Cat Gap

Posted by Petiver 5 days ago

Counter209Comment58OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by verbify 1 day ago

I once was thinking that if intelligent machines surpassed human intelligence, the end game would be human intelligence would atrophy but the machines would continue to serve us.

Then I had a humorous thought - what if this already happened, i.e. cats were superintelligent, invented humans to serve them and then they had no need for their own intelligence.

Comment by gradus_ad 1 day ago

It's funny to think that no matter how our technology develops, cats will be right there along for the ride, completely ignorant of it all. It's humorously comforting to think of an interstellar civilization powered by fusion and AGI serving cats just as they're served now. Scratching posts on starships seems to be inevitable.

Comment by jasonwatkinspdx 17 hours ago

The domestication of cats happened because of the invention of farming.

If you store grain in a granary, it attracts a lot of insects, rodents, etc. Cats that could tolerate getting close to human settlements found a good food source. And humans like this, because the cats protect the grain without eating it. So you can see why ancient agrarian societies like the Egyptians held cats in high esteem.

And despite only having a few thousand years to adapt to each other, ends up cats and humans can understand each other and form emotional bonds pretty easily.

I imagine we'll see cats on spaceships of the future just like they were the norm on ships in the age of sail.

Comment by b112 20 hours ago

This seems like a book.

Humans extinct for a billion years, AGI and robots tasked to feed and "take care of the cats".

I imagine entire cities, houses built, all empty save cat and humanform robot.

Comment by gmueckl 19 hours ago

I would recommend the two episodes "Three Robots" and "Three Robots: Exit Strategies" from the anthology series Love, Death and Robots if you like this kind of humor.

Comment by jasonwatkinspdx 17 hours ago

You might like the game Stray. Here's the trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJawWyRUOBM

It's about a cat that lives in a city of robots long after humans are extinct.

Comment by 17 hours ago

Comment by marcher 18 hours ago

In the puzzle game series The Talos Principle, intelligent robots (who were made to outlive humanity after a species-ending global pandemic) seem to have the exact same kind of affinity for caring for cats that humans do. It's actually really sweet and cute.

Comment by xingped 18 hours ago

This was a minor plot point in that one black mirror episode with the robots on a tourism trip to Earth, lol

Comment by shawn_w 17 hours ago

You mean Love, Death and Robots?

Comment by xingped 16 hours ago

I'm sorry, yes, you're right. I misremembered which series I was thinking about.

Comment by cfraenkel 18 hours ago

"There will come soft rains" Ray Bradbury

Comment by nervousvarun 20 hours ago

Obligatory Banks Culture universe reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_series

Basically when the "minds" are benevolent deities all scenarios are possible including this one. We can spend our time with cats, we can even turn into cats...as he writes about "Changers" who genetically alter themselves or shift species at whim.

And as always if someone acts up and violates the Golden Rule they get a slap drone: https://theculture.fandom.com/wiki/Slap-drone

Comment by nakedneuron 1 day ago

This is brilliant.

So, if machines will be decent servants to the cats, will humans get x-ed out of the equation?

Comment by peanball 1 day ago

A topic of the “Three Robots” episode of Death Love & Robots, kind of. Sorry for the fandom link.

https://lovedeathrobots.fandom.com/wiki/Three_Robots#:~:text...

Comment by taneq 1 day ago

Maybe the cats were themselves invented by mice?

Comment by colordrops 1 day ago

This is sort of the story of The Time Machine.

Comment by cryptonector 19 hours ago

Red Dwarf joins the chat

Comment by corgiorgy 1 day ago

I used to run a Twitter bot called @itsavailable that would mine interesting strings that were not registered .com domains and tweet them out at a regular cadence. One of its sources was the most-visited English-language Wikipedia page titles in the past hour.

One of the only domains I ever bothered purchasing for myself was https://catgap.com

Comment by meindnoch 1 day ago

Warning: if you open that link you'll see a woman using her finger pulling apart a hole on a pussy.

Comment by 23 hours ago

Comment by pfdietz 1 day ago

You are technically correct (the best kind of correct.)

Comment by anileated 1 day ago

Hat tip on both your (new?) domain name and your username.

Comment by cobbzilla 1 day ago

Thank you for brightening my day with your website. That is one adorable (and adorably annoyed-looking) cat.

Comment by 23 hours ago

Comment by dostick 1 day ago

Don’t click that link!

Comment by naian 1 day ago

The woman is pushing the cat's lip up with her finger. It's not painful to the cat.

Comment by taneq 1 day ago

?

Comment by Sharlin 1 day ago

There are many fascinating things about cats, but one of the things I often think about is how interesting it is that an animal of such solitary nature became domesticated so easily, and how social – and socially intelligent – domestic cats came to be, despite stereotypes. To the point that many housecats, and entire breeds, are called "dog-like" in their demeanor. Female feral cats also form social groups, "colonies", though unfixed males are certainly more territorial. This is evidently an example of neoteny, the retention of juvenile traits in adulthood, seeing that most felids do have a social period while living with their mother and littermates.

Comment by p_l 1 day ago

Cats are actually very social animals, they just don't firm similar pack structures to dogs

With modem technology it became feasible to observe cats without disruption and it showed communal behaviours, including communal care for offspring and IIRC even bringing food to share.

All along the line of somewhat transitionally joined communities instead of more stable groups

Comment by Sharlin 19 hours ago

Yes, this is (outdoors, stray, or feral) domestic cats, which is exactly what I mentioned. And as I said, it's largely the females and their juvenile offspring that form colonies – unfixed adult males, while certainly capable of having friendly social encounters on "no cat's lands", definitely don't willingly share their territory with other adult males.

But my point was that their immediate ancestor (and practically still the same species – they easily interbreed) the African wildcat is not similarly gregarious, and neither is almost any other felid, big or small.

Comment by jasonwatkinspdx 17 hours ago

This is a bit off the mark.

Cats have only been domesticated for like ~10k years, so not much in the way of change or adaptation has happened. So wildcats have the same capacity for forming social bands and such, they just don't in the wild as they don't have any incentive to.

Comment by Sharlin 16 hours ago

Neoteny is easy to achieve in 10k years. Cf. the Soviet experiments on domesticating foxes, which started showing juvenile, gregarious traits in a few generations of selective breeding. In general felids are social in kittenhood within their family unit, most wild species just "grow out of it" in puberty. Selection pressure (natural or artificial) favoring individuals that tolerate or even enjoy human (or conspecifics') presence favors retention of juvenile traits in adulthood, and this change can happen quite quickly.

Comment by TheOtherHobbes 20 hours ago

There are some interesting reels showing cats apparently learning English using speech buttons.

Cats are very communicative, which suggests they're strongly social, in the broadest sense.

Comment by akkad33 19 hours ago

Cats are not so solitary. They can actually live in communities but they are not pack animals

Comment by Sharlin 19 hours ago

Which is exactly what I said. Feral or stray domestic cats form colonies, because domestic cats are more social than their immediate ancestors. The African wildcat is not particularly social, not in the way domestic cats are. Which is why it's interesting.

Comment by msuniverse2026 1 day ago

"We must close the cat gap." - JFK, 1960

Comment by CalRobert 1 day ago

Animals could be bred and... slaughtered...

Comment by ursAxZA 1 day ago

I’ve always wondered what it would feel like to dream as a cat. I don’t think I’ve ever had a dream where my body actually changed shape. Being loved just for existing seems like a pretty solid evolutionary strategy.

Comment by aitchnyu 6 hours ago

Also helps if you are aided by a microbe for your food sources (mice and humans) that rewires their brain to be more attracted to cats.

Comment by the_af 17 hours ago

> I’ve always wondered what it would feel like to dream as a cat

If you haven't already, read "A Dream of a Thousand Cats", one of the Sandman stories. It was also adapted by Netflix as the last episode of season 1 of The Sandman.

Comment by ursAxZA 14 hours ago

Thanks — I’ll read it tonight and become a cat in my sleep. Though I suppose I’ll need Scheherazade to guide me there first.

Comment by catlover76 16 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by vlachen 1 day ago

An obvious failure of the Cat Distribution System.

Comment by bigbadfeline 13 hours ago

This is probably the funniest comment section I've read on HN. Congrats to all.

Comment by rsynnott 17 hours ago

Mr President, we most not allow a cat gap!

Comment by euroderf 1 day ago

Cat gap? Divine intervention. The divinity? Cats.

Comment by orbital-decay 1 day ago

I'm surprised that sampling bias is not in the list. Is it possible that these fossils simply haven't been found yet?

Comment by notepad0x90 1 day ago

I think the postulation is that the cats would be so abundant, it shouldn't be hard to find their fossils.

Comment by madaxe_again 1 day ago

That was my first conclusion, too - the absence of something in the fossil record does not mean that it was not there, just that it did not fossilise.

For one, predators in general often have more gracile build, high power to weight ratio - and don’t fossilise well. They’re also much rarer than herbivores, of course. This means the signal in the fossil record is much weaker and any deviation seems much greater, as you have to turn up the gain to get meaningful data.

Perhaps cats during that period were predominantly dry desert hunters - it is a common niche for felidae - and that environment produces checks wristwatch few fossils.

Perhaps there was another critter extant during that period that just found the crunch of cat bones irresistible, and they all got scavenged.

Perhaps they developed culture and cremated their dead.

Dunno. All that said the E-O was a big transition and it likely did result in gigadeaths, and predators would have been harder hit, ultimately and proportionally.

Comment by usrusr 1 day ago

Similar thoughts crossed my mind as well. But then there's the repopulation with a species that can be traced from Asia. The pre-gap felines just aren't part of the post-gap set. If some were descendants of some endemic low-fossilization branch, chances are they'd be connected across the gap through similarities.

Comment by hurturue 1 day ago

have you tried turning the computer off on on?

Comment by felineflock 1 day ago

The cat gap is due to the long time it took for the mutant descendants of Noah's cats to get to America.

Comment by grubbs 1 day ago

Welp. Now I'm in a wikipedia hole of how cats came to be.

Comment by Razengan 1 day ago

The universe was created to incorporate cats.

Comment by mjd 18 hours ago

I was a bit disappointed that this didn't turn out to be analogous to the “bee space”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langstroth_hive#Bee_space

Comment by exasperaited 1 day ago

Ignoring the much more obvious explanation that they simply buggered off to do their own thing and there was nobody around to bang a plate with a fork.

Comment by DonHopkins 1 day ago

For more cat facts, see CatFACS, cat --help, and man cat.

https://animalfacs.com/catfacs_new

Comment by IndianShitbombs 1 day ago

[flagged]

Comment by qwertytyyuu 1 day ago

I’m disappointed this wasn’t about felines

Comment by lucketone 1 day ago

So during what period cats were missing?

Duration is clear, start and end not clear

Comment by david_shaw 1 day ago

> The cat gap is a period in the fossil record of approximately 25 million to 18.5 million years ago in which there are few fossils of cats or cat-like species found in North America.

25M - 18.5M years ago.

Comment by 19 hours ago

Comment by lucketone 1 day ago

In my defence, word “ago” was on the other line, so I kind of skipped it.