California judge rules that Tesla engaged in deceptive marketing for Autopilot
Posted by elsewhen 4 hours ago
Comments
Comment by ursAxZA 1 hour ago
“Autopilot” is already a technical aviation term — planes don’t fly themselves while the pilot sleeps — so the misunderstanding comes from the public, not the term.
And without a legal framework defining responsibility for autonomous systems, the liability naturally falls back to the human who activates the feature.
So the root issue isn’t the marketing; it’s the regulatory vacuum that let the ambiguity persist.
(Just my impression as a non-expert observer.)
Comment by BugsJustFindMe 3 hours ago
Comment by millzlane 2 hours ago
My question: Why isn't someone going to jail, when they have clearly broken a law?
Comment by dragonwriter 2 hours ago
Because the law in question is civil, not criminal, and because the violation was found by an executive branch administrative law judge, not by a court of general jurisdiction in even a civil lawsuit.
Comment by johng 3 hours ago
Comment by windexh8er 1 hour ago
And then... "Currently enabled features require active driver supervision and do not make the vehicle autonomous. The activation and use of these features are dependent on development and regulatory approval, which may take longer in some jurisdictions."
I can't believe they aren't forced to say that this may never happen, which is the reality given the history of it.