, none of the responding officers had a clue what they were walking into. Brown is a large campus in a strongly residential neighbourhood with many hiding spots; and people were ordered to shelter in place.

Comment by reed1234 22 hours ago

Isn’t that hindsight bias?

Comment by makeitdouble 1 day ago

> Is there some sort of wide-spread belief that the world works like an episode of Law and Order and every crime is instantly solved by rolling up your sleeves and doing good old fashioned detective work?

There is to a point, and it's not some random organic sentiment: this is the image that has been crafted for decades, if not centuries. The police has a role in pushing it, but it's also has been a useful fiction for our societies as a whole.

"crime will somewhat get punished" has more weight with a competent agency with at least average intelligent people.

Comment by idrios 1 day ago

You're missing a 4th and unsettling option:

D) Going to be "solved" by catching someone unfortunate who seems plausible enough and lacks an alibi.

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

I disagree that his catching was inevitable. They only knew an identity yesterday. If the suspect wasn’t a coward it’s plausible they could’ve just driven away to literally any other part of the United States and then flew back to Portugal. I have no comment on the Kirk case.

As for the expectation, other than if civil liberties are going to be violated in the name of safety I expect much faster results, and I’m sure the MIT professors family would agree.

Comment by nervousvarun 1 day ago

How could they possibly have solved it faster than this? There's no magic to this and it takes time like anything else. Yes there's digital footage but someone has to go through it. The murder in Massachusetts isn't immediately obviously related.

Of course the family wants it solved right away but there's a reality to this that seems to be overlooked here but is also not unique here. A lot of murders are never solved. Luck is a factor all the time.

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

I am not saying luck isn't a factor - you're missing my point which is we're compromising privacy and going further into a surveillance state, yet it's not like the actual outcomes are improving.

I'm not really sure what you think I'm arguing.

Comment by techdmn 13 hours ago

I have a theory, it would be great if someone would do a rigorous study to back me up! Ha. I'm most likely wrong, but anyway:

The more effort a state puts into surveiling its population, the more effort law enforcement will put into suppressing dissent, and less into addressing crimes targeting the general populous.

Comment by ribosometronome 18 hours ago

Portugal extradites.

Comment by xrd 1 day ago

Just checking, are you sure this is the story: "hinged on a confession by the killer to his dad." It seems that story is a-changing and that's an important note. My point might be that what is put out as the story often comes with an agenda.

Comment by wildlogic 6 hours ago

This is a reference I think to the Charlie Kirk murder.

Comment by ecshafer 1 day ago

If you watch some of the real life detective / crime shows. The people who murder people and get caught be cops, basically shoot people in broad daylight on camera, tell people about it, then immediately fold in interrogation.

Comment by mc32 1 day ago

People often fold during an interrogation/questioning unless they are career criminals and have been through the system and learn from their prior mistakes/luck.

Comment by BobaFloutist 1 day ago

Innocent people often fold during interrogation.

Comment by mc32 1 day ago

Sure, but in the 21st century people are typically not thrown in prison on the basis of a confession only. The prosecutors have to have corroborating evidence.

We do have criminals who fold, either they're too confident, they trip up, etc. Recently some guy killed his sugar-momma in Fla, then took her car and drive it cross country to Seattle and along the way used her CC. He gave it all away in the jail interview.

Comment by rectang 23 hours ago

In the 21st century, innocent people routinely accept plea deals to avoid the risk of trial. The corroborating evidence need not be strong because the threat of the trial penalty is enough when you can't afford a good lawyer.

https://innocenceproject.org/coerced-pleas/

Comment by pixl97 23 hours ago

>The prosecutors have to have corroborating evidence.

Bla bla bla, prosecutors are the good guys and show all the evidence they have....

Um, not.

We keep finding again and again we're putting innocent people in jail even for things as serious as capital crimes, and later it was found the investigation was botched and there was no evidence that person was guilty and other evidence was never presented.

Comment by naijaboiler 15 hours ago

wrong. confession is the pimary way most people get convicted

Comment by olalonde 19 hours ago

Or unless they exercise their right to remain silent.

Comment by mothballed 19 hours ago

Yes but if you do it wrong then your silence can be used against you. And if you ask for a lawyer slightly incorrectly then that doesn't count either.

Comment by duskdozer 11 hours ago

Well, how exactly were they supposed to know he wanted a lawyer and not a lawyerdog, whatever that is? I don't even think that's a real thing! Clearly the suspect was crazy.

Comment by almosthere 20 hours ago

I mentioned to someone that day that the person would be caught by a family member - that this stuff was looking more and more like Mangione - who was also primarily caught by his mom. That being said, the only reason family ends up ratting these people out is because of the high pressure it ends up on the family. If it turns out they find these people, and the family did not turn them in, they are going to the big house too.

Comment by watwut 6 hours ago

> the only reason family ends up ratting these people out is because of the high pressure it ends up on the family.

That is not true. There was no pressure on unabomber brother - he "ratted" him out entirely on own will. Also Elliot Rodgers parents called police after they read the manifesto - before any pressure happened. Ex wife of DC shootings had restraining order on him, feared him, and when police asked whether she thinks he is capable of violence like that her first answer was "yes".

The thing also is, these people are often assholes in their own lives, toward relatives too. They tend to have track record of domestic violence and abuse.

Comment by stocksinsmocks 19 hours ago

D) the FBI stitches it up to protect the real criminals and brings out some poor fool to take the blame.

Comment by agoodusername63 1 day ago

I believe the theory that Mangione even wanted to be caught and arrested because he didn't see a viable life for himself anymore with his spinal problems and medical bills. Who social engineers their way into getting a CEO's itinerary and then keeps a manifesto on their person well after the crime

Now he doesn't have to worry about paying for that. Or getting reasonable treatment but hey,

Comment by ikamm 1 day ago

It's a fun theory that everyone likes to support but it falls apart when you read his Reddit account and realize he had insurance that paid for spinal fusion surgery and claimed to have no pain afterwards without the assistance of medication. That's probably also why he doesn't appear in any pain in his appearances since the incident, not because the NY DOC (infamous for their terrible healthcare) magically got him surgery instantly.

Comment by firesteelrain 1 day ago

He became radicalized over time and even wrote that his pain was improved. Somewhere along the way he read something or got it into his head that he had to murder the United Healthcare CEO where he never was a customer. It was just one if not the largest healthcare insurance company.

Comment by 23 hours ago

Comment by SV_BubbleTime 1 day ago

I can’t speak to his thinking, but being caught with the gun used, and a confession letter…

Tells me he knew he was going to be caught and is angling for a hung jury.

Comment by expedition32 23 hours ago

In my country if the police is really serious, and I mean national crisis level of serious, they can go full China and track everyone. They have the means.

Like presumably the US has doorbell camera databases and every car on the highway is electronically flagged?

Comment by firesteelrain 21 hours ago

Flock is around but it’s not as prevalent as some would want you to believe. At least not yet.

Ring cameras and other cameras still require warrant. Same for the data that Flock collects

Comment by DaSHacka 20 hours ago

> Ring cameras and other cameras still require warrant. Same for the data that Flock collects

That data is now one and the same though:

https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/flock-safety-and-ring-partn...

Comment by shbooms 20 hours ago

It depends where you are. most cities in the US have them everywhere now

Comment by WillPostForFood 1 day ago

"this guy basically got away"

Titanic basically sailed safely across the Atlantic, except for a bit of bad luck.

Comment by WalterBright 1 day ago

The Titanic disaster was a confluence of many instances of bad luck. Including the idea that if the lookout had noticed the berg a few seconds later, it wouldn't have sunk.

(Because then it would have hit the berg head on, crushing the front, but not ripping most of the side open.)

Comment by bagels 1 day ago

But they found him? If he was alive, he probably would have been caught eventually, no?

Comment by SoftTalker 19 hours ago

Maybe. The average homicide clearance rate in the US is only around 60%. But that includes a lot of killings where nobody really cares about anyone involved. This was a much higher profile crime so it would get a lot more attention. But there are high profile cases that get a lot of (at least local) attention that don't ever get solved either.

Comment by seanmcdirmid 19 hours ago

It is really difficult to ascertain motive and suspects when it’s a chronic homeless case getting murdered. It could be a thing from drugs to just looking at a crazy guy wrong one night, you literally have no leads unless there is a video or some other piece of hard evidence. It isn’t really about caring, judt that the environment they live in is so chaotic and uncontrolled that you’d have a suspect pool that is too big to reasonably investigate.

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

I mean I guess all criminals die or are caught, yes.

Comment by dustincoates 1 day ago

Being smart doesn't guarantee you'll get away with murder: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_and_Loeb

Comment by card_zero 21 hours ago

Sometimes criminology students kill people, apparently as research: Bryan Kohberger, Nasen Saadi.

Comment by c22 23 hours ago

Actually being smart guarantees you won't have to.

Comment by pixl97 23 hours ago

Na, if you're smart you just start a company and have it kill people via industrial accident, then it's just a fine.

Comment by tayo42 10 hours ago

50% of murders are unsolved

Comment by sans_souse 1 day ago

Same perspective here just 15 miles northwest of scene. Pretty sure they confirmed officially presence of MA NH LEO, NHSP, MASP, FBI, CIA, ATF, and Secret Service.

Comment by dantillberg 1 day ago

Every agency has to show how relevant they are.

Comment by lawlessone 1 day ago

Like the song 99 red balloons:

>Everyone's a superhero

>Everyone's a "Captain Kirk"

Comment by cafard 1 day ago

My apologies to the guy who first proposed that the shootings were related--I thought that was a real stretch.

Comment by energy123 17 hours ago

Unless there was a reason to believe they were related, I wouldn't apologize to a broken clock.

Comment by ndarray 7 hours ago

There are two types of broken clocks. One is always suspicious, the other thinks nothing ever happens. One is more often right than the other, but both are equally broken.

Comment by notKilgoreTrout 7 hours ago

The arguments against seemed to show the weakness of frequentists in practical deduction.. It certainly could have been a domestic where the police already knew but weren't communicating it but otherwise most suggestions didn't match the statistics of the specific demographic/locations to compete with the anomaly of a total AWOL with good luck, nothing to lose and a connection to top academia who wasn't dead or in jail.

Comment by SoftTalker 19 hours ago

It was a stretch, but that didn't mean it wasn't possible.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by binary132 1 day ago

yeah, very surprising

Comment by Tripping5292 18 hours ago

What was the motive? The targets seemed unique. One the VP of the Republican student club and the other a prominent Jewish physicist.

Comment by typs 18 hours ago

It’s unlikely the students at Brown killed were targeted. He opened fire on a room of students at a review session, shooting 11 people. It seems very possible that this was an act of violence out of resentment towards Brown, where he dropped out a graduate program over 20 years ago. He would’ve had most of his classes and spent most of his time in the building where he carried out the shooting.

He appears to have attended the same undergraduate program in Portugal as the MIT professor.

Therefor it seems possible that these shootings were carried out of personal resentment, though only he knew for certain.

Comment by blast 1 day ago

> John posted about the encounter on Reddit after the shooting

Anyone have the Reddit link? (I wonder why the article doesn't include it)

Comment by albroland 1 day ago

Comment by caymanjim 1 day ago

I feel sorry for this guy. His Reddit inbox is probably fucked, and he's absolutely going to get doxxed and hounded by news people, and I wouldn't be surprised if even worse things happened to him.

Good on him for reporting what he saw. He also went to the police the next day and reported it directly. But now the media machine is going to make him regret he ever said anything, which is unfortunate.

Comment by armchairhacker 15 hours ago

He’s already public, but he can make a new Reddit account.

> Now the media machine is going to make him regret he ever said anything

We’ll see how it turns out, but I don’t see why even the internet mob would hate him. He probably can’t live in Brown’s basement anymore, but maybe with the reward money and recognition he can find a real place.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by ManuelKiessling 1 day ago

This is admittedly very tangential only, but as a non-native speaker / not a US-American, I found this sentence from the NYT reporting[0] a bit confusing:

> John said that the suspect’s clothing was inappropriate for the weather and that they had made eye contact.

Why is the report mentioning the eye contact? Is that culturally significant, as in, in the US you don’t normally do eye contact with strangers, and if a stranger does make eye contact, it’s suspicious?

[0]: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/us/brown-mit-shooting-inv...

Comment by wmeredith 1 day ago

I think the eye contact bit is useful as a signal that the witness got a very good look at the suspect's face.

Comment by jdminhbg 1 day ago

I think the eye contact in question was a prelude to the two of them kind of following each other around and a minor verbal altercation, so the later context shows that it was probably kind of suspicious eye contact, rather than a friendly "what's up?"

Comment by nine_k 1 day ago

I suppose that made eye contact = the face was clearly visible for a second or two, and thus recognized with more certainty.

Comment by zdragnar 20 hours ago

I agree with the other comments that this sentence is just poorly written.

In cities people tend to not make eye contact while walking by each other, though in smaller towns it is more common to acknowledge each other in passing.

In neither case would it be accurate to find eye contact suspicious. The sentence appears to be a summation of several things the person saw, convincing them poorly and creating the ambiguity.

Comment by eduardogarza 1 day ago

Obviously a lot of footage in investigations does not reach the public, during active ones or even after. But if you've followed these stories it seems liket between the Brown shooting and the Kirk/Utah shooting, there is a potential concern with universities not having security footage in certain areas of their campus? Has anyone else inquired more into this?

Comment by mhb 1 day ago

I'm sure Flock's sales team has made inquiries.

Comment by y-curious 22 hours ago

That’s funny, picturing their sales team smirking and rubbing their hands mischievously at every publicized manhunt

Comment by xrd 1 day ago

Well, Candace Owens and Valhalla VFT are talking about exactly those things and the MSM is saying their concerns are baseless. I can't believe I actually watched Candace Owens discuss some of this stuff, I shudder to write that.

Comment by pppppiiiiiuuuuu 20 hours ago

Owens is unhinged. She's also claiming the French government are trying to have her killed because she's claiming their first lady is secretly transgender. It's not just the "MSM" who are pointing out she has no credibility, it's also people like Ben Shapiro from her same corner of the media.

Comment by bdangubic 1 day ago

exactly what we need, more cameras everywhere

Comment by crubier 7 hours ago

I mean, yes? The cameras do help solve a ton of crime. The real issue is using them for surveillance without a cause, and that imo this is what should be under scrutiny. But trying to fight cameras existing in general is a lost cause imo

Comment by lisbbb 1 day ago

The thing that bothers me about the whole story, apart from the deaths of course, is that we live in a surveillance state. While I want major crimes to be resolved and there to be deterrents to future ones, I just don't know about turning the whole US into East Germany. It's not going to work out well for any of us. As you can see, it didn't help solve the crimes, either. It was witnesses who did all the heavy lifting here.

Comment by vjvjvjvjghv 23 hours ago

Our surveillance state is mostly for commercial and political reasons. It doesn’t exist for crime fighting

Comment by 19 hours ago

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by lotsofpulp 21 hours ago

> As you can see, it didn't help solve the crimes, either. It was witnesses who did all the heavy lifting here.

That is not the case. If there was more high quality footage with a clearer resolution and full coverage to the time the suspect went to the car, then it would have been trivial to locate them without a witness.

Comment by kittikitti 21 hours ago

This is a good point and worth noting because we sacrifice so much for the supposed benefits.

Comment by TiredOfLife 15 hours ago

It's almost like the claim that you live in a surveillance state is hugely overblown.

Comment by ewild 19 hours ago

i was at the cvs right next to the extra storage when the helicopters showed up and all the police it was kinda nuts to be so close to an event like this.

Comment by noobermin 18 hours ago

I hate to bring this up, but the conspiracy theories around this are nuts and I'm honestly quite bothered and annoyed by it. While the death is an absolute tragedy, the idea that the CIA killed him because fusion is around the corner and I suppose Loreiro was to usher in the next age of limitless electricity is quite ridiculous.

I will say that there is a non-zero overlap of people pushing this insanity and the posters here, given what I've seen elsewhere on the internet, and I will kindly ask that you stop.

Comment by jmyeet 11 hours ago

There are going to be many, many questions about this because a lot of it doesn't make sense and doesn't fit any profile.

School shootings in particular and mass shootings in general tend to follow a particular pattern. Usually the shooter has no intention of escaping or otherwise leaving the scene. Usually they are killed at the scene either by the police or by their own hand. Some do escape but it's rare.

So this shooter allegedly escaped the scene and then a couple of days later went on to kill one particular researcher at a different college 50 miles away in what looks like it was targeted and planned.

These are two very different crimes.

And then the shooter commits suicide?

If the MIT researcher was a target, why commit a mass shooting prior? If the mass shooting was the goal, how do we explain the planning and intent of the second attack? And why wasn't that a mass shooting?

Was it the same gun in both attacks? If so, why weren't the incidents linked sooner? If they were different guns, that too raises questions.

In case it wasn't clear, the MIT attack was cased for at least 2 weeks prior.

Comment by MangoToupe 1 day ago

You'd think the washington post would have figured out how to turn off ads on somber articles by now

Comment by j-bos 23 hours ago

Legacy media gets a pass from advertisers.

Comment by doctorwho42 11 hours ago

Legacy of bezos now.

Comment by weird-eye-issue 1 day ago

Oh how naive you are...

Comment by weird-eye-issue 18 hours ago

Its amazing people are downvoting this

These media companies love tragedies like this. It is what makes them the most money. Why would they disable ads on their most lucrative pages?

Comment by twixfel 15 hours ago

It's very silly to say they "love" them. It's unlikely anyone is happy this happened. They are a news company, they report news, and people are interested most of all in bad things that have happened.

Comment by weird-eye-issue 13 hours ago

No it's not silly. These companies would be at a tiny fraction of their current revenue if people didn't like reading bad news and especially terrible tragedies. How much do you think their page views spike when there is an active manhunt or major events that happen? From a business perspective: they love them.

Comment by fithisux 17 hours ago

It does not make sense why kill Loureiro.

Sorry, but it seems very brittle as a story.

Comment by doctorwho42 10 hours ago

The answer is, no one can know for sure.

The most probably answer from the facts we have is quite simple and human... Jealousy. They both were classmates in the same overseas undergrad program, Nuno was a well established and accomplished professor in one of the preeminent tech schools in the world. While he flunked out of his program, and hasn't done much of note.

Comment by Aliabid94 1 day ago

Worth noting that a partner at Sequoia (Shaun Maguire) publicly accused the wrong guy of being the shooter.

https://www.fastcompany.com/91463942/sequoia-shaun-maguire-b...

Comment by Aurornis 23 hours ago

Shaun Maguire has a long history of inflammatory comments and pushing false information on Twitter.

Every time he’s involved in a new scandal I’m surprised all over again that he’s still a partner and Sequoia still hasn’t pressured him to stop.

Comment by godelski 23 hours ago

I'm impressed he hasn't been fired and sued into bankruptcy.

Comment by hiddencost 15 hours ago

It's because they agree with him.

Comment by tptacek 1 day ago

Comment by fwip 1 day ago

> Maguire subsequently partially apologized for those comments in a video. “This tweet did not land the way I thought it would,”

What an asshole. He could have gotten the kid killed, not to mention the damage to his social reputation. And he can't even manage a "sorry if you were offended" non-apology.

Comment by zerocrates 21 hours ago

The "did not land" video they're talking about, that was his response to people being mad at him for calling Mamdani an Islamist (and being "from a culture that lies about everything"). Also, "partially" is doing a lot of work there: he starts that video saying "cancel culture is alive and well" and doesn't in fact back off at all from his claim: the "did not land" part is even just Maguire lamenting that he accidentally helped Mamdani by targeting him.

Anyway, when he went after the Brown student saying he was "very likely" the shooter (also bringing in Mamdani again), he did less: he simply deleted the video.

Comment by fwip 21 hours ago

Oh - thank you very much for the correction, I must have been reading the article too quickly!

Comment by throwaway12531 23 hours ago

I can't express how puzzled I am that Maguire is still at Sequoia. Forget cancellation; anyone should be free to say whatever they want. This is about judgment, humility, discretion and dare I say empathy, which are fundamental skills in any investment process and which a partner at the most storied venture fund in the word ought to have.

In what world is it good or right to dox a random undergrad based on speculation, simply because maybe just maybe it will net you Internet points? Note that Maguire never apologized once it became clear he was wrong; he simply deleted the post. He gets to keep the engagement and outrage points and move on, paying no price for spreading a dangerous lie. The undergrad he and others doxxed can't say the same.

Shaun would be just another rage-baiter if it wasn't for the Sequoia imprimatur. With an investor like this on your cap table, who needs enemies? It shouldn't matter if Shaun is the "Elon guy" at Sequoia or indeed the best investor in the world. Integrity should and does precede returns in time. But maybe I am naive and this just isn't true for megacap venture as an asset class, where so much depends on sidling up to the 50 or 100 founders who can reliably produce decacorns to return your fund.

Perhaps all we can do is vote with our feet. Sequoia is on my cap table today, but if I was fortunate to have the choice between them and a similar firm that actually demonstrated integrity instead of just talking about it, I would not take money from them again. In all likelihood they won't care a whit about me, but they may care more about some of you, reading this.

Comment by tucnak 11 hours ago

> This is about judgment, humility, discretion and dare I say empathy, which are fundamental skills in any investment process

I'm sorry, don't take this the wrong way, did you smoke pcp before writing this?

Comment by UncleMeat 1 day ago

The whole VC industry is poison at this point.

Comment by lawlessone 1 day ago

It's like a lottery for rich people.

Comment by tucnak 11 hours ago

Why are you downvoted? VC's mostly give money to rich kids from prestigious schools. VC's basically hate the poor and want nothing to do with them.

Comment by __loam 1 day ago

[flagged]

Comment by paulgb 1 day ago

I'm mostly surprised that someone can so consistently and repeatedly demonstrate an inability to filter information he receives and still be trusted with LPs' money. It's another form of Gell-Mann amnesia.

Comment by fwip 1 day ago

Rich guys are mainly incompetent. They'll tell you they're rich because of meritocracy, but I've found that too much money has the opposite effect. You end up surrounded by yes-men and can buy your way out of any failure, so your skills (if you ever had em) atrophy.

Comment by unbelievably 1 day ago

[flagged]

Comment by MangoToupe 1 day ago

Everyone knows sequoia can't invest... but this is too far

> Maguire, acting as a self-appointed digital detective, has shared posts suggesting that an entirely different man was behind the crimes—a Palestinian student at Brown University...

> On July 4, Maguire made inflammatory comments calling New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani an “Islamist.”

Jokes aside, maguire does seem like an emphatically despicable person

Comment by barfoure 23 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by barfoure 1 day ago

[flagged]

Comment by godelski 23 hours ago

Unvelievably's current comment says

  >> Maguire clearly "comes from a culture that lies about everything."
But given yours, did they originally say what you quoted?

I'm trying to understand the downvotes and if people think you said what they said

Comment by renewiltord 1 day ago

Everyone is talking in some kind of weird in-group code or in-jokes that I can't understand so I'll decipher it for the rest of us normies.

> Maguire clearly "comes from a culture that lies about everything."

This is a reference to Shaun Maguire's Twitter post where he said that Zohran Mamdani "comes from..."

https://x.com/shaunmmaguire/status/1941135110922969168

> > Maguire is Jewish, with ancestral ties to early Jewish settlers in California.

> Sir, we are going to have to ask you to leave.

This comment appears to be reacting to the first one by assuming the first one is saying that Jewish people lie about everything, and it responds by saying this is unacceptable to say.

I have been off Twitter for 2 months and when I go there I can't understand anything. People are always saying "can I say something?" and "we know what this means" and shit like that and either the 2 months have killed my brain or something because I never know what the first guy isn't going to say and the second guy knows.

Now Hacker News is similarly incomprehensible and I'm starting to think my mind is no longer able to handle human speech. If this is happening to anyone else, then I hope the interpretation helped. If it didn't, then maybe I'm just losing my mind.

Comment by protastus 1 day ago

Thanks for the explanation -- I also had no idea what this meant.

I am disturbed that in-group code has been normalized as a way to state socially abhorrent positions out in the open, as if it offered plausible deniability.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by barfoure 1 day ago

[flagged]

Comment by laidoffamazon 1 day ago

I hate everyone involved in this. It’s like a confluence of every type of perma-victim with immense privilege.

Comment by gazabbqparty 10 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by Tripping5292 18 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by hiddencost 15 hours ago

[flagged]

Comment by Zopieux 15 hours ago

>ctrl-f "gun control"

>0 results

Never change, HN.

Comment by Geonode 4 hours ago

How did banning drugs work out? Alcohol?

Comment by oceansky 13 hours ago

Instead, there are people arguing for increased surveillance. Which even if implemented "correctly" would not prevent crime.

Might be used to track women seeking abortions though.

Comment by elif 1 day ago

Another shooting with random or unclear motives, which conveniently fits an anti-immigrant narrative, also conveniently tied up with a bow... Don't get too caught up in the specifics of the spectacle, and take a long view of really weird coincidence.

Comment by eBombzor 22 hours ago

Is there really much of an anti-immigrant narrative here?

Comment by pavon 20 hours ago

The Trump administration has suspended the green card lottery program, using this murder as an excuse.

Comment by noobermin 18 hours ago

They are taking advantage of a situation. You'd think a false flag would definitely have someone who could be construed to not be a white immigrant.

Comment by krapp 13 hours ago

I don't think it's a false flag but the online right has already decided the shooter isn't white.

If anyone has ever been confused by the concept of race being a cultural construct, here is an object lesson.

Comment by astura 21 hours ago

The killer was an immigrant (from Portugal).

Comment by vkou 20 hours ago

Any crime by an immigrant or by a non-immigrant can be twisted into an anti-immigrant narrative by Trump. And this one has been.

Comment by fastball 17 hours ago

Which non-immigrant crime was twisted into an anti-immigrant narrative?

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

sadly flock ended up being helpful here (according to the police per the article). also interesting that it was some random homeless guy who happened to be there that blew the whole thing wide open. despite all of the surveillance...

Comment by vablings 1 day ago

How can you not read this and just see it's a huge puff piece for Flock. As far as I can read from the first article and reports they were not pivotal in tracking down the killer. It was once again only someone else who knew that person and came forward, exactly the same as Tyler Robison case

"Phil Helsel Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha said a person who had information about the suspect played a crucial role in the case."

Comment by Computer0 1 day ago

The commentor you are replying to is likely in support of Flock.

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

lol why do you say that?

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

The police state in the article it was helpful in linking the crimes. What evidence do you have to contradict their testimony?

Comment by tapoxi 1 day ago

Was it helpful? The man committed two shootings and they caught him after he committed suicide. It didn't prevent a crime.

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

It connected the two incidents per license plate readings per the article. Why do you think it wasn’t?

Comment by bigbuppo 1 day ago

My question is how many other license plates also would have been connected this way? What's the false positive rate?

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

Why is that relevant for this case?

Comment by bigbuppo 1 day ago

If there's any claim that "flock found these two plates were seen in both areas!!111" then how many other plates were seen in both areas in the same timeframe? How much of this is throwing away results that disagree with the narrative?

Comment by websiteapi 1 day ago

Again, not sure how that’s relevant.

Comment by IncreasePosts 11 hours ago

He may have only committed suicide once he knew they were closing in.

Comment by bagels 1 day ago

Who ever credibly claims that cameras prevent crime though?

Comment by blast 1 day ago

> some random homeless guy

Was he homeless? I haven't seen that mentioned in the articles.

Comment by WhyOhWhyQ 1 day ago

New York Post states it in a YouTube video titled 'All About Brown, MIT Shooting Suspect Claudio Neves Valente – who BARKED During Massacre'.

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by 1 day ago

Comment by Myrmornis 22 hours ago

“This is a very advanced technology, and whatever nation masters it first is going to have an incredible advantage,” Loureiro says.

https://energy.mit.edu/news/funding-the-fusion-revolution/