Nano Banana is so good that you can use it to play a RPG at 1 frame a minute

Posted by johnfn 1 day ago

Counter16Comment12OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by dakial1 5 hours ago

Yeah this has nothing to do with playing RPG, just a generation of screens.

But it reminded one of the firsts prompts I tried with ChatGPT back in 2022. I asked him to simulate a text-based adventure (based on the discworld universe) and every command I gave it would behave as an open world text RPG. It was pretty mindblowing

Comment by idsafsdij 1 day ago

Question for the author: When you see a mirror, does that register to you as another person in the room?

Comment by WhyOhWhyQ 1 day ago

"somewhat zelda inspired" == direct copy of zelda in 2025.

Comment by xg15 23 hours ago

There is no cave to the east of the town on the world map.

(Ok, a bit unfair maybe as OP never demanded the LLM to be consistent)

Comment by Pwntastic 1 day ago

"play" is doing a lot of work here

Comment by uint32_t 1 day ago

How can this in any way shape or form be considered "playing" an RPG?

Can you point to where the game is? Was there an interesting story crafted by a game designer for you to experience? Did you have to learn, through world-building and subtle cues developed over decades and your own experience with past games, what actions you can take with your character and how you can navigate the game world? Was there a skill gap that created a challenge and motivation for you to overcome and become good enough at the game to progress through the story and complete the quest? Finally, most important of all, did you have fun?

The answer to all of these questions is "no".

Is it impressive that Nano Banana can generate these images of a Legend of Zelda ripoff with just a few text prompts? Perhaps it is to some, but why not just play an actual Legend of Zelda game? They exist. They are good.

I'm not even saying that a game has to have all or even any of the qualities I mentioned above (they were just some examples off the top of my head). What I do think, however, is that whatever this is it's definitely not a game and you're definitely not playing it.

Comment by Ukv 23 hours ago

> [...] Finally, most important of all, did you have fun? The answer to all of these questions is "no".

Exploring the possibilities and limitations of a new technology is fun.

Obviously this is just a quick experiment lacking a whole lot you'd expect from a regular game, but there's also a lot to be curious about and different directions it could be taken in. With a harness could it generate a background, sprites, and collision mask so the player/NPCs can walk around in real-time? Could you limit commands from the player to reasonable actions ("I attempt to kick down the door") without the full god-mode world control? Or alternatively, could you allow a player to act as god of the world dictating changes, with NPCs or other players living within it (like as a tool for DnD)?

> why not just play an actual Legend of Zelda game? They exist. They are good.

One of their posts under "Latest" at the bottom is "Things I appreciate about Ocarina of Time", so presumably they have. Playing a game doesn't mean you can't also play around with experiments like this.

Comment by johnfn 22 hours ago

Yes, you are not literally playing an RPG.

Somehow I thought that would be obvious? Do I really have to preface every bit of AI-related content with a disclaimer that you should not take everything I say pain-stakingly, excruciatingly literal? Was "1 frame a minute" not the slightest hint that I didn't literally believe I was playing a game? Can't we just get to a point where we look at the tech and say "Hey, it's good enough that it's almost like I'm playing with a game, and that's just a natural side-effect of the model being good? Isn't that neat?" Or are you going to well-actually any admission of excitement or interest with "No, you are not excited, it is not a TRUE game, it isn't a 100% accurate simulacrum of a real game!"

Do you really, truly not understand any sense of metaphor or simile? Did you point at Asteroids when it came out and say "this is not the same as being on a spaceship!" Did you look at the first animated movie and say "This isn't the real world!" Obviously this isn't a game! It's its own thing, and whatever it is seems kind of cool.

> Finally, most important of all, did you have fun?

Yes, I did.

Comment by lelanthran 14 hours ago

Maybe instead of a title that says

    Nano Banana is so good that you can use it to play a RPG at 1 frame a minute
Say instead

    Nano Banana is so good that you can use it to "play" a RPG at 1 frame a minute
Because, you see, GP is not the only one who clicked the link with the expectation that the LLM was actually giving you an RPG game to play @ 1 frame/minute.

Comment by johnfn 14 hours ago

But obviously not? Who could possibly think that?? Bah, no, I understand your point, and I will have to think more critically about my titles in the future.

Comment by Peritract 13 hours ago

I think, as a general principle, if you're asking for people's attention, you should say what you actually mean. In this case, you used an inaccurate headline to get views, adding no new information beyond what you yourself claim as 'obvious'.

I think it's reasonable for people to react badly to that.

Comment by johnfn 12 hours ago

Who reasonably believes that you can "play a game at 1 frame a minute" on Nano Banana? Isn't that a truly absurd claim, one stronger than "AGI has been achieved"? Is it really that unreasonable to ask my audience to think for half a second about what I might actually be claiming, given the literal interpretation of my words is absurd?

It feels like if I made a title saying "Make page loads feel instant" and everyone came in to say "actually no, in your post it took 0.2 seconds to load your page, and that's not instant."