Venezuela's Navy Begins Escorting Ships as U.S. Threatens Blockade
Posted by belter 19 hours ago
Comments
Comment by Havoc 18 hours ago
Comment by mgiampapa 18 hours ago
Comment by general1465 10 hours ago
2031: After 4 year struggle Maracay has finally fallen, An F35 has been shot down by unknown energy weapon, probably provided by China.
Comment by prmph 17 hours ago
I though he and his followers said he was anti-war? Oh yup, this is probably just a "special military operation"
Comment by tim333 39 minutes ago
Comment by davidw 17 hours ago
Maybe if they can pinpoint its whereabouts at a specific time when it's not heavily guarded, they can send a team to snatch it with minimal casualties.
Comment by simonsarris 5 hours ago
Comment by dzhiurgis 16 hours ago
Comment by beloch 17 hours ago
Comment by duxup 17 hours ago
Granted considering his statements as things has gone on I'm not at all sure about his grasp on reality. Maybe he sees the wrong tweets and does something stupid(er) than usual?
Comment by sailfast 17 hours ago
Comment by 2OEH8eoCRo0 16 hours ago
Comment by YY4987439827 18 hours ago
Comment by credit_guy 17 hours ago
Comment by cmurf 16 hours ago
Comment by regularization 16 hours ago
Comment by cr1895 16 hours ago
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/oil-tanker-seized-by-...
Comment by nradov 16 hours ago
However the M/V Skipper was not registered in Guyana. It was flying a false flag and so any country was free to seize it.
Comment by clanky 14 hours ago
Comment by nradov 14 hours ago
Comment by clanky 14 hours ago
Comment by nradov 13 hours ago
Comment by clanky 13 hours ago
If you believe in "might makes right" why not just be honest and come out and say that?
Comment by woooooo 17 hours ago
Comment by throwup238 16 hours ago
Comment by woooooo 14 hours ago
Comment by amenhotep 17 hours ago
Comment by vkou 15 hours ago
There's a number of countries (some of them land-locked) that sell flags of convenience, but in that particular case, it's possible that didn't happen.
Comment by defrost 14 hours ago
What's a problem is companies that claim to be registered in Delaware when Delaware records show no such registration.
Comment by foogazi 17 hours ago
Comment by daviddever23box 17 hours ago
Comment by foogazi 17 hours ago
Iraq’s Republican Guards rejoice!
Comment by yakbarber 17 hours ago
No, but they'll win all the battles.
Comment by Qem 17 hours ago
Comment by jalapenos 15 hours ago
Whether they should have bothered in the first place though, given how corrupt and dysfunctional the regime in the south was, is an open moral question.
Comment by clanky 15 hours ago
Yes, that's called "losing a war," and no serious strategist pretends that politics is not one of the key theaters (if not the key theater) of conflict.
Comment by dragonwriter 12 hours ago
Yes, that's literally how essentially every war ends; some combination of factors causes one side to stop fighting rather than continuing the pay the price in blood and treasure that fighting demands.
There's probably a few somewhere that end because the losing side doesn't give up but fights to the last person, but that's very much not the norm.
Comment by hirvi74 16 hours ago
How does a country lose a war without losing any major battles? On the homefront first.
Comment by PearlRiver 15 hours ago
Comment by minebreaker 16 hours ago
I don't disagree, but it cost at least 400,000 civilian lives in Vietnam war. It's hard for me to say "good move."
Comment by matheusmoreira 15 hours ago
Comment by orwin 7 hours ago
Comment by matheusmoreira 32 minutes ago
It's not going to go well for Venezuela if the US attacks it, no matter the result of the war.
Comment by clanky 17 hours ago
Comment by pixl97 18 hours ago
Comment by Qem 17 hours ago
Comment by bmandale 17 hours ago
Comment by jmpman 17 hours ago
Comment by pixl97 14 hours ago
Comment by jalapenos 15 hours ago
Comment by PearlRiver 14 hours ago
Like seriously not even Trump can be stupid enough to actually want to GOVERN it. Can he?
Comment by jalapenos 13 hours ago
Comment by stocksinsmocks 17 hours ago
Comment by clanky 14 hours ago
Although the U.S. ruling class often likes to pretend it can operate with no regard for its domestic perceptions of legitimacy, the stunning amounts they expend on relentless psychological operations suggest otherwise. Killing millions in an aggressive nuclear strike would do nothing but reveal to many people (who are desperately trying to pretend otherwise) that they are controlled by a klatch of relentless psychopaths.
Comment by nradov 16 hours ago
Comment by clanky 14 hours ago
Comment by metadope 2 hours ago
Comment by clanky 2 hours ago
Maybe they'll try to arrange some kind of Gulf of Tonkin style false flag.
Comment by nradov 1 hour ago
Comment by tedggh 16 hours ago
Comment by AlotOfReading 15 hours ago
Oil contributes very little to the economy these days. The oil industry was dismantled many years ago and replaced mostly by drug trafficking and illegal mining.
Mind sourcing that? It's not what's on the Wikipedia page for Venezuela's economy, nor the CIA world factbook for the country. The largest estimate I could find for drug trafficking was 8 billion USD, which came from transparency international, an org with sketchy history on Latin American numbers. The latest petroleum export numbers I can find are much higher.Comment by tedggh 3 hours ago
Comment by ryandrake 18 hours ago
Comment by stocksinsmocks 15 hours ago
Comment by jmpman 17 hours ago
Comment by ncr100 16 hours ago
It would serve to darken Trump's image a bit while affirming he's a Strong Man (a quote from the article).
Comment by jameskilton 18 hours ago
Comment by vdupras 18 hours ago
If we're optimistic and assume that Trump, Xi and Putin have some kind of deal for a new world order where the US is no longer a world police, and the US gets to have its oligarchs just like Russia has.
Maybe that part of the deal is that Trump gets the Americas. It sure sucks for the new vassal states, but it beats having a nuclear war.
Comment by DivingForGold 17 hours ago
Could it be Trump is leaning towards just letting Putin and the EU settle their own differences by themselves - - while Trump concentrates on his side of the world, which Venezuela is a too easy prize to win. The old playbook: Find a US leaning Venezuelan leader who can be bought off with CIA money, get rid of Maduro, by force if needed, then the huge discoveries in the oilfields of Guyana next door that Exxon, Hess Corporation, CNOOC and others have their hands deep in are secured.
Comment by black_13 18 hours ago
Comment by rich_sasha 14 hours ago
They are sometimes described as "sanctioned", but what does it mean here? Does it mean Trump tweeted so? Is that by UN? US Congress?
Trump is clearly acting with bad will in Venezuela regardless, but I think the criticism should focus on the many parts where he is doing something wrong. If there were internationally-recognised sanctions that simply weren't enforced, I'd criticise Trump for all the other parts.
Comment by nradov 14 hours ago
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/us-unseals-warrant-tanker...
Comment by rich_sasha 12 hours ago
I think we need to be wary of the pattern where:
- some bad things happen but are ignored / uncontested by the "good" side
- the "bad" side comes in and does a lot of genuinely bad things of their own
- but also, perhaps selectively, contests other "bad" things that were left hanging by the "good" side, where it fits their narrative
- the "good" side is up in arms against the "bad" side following the law
Clearly this argument hinges on recognising Trump as a baddie and the Democrats, somewhat, as baddies. As a non-American, this is roughly how I see it, but I can't stir up outrage against Trump for enforcing sanctions according to his country's own laws. Bullying Venezuela, sure, but not this particular fragment.
I remember how defensive Democrats were of illegal immigration during the last election. I'll agree with anyone who wants to treat people fairly and humanely, but the Democrats were almost making out that illegal immigrants are some kind of modern day martyrs. If you think the immigration laws are not right, change them, but don't sit on and praise a system perpetuated by illegality.
It's just a hypocritical, massive own goal, and I detracts from all the genuinely bad things done by the "bad" side.
Comment by mcphage 3 hours ago
If they want to change the immigration laws, they first need to convince people that immigrants currently in the country illegally aren't monsters.