Nvidia-backed Starcloud trains first AI model in space, orbital data centers

Posted by walterbell 8 hours ago

Counter12Comment17OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by leothetechguy 6 hours ago

I remember another hacker news commentator describing these orbital data centers as a obviously bad idea to the point where any investments into that technology are incomprehensible. I share that sentiment, is there something I'm missing?

Comment by gmerc 4 hours ago

The point is to take the money, you see. It's the idiots who give it (which will involve looting the federal government for years to come) who will be screwed, not the guys running the scam. This should be evident after AI now. The entire industry is a narrative manufacturing machine aimed at separating investors from their money. That's all there is to it.

Comment by Bombthecat 5 hours ago

Even after a global disaster, it's still there.

No idea how it could help, but.. it's a reason

Comment by nacozarina 4 hours ago

nope, tis ordinary goldrush hijinx

Comment by m_rpn 4 hours ago

They've run out of terrestrial snake oil to sell so they now need interstellar snake oil.

Comment by xt00 7 hours ago

So using Stefan-Boltzmann equation if you have a 1m^2 surface at 100C you can radiate about 1kW from that surface -- assuming both sides radiate that, then lets assume it is double. Assume each blackwell chip + support electronics etc needs about 2kW of power to run. So each 1sq meter of say a copper plate is needed to cool 1 blackwell chip. So if you have some way to make some massive radiators that are basically giant plates spanning thousands of square meters, then you should be good. the Stefan-Boltzmann equation is proportional to the 4th power of T (in kelvin), so if you can somehow manage to use a heat pump for the heat from the GPU's into your heat sink such that you could run your radiators at a much hotter temperature, then the blackbody radiation that they put out dramatically goes up. So cooling is quite challenging but not impossible. (I also neglected importantly that you would need to use the giant solar panels as a sun shade for these radiators otherwise they would be pulling in heat from the sun)

For power, you need to somehow manage to generate all of the power that you would need to cool. So the most logical would be some huge solar panels -- assuming you could use similar tech to the space station, you can get aroudnd 100kW from those solar panels -- assume you can do say 10X better somehow, then now you have 1MW of power.

Unclear what the goal here is -- if the idea was doing this for cost, it sounds super unlikely to pan out -- if they want to put a datacenter in space such that nobody can tell somebody what to do, it would seem just as easy to go hide a datacenter in some random far flung corner of the world in a bunker. Seems just like a great way to light some money on fire.

Comment by m4rtink 5 hours ago

Note all of this is mass that currently needs to be launched from Earth at significant cost - it is indeed nice this cost if finally going down thanks to partial launcher reusability (and hopefully full reusability soon as well) but I really don't see this making any economical sense unless a lot of this mass eventually comes from in situ resources you don't need to lift to orbit.

Comment by m4rtink 5 hours ago

Also about the radiators - ideally they should radiate into empty space. If there is something in the way, like parts of your station or other radiators, then it will heat up - reducing effectiveness (you will have to remove this heat again) or even making stuff overheat.

Comment by oakwhiz 7 hours ago

probably something like a stirling engine + working fluid going down tubes in the plate, it becomes worth it to develop silicon-on-insulator GPUs and other weird technologies that run at higher temps

Comment by butvacuum 4 hours ago

Anatoly Cherdenko would be terrified.

Comment by grim_io 2 hours ago

So, AI is now officially rocket science.

Anyways... This is dumb.

Radiation shielding, power, cooling, maintenance. All unnecessarily made more complex.

What for?

Comment by moi2388 8 hours ago

“ Anything you can do in a terrestrial data center, I’m expecting to be able to be done in space,” Starcloud CEO Philip Johnston told CNBC.”

In theory, yes. But this cannot possibly be economical.

Any idea how much solar panels you’d need to power an entire data centre from space?

And how insanely much space you need for radiating away heat? There is no conduction or convection, so I’d love to see them try, and make this economically viable.

Comment by scheme271 7 hours ago

Beyond that what about protecting against latch-ups and bit flips due to radiation? The environment is significantly worse in space so short term faults and long term damage should be a concern. There's a reason why radiation hardened hardware uses chips with really large features.

Comment by amatecha 7 hours ago

Yeah I was wondering about that too, the far-greater exposure to radiation... I don't know anything about how well-mitigated that is these days, but I'm sure it's a huge factor they would have in mind?

Comment by seg_lol 7 hours ago

The resulting LLMs will have space-brain-bit-rot.

Comment by mvanbaak 5 hours ago

I have an internet subscription for comments like this. Thanks for making my monday morning.

Comment by dJLcnYfsE3 4 hours ago

Microsoft gave up on underwater data centers after trail run. I suspect it also was uneconomical. Easier cooling doesn't help that much when servers are inaccessible for maintenance.